Newsletter Subject

Bank Regulations Couldn't Come at a Worse Time

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Sun, Oct 1, 2023 12:37 PM

Email Preheader Text

In today's Masters Series, originally from the September 27 issue of the free Altimetry Daily Author

In today's Masters Series, originally from the September 27 issue of the free Altimetry Daily Authority e-letter, Joel details how the Federal Reserve is interfering with the banking system... explains why this meddling will likely lead to disaster... and talks about how investors can prepare for this looming chaos... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Master Series] Editor's note: [A financial storm is approaching](... The Federal Reserve has recently been interfering with the banking system behind the scenes. And according to Joel Litman – founder and chief investment strategist of our corporate affiliate Altimetry – the Fed's meddling signals a major catastrophe is looming in the market right now... In today's Masters Series, originally from the September 27 issue of the free Altimetry Daily Authority e-letter, Joel details how the Federal Reserve is interfering with the banking system... explains why this meddling will likely lead to disaster... and talks about how investors can prepare for this looming chaos... --------------------------------------------------------------- Bank Regulations Couldn't Come at a Worse Time By Joel Litman, chief investment strategist, Altimetry The Federal Reserve is messing with the banking system once again... The last time regulators made such a move was in late 2007. Indeed, it's easy to think of the Great Recession as no more than greedy banks selling risky home loans and complex financial instruments. That was certainly part of it. Banks, driven by the allure of easy profits, had recklessly given out mortgages to individuals with questionable creditworthiness. They had to create new kinds of loans like "NINJA" (which stands for "no income, no job, no assets") to keep selling more products. In other words, banks were lending to folks who had no way of repaying their loans. When many of these borrowers defaulted, the so-called "subprime bubble" burst, sending shock waves through the financial world. However, during this period, there was a bigger underlying issue for banks: "mark to market" accounting. Basically, mark-to-market accounting requires companies to value their assets and liabilities at their current market price, rather than their historical cost. Stocks "mark up" and "mark down" constantly throughout the day. (This is what's referred to as "marking.") Meanwhile, assets like houses usually only change their "mark" every few years when they change hands. In 2008, the Fed mandated that banks use mark-to-market accounting. Unfortunately, this caused them to mark down the loans they had given to subprime borrowers. And as loan values fell, folks began to panic... Several big banks faced old-fashioned bank runs, investors ran for the hills, and we faced our worst bear market of the century. As I'll explain today, the Fed is trying to meddle with the banking system once again. And despite its good intentions, it may actually be setting us up for an even deeper credit crisis... --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Link: ['All Signals Are Flashing Red!']( The Pentagon consultant who predicted the 2008 and 2020 market crashes is now stepping forward with another big warning: "This next crisis will affect $50 trillion and wipe out HUNDREDS of stocks. You don't need to panic... but you DO need to prepare – immediately." [Find the full story here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- The Fed is tightening reserve requirements... Back in July, the Fed's Board of Governors proposed that America's biggest banks (those with at least $100 billion in assets) raise their capital requirements by about 20%. In essence, that means they need to keep 20% more cash relative to their loan portfolios. This will be an absolute nightmare for the credit market... especially given that banks are already tightening their lending. We can see this by looking at the Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey ("SLOOS"). The SLOOS is a quarterly poll conducted by the Fed to gauge the health of the banking sector. It asks loan officers if their lending rules have tightened, eased, or stayed the same over the past three months. The survey's results also help the central bank gauge business and household demand for loans. This information offers a snapshot of the economy's financial well-being. And it can hint at future economic trends... which helps both policymakers and investors make informed decisions. In the second quarter, 51% of banks tightened their lending standards. That's about as high as it gets without triggering a recession... As you can see, any time the percentage of banks tightening lending standards has topped 50%, we've entered a recession (as marked by the areas shaded in gray). Banks pulled back on lending to protect themselves from losses. They were concerned about financial stability and the health of the broader economy... Thus, they prioritized safeguarding their assets and maintaining liquidity. Now, the Fed is proposing boosting capital requirements for big banks – and that's bad news for banks and borrowers alike. You see, for banks, higher capital mandates mean they need to hold a greater proportion of their assets as capital. This can reduce their ability to lend and potentially decrease their profitability. For borrowers, a tighter lending environment can translate to less available credit. It also means more stringent loan-approval criteria... and possibly higher interest rates. Collectively, these factors can stifle economic growth. Banks end up becoming more risk averse, and consumers and businesses face challenges in accessing needed capital – which could potentially lead to defaults. This means that the amount of banks tightening their lending standards will just keep climbing. A potential credit crunch is right around the corner... As we showed you, banks are aggressively tightening lending standards today. And increased capital requirements could make that even worse... Though the Fed is ultimately trying to protect the economy, its proposal will likely only force a bigger credit crunch and a major refinancing issue. It will set us up for a significant crash and market panic. Regards, Joel Litman --------------------------------------------------------------- Editor's note: The Fed insists the worst is over... But every warning sign on Wall Street is telling a different story. If you don't want to get blindsided by the next market crash, you must listen to Joel's latest warning... He recently revealed the crisis that will affect a tidal wave of money – including hundreds of stocks, some of which you probably own. Plus, he shared the No. 1 way to protect your portfolio from this upcoming market disaster. [Learn more here](... --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Link: [Can Kevin Kisner Collect $4,000 in 60 Seconds?]( Today, you can tune into a Real Money Demo featuring a professional athlete who will attempt to collect $4,000 in 60 seconds by selling put options. Will he succeed or lose money? Watch his transaction on Costco Wholesale (COST) to find out – [including how to begin using this strategy yourself](. --------------------------------------------------------------- You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You're receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized investment advice. © 2023 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.