Newsletter Subject

Keeping My Promise After Four Years

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Fri, Nov 3, 2023 10:09 PM

Email Preheader Text

Keeping my promise after four years... U.S. bankruptcies are on the rise again... Unwinding the bigg

Keeping my promise after four years... U.S. bankruptcies are on the rise again... Unwinding the biggest mega-bubble in all recorded history... WeWork is headed for bankruptcy... Another familiar name could soon join it... An unprecedented moment in financial history... I can't predict – but I can help you prepare... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Digest] Keeping my promise after four years... U.S. bankruptcies are on the rise again... Unwinding the biggest mega-bubble in all recorded history... WeWork is headed for bankruptcy... Another familiar name could soon join it... An unprecedented moment in financial history... I can't predict – but I can help you prepare... --------------------------------------------------------------- Today, I (Dan Ferris) am keeping a promise that I made four years ago... You see, [in the October 25, 2019 Digest]( I wrote about beleaguered coworking-space operator WeWork (WE). At the time, news just broke that Japan-based conglomerate SoftBank planned to take control of WeWork. As part of the deal, WeWork co-founder Adam Neumann was set to get a fat paycheck and ride off into the sunset. (I always tell you that we can't predict the future.) But more importantly, in that Digest, I made a promise to readers... I'll keep writing about WeWork until it's gone, and probably long after that. Here's the thing... WeWork is almost gone. So in today's Digest, I'm keeping my promise to you... I'll share all the details of WeWork's impending demise. I'll tell you about another familiar name that will likely soon go bankrupt as well. And finally, I'll discuss what investors like us can do during these unprecedented and unnatural times in the financial markets. In that October 2019 Digest, I made an important point about WeWork... [WeWork is] a pristine example of the nonsense that prevails when investors get excited about risky, awful businesses that light money on fire. I've occasionally pointed out that all the best investors are more interested in negative action (what not to do) than positive action (what to buy today). It can sometimes be difficult to get that point across to subscribers who think they're paying us for stock picks. Yes, if you're a subscriber, you're paying us at Stansberry for stock, bond, and options recommendations... But you're also paying us to have more insight than the folks on the other side of those recommendations. You're paying us to know what to avoid, too. I hope you listened to the part about "negative action" – what not to do... After all, the unwinding of the biggest mega-bubble in all recorded history is picking up speed. And as investors, we've had to dance around a lot of pitfalls in recent years. For one thing, a lot of companies are going bankrupt... Market-intelligence firm S&P Global recently reported that 516 U.S. companies have gone bankrupt so far this year (as of September 30). That rivals the first three quarters of 2020, when 518 U.S. companies went bankrupt. So when it comes to bankruptcies, we're near "shutting down the entire global economy" numbers. Great. Other than that year, it's the highest number of U.S. bankruptcies in the first three quarters since 2010. Back then, the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression was still working its way through the economy. That year, 657 companies went bankrupt in the first three quarters. And 2010 finished with 827 bankruptcies. At least 17 companies with more than $1 billion in liabilities have gone bankrupt this year. Teeth-straightening service SmileDirectClub tops the list. It filed for bankruptcy at the end of September. Other familiar names on the list include [99-year-old trucking company Yellow]( [home-goods retailer Bed Bath & Beyond]( and [Silicon Valley-based bank SVB Financial](. In its most recent report, S&P Global cited the Federal Reserve's "higher for longer" interest-rate policy as a factor that added to "economic pressures." In other words, a lot of companies can't handle normal rates. And if not for four decades of declining rates and more than a decade of 5,000-year-low borrowing costs... They might've never existed at all. That brings us to the latest developments with WeWork... Again, it's known as a coworking company. That just means it leases expensive buildings in big cities for terms of 10 years or more. Then, it rents out office space in those buildings for as short as a month – mostly to startup companies and individuals. In its early days, the company offered a fun atmosphere – with free beer and nice furniture. It was a cool company, with an equally cool co-founder in Neumann... [In the past]( Neumann charismatically opined that he aspired to become the world's first trillionaire or its president (yes, of the whole world). He also liked to smoke a lot of weed and drink a lot of tequila. Heck, I must admit... Even I liked Neumann's mojo at first. Who doesn't like a guy with big dreams, who attracts a lot of money, and gets plenty of press coverage, which