Newsletter Subject

Misdirection in Spades

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Wed, Jan 10, 2024 11:11 PM

Email Preheader Text

Everyone is wrong... A great supply of political misdirection... A story as old as our time... More

Everyone is wrong... A great supply of political misdirection... A story as old as our time... More spending to come... Should the presidential election keep you out of stocks?... History, for what it's worth... Nvidia is up 10% this week... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Digest] Everyone is wrong... A great supply of political misdirection... A story as old as our time... More spending to come... Should the presidential election keep you out of stocks?... History, for what it's worth... Nvidia is up 10% this week... --------------------------------------------------------------- We've still got 11 months... That is, until the U.S. presidential election. And already, the talk we're hearing from the two leading candidates for the White House about the state of the U.S. economy hurts our ears. I (Corey McLaughlin) am not taking sides, and don't need to, because there's enough evidence of misdirection to go around. Says the sitting president: The economy is great, inflation is on the decline, and "we" created millions of jobs. In reality, more than two-thirds of the jobs "created" since 2021 were simply just recovered from the start of the pandemic... Back then, the government's unemployment rate spiked from 3.5% to 15% in two months with the "old" economy shut down. Nearly four years later, the rate is at 3.7%. Says the other: "We have an economy that's so fragile, and the only reason it's running now is it's running off the fumes of what we did." Meaning, of course, greenlighting more than $3 trillion in stimulus programs... which helped ignite 40-year-high inflation (and hundreds of billions of dollars of fraud)... before the $2 trillion more in stimulus still to come that was pushed into law by the present administration. Where is the debate about that? Or the U.S.'s debt-to-GDP ratio of 120%, and what it means and implies? Or that the current reported debt of $34 trillion and counting assumes the government will never make another Social Security or Medicare payment? As [Stanley Druckenmiller points out]( factoring in those obligations would swell the U.S. debt closer to $200 trillion. Who cares? Or at least that's how they act. The future is someone else's problem. In the meantime, here's what's really happening... More government spending, it looks like. It's a story as old as time... Suddenly, the folks in Washington, D.C. are eyeing up another possible government shutdown in 10 days... unless they can agree to spend more dollars and mortgage our future and keep running trillion-dollar deficits. It seems they might. Over the weekend, our dear "leaders" in Congress agreed to a tentative $1.66 trillion spending agreement to keep the government open in 2024, including roughly $886 billion in defense spending. The framework is far from a done deal, and it's still under debate by the red and blue parties. Color us shocked if Congress doesn't agree to pay itself, though. As financial author John Mauldin wrote recently in Forbes (which we read in Bill Bonner's free daily newsletter [yesterday](... We have no good choices left. It is as if we are on a trip through a desert and know for certain we don't have enough water to go back. We have to go forward, not knowing where the desert ends. That's the reality. Unless you want to cut Social Security and Medicare, ignore military pensions, sell the national parks, abolish departments like State and Treasury, cut the defense budget in half along with Homeland Security, Education, Labor, the Justice Department and the FBI, etc., we are going to have to live with the $2 trillion deficits. Here's a fact I'm willing to use to make bets: The dollar has lost about 98% of its purchasing power since 1971, when the government abandoned, for good, the idea of a "sound" currency pegged to something real (gold). The money printer has been wide open for business ever since. It's a temporary fix to call on when needed. That's a difficult addiction to break, even if it devalues everything in the long run. A look at history, for what it's worth... As much as it may feel and appear that "this time will be different" in politics – and maybe it will be if all hell breaks loose come November – we like to see what history suggests about future market behavior. In this case, let's look at market performance in presidential election years. Should political uncertainty keep folks out of stocks? Our colleague Sean Michael Cummings recently published an analysis, which [he shared in the free DailyWealth newsletter earlier this week](... If you're worried that election years pose a threat to your portfolio, I'd understand that logic. However, history shows that isn't the case. To prove this, I measured how stocks performed in every election year going back to 1928. In the 24 election years in roughly the past century, stocks have held up well... Ho-hum. Stocks have returned about 6% in presidential-election years, in line with the annual average return of the market in about 75 other years. But as Sean continued... There's a little more to this story than meets the eye. First, stocks tend to underperform in the first three months of an election year. So if stocks fall through March, history suggests that's a buying opportunity and not a sell signal. Second, it's worth noting that elections are reliably bullish. Stocks were positive in 20 of the past 24 election years... resulting in a strong win rate of 83%. What's more, stocks returned 20% in the average up year and fell just 17% in the average down year. So we have a strong risk-to-reward setup for election years, too. Now, I'm not saying that the year ahead contains zero political risk. With so many elections taking place, it's almost certain that we'll see some chaotic results. But overall, the stock market reacts well to elections. We'll see what happens this time... eventually. We could get into what potential politics, or the odds on who wins, might do for the economy and markets this year. But we'll save that and more talk for another day. The Iowa caucuses begin soon. For now, we simply want to start with a baseline: About 100 years of history suggests that the presidential election shouldn't scare you out of stocks. Today, the tide rose… The benchmark S&P 500 Index was up this afternoon and closed 0.6% higher. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index and Dow Jones Industrial Average finished up 0.7% and 0.5%, respectively, while the small-cap Russell 2000 Index lagged but was still up slightly. Elsewhere, bonds have continued their once-familiar sleepy behavior for another week, though the 10-year Treasury has edged ever so slightly higher above 4%. Tomorrow morning's release of December's consumer price index inflation data could shake things up. Stronger-than-expected inflation data could put a dent in the market's prevailing idea of multiple Federal Reserve rate cuts in the first half of this year. Alternatively, a continued slowing or stagnant pace of inflation could encourage the thought. In the meantime, looking even just a little bit deeper than the indexes reveals some interesting notes... Many analysts have understandably argued that hot tech stocks like Nvidia (NVDA) can't possibly go any higher after such a big run-up in 2023. But this "Magnificent Seven" chipmaker is back to making new highs... This week, Nvidia has seen its best-returning string of trading days since its AI-related earnings catalyst in May of last year. Nvidia is up more than 10% this week on what appears to be no new news. You could take this as another signal that the Magnificent Seven stocks are simply pushing the market higher... or a sign that the rest of the market has some catching up to do. Some evidence suggests the latter... Roughly 60% of S&P 500 stocks are trading above their 200-day moving averages ("200-DMAs"), and the benchmark index's own 200-DMA has been trending higher itself since early last year after bottoming in October 2022. Concerning warning signs about the economy abound, too, no doubt. Here's looking at skyrocketing U.S. consumer debt, or declining U.S. wholesale inventories, which were reported today... in addition to whatever is going on in Washington. But for now, the trend for stocks is up. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: ['2024's Market Is a Trap']( If you're holding stocks, you can't afford NOT to see this urgent warning from Joel Litman. He famously predicted the financial crisis in 2008 and is now sounding the alarm on a similar crisis unfolding on Wall Street – one that'll have dire implications for investors over the next three years. [It's time to move your money](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [Bill Gates Is Raving About WHAT?!]( The legendary Microsoft founder says that this tech "will be as revolutionary as the personal computer." It could create a new generation of millionaire investors by the end of the decade. [Click here for the full story](. --------------------------------------------------------------- New 52-week highs (as of 1/9/24): Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), Cencora (COR), Trane Technologies (TT), Sprott Physical Uranium Trust (U-U.TO), and Visa (V). In today's mailbag, feedback on recent updates to our "Stansberry Data Monitors" – market indicators that are available to Stansberry Alliance members and Stansberry's Investment Advisory premier subscribers [here](... Do you have a comment or question? As always, e-mail us at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. "What a wonderful breath of fresh air! Yes, these documents are specific and easily understandable. Keep up the best work in the industry. I am going to be busy the next day or two absorbing all this concise information." – Subscriber Mark S. All the best, Corey McLaughlin Baltimore, Maryland January 10, 2024 --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Top 10 Open Recommendations Top 10 highest-returning open positions across all Stansberry Research portfolios Stock Buy Date Return Publication Analyst MSFT Microsoft 11/11/10 1,287.2% Retirement Millionaire Doc MSFT Microsoft 02/10/12 1,188.3% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter ADP Automatic Data Processing 10/09/08 852.9% Extreme Value Ferris wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 02/21/20 846.8% Stansberry Innovations Report Wade WRB W.R. Berkley 03/16/12 655.3% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter BRK.B Berkshire Hathaway 04/01/09 550.5% Retirement Millionaire Doc HSY Hershey 12/07/07 470.6% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter AFG American Financial 10/12/12 413.8% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter BTC/USD Bitcoin 01/16/20 408.8% Stansberry Innovations Report Wade PANW Palo Alto Networks 04/16/20 328.6% Stansberry Innovations Report Engel Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 10 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the model portfolio of any Stansberry Research publication. The buy date reflects when the editor recommended the investment in the listed publication, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if a security is still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber to that publication and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 10 Totals 4 Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter 3 Stansberry Innovations Report Engel/Wade 2 Retirement Millionaire Doc 1 Extreme Value Ferris --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 5 Crypto Capital Open Recommendations Top 5 highest-returning open positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Stock Buy Date Return Publication Analyst wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 12/07/18 1,812.3% Crypto Capital Wade BTC/USD Bitcoin 11/27/18 1,132.1% Crypto Capital Wade ONE/USD Harmony 12/16/19 1,112.6% Crypto Capital Wade POLYX/USD Polymesh 05/19/20 1,047.0% Crypto Capital Wade MATIC/USD Polygon 02/25/21 838.4% Crypto Capital Wade Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 5 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the Crypto Capital model portfolio. The buy date reflects when the recommendation was made, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if it's still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Hall of Fame Top 10 all-time, highest-returning closed positions across all Stansberry portfolios Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Nvidia^* NVDA 5.96 years 1,466% Venture Tech. Lashmet Microsoft^ MSFT 12.74 years 1,185% Retirement Millionaire Doc Band Protocol crypto 0.32 years 1,169% Crypto Capital Wade Terra crypto 0.41 years 1,164% Crypto Capital Wade Inovio Pharma.^ INO 1.01 years 1,139% Venture Tech. Lashmet Seabridge Gold^ SA 4.20 years 995% Sjug Conf. Sjuggerud Frontier crypto 0.08 years 978% Crypto Capital Wade Binance Coin crypto 1.78 years 963% Crypto Capital Wade Nvidia^* NVDA 4.12 years 777% Venture Tech. Lashmet Intellia Therapeutics NTLA 1.95 years 775% Amer. Moonshots Root ^ These gains occurred with a partial position in the respective stocks. * The two partial positions in Nvidia were part of a single recommendation. Editor Dave Lashmet closed the first leg of the position in November 2016 for a gain of about 108%. Then, he closed the second leg in July 2020 for a 777% return. And finally, in May 2022, he booked a 1,466% return on the final leg. Subscribers who followed his advice on Nvidia could've recorded a total weighted average gain of more than 600%. You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice. © 2024 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

