The No. 1 Way to Annoy Wall Street

Wall Street pros don't see everything. You can find plenty of hidden clues to a company's success... and use them to your advantage. [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [DailyWealth] Editor's note: The Wall Street pros don't see everything. When it comes to assessing a company's true value, you need to look at what really matters. Joel Litman, founder of our corporate affiliate Altimetry, has a few favorite measures he keeps an eye on... In today's Weekend Edition, which was most recently published in the Stansberry Digest earlier this week, Joel shares his knowledge as a forensic accountant to shed light on a hidden clue to a company's financial success... and on how you can use it to your advantage. --------------------------------------------------------------- The No. 1 Way to Annoy Wall Street By Joel Litman, chief investment strategist, Altimetry --------------------------------------------------------------- Paul O'Neill didn't give investors what they wanted... Back in my consulting days in the 1990s, one of my biggest corporate clients was Alcoa (AA). The aluminum producer was also one of my favorite clients. So when a Wall Street executive told me Alcoa's CEO annoyed investment analysts, I can still remember my surprise to this day. Imagine strolling the halls of a Wall Street research firm during earnings season. Everyone would be getting ready to tune into a management call about a company's quarterly or annual performance. You'd see rows and rows of cubicles filled with these young analysts getting ready to plug management's numbers into their fancy financial models. Most management teams wouldn't dream of deviating from this path. They're trained to give analysts tidy numbers for their tidy reports. Not O'Neill. He refused to play by the rules... Instead of opening with earnings guidance... margin percentages... or capital expenditures... O'Neill's focus always started with workplace safety. Unable to type "safety measures" into their thousand-row spreadsheets, the sell-side equity analysts would attempt to steer the ship back on course. They'd ask questions that fit their way of looking at companies and profits. But if they had been more open-minded, these analysts could have seen what O'Neill was doing... and they would have told their investors to buy every share of Alcoa they could. As I'll explain today, O'Neill's focus on safety and shareholder returns set Alcoa apart from the rest. Wall Street missed out on a great corporate success story – all because it couldn't get behind a new way of thinking... --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Link: # [RECAP: Last Week's Severe Fed Warning]( Marc Chaikin helped build Wall Street. Joel Litman spent his career denouncing it. But they both agree that the Federal Reserve's next move will threaten your wealth more than anything else today. Plus, they share the EXACT step to take with your money to protect yourself and see 5x potential gains. Don't get blindsided – see what's coming and how to prepare immediately, [right here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- O'Neill was adamant that employee safety and shareholder returns aren't mutually exclusive... At his very first meeting with investment analysts, the CEO touted his unconventional approach to performance in front of a Wall Street crowd. According to Charles Duhigg's The Power of Habit, O'Neill insisted... I'm not certain you heard me. If you want to understand how Alcoa is doing, you need to look at our workplace safety figures. If we bring our injury rates down, it won't be because of cheerleading or the nonsense you sometimes hear from other CEOs. That kind of statement really does annoy Wall Street analysts. They're focused on their earnings reports and getting their short-term forecasts to Bloomberg or CNBC. They simply don't know what to do with a CEO who doesn't follow convention. It's one reason why these folks are so bad at recommending stocks. They aren't focused on the real long-term drivers of business valuations... which is reflected in their largely abysmal track records. In Alcoa's case, aluminum production can be dangerous. O'Neill knew that lots of employees got injured every year in the industry. Not only was it humanitarian to focus on workplace safety... he also knew it reflected his business's foundation of efficiency. According to O'Neill, high injuries meant "we're not doing a good job, not just for the lives and health of our people, but also for our investors and shareholders." So he emphasized safety before discussing revenue, income, or anything else. That emphasis helped add $24.53 billion in market value during O'Neill's tenure as CEO... and led to a roughly 10-fold return for shareholders. Today, Alcoa still has a reputation as one of the safest aluminum companies. Now, while O'Neill's safety proclamations were unconventional, all management teams are required to share where they're focused... If you want to know what a company is going to do in the future... what keeps management up at night... and what drives the team's motivation... you shouldn't look at the annual 10-K report. The big issue with the 10-K is that it's backward-looking. Other than some relatively small sections about risks or analysis, the overwhelming majority of data is historical. I prefer a different document... a proxy statement called the DEF 14A. It's probably the most important financial report most folks have never heard of. Many of my clients would say it's actually more valuable than the 10-K. In the DEF 14A, the company is required to disclose who's on the board and management team... how much they're paid... and how they're paid. Compensation is crucial to forecasting performance and estimating valuation, folks. If you want to understand management's strategy, look at compensation metrics. If you want to ensure the board is putting its money where its mouth is, look at compensation metrics. Incentives dictate behavior. Management will do what it's paid to do. Full stop. In short, the DEF 14A tells you how a company defines wealth. And in Alcoa's case, we can see that O'Neill's legacy lives on today. A huge chunk of management's annual bonus is still tied to employee safety... Ten percent of the bonus is based on having zero fatalities on the job. If anyone dies from unsafe working conditions, there goes this portion of the bonus right away. Another 10% is based on serious injuries. If there are more than five serious injuries in a given year, this portion falls to zero. Safety is obviously a unique metric that's specific to this industry. But several earnings numbers can help you understand what a business is focused on... If you want to find a growing company, look for a focus on revenue growth... earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization ("EBITDA")... or just the sheer number of new stores or customers. However, many management teams get paid to grow the business, regardless of profits. While these folks may talk about earnings on quarterly calls, if they aren't paid based on true economic earnings metrics, they simply don't focus on them. Metrics like return on assets ("ROA") or return on invested capital ("ROIC") will direct management's attention toward improving margins and asset efficiency. Just recognize, that might mean less focus on growth. Remember, the DEF 14A is public information. Anyone can and should access it. So before you invest in a company, take a look through the compensation plan. It'll help you make sure management is doing the right things for the business – and for shareholders. You might even find the next Alcoa... while Wall Street analysts are still burying their heads in spreadsheets. Regards, Joel Litman --------------------------------------------------------------- Editor's note: If you have money in the markets, you've navigated your fair share of volatility this year. But according to two legendary investors, it doesn't look like it'll let up anytime soon... Earlier this week, Joel and Chaikin Analytics founder Marc Chaikin sat down to deliver an urgent message. In short, they haven't been this worried about the economy since 2008. They believe early 2024 will be a "brutal period" if you aren't prepared for this specific shift. But those who act now can take advantage of what's happening... and potentially make as much as five times their money on a rare investment. If you missed Joel and Marc's discussion, don't worry... [You can watch a replay right here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [Tell us what you think of this content]( [We value our subscribers' feedback. To help us improve your experience, we'd like to ask you a couple brief questions.]( [Click here to rate this e-mail]( You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to DailyWealth. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from DailyWealth [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice. © 2023 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.