Newsletter Subject

How to Find Great Businesses and Avoid Bad Ones

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Thu, Nov 16, 2023 11:11 PM

Email Preheader Text

Some things never change... Another classic essay from Porter Stansberry... How to properly value a

Some things never change... Another classic essay from Porter Stansberry... How to properly value a business... A four-step guide... How to avoid 90% of your mistakes... Check out our proprietary Stansberry Indicators... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Digest] Some things never change... Another classic essay from Porter Stansberry... How to properly value a business... A four-step guide... How to avoid 90% of your mistakes... Check out our proprietary Stansberry Indicators... --------------------------------------------------------------- Editor's note: [Two weeks ago]( we republished a classic essay from Stansberry Research founder Porter Stansberry about "crossing the desert" of investing. It's his timeless advice for being successful in the markets in the long run... and not dying somewhere along the way. In the essay, Porter talks about the importance of knowing how to "value" a business and its share price. Specifically, he says... The most important thing for investors to understand about investing in stocks is simply what kinds of businesses make for great investments and how to properly value these kinds of businesses. After we published the essay, we received several questions from folks who maybe weren't around when the words were originally published back in 2015 – like subscriber Linda O., who wrote... I recently read Porter's message. I have been a member of a few Stansberry products for several years. When Porter mentioned that 90% of Stansberry's readers most likely do not know how to value a stock (determine whether or not the stock was expensive), I sadly and embarrassingly realized I was one of the 90%. Can someone at Stansberry review the 30-second method of determining the value of a stock? Turns out, Porter received similar questions nearly a decade ago after he originally published the essay. So, today, I (Corey McLaughlin) want to answer Linda's (and others') questions by sharing Porter's follow-up essay from back then, where he shared his view on how to properly value a stock. This essay, originally published in 2015, is slightly edited because subscribers today have access to our valuation grades, which are part of [a proprietary "Stansberry Score"]( for thousands of stocks, on our website. If all you have is 30 seconds, StansberryResearch.com is a great place to plug in a ticker symbol and get our quick take on a company's value. But if you want to understand what goes into our grading system and what really makes a great, average, or poor business, you'll want to read today's essay, which breaks down what to look for to value a company. I hope you find it helpful... --------------------------------------------------------------- We're going to do something that's hard for most people in today's Digest... It involves some math. It involves thinking hard about rather abstract ideas. For most of you, it will involve learning new jargon, which is probably the hardest part. No, it's not as hard as walking across a giant desert for 40 days. But it's something most people will go to great lengths to avoid. So let me tell you why you should first calculate these four things every time you buy another stock. What you'll find below is a nearly foolproof way to evaluate the quality and the value of any business. This four-part test will allow you to quantify, with surprising precision, exactly what makes a given business great, average, or poor. This knowledge will allow you to make vastly better and more informed decisions about what any business is worth and what you should be willing to pay for it on a per-share basis. But that's not the best reason to learn this four-part test... The real secret is, once you develop the discipline to always do this work before you buy any stock, you'll never make a quick decision to buy a stock ever again. Once you add something that's hard to do, that requires a little bit of time, a little rigor, and a little discipline to your investment process, you're going to greatly reduce the number of stocks you buy. You're also going to radically improve the quality of the stocks you're willing to invest in because you'll have the skills to do so. And that will eliminate more than 90% of your investment mistakes. Remember... you don't need to find a great investment every month or even every year. You just need to find them every now and then... and have capital ready to put to work. As I (Porter Stansberry) explained, I believe the No. 1 thing you need to know to be successful as an investor in common stocks is what type of business makes for a great investment. Investment legend Warren Buffett says the same thing. He puts it this way... Your goal as an investor should simply be to purchase, at a rational price, a part interest in an easily understandable business whose earnings are virtually certain to be materially higher five, 10, and 20 years from now. So... what makes a great business?... How can you be certain its earnings will materially grow over reasonable periods of time? To figure it out, let's take one of Buffett's most famous investments – Coca-Cola (KO). Coke sells addictive (caffeine-laced) sugar water for more than the price of gasoline all around the world. It has integrated its brand into people's lives through decades of advertising spending – an investment that has paid off tremendously. Coke has one of the world's most universally recognized and admired brands. But how do these advantages translate into hard numbers? The most obvious characteristic of a great business is high profit margins. High margins are proof of a great brand, a superior product, or some form of regulatory capture that permits greater-than-normal profitability. On every dollar of revenue in 2014, Coke earned nearly $0.25 in cash. And it brought in $46 billion in revenue. To figure out exactly how much money Coke earns in cash, we simply look at the company's cash-flow statement, under the line: "total cash flow from operating activities." We see that in 2014, this was $10.6 billion. (You can get this by looking at the company's annual report or by using any number of other online databases.) Next, we divide those cash profits by the company's total revenues ($45.9 billion), which you can find on the income statement. Doing the math gives you a fraction that is commonly expressed in percentage form: 23%. Coke's cash operating profit margin is 23%. It's earning $0.23 in profit on every dollar it generates in sales. In our experience, businesses with cash operating margins in excess of 20% are world-class. If you were putting together a checklist, you could start there. A great business must have cash operating margins greater than 20%. The next 'mile marker' you're looking for is something we call capital efficiency... This is another concept that, like profitability, is easy for most people to grasp. All you're trying to understand with this test is how much capital the company requires to maintain its