Newsletter Subject

The Wealth Destroyer of the Decade

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Fri, Feb 9, 2024 11:11 PM

Email Preheader Text

'Unskilled and unaware of it'... Self-inflated assessments... The wealth destroyer of the decade...

'Unskilled and unaware of it'... Self-inflated assessments... The wealth destroyer of the decade... The urge to up the ante... Traders are ramping up bets... Predicting and preparing... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Digest] 'Unskilled and unaware of it'... Self-inflated assessments... The wealth destroyer of the decade... The urge to up the ante... Traders are ramping up bets... Predicting and preparing... --------------------------------------------------------------- Folks are dumber than they think... There's a feeling investors have right before they lose it all in a bull market... When everyone is hyper bullish, folks simply believe they can't lose. They're the smartest investor in the room. But the unskilled always overestimate themselves. I (Dan Ferris) have seen it countless times. This phenomenon is called the Dunning-Kruger effect... In 1999, social psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger wrote a paper called "Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Competence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments." The two men compared self-assessment tests to objective performance in humor, grammar, and logic. On average, low-skilled participants rated themselves better than 61% of the group members. But in reality, they wound up only scoring better than 11% of group members. In short, the bottom of the barrel thought they were the top. Dunning and Kruger concluded: People tend to hold overly favorable views of their abilities in many social and intellectual domains. [We] suggest that this overestimation occurs, in part, because... Not only do these people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices, but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it. The Dunning-Kruger effect seems tailor made for describing the behavior of most investors. In fact, you could argue that the financial world discovered the Dunning-Kruger effect first... John Kenneth Galbraith ended his 1990 classic A Short History of Financial Euphoria by displaying his knowledge of the human condition: Fools, as it has long been said, are indeed separated, soon or eventually, from their money. So, alas, are those who, responding to a general mood of optimism, are captured by a sense of their own financial acumen. Thus it has been for centuries; thus in the long future it will also be. Most investors are bad at making money... But it's not just that... Investors are also bad at admitting just how bad they are at making money in the financial markets. That's why my friend and fellow value investor Rick Rule of Rule Investment Media often counsels investors not to "confuse brains with a bull market." Regular Digest readers know that I often consider meme-stock investors, short-term options traders, and technology speculators as "unskilled and unaware of it." But let's skip past them for today. You see, there's one investor who embodies the Dunning-Kruger effect better than any other. And if you've been reading my Friday Digests for the past couple of years, you already know who I'm talking about... According to a recent Morningstar report, Cathie Wood's ARK Investment Management is the biggest wealth-destroying fund management company of the past 10 years. The report names the 15 top wealth-destroying funds of the past decade, which includes ARK's flagship Innovation Fund (ARKK) and its Genomic Revolution Fund (ARKG). ARKK has lost $7.1 billion for investors over the past 10 years, while ARKG has lost $4.2 billion. These funds made up most of ARK's $14.3 billion in firmwide losses during that time. This is worse than the Dunning-Kruger effect... It's the 'Cathie Wood effect'... ARKK lost two-thirds of its value in 2022. Yet, ARK's founder didn't show anything remotely close to regret in her first letter to investors for 2023. Instead of mentioning the awful bets ARK made on lousy businesses, many of which have never made a penny and likely never will, Wood started the letter by telling investors that she founded ARK in 2014 for two reasons: first, to focus solely on disruptive innovation, and second, to create a transparent research ecosystem. Notice that Wood didn't say she started ARK to help clients grow their wealth. I find that curious for a wealth management company. Then Wood did what all Dunning-Kruger losers do and blamed her lack of competence and poor performance on something else – the Federal Reserve's rate hikes. Wood never even directly acknowledged that the fund had been crushed. She merely said, "Innovation companies suffered disproportionately," and she had "never seen markets this dislocated" in all her "45 years on Wall Street and more than 30 years in portfolio management." As if losing gobs of money on the worst money-losing tech garbage is some kind of weird anomaly that rarely happens. Finally, the letter ran through a laundry list of buzzwords and tech fads, which Wood called "game-changing innovations" that the stock market had ignored – including ChatGPT, connected TV, digital wallets, social commerce, blockchain technology, electric vehicles, autonomous driving, autonomous logistics, 3D printing, space exploration, industrial robots... and a list of health-related innovations. It's like Wood is trying to use words as a substitute for results. I'm a value investor. Believe me, without patience, I'd have been long gone by now. But after a decade of lighting more money on fire than any of her competitors, Wood can't just keep throwing out buzzwords and confident predictions with terrible results. In March, Wood told Bloomberg TV that the fund had $2 billion of losses due to selling stocks during the 2022 rout. She was delighted to note that losses could be used to offset taxes for future gains. Wood never apologizes for being lousy at her job... She never says anything like, "We have pursued a terrible investment strategy for a decade and have turned in the worst performance in our entire industry – losing more than twice as much capital as the next worst company." Nor does she ever apologize for her awful performance. As I said in my [October 2022 open letter to Cathie Wood]( I keep Googling "Cathie Wood finally apologizes for buying garbage and lighting $21 billion on fire"... and nothing comes up. Last night, I googled "Cathie Wood apologizes" again and my open letter was the top result. Google should have simply replied, "She still hasn't