EDM Keywords (223)

years year wrong writers worth worried work willing whole whatever weekend week washington want use understand underperform trip trend trap trading today time threat thought though tech talk suggestions subscription subscribers subscriber stronger story stocks still state start stansberry spending spend specific speak sounding simply sign shared sent seen seems see security scare saying save running roughly revolutionary returned rest responsibility release refer redistribution red recovered recorded recommendation recommend receiving received reason reality read raving rate questions question pushed published publication prove problem positive position portfolio politics pay part overall old odds nvidia needed need must much move mortgage money misdirection might meets measured meantime means meaning maybe may markets market make made lost looking look live little line like least learned learn law knowing know keep jobs investors investment information industry implies idea hundreds history higher held hearing happens government good going gain future fumes fraud framework fragile forbes followed folks finally fell feedback far factoring fact eyeing endorse end employees elections economy ears doubt dollars dollar documents different desert dent decline december debt debate date continued congress comment come closed certain catching case cares call busy bottoming booked billions benchmark baseline based back average available appears appear analysis already alarm agree afternoon afford advice address addition acting act account 98 83 75 600 2023 2008 20 1928 17 15 120 108 10

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

13/05/2024

Sent On

12/05/2024

Sent On

12/05/2024

Sent On

11/05/2024

Sent On

11/05/2024

Sent On

11/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.