facilities and grow its revenues. For example, oil and gas companies are notorious for spending every penny they make on drilling more holes and building more facilities. Their capital-spending programs leave little of their profits to be distributed to shareholders (often less than zero). We've developed a sophisticated way to measure in precise terms the capital efficiency of any business using several factors. [Editor's note: You can see our work for yourself in [the "Stansberry Indicators" section of our website]( which details this and three other proprietary indicators.] But you can use a much simpler equation as part of our four-part test of a great business. All you need to do is figure out whether the company in question distributes more capital back to shareholders... or spends more money "on itself" via capital-spending programs. A great business is able to distribute more profits to its shareholders than it consumes via capital investments... Coke, for example, spent $2.4 billion on capital investments in its own business in 2014. It spent $5.35 billion on dividends and $2.63 billion on share buybacks in the same period. You can see that Coke is spending far more on its shareholders than it spends on itself. (By the way, all of these numbers are labeled clearly on the company's cash flow statement.) What's powerful for investors about businesses like these is that you don't have to depend on a "greater fool" to come along and pay you more money for your shares than they're really worth. You don't need lower interest rates or a raging bull market to be successful. As these businesses grow, they're going to increase their payout amounts, year after year. It's the compounding effect of this growth that will make you wealthy – not the misguided actions of foolish investors. That's why Buffett says you should never buy a stock you wouldn't be happy to hold for a decade, even if the stock market was closed. The third part of our four-part litmus test for great businesses is 'return on invested capital'... (Here comes the jargon.) Yes, it's a mouthful. But I promise, with just a little practice, you'll be able to easily calculate this figure in your head. We use this metric because there's no more pure way of determining the value and the power of a company's "moat" – the degree to which the company is sheltered from profit-eliminating competition. The business school formula for determining the precise amount of invested capital is complex and requires several different numbers (and judgments about each of them). It's a pain. And there's a much easier way to get a ballpark figure – just add the total amount of a company's long-term debt and the total value of the company's equity capital. You'll find both numbers as simple line items on the balance sheet. As I write, Coke has $30 billion worth of equity capital and $42 billion worth of debt (adding the current position of long-term debt to long-term debt). So in our book, the company has invested capital of $72 billion. On this capital in 2014, the company reported $7 billion worth of net income, or "earnings." You'll find Coke's net income on [the stock's page on our website]( or you can look at its income statement directly. Once you have the numbers, you just do the basic math (seven divided by 72) to derive another percentage: 10%. As you'll see, this is where Coke falls a bit flat. The beverage market is ultra-competitive, and Coke's brand only provides a small measure of protection against competitive pricing. The last part of our great business test is also a bit "wonky" and will make you sound like a finance geek... It's called return on net tangible assets... This number gives you the best overall measure of the quality of any business. It's similar to the more commonly used ROE ("return on equity") with two important differences. First, measuring returns against net tangible assets takes goodwill out of the calculation. So companies with large amounts of goodwill (like companies with great brands) will typically show a much higher return. Second, this measure of quality rewards companies that can borrow most of the capital they need because their results aren't cyclical. Calculating this number is also really easy. All you have to do is compare this number with the company's net income for the last year. In Coke's case, net tangible assets total only $3.9 billion. Coke earned a profit equal to 179% of its net tangible assets – a truly outstanding figure. (Note: In some cases, a company will actually have more liabilities than it has tangible assets. In those cases, the math you see above no longer works because you can't divide using a negative net-tangible-assets figure. When that happens, we'll subtract out only the long-term portion of total liabilities. This provides a more meaningful number, while still measuring the company's ability to safely replace equity with debt in its capital structure.) Putting all of these factors together... 1. Cash operating profit margin: cash from operations/revenue (should be greater than 20%). Our test of business greatness starts with profits. How much money, in cash, does a business earn from its operations, expressed as a percentage of its sales? The higher the margins, the better. This tells us that the company owns high-quality brands and products, and its market position. We expect great businesses to produce cash operating margins of at least 20%. 2. Shareholder payout ratio: capital returned to shareholders/capital expenditures (should be greater than 1). Our second test is capital efficiency. Does the business produce substantial amounts of excess capital, and does management treat shareholders well? We test this by seeing whether shareholders receive at least as much capital each year as the business reinvests in itself. 3. Return on invested capital: net income/long-term debt + shareholder equity (should be greater than 20%). The third test is return on invested capital, which is the best measure of a company's moat. Here again, we would expect to see returns on invested capital of at least 20% to qualify as a great business. 4. Returns on net tangible assets: net income/net tangible assets (should be greater than 20%). Finally, our last measure of great companies – return on net tangible assets – is the single best overall measure of the quality of a business. It combines brand value, capital efficiency, the quality of earnings, etc. No surprise, we expect returns on net tangible assets in excess of 20% annually. Bonus No. 5: Share price multiple: enterprise value/EBITDA (ideally less than 10). Business quality is extremely important, but the stock price is equally important for investment outcomes. Our best advice is to value high-quality businesses by the amount of cash they earn before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. In finance jargon, this measure of profits is called "EBITDA." You can't use this measure with lower-quality businesses, but it works well for high-quality businesses because it allows you to quickly judge companies in different industries against each other. Now, let me show you a trick that will show you when to buy a high-quality company. We try to avoid paying more than 10 