Newsletter Subject

What Central Bankers Hate More Than Inflation

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Tue, Dec 12, 2023 11:29 PM

Email Preheader Text

The latest inflation data… Status quo for the markets… Considering the three 'flations'â?

The latest inflation data… Status quo for the markets… Considering the three 'flations'… What central bankers really hate… The surprising winners from deflationary periods… [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Digest] The latest inflation data… Status quo for the markets… Considering the three 'flations'… What central bankers really hate… The surprising winners from deflationary periods… --------------------------------------------------------------- It wasn't bad news... This morning, the U.S. government published one of its final major inflation readings of the year, and the November consumer price index ("CPI") showed price growth of 0.1% from October and 3.1% versus a year ago. These numbers were mostly in line with Wall Street expectations. The market shrugged. Three of the four major U.S. stock indexes were higher by mid-morning, and the market's "fear gauge" – the CBOE Volatility Index, or VIX – remained at peaceful levels. While the month-over-month CPI reading from Uncle Sam was up slightly from flat headline price growth in October, November's year-over-year number was down from October's 3.2%, continuing a downward trend of the pace of inflation since a peak of 9.1% in June 2022. Beneath the headline numbers, here are a few details worth noting... Falling energy prices, including a notable 6% decline in gasoline from a month ago, balanced out still-rising rent costs and slight gains in food prices. This CPI report also showed higher prices in most other major categories (like medical care, used vehicles, and car insurance), though apparel saw deflation of more than 1% from October. Status quo for stocks, bonds, and the Fed... All in all, it doesn't matter what I (Corey McLaughlin), you, or anyone else think about inflation in our community or line of work. This data probably won't have much influence over the Federal Reserve's decision on monetary policy tomorrow, and thus the direction of the broader stock market in the short term. As Ten Stock Trader editor Greg Diamond [wrote to his subscribers today](... There were no big surprises with the Consumer Price Index ("CPI") number this morning. We saw an initial drop in stocks, but the bulls charged right back. As I mentioned yesterday, we could just see a grind higher. The leading odds are on the central bank to keep its benchmark lending rate in a range of 5.25% to 5.5%. And this report didn't show anything significant enough for the Fed to break its interest-rate "pause" streak that began in June, which is bullish for stock prices on balance. To some investors, the inflation fight is over... The Fed has already defeated it. However, the headline inflation numbers aren't what Fed Chair Jerome Powell has targeted. These investors won't like it if Powell uses his post-meeting press conference to remind them things like, "The data shows that inflation isn't dead yet" and, "We're committed to our 2% target." Keep in mind, though, as we've said recently, the Fed's preferred inflation gauge – the "core" personal consumption expenditures ("PCE") index, which strips out "volatile" food and energy prices – has averaged 0.2% monthly growth for the past five months. That's already in the ballpark for the central bank to meet its 2% annualized inflation goal. So, investors have been betting over the past few months that the next most likely move for the Fed is to cut rates rather than raise them or hold them steady, given simultaneous expectations for the economy and jobs market to deteriorate. While we're on the subject of the three 'flations'... I don't want to get too far ahead, but as we talk about continued "disinflation" – prices rising, but by less than before – it's wise to also consider the next possible major stop in this discussion... A few weeks ago, we noted we heard the "d-word," or deflation, coming from the voice of Walmart CEO Doug McMillon. The head of America's largest retailer (and grocery chain) raised this possibility on the company's most recent quarterly earnings call. And afterward, we received a few notes about the subject, so we want to follow up on it. As we wrote in the [November 21 edition]( McMillon said price growth in general had been slowing and suggested consumers could even see growth reverse for items such as canned goods and consumables soon. He said on the call... In the U.S., we may be managing through a period of deflation in the months to come. And while that would put more unit pressure on us, we welcome it, because it's better for our customers. He followed up on these comments in a television interview last week. McMillon said record-high credit-card balances and dwindling household savings raise questions to him about how much consumers will spend in the year ahead. Combined with deflation he's already seeing – for example, general merchandise items at Walmart have dropped by 5% from a year ago – that could hurt a company's profits. Walmart's full-year earnings forecast last month was lower than Wall Street expected. This deflation talk is notable to me for a few reasons... We're bringing up Walmart because it's America's largest retailer. Buying trends in its stores happen all around the country to varying degrees. As we wrote in the November 21 edition, if the big trend in prices in America turns from disinflation to deflation – outright decreases in prices – that will mark a sea change for the markets... We could be approaching the next part of the post-pandemic U.S. economic story... That is, when the dominant market narrative of cheering disinflation turns to one of fearing and dealing with deflation. Deflation is when nominal prices go down. That would be great for real people on a budget who need to buy things, but not so great for businesses interested in