then gives him the platform to express his desire to rule everything – starting with his real estate empire? Neumann was like a young, modern version of Donald Trump. His version was just updated with more hair, trippy modern values, drugs, and alcohol. Neumann's vibe is evident in WeWork's 2019 filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, when it planned to go public. In all capital letters, the document began... WE DEDICATE THIS TO THE ENERGY OF WE – GREATER THAN ANY ONE OF US BUT INSIDE EACH OF US. A few pages later, the mission statement included this gem... Our mission is to elevate the world's consciousness. I bet you've never heard a landlord talk like that before! (After Neumann left the company, WeWork replaced the mission statement with something less ethereal.) Now, one thing I need to make clear... Extreme eccentricity in a businessperson is best served with success and growth – and ultimately, profitability. That makes the eccentric vibe seem like some kind of magic. "Weird guy makes a ton of money for himself and his investors while running a wonderful business" is a great story. We've heard it many times over the years – Warren Buffett, Steve Jobs, Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, you get the picture. But if you light billions of dollars of investor capital on fire, all that weirdness turns to red flags in the rearview mirror. (With that said, in our current environment, even Neumann will never appear to be quite as clueless as the investors who gave him all the money.) Neumann has been a godawful disaster as a businessman... The COVID-19 pandemic supercharged the "work from home" migration. And that shift hurt WeWork's core business. But you can't blame the company's failure on that move alone... After all, the company has reported operating losses for its entire 13-year existence. Its operating losses from its 2010 founding through this past June totaled about $16 billion. As far as anyone can tell, it was never a viable business. And yet, as the Wall Street Journal reported yesterday... WeWork's lowercase, serif-font logo sprang up on buildings in more than 100 cities from Beijing to São Paulo. It became the largest private tenant in both New York and London and built enough desks to fit the population of Baltimore. WeWork peaked in early 2019, when tech speculator Masayoshi Son's SoftBank gave Neumann more than $10 billion in funding. That move raised WeWork's valuation from $17 billion to $47 billion. It was always an absurd number. And it started falling later that year... By early November 2019, WeWork's valuation had plunged to less than $5 billion. It was down nearly 90% in about 10 months. And that happened even before it went public. That finally happened two years later... On October 21, 2021, WeWork went public with the help of a special purpose acquisition company ("SPAC"). I can't believe it ever reached that point. And I doubt it could've gone public without the enormous SPAC boom in 2020 and 2021 – a classic sign of a massive mega-bubble top... If the Fed didn't push rates to zero in response to the pandemic-related shutdown of the global economy, WeWork probably would've gone "gentle into that good night" a lot sooner. The Fed and the government's massive stimulus efforts helped do what all bubbles do... It lit a lot more investor capital on fire. In other words, the bailouts magnified the losses – which punished the masses even more. WeWork, some of the worst garbage in the stock market, had already topped out by then. Today, it's down more than 99% since it went public at a split-adjusted $392 per share. Now, the Wall Street Journal reports that WeWork could file for bankruptcy as early as next week... The company's latest balance sheet showed $18.7 billion in total liabilities. That figure included $13.3 billion in long-term lease obligations and $2.9 billion in long-term debt. Meanwhile, since WeWork's founding, investors have put nearly $30 billion of capital into the company (most of which has already gone to money heaven). Three members of WeWork's board of directors quit in August. And notably, four new directors with experience in complex restructuring transactions replaced them. WeWork missed an interest payment on October 2. That triggered a 30-day grace period. And on Tuesday, the company said bondholders were giving it an extra seven days. The clock is ticking... The extra seven-day period is up next week. So sooner or later, depending on the bondholders' patience, WeWork will need to either pay up or file for bankruptcy protection. Of course, as we discussed earlier, WeWork isn't alone in the bankruptcy line this year. It won't be the last company to die in 2023. And you might even recognize another name... Another one of my favorite Digest targets looks to be close to bankruptcy as well... I'm talking about movie-theater operator AMC Entertainment (AMC). Risk-management and credit-monitoring company Creditsafe said Wednesday that AMC's debt-to-equity ratio and late payments could be the warning signs before its demise. AMC's latest balance sheet showed negative $2.6 billion in shareholder equity. That means the company's liabilities are $2.6 billion more than its assets. It has $4.8 billion in debt. That's