years' worth of EBITDA per share when we buy a business. We measure the cash earnings against the enterprise value of the business (the value of all of the shares and all of the debt, minus the cash in the business). But you don't need to do all of this work yourself... --------------------------------------------------------------- Editor's note: As I mentioned, subscribers today have access to our proprietary grades for thousands of businesses – our Stansberry Score – that provide an instant snapshot of the factors of a company's overall financial health that Porter describes in this essay. This composite score is derived from four proprietary indicators – Capital Efficiency, Valuation, Financial, and Momentum (if you're satisfied knowing simply whether a stock is rising or falling) – and is updated daily. You can find much more detail about each of these indicators and ratings under the "Tools" tab of our website. For example, here are [the Top 10 ranked companies by Stansberry Score today]( Please note that this list isn't an immediate buy recommendation for any of these stocks. Investors should not use these indicators to make final decisions, but to surface interesting ideas and check companies against the universe of other companies. We'll leave the recommendations to our editors who research the context and trends beyond these scores... though, indeed, some of these are open recommendations in our publications. But mainly, being familiar with this list and knowing the factors that go into it – along with today's classic essay from Porter – should give you more tools for how to properly value a business, consider when to buy a stock, and know what shares to avoid. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: [Where Stocks (and Gold) Are REALLY Going Next]( The man who nailed the recent market bottom within 24 hours names the exact day that 2024 could see its biggest move... and how you could double your money 10 times along the way, without touching stocks. [Learn more here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [Tech Insider: 'Watch Your Mailbox']( You could soon get a strange package from the federal government. It's part of the biggest overhaul to our money in decades and it could change your life (and retirement) in ways that will surprise you. [Full story here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- New 52-week highs (as of 11/15/23): Applied Materials (AMAT), Costco Wholesale (COST), Cintas (CTAS), Expedia (EXPE), ICON (ICLR), Intel (INTC), Motorola Solutions (MSI), Parker-Hannifin (PH), VanEck Semiconductor Fund (SMH), Sprott Physical Uranium Trust (U-U.TO), and Walmart (WMT). In today's mailbag, a subscriber shares how his investing journey began. We talked about this idea in [yesterday's edition](... Do you have a story to share? As always, send your notes to feedback@stansberryresearch.com. "I have also benefited from an educator's insight about the importance of learning economics. I have been studying the markets since the '60s (high school) and my parents encouraged me to learn as much as I could. I actually went to college for Economics 101 and psychology (which possibly paved the way for my interest). I didn't finish college due to the incredibly dull teaching of the subjects and no correlation to my interest in the stock markets! Thank you." – Subscriber Steve J. Regards, Porter Stansberry Baltimore, Maryland November 16, 2023 --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Top 10 Open Recommendations Top 10 highest-returning open positions across all Stansberry Research portfolios Stock Buy Date Return Publication Analyst MSFT Microsoft 11/11/10 1,275.8% Retirement Millionaire Doc MSFT Microsoft 02/10/12 1,168.4% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter ADP Automatic Data Processing 10/09/08 832.7% Extreme Value Ferris WRB W.R. Berkley 03/16/12 614.8% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 02/21/20 577.4% Stansberry Innovations Report Wade BRK.B Berkshire Hathaway 04/01/09 532.6% Retirement Millionaire Doc HSY Hershey 12/07/07 474.1% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter AFG American Financial 10/12/12 390.7% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter BTC/USD Bitcoin 01/16/20 310.9% Stansberry Innovations Report Wade TTD The Trade Desk 10/17/19 301.0% Stansberry Innovations Report Engel Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 10 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the model portfolio of any Stansberry Research publication. The buy date reflects when the editor recommended the investment in the listed publication, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if a security is still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber to that publication and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 10 Totals 4 Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter 3 Stansberry Innovations Report Engel/Wade 2 Retirement Millionaire Doc 1 Extreme Value Ferris --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 5 Crypto Capital Open Recommendations Top 5 highest-returning open positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Stock Buy Date Return Publication Analyst wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 12/07/18 1,416.9% Crypto Capital Wade ONE/USD Harmony 12/16/19 1,088.6% Crypto Capital Wade POLY/USD Polymath 05/19/20 1,081.5% Crypto Capital Wade MATIC/USD Polygon 02/25/21 868.8% Crypto Capital Wade BTC/USD Bitcoin 11/27/18 847.2% Crypto Capital Wade Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 5 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the Crypto Capital model portfolio. The buy date reflects when the recommendation was made, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if it's still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber and refer to the most recent portfolio. Stansberry Research Hall of Fame Top 10 all-time, highest-returning closed positions across all Stansberry portfolios Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Nvidia^* NVDA 5.96 years 1,466% Venture Tech. Lashmet Microsoft^ MSFT 12.74 years 1,185% Retirement Millionaire Doc Band Protocol crypto 0.32 years 1,169% Crypto Capital Wade Terra crypto 0.41 years 1,164% Crypto Capital Wade Inovio Pharma.^ INO 1.01 years 1,139% Venture Tech. Lashmet Seabridge Gold^ SA 4.20 years 995% Sjug Conf. Sjuggerud Frontier crypto 0.08 years 978% Crypto Capital Wade Binance Coin crypto 1.78 years 963% Crypto Capital Wade Nvidia^* NVDA 4.12 years 777% Venture Tech. Lashmet Intellia Therapeutics NTLA 1.95 years 775% Amer. Moonshots Root ^ These gains occurred with a partial position in the respective stocks. * The two partial positions in Nvidia were part of a single recommendation. Editor Dave Lashmet closed the first leg of the position in November 2016 for a gain of about 108%. Then, he closed the second leg in July 2020 for a 777% return. And finally, in May 2022, he booked a 1,466% return on the final leg. Subscribers who followed his advice on Nvidia could've recorded a total weighted average gain of more than 600%. You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice. © 2023 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