growing profits in an environment where everything got way more expensive the past few years, labor included. Deflation happens when tires or balloons pop. The same could be said for the economic bubble we saw begin in early 2020. Trillions of dollars in stimulus were injected into an economy that had already enjoyed a decade of abnormally low interest rates that juiced the market. You could argue the economy needs a period of deflation to get back to "normal," whatever that is these days. But even if that is true, it won't happen without painful consequences. You could also argue that the pace of inflation will keep on gliding down ever so neatly forever – or other outcomes. Some of those consequences to consider are a more difficult road for businesses to turn profits, as McMillon suggested. This discussion also serves as a reminder that the next stop from disinflation is deflation, absent a catalyst otherwise. Today's CPI report showed slight deflation in apparel versus last month, as I mentioned. More specifically, prices fell in categories like toys (2.8% lower than a year ago), furniture (down 3.1%), appliances (down 3.5%), school supplies (down 4.8%), and airline tickets (down 12.1%). Let me be clear: We are not seeing deflation all across the entire economy. But it is out there already in pockets, especially interest-rate-sensitive areas. Whether we see widespread deflation ahead, I can't tell you. But it's a worthy subject to discuss. Again, deflation might be good for consumers like you and me, but it makes life more difficult for businesses. And the last time we wrote about deflation, a few of you wrote in wondering about what assets, stocks or otherwise, might hold up the best in deflationary periods. To this point, deflation is not great news for markets – at first... The effect of deflation on stocks runs parallel with that of interest-rate cuts (like we discussed last week). Deflation is painful for markets when it begins – it signals economic downturn. But if history is a guide, there's better news in the long run. We did some digging into the subject recently, and what we found might surprise you. First off, deflationary periods are historically rare: Since the start of the Great Depression, only nine calendar years have registered a negative CPI reading, or outright deflation. The most recent was in 2009 when the CPI was negative 0.4%. Second, as they are arriving, these periods have been mostly painful. The Depression was not surprisingly the worst, when prices fell each year by 3%, 9%, 10%, and 5% from 1930 to 1933, respectively, according to the CPI. In 1937, as the Fed tightened policy near the end of the Depression, interest rates rose and the benchmark stock index dropped 35%. Deflation set in in 1938 (with prices dropping 2%) and 1939 (falling 1.3%) before the Fed relented and lowered rates to rock-bottom levels for another few years. That helped juice the markets higher... The story has been similar in the last few, rare periods of deflation in the U.S. But what stands out is just how much stocks returned amid these periods of deflation. The chart below shows the last three years when CPI was negative (1949, 1955, and 2009). Perhaps counterintuitively, deflation is correlated with double-digit positive returns for stocks. (Since it went by different names over the years, consider the label "S&P 500" to mean the leading index of the day)... Corporate bonds have also done well, with Treasurys and real estate lagging the performance of major asset classes generally. By definition, the relative value of cash should also rise. The reason? If you think central bankers dislike inflation today, they have tended to really hate deflation, and they don't hesitate to step in and "rescue" the markets. In 1949, after a period of rising interest rates led to deflation (a negative 1% CPI for the year), according to a history by the St. Louis Fed... Short-term rates declined abruptly around the middle of the year, following reduction of member bank reserve requirements and discontinuance of net sales of securities by the Federal Reserve System to meet market demand (which began early in the year). The deflation in 1955 was mild (negative 0.3%) and the outlier of this group. Yet it has some similarities to today. It happened as interest rates rose after the post-Korean War inflationary period and in between the recessions of 1953 to 1954 and 1958, or the "Eisenhower Recession." The between period went fine for stocks. In 1954, the year before the deflation, stocks were up 53%. But the Great Recession reminds us of the dangers of deflation fears and reality again. The S&P 500 was down 37% in 2008 before the Fed stepped in with its newfangled rescue measures and ultra-low interest rates. The deflation wasn't as bad as some feared (negative 0.4% in 2009), and the events kicked off a record-long bull market and other consequences. Will the Fed "let" deflation happen for very long if deflation strikes before the central bank would prefer to cut rates? I doubt it – the bank is in tune with trying to fix any crises that may arise. But if deflation does happen, it could be a bumpy ride until we see a "fix." Said another way, the worse the deflation, the worse for stocks and the economy as it's happening... but then you may want to expect a bigger response and return for stocks on the other side. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: [WARNING: Today's Federal Reserve Meeting]( Investors are looking to today's final Fed meeting of the year with high hopes for interest-rate relief. But two Wall Street veterans just stepped forward with a dire warning: The Fed's next move could make or break your wealth in the coming weeks. [Here's the No. 1 step they recommend you take before today's closing bell to prepare](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [How to Put Guaranteed Income 'Under the Tree']( A regular guy from upstate New York retired years ahead of schedule thanks to ONE investing idea that doesn't involve stocks, options, or cryptocurrencies. The secret? A simple strategy for seeing double-digit annual income... AND triple-digit capital gains... with legal protections (even in an economic crisis). [Click here to learn more](. --------------------------------------------------------------- New 52-week highs (as of 12/11/23): ABB (ABBNY), Adobe (ADBE), Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), A.O. Smith (AOS), Brown & Brown (BRO), Costco Wholesale (COST), Cintas (CTAS), D.R. Horton (DHI), Enstar (ESGR), Expedia (EXPE), Fidelity National Financial (FNF), W.W. Grainger (GWW), Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII), ICON (ICLR), Ingersoll Rand (IR), iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense Fund (ITA), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Lennar (LEN), London Stock Exchange Group (LNSTY), Motorola Solutions (MSI), Palo Alto Networks (PANW), ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD), Qualys (QLYS), Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology Fund (RSPT), SentinelOne (S), Sprouts Farmers Market (SFM), Sherwin-Williams (SHW), VanEck Semiconductor Fund (SMH), SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value Fund (SPYV), Trane Technologies (TT), and Vanguard S&P 500 Fund (VOO). In today's mailbag, a comment on [yesterday's Digest]( about reality versus fantasy... Do you have a comment or question? As always, e-mail us at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. "Hi, I wouldn't trust YouGov [polls], they have a political agenda. They'll ask lots and lots of questions, and then carefully select out the one question where they got the answer they wanted. [It's] selective quotation. What is the full list of questions they asked the people?..." – Subscriber Richard M. Corey McLaughlin comment: Richard, I'm with you on being skeptical about polls and how data can be skewed based on how questions are presented. I read through the details of this one and found the common answer about inflation – from various demographics and political preferences – to be significant. You can find the whole thing [here](. All the best, Corey McLaughlin with Tyler Jarman Baltimore, Maryland December 12, 2023 --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Top 10 Open Recommendations Top 10 highest-returning open positions across all Stansberry Research portfolios Stock Buy Date Return Publication Analyst MSFT Microsoft 11/11/10 1,278.8% Retirement Millionaire Doc MSFT Microsoft 02/10/12 1,173.7% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter ADP Automatic Data Processing 10/09/08 846.5% Extreme Value Ferris wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 02/21/20 771.1% Stansberry Innovations Report Wade WRB W.R. Berkley 03/16/12 653.6% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter BRK.B Berkshire Hathaway 04/01/09 533.1% Retirement Millionaire Doc HSY Hershey 12/07/07 453.8% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter AFG American Financial 10/12/12 406.7% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter BTC/USD Bitcoin 01/16/20 362.6% Stansberry Innovations Report Wade PANW Palo Alto Networks 04/16/20 328.2% Stansberry Innovations Report Engel Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 10 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the model portfolio of any Stansberry Research publication. The buy date reflects when the editor recommended the investment in the listed publication, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if a security is still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber to that publication and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 10 Totals 4 Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter 3 Stansberry Innovations Report Engel/Wade 2 Retirement Millionaire Doc 1 Extreme Value Ferris --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 5 Crypto Capital Open Recommendations Top 5 highest-returning open positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Stock Buy Date Return Publication Analyst wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 12/07/18 1,701.2% Crypto Capital Wade ONE/USD Harmony 12/16/19 1,116.5% Crypto Capital Wade POLYX/USD Polymesh 05/19/20 1,058.3% Crypto Capital Wade BTC/USD Bitcoin 11/27/18 997.8% Crypto Capital Wade MATIC/USD Polygon 02/25/21 847.4% Crypto Capital Wade Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 5 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the Crypto Capital model portfolio. The buy date reflects when the recommendation was made, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if it's still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Hall of Fame Top 10 all-time, highest-returning closed positions across all Stansberry portfolios Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Nvidia^* NVDA 5.96 years 1,466% Venture Tech. Lashmet Microsoft^ MSFT 12.74 years 1,185% Retirement Millionaire Doc Band Protocol crypto 0.32 years 1,169% Crypto Capital Wade Terra crypto 0.41 years 1,164% Crypto Capital Wade Inovio Pharma.^ INO 1.01 years 1,139% Venture Tech. Lashmet Seabridge Gold^ SA 4.20 years 995% Sjug Conf. Sjuggerud Frontier crypto 0.08 years 978% Crypto Capital Wade Binance Coin crypto 1.78 years 963% Crypto Capital Wade Nvidia^* NVDA 4.12 years 777% Venture Tech. Lashmet Intellia Therapeutics NTLA 1.95 years 775% Amer. Moonshots Root ^ These gains occurred with a partial position in the respective stocks. * The two partial positions in Nvidia were part of a single recommendation. Editor Dave Lashmet closed the first leg of the position in November 2016 for a gain of about 108%. Then, he closed the second leg in July 2020 for a 777% return. And finally, in May 2022, he booked a 1,466% return on the final leg. Subscribers who followed his advice on Nvidia could've recorded a total weighted average gain of more than 600%. You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice. © 2023 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