apologized. She probably never will." As Dunning and Kruger warned us about overconfident fools, Wood's lack of competence has robbed her of "the metacognitive ability to realize it." You can see this in action from Wood's April 2022 keynote speech at an investment conference in Miami. She reminded the live audience of the 15% annualized returns she projected for her ARKK fund in 2021. In December 2021, she projected 40% annual returns over the next five years and told ARK clients that innovation stocks were not in a bubble and, in fact, were "in deep value territory" because they'd fallen so much. With ARKK down about 50% over the previous year, Wood leaned into the microphone and, with a straight face, raised her return prediction to 50%. That's right, Wood predicted 50% annualized returns, an absurdly high rate of return from an industry that fails to even match the S&P 500's average annual returns over any meaningful period of time. The crowd cheered. Dunning and Kruger would have smirked. Upping the ante is a Cathie Wood signature move. In 2020, she predicted bitcoin would hit $500,000 in 2030, which she reiterated last October. This year, she has raised her 2030 projection to $1.5 million after the Securities and Exchange Commission approved bitcoin exchange-traded funds. Innovation is usually a terrible investment... Making a fortune betting on innovative technologies is just a story people tell in bull markets. If you've read Clayton Christensen's 1997 book The Innovator's Dilemma, you'll know what all Americans have known since the 19th century... that pioneers take the arrows and settlers take the land. In other words, innovators make all the mistakes and use up all the capital they're given figuring out hard problems. They make no money. It's only when the real businessmen come along and use proven technologies to manufacture reliable products people want that profits are made. But that's the great thing about the future for folks like Wood: It never arrives. If it ever looks like she's wrong, it just means the future hasn't arrived yet. If you intend to fleece your clients for fees purportedly in exchange for managing their wealth... and you've destroyed more wealth than anybody else in your industry... staying focused on the future is probably the smart move. Wood is like the captain of a sinking ship who keeps her eye on the horizon, hopeful and optimistic, until the sea swallows and silences her forever. So far, she's still sinking. Yet, as of nearly a year ago, the ARKK fund alone had brought in about $310 million in total fees since its inception in 2014. But this can't last forever. Wood started ARK after a rift with her old boss at global asset management firm AllianceBernstein. In December 2021, her old boss told the Financial Times that Wood's "biggest blind spot is managing risk and volatility," which I'm sure many of the folks who took a bath in her funds might have liked to know. One day, I'm sure I'll be reporting to you that ARK is finally out of business. Until then, it's probably best to view Wood as a reliable source of entertainment and not much else. But Wood isn't the only Dunning-Kruger loser... Other market bets today seem to reflect a sense of the bettors' own financial acumen, as Galbraith would say. For example, the whole idea of the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 Index making new highs on the expectation that the Fed will cut rates is highly questionable if not downright stupid. History suggests the Fed starts cutting rates as bad times begin and keeps cutting them through a recession, which is virtually always accompanied by a bear market. And there's zero precedent for cutting rates with the big market indexes making new all-time highs. So we're in unchartered territory... marching steadily forward into pitch blackness. Meanwhile, as the Wall Street Journal pointed out yesterday in an article appropriately titled, "Investors Are Almost Always Wrong About the Fed," traders in the federal-funds futures market "keep ramping up bets that rate cuts are just months away." Stansberry Investor Hour co-host Corey McLaughlin and I have discussed how lousy the futures market is at predicting the future path of the fed-funds rate... but how well it reflects the status quo. You'd think unemployment still hovering just above 54-year lows and zero precedent for rate cuts at new all-time highs in the stock market would leave traders cautious, not confident. The flip side of the Dunning-Kruger effect... While low-skilled folks tend to overestimate their abilities, highly competent folks tend to underestimate their abilities. Since I started hosting the Stansberry Investor Hour in 2018, I've interviewed hundreds of successful traders and investors. They've all been confident but humble... They never pretend to know exactly how the future will play out. And they always use effective risk controls like trailing stop losses and strict guidelines around position sizing. Tightly controlling risk is not the act of an overconfident fool. It's what you do when you're aware that you don't know everything. As for me, I remain cautious today as stocks continue to trade at mega-bubble valuations and traders act like rate cuts are right around the corner. [And as I explain in my new presentation here]( an upcoming overhaul to the U.S. dollar could also shake the markets. That's why I'm focusing on helping investors prepare for a wide variety of outcomes, which involves never basing your investment strategy solely on your ability to make predictions. You can learn more about my "prepare, don't predict" strategy [here](. (And Ferris Report subscribers and Stansberry Alliance members can read my latest research [here]( Folks who have too much confidence about the future of financial markets are guaranteed to be proven wrong... and they'll likely blame their failure on everyone but themselves. So keep in mind that nobody knows the future and maintain a diversified portfolio with a core of great businesses, plenty of cash, T-bills, and precious metals. That way, you'll be ready for good times and bad. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: [February 14 Will See the Biggest Move of 2024]( The market will see a massive move on February 14. That's the newest prediction from the man who called the 2020 and 2022 crashes and last year's turnaround within 24 hours. But if you know what's coming, you could double your money 10 different times... without buying a single stock. [See this expert's outline (and No. 1 recommendation) here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [Gold Is Headed Above $3,000 per Ounce (Here's How to Play It)]( With so many strange events happening across the economy (the longest bear market for bonds since the Civil War... unprecedented bank closures... and soaring prices), it's no wonder the richest investors are loading up on gold. But what you might not realize is there's a much better way to profit from rising gold prices – WITHOUT ever touching an ETF, mining stock, or even bullion. [Find the full details here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- New 52-week highs (as of 2/8/24): Autodesk (ADSK), ASML (ASML), Broadcom (AVGO), American Express (AXP), Brown & Brown (BRO), Costco Wholesale (COST), Salesforce (CRM), CyberArk Software (CYBR), Disney (DIS), Expedia (EXPE), Comfort Systems USA (FIX), GEO Group (GEO), Home Depot (HD), Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), Jack Henry & Associates (JKHY), Eli Lilly (LLY), Microsoft (MSFT), Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund (NBXG), NVR (NVR), Palo Alto Networks (PANW), Parker-Hannifin (PH), ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD), Repligen (RGEN), Construction Partners (ROAD), Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology Fund (RSPT), SentinelOne (S), VanEck Semiconductor Fund (SMH), ProShares Ultra S&P 500 (SSO), Stellantis (STLA), TFI International (TFII), ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD), Vanguard S&P 500 Fund (VOO), and Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS). In today's mailbag, feedback on [Part II of our annual Report Card]( which we published yesterday. Also, we received a few notes asking about certain grades on publications that weren't included. If you didn't see the grade for the publication you were looking for yesterday, [be sure to check out Part I]( published last week... And as always, keep your thoughts, questions, and concerns coming to feedback@stansberryresearch.com. "Stansberry Team, Words cannot express how satisfied I have been with your whole team's talent to communicate with clarity and super impressed that you are all on the same page... politically, financially, long term, and empowering your membership. "I joined Stansberry 22 years ago after reviewing many, many [company's philosophies] but yours stood out with Porter's exceptional open concept of bringing the average investor into the process and educating them. "I am not a millionaire, but [would] love to be before I die. I just turned 81 and although I do not do options, I have done well enough myself that my financial planner handles the bonds, etc., but I handle my own stocks using your portfolios as a guide. He keeps saying how well I am doing and to keep doing it. Thank you. "Grading yourself each year and the results are reflected in your yearly meetings, which I pay to watch each year. Good Job." – Subscriber Kathleen S. Good investing, Dan Ferris Eagle Point, Oregon February 9, 2024 --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Top 10 Open Recommendations Top 10 highest-returning open positions across all Stansberry Research portfolios Stock Buy Date Return Publication Analyst MSFT Microsoft 11/11/10 1,359.1% Retirement Millionaire Doc MSFT Microsoft 02/10/12 1,312.9% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 02/21/20 1,011.3% Stansberry Innovations Report Engel ADP Automatic Data Processing 10/09/08 904.8% Extreme Value Ferris WRB W.R. Berkley 03/16/12 727.3% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter BRK.B Berkshire Hathaway 04/01/09 604.8% Retirement Millionaire Doc HSY Hershey 12/07/07 493.3% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter FLUT Flutter Entertainment 08/01/19 437.8% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Gula AFG American Financial 10/12/12 419.5% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter BTC/USD Bitcoin 01/16/20 389.2% Stansberry Innovations Report Wade Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 10 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the model portfolio of any Stansberry Research publication. The buy date reflects when the editor recommended the investment in the listed publication, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if a security is still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber to that publication and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 10 Totals 5 Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter/Gula 2 Retirement Millionaire Doc 2 Stansberry Innovations Report Wade/Engel 1 Extreme Value Ferris --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 5 Crypto Capital Open Recommendations Top 5 highest-returning open positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Stock Buy Date Return Publication Analyst wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 12/07/18 2,053.7% Crypto Capital Wade ONE/USD Harmony 12/16/19 1,097.4% Crypto Capital Wade BTC/USD Bitcoin 11/27/18 1,075.1% Crypto Capital Wade POLYX/USD Polymesh 05/19/20 1,040.7% Crypto Capital Wade MATIC/USD Polygon 02/25/21 845.6% Crypto Capital Wade Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 5 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the Crypto Capital model portfolio. The buy date reflects when the recommendation was made, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if it's still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Hall of Fame Top 10 all-time, highest-returning closed positions across all Stansberry portfolios Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Nvidia^* NVDA 5.96 years 1,466% Venture Tech. Lashmet Microsoft^ MSFT 12.74 years 1,185% Retirement Millionaire Doc Band Protocol crypto 0.32 years 1,169% Crypto Capital Wade Terra crypto 0.41 years 1,164% Crypto Capital Wade Inovio Pharma.^ INO 1.01 years 1,139% Venture Tech. Lashmet Seabridge Gold^ SA 4.20 years 995% Sjug Conf. Sjuggerud Frontier crypto 0.08 years 978% Crypto Capital Wade Binance Coin crypto 1.78 years 963% Crypto Capital Wade Nvidia^* NVDA 4.12 years 777% Venture Tech. Lashmet Intellia Therapeutics NTLA 1.95 years 775% Amer. Moonshots Root ^ These gains occurred with a partial position in the respective stocks. * The two partial positions in Nvidia were part of a single recommendation. Editor Dave Lashmet closed the first leg of the position in November 2016 for a gain of about 108%. Then, he closed the second leg in July 2020 for a 777% return. And finally, in May 2022, he booked a 1,466% return on the final leg. Subscribers who followed his advice on Nvidia could've recorded a total weighted average gain of more than 600%. You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice. © 2024 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