EDM Keywords (319)

zero yesterday year wrote writers worth world work words willing whole whether website wealthy ways way want view value using use universe understand type trying try trick tools today time three thousands thing test tell talked surprise suggestions successful subtract subscription subscribers subscriber subjects studying story stocks stock still stansberry spends speak something someone skills simply similar show sheltered shares shareholders shared share sent see security says sales sadly rising revenues revenue return retirement results responsibility research requires republished refer redistribution recorded recommendations recommendation recommend receiving received readers read ratings questions quantify quality qualify puts put purchase published publications publication psychology provides provide protection proof promise profits profit products probably price powerful power position porter poor plug period percentage people pay part pain paid page one nvidia numbers number notorious notes note need nailed must much mouthful money momentum moat metric message member measure maybe math markets margins man makes make maintain mainly mailbox mailbag made looking look lives list likely life liabilities let leave least learned learn knowledge knowing know kinds judgments involves investors investor investment investing invest interest integrated insight information indicators increase importance idea hope holes hold higher helpful head hard happy happens growth grow greater grasp gold going goes goal go give get generates gasoline gain fraction form followed follow folks find finally figure feedback familiar falling factors facilities expensive excess example exactly every evaluate essay equity endorse employees eliminate educator editors editor edition easy earnings earn drilling dividends divide distributed distribute discipline digest developed develop determining details detail desert derived depend degree decades debt date crossing could correlation context complex compare company companies comes college coke closed checklist certain cash cases capital calculation buy businesses business building buffett brought breaks brand borrow booked book better believe based back avoid around amount amortization always also along allows allow advice address add actually acting account access able ability 90 72 600 23 2015 2014 20 179 108

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

28/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.