EDM Keywords (280)

yesterday years year wrote writers would worst worse work word wondering wise whole went welcome wealth wanted want walmart voice vanguard us tune trying true tree treasurys today tires thus tended tell targeted talk take surprisingly suggestions subscription subscribers subscriber subject strips story stocks stimulus still step start stands spend speak slowing slightly skeptical similarities similar significant shows sent see security securities secret saw said return responsibility rescue report reminder remind registered refer redistribution recorded recommendation recommend recessions recent receiving received reasons reason reality read range raise questions question published publication prices presented prepare possibility position polls periods period performance peak past part painful pace outlier outcomes one october nvidia numbers notes noted notable next need must mostly morning months month money middle mentioned meet mean may matter markets market mark managing make mailbag made lower lots looking long line like less learned learn last label keep june juiced items investors investment injected information inflation however hold history higher hesitate heard head happening happened happen guide great got good gliding get general gasoline gain found followed follow fix first find finally feedback fed fearing expensive expect ever even environment endorse end employees effect economy dropped doubt dollars disinflation discussion discuss discontinuance direction digging digest difficult deteriorate details depression deflation definition decision decade dealing days date data dangers customers cryptocurrencies crises cpi country could correlated consider consequences company community committed comments comment come closed clear chart cash call businesses bullish budget bringing break booked betting better best begins began based bank ballpark balance bad asked arriving around approaching answer another america already afterward advice address acting across account 600 53 37 2009 2008 1958 1955 1954 1953 1949 1938 1937 1930 108

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.