an insane debt-to-equity ratio of negative 186%. An extremely negative debt-to-equity ratio like that is a classic sign of high financial risk. Creditsafe also said AMC has gotten a lot slower at paying its bills. As MarketWatch reported on Wednesday... AMC's Days Beyond Terms (DBT), which is how many days past payment terms it typically takes to pay invoices, also deserves attention, according to Creditsafe... The credit monitoring company says AMC's DBTs jumped from 9 days in March to 14 in April. They then dropped slightly over the next two months, before spiking drastically to 21 by August. Typically, a lower DBT score indicates that a company is a more reliable payer. I couldn't help but notice another item on AMC's balance sheet... Today, the company's property is valued at $1.6 billion. Most of that value is in leasehold improvements, equipment, furniture, and fixtures. Let's do a little bit of "back of the envelope" analysis to simplify things. Specifically, we'll divide the property value by the total number of AMC theaters – both leased and owned. According to AMC's 2022 annual report, the company owned or leased a total of 865 theaters at the end of that year. At $1.6 billion in total property value, each theater would be worth roughly $1.9 million. At the end of 2017, AMC reported a total of 1,014 owned or leased theaters. They were valued at around $3.1 billion on the balance sheet that year – or about $3.1 million per theater. During that same period, AMC's revenue fell from nearly $5.1 billion to about $3.9 billion. It stopped making consistent profits in 2016. Since 2017, it has generated roughly $7.4 billion in net losses. And attendance dropped from 1.2 billion in 2017 to 708 million in 2022. Putting it all together... Revenue is down nearly 25% over the past six years. The company has lost billions of dollars in that span. The amount of folks going to its theaters is down more than 40%. And its per-theater property value fell about 39%. I can't help but wonder if AMC's accountants have been conservative enough in valuing the theaters. And then, I think about what would happen to the value of all those leasehold improvements, furniture, and equipment in a liquidation bankruptcy. If AMC had to liquidate the assets, it would be a bloodbath. Like WeWork, AMC is a furnace that burns cash. It's not a viable business. I suspect some of the individual theaters do well. I assume they can continue operating for several years. But many of them aren't successful. And unless they start printing money in the lobby, they'll unlikely ever be profitable again. AMC's bankruptcy might not be imminent like WeWork. But it's inevitable. As I implied above, the lowest interest rates in history led to WeWork's birth... Neumann and his partners founded the company in 2010. That was only two years after the Fed took rates to zero. Real estate loans and leases hinge on interest rates. Low rates can seem to justify buying or leasing real estate properties at exorbitant prices. But without extremely low rates, it would've been a lot harder to convince a lender or building owner that it could pay for expensive long-term leases by offering short-term (and usually temporary) office space for a bunch of startups and lone entrepreneurs. Likewise, AMC would've gone bankrupt by now if its "meme stock" status and zero-percent interest rates didn't bail out the company. And of course, its meme-stock status was a direct result of the Fed shoving rates back down to zero during the pandemic. That move made it impossible for anyone to earn safe income on their savings. And in turn, it encouraged speculative gambling on stocks like AMC. AMC would've had to pay much higher interest rates on its debt. That would've pressured its operating results. And perhaps, it would've taken the company into a position of generating consistent net losses even sooner than 2017. The company itself might still be around in one form or another. But in that environment instead of what really happened, its equity would've gone to zero at least once by now. You know what happened instead... Rampant speculation turned what would've likely been a tame short-covering rally into the mother of all short squeezes. AMC soared from about $20 per share in January 2021, to an intraday high of nearly $650 in June of that year. That's a gain of more than 3,000%. And most of that surge occurred in just about 20 trading sessions starting in May. The remarkable ascent was a bright, shiny object that mesmerized the "apes" who became AMC's hyper-loyal shareholders. They poured boatloads of money into the stock without understanding how badly the business had already deteriorated. Management saw an opportunity to raise money by issuing new shares. And it pounced... AMC's share count rose roughly ninefold from the third quarter of 2020 to the second quarter of 2021. (That's less than one year.) The company raised more than $2.1 billion in total by selling both new stock and new bonds. But of course, what was good for the company and its well-paid executives was terrible for shareholders... The stock has fallen roughly 99% since its mid-June 2021 meme-stock high. The apes have lost nearly everything. AMC's management team sold them shares, kept its