EDM Keywords (287)

yesterday years year wrong writers wound worse work wood wonder whole well wealth way watch volatility value usually used use urge unskilled underestimate unaware twice turned trying trade took today time think thank talking talent sure suggestions suggest substitute subscription subscribers subscriber stood still speak silences short sent sense seen see security securities second say satisfied said room robbed right rift return results responsibility responding reporting reminded regret reflects reflected reflect refer redistribution recorded recommendation recommend recession receiving received realize reality ready reading read ramping raised questions pursued published publications publication projected profits profit process probably prepare predicting position portfolios porter play philosophies phenomenon penny pay part overestimate outline outcomes options optimistic optimism nvidia note new nearly must much money mistakes mind millionaire might microphone miami mentioning membership means markets market managing man make maintain made lousy lose looking long logic loading list liked like lighting letter let learned learn land lack knowledge know kind keeps keep job investors investment intend innovator information industry included inception humble headed handle guide guaranteed grading grade gold gain future fund friend founder forever followed folks focusing fleece fire find finally feedback fed far fallen failure fails fact eye explain expert expectation exchange example everyone eventually entertainment endorse empowering employees embodies educating economy dunning dumber displaying dislocated discussed dilemma difficulties die destroyed describing delighted decade date curious crushed create corner core confident competence communicate coming closed clients clarity check cash captured captain capital called buzzwords business bubble brought bringing bottom booked blamed bills bettors better bets behavior bath based bad aware arrows arkk arkg ark apologized ante americans although also alas advice admitting address action acting act account according ability abilities 61 600 50 2030 2024 2021 2020 2018 2014 11 108

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.