Newsletter Subject

Wall Street Isn't Behind the Housing Shortage

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Thu, Dec 21, 2023 12:35 PM

Email Preheader Text

Wall Street isn't responsible for America's housing shortage. The truth of the matter isn't as clear

Wall Street isn't responsible for America's housing shortage. The truth of the matter isn't as clear-cut... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [DailyWealth] Wall Street Isn't Behind the Housing Shortage By Sean Michael Cummings, analyst, True Wealth --------------------------------------------------------------- One misleading story about the U.S. housing market could turn into law... The "bombshell" article first appeared on online publishing platform Medium earlier this month. And thanks to its shocking headline, it went viral. Check it out... It's a terrible statistic. And to a passive observer of the housing market, it feels true. Heck, it even convinced Washington, D.C. to act. The day after the article came out, congressional Democrats introduced a new bill called the End Hedge Fund Control of American Homes Act. The bill aims to make it illegal for Wall Street to own single-family homes. But here's the problem... Medium's story isn't true. Wall Street isn't responsible for America's housing shortage. As I'll explain today, the truth of the matter isn't as clear-cut... --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: [Urgent Announcement From Doc]( Dr. David "Doc" Eifrig has an urgent message about his position at Stansberry Research. In a new short 10-minute update, he shares his (very rare and surprising) outlook for 2024... and an announcement that could shake up the entire financial publishing industry. This could change how you make money next year... but you must see this before the holidays are over. [Click here for Doc's holiday update](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [Is Your Bank Next?]( A powerful new trend is spreading like wildfire inside the U.S. financial system. At least 41 banks are already involved. But the Federal Reserve predicts that number will grow fast. [See if your bank is involved right here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- It's tempting to believe a small pool of investors devoured 44% of America's single-family homes this year. If that were the case, those folks might be forced to give them back. But according to data from Freddie Mac, this group of investors simply doesn't exist... Since 2000, this mortgage entity has tracked housing purchases by institutional investors (folks who own 100 or more properties). It has also tracked purchases from iBuyers – companies that use algorithms to quickly buy and resell homes in cash. Combined, institutional investors and iBuyers make up a very small percentage of the overall homebuyer market. Take a look... Since 2020, iBuyers and institutional investors have gained some ground... but they still make up less than 5% of the total purchasing market this year. That's a far cry from Medium's 44% headline figure. Real estate consulting firm John Burns has more evidence of Big Money's small footprint. The company tracks the market share of U.S. home purchases by landlords with 1,000 properties or more. These real estate "whales" only made up 0.4% of the market this spring. Check it out... By this metric, the biggest buyers aren't anywhere close to 44% of the market. In fact, their highest level on record is only 2.4%. So unfortunately, Wall Street isn't the culprit here. According to Realtor.com, the largest portion of the mortgage market belongs to plain old homeowners. By the end of 2018, Baby Boomers originated 17% of new mortgages, Generation X originated 36%, and millennials originated a sizeable 45% of new mortgages. In short, the folks behind this shocking headline at Medium are selling easy answers. But the U.S. housing picture is much more complex than that. The housing market is driven by the entire homebuying population... not a few wealthy individuals. Ultimately, the answer rests with homebuilders, not Congress. After all, the U.S. needs 2 million to 7 million more housing units in order to meet demand. There's only one way we'll get out of the U.S. housing shortage... and that's by building enough homes to meet demand. No one can pass a law to solve the supply shortage... And if you see anyone claiming otherwise, that should raise a couple red flags. Good investing, Sean Michael Cummings Further Reading While demand for homes is as high as ever today, millennials have found creative ways to hack their way into the properties they want. Here's what this "house hacking" trend means for the housing market – and could mean for real estate stocks... [Read more here](. "Anticipating a major decline anytime soon is foolish," Brett Eversole writes. The U.S. housing story is rather simple today... Too many folks are looking to buy homes that don't exist. That kind of supply-and-demand imbalance can only lead to one outcome – and it's not a crash... [Learn more here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [Tell us what you think of this content]( [We value our subscribers' feedback. To help us improve your experience, we'd like to ask you a couple brief questions.]( [Click here to rate this e-mail]( You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to DailyWealth. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from DailyWealth [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You're receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice. © 2023 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.