paychecks intact, and destroyed the apes' wealth as tens of billions of dollars in market cap evaporated. None of it would've likely happened without the extreme level of speculation that occurred in 2020 and 2021. And I don't believe the market would've gone "absolutely ape" without the massive central bank and government stimulus that occurred after the lockdowns. To be fair, though... By 2020, the excesses and misallocations of capital of more than a decade of record-low rates were already there. The post-pandemic speculative excess was simply the beginning of the end – the final "blow off" top that has signaled the death of all the big mega-bubbles. Now, you might be wondering why I go through all this stuff again and again and again... It's simple... We're living through an unprecedented moment in financial history. We just experienced 40 years of falling rates followed by more than a decade of zero rates. That period warped our entire world out of all recognizable shape. But now, rates are returning to a normal level after the Fed hiked them at the fastest pace since 1980. It's like we just stepped back on land after bobbing around in the ocean on a tiny boat for a few weeks. We got thrown around. And we won't be able to keep our balance for a while. Companies like WeWork and AMC are so symptomatic of this era that I'll keep following them every step of the way. I'll track them both to their ultimate, inevitable failure. With WeWork, that's a promise I made four years ago in the Digest. And now, it looks like the company's death could come as soon as next week. But unfortunately, it's not the end of the entire saga of this mega-bubble. Because of the unprecedented and unnatural turn of events in the market (and its all-pervasive effect), I doubt many investors are ready for what comes next. I can't predict what that will be. But understanding how different the current moment is from the past four decades is a great start to helping us all prepare for what's ahead. That preparation will help us preserve and grow our wealth – whatever the future brings. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: ['Slowly, Then All at Once... This Is How Trust in Government – and Your Life Savings – Disappears']( Porter Stansberry just returned after three years with a big warning about 2023's historic bond-market meltdown... and what's coming next. [Click here for details](. --------------------------------------------------------------- ['I Found the Answer to Retirement']( A subscriber from New York came forward with his unique story of how he retired early and worry-free WITHOUT stocks... thanks to ONE single idea that anyone can use. Now he sees 16%-plus annual returns with legal protections... and he NEVER has to worry about another market crash again. [Get the full story right here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- New 52-week highs (as of 11/2/23): Cameco (CCJ), CyberArk Software (CYBR), Cheniere Energy (LNG), Shell (SHEL), and Walmart (WMT). Today's mailbag features feedback on [yesterday's Digest]( which was a classic essay from Stansberry Research founder Porter Stansberry. As a reminder, Porter is back for the first time in three years. And he's sharing a new video message with all our readers and subscribers. The video covers the trouble he sees for the economy in 2024, how we got here, and how he suggests you prepare for what's to come. [You can check it out here – for free](. And as always, if you have a comment or question, you can send it to feedback@stansberryresearch.com. "I'm proud to say I've been with Stansberry Research long enough to have read the original publication of [yesterday's] missive. "I miss Porter's commentary. This was part of the start of my personal education on economics and finance." – Subscriber Warren F. "Welcome back, Porter! We've missed you!" – Subscriber Michael D. "Just a note to say it was great to hear from Porter again." – Subscriber Ed E. Good investing, Dan Ferris Eagle Point, Oregon November 3, 2023 --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Top 10 Open Recommendations Top 10 highest-returning open positions across all Stansberry Research portfolios Stock Buy Date Return Publication Analyst MSFT Microsoft 11/11/10 1,234.4% Retirement Millionaire Doc MSFT Microsoft 02/10/12 1,096.6% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter ADP Automatic Data Processing 10/09/08 793.7% Extreme Value Ferris WRB W.R. Berkley 03/16/12 607.9% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 02/21/20 577.4% Stansberry Innovations Report Wade BRK.B Berkshire Hathaway 04/01/09 518.8% Retirement Millionaire Doc HSY Hershey 12/07/07 458.9% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter AFG American Financial 10/12/12 382.7% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter TTD The Trade Desk 10/17/19 320.0% Stansberry Innovations Report Engel BTC/USD Bitcoin 01/16/20 303.5% Stansberry Innovations Report Wade Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 10 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the model portfolio of any Stansberry Research publication. The buy date reflects when the editor recommended the investment in the listed publication, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if a security is still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber to that publication and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 10 Totals 4 Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter 3 Stansberry Innovations Report Engel/Wade 2 Retirement Millionaire Doc 1 Extreme Value Ferris --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 5 Crypto Capital Open Recommendations Top 5 highest-returning open positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Stock Buy Date Return Publication Analyst wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 12/07/18 1,416.9% Crypto Capital Wade POLY/USD Polymath 05/19/20 1,104.4% Crypto Capital Wade ONE-USD Harmony 12/16/19 1,072.9% Crypto Capital Wade BTC/USD Bitcoin 11/27/18 825.5% Crypto Capital Wade MATIC/USD Polygon 02/25/21 797.6% Crypto Capital Wade Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 5 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the Crypto Capital model portfolio. The buy date reflects when the recommendation was made, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if it's still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Hall of Fame Top 10 all-time, highest-returning closed positions across all Stansberry portfolios Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Nvidia^* NVDA 5.96 years 1,466% Venture Tech. Lashmet Microsoft^ MSFT 12.74 years 1,185% Retirement Millionaire Doc Band Protocol crypto 0.32 years 1,169% Crypto Capital Wade Terra crypto 0.41 years 1,164% Crypto Capital Wade Inovio Pharma.^ INO 1.01 years 1,139% Venture Tech. Lashmet Seabridge Gold^ SA 4.20 years 995% Sjug Conf. Sjuggerud Frontier crypto 0.08 years 978% Crypto Capital Wade Binance Coin crypto 1.78 years 963% Crypto Capital Wade Nvidia^* NVDA 4.12 years 777% Venture Tech. Lashmet Intellia Therapeutics NTLA 1.95 years 775% Amer. Moonshots Root ^ These gains occurred with a partial position in the respective stocks. * The two partial positions in Nvidia were part of a single recommendation. Editor Dave Lashmet closed the first leg of the position in November 2016 for a gain of about 108%. Then, he closed the second leg in July 2020 for a 777% return. And finally, in May 2022, he booked a 1,466% return on the final leg. Subscribers who followed his advice on Nvidia could've recorded a total weighted average gain of more than 600%. You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice. © 2023 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

EDM Keywords (365)

zero yet yesterday year wrote writers would worry world work words wondering wonder whole wework well weeks weed way vibe version valuing valued value valuation use us updated unwinding unprecedented unless unfortunately understanding turn tuesday trust trouble triggered track total top ton today ticking think theaters terrible terms tens tell talking taken symptomatic suspect sunset suggests suggestions successful success subscription subscribers subscriber stuff stock still startups start stansberry speed speculation speak span sooner soon sometimes smoke simply simple signaled side short sharing shareholders share set september sent send selling sees seem see security securities say savings said running rivals rise ride returning returned retirement responsibility response rents refer redistribution recorded recommendations recommendation recommend receiving received ready readers read rates quite questions question punished published publication proud property promise profitable prevails pressured prepare preparation predict position porter population point plunged platform planned pitfalls picture picking perhaps paying paulo part pandemic opportunity one ocean occurred nvidia note nonsense never neumann need must mother money mojo missive mission missed misallocations might mesmerized means may market march many makes make made lot losses london lockdowns lobby living lit listened list liquidate likely like liabilities less lender least leased learned learn land known know kind keeping keep june investors investment interested insight inside information inevitable individuals impossible importantly implied hope higher help heard hear headed guy growth grow greater great government gotten got good gone go giving gives get gem gave gain future furnace funding free found followed folks fit first fire finally filed file feedback fed far failure factor express experience excesses evident events era equipment energy endorse end employees elevate economy economics early drink doubt dollars divide discuss digest difficult different die details destroyed desire dedicate decade debt death date creditsafe course could convince consciousness company companies commentary comment comes come clueless closed close clock check capital businessperson businessman business bunch buildings bubbles broke booked board blame bills billions bet believe beijing beginning become became based bankruptcy bankruptcies balance bail badly back avoid august attracts assume assets aspired around april apes anyone answer another amount amc always already alone ahead advice address added acting accountants account able 600 40 39 21 2024 2023 2021 2020 2017 2010 14 108

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.