Newsletter Subject

Two Things Can Be True

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Mon, Sep 18, 2023 10:11 PM

Email Preheader Text

What gives on the bullish and bearish takes?... An answer you deserve to have... Two things can be t

What gives on the bullish and bearish takes?... An answer you deserve to have... Two things can be true... What matters more than being 'right'... We have a lot of products... Video: Bubba sounds off... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Digest] What gives on the bullish and bearish takes?... An answer you deserve to have... Two things can be true... What matters more than being 'right'... We have a lot of products... Video: Bubba sounds off... --------------------------------------------------------------- Bullish or bearish?... Today, I (Corey McLaughlin) want to cover a good question that came in from a new subscriber over the weekend... It's a topic that we've covered before, and we expect to do so again. So if you've been with us at Stansberry Research for a while, it may be old hat to you. But it's nevertheless important. Diana S. wrote in after reading my colleague [Dan Ferris' latest terrific Friday essay]( recalling his early days and education as an investor... I'm a new subscriber. I'm trying to reconcile the message in this email about Ferris' expectation of lower stock returns over the next several years with [the bull market predictions of Matt McCall and Brett Eversole](... I understand that Matt and Brett are part of Stansberry Research. How can you justify expressing completely opposite points of view within your organization? What's going on? I would really like to know. Diana, welcome, and thanks for writing in. You bring up a very good question that deserves an answer. In short, yes, you will find our editors and analysts do have different opinions. We will not run away from this idea. You probably saw that in that combination of Dan's Friday essay followed by Brett's Masters Series essays over the weekend, which gave reasons for why he's recommending buying stocks today. I'll get the short answer out of the way... Different perspectives on the market and having analysts with varying investing strategies is actually a large part of what makes our business go... Not only does it make for various offerings for subscribers, but it prevents the onset of dreaded groupthink that can turn an organization – or an individual investor – off track. In the markets, like in life, hearing different views is an invaluable thing. (I still believe this is the case in the long run, even though it seems nobody working in Washington, D.C., or most people in mainstream media agree with the concept today.) Our editors actually talk to each other and debate ideas... Even if they disagree on a market outlook, they'll engage about their disagreements. I've seen it with my own two eyes. As I wrote in a September 2021 Digest on this topic, titled "[Why Being 'Right' Isn't the Most Important Thing]( around the time of a "Bulls vs. Bears" event featuring Dan, Stansberry Research co-founder Steve Sjuggerud, and partner Dr. David "Doc" Eifrig... The idea allows each of our editors and analysts to express their views and share their recommendations with you, our dear subscribers... And we know you all often have different goals, expectations, risk tolerances, and generally different mindsets. Not everyone agrees with everything 100% of the time. Steve, for example, has had success in his career using sentiment and trends to time the markets, including calling for higher stock prices at times when it wasn't popular to do so. Meanwhile, Doc has done well for his subscribers by recommending shares of high-quality companies at good prices that you can hold for years or decades. And Dan is a value-oriented investor... He seeks to recommend shares of companies that the market isn't properly pricing. These three different strategies use different analytical approaches. Sometimes, all three editors reach different conclusions... Sometimes, they come to the same one. At the same time... If you stick around with us, I think you'll find our editors and analysts actually share more in common and aren't as "opposite" as it may sound. The point referenced about Dan expecting "lower stock returns" overlooks a key idea within there... He still expects stocks to generate some kind of returns in the future, just perhaps not as large as some folks may have become accustomed to in a lower-interest-rate era. Meanwhile, yes, Brett and Matt think we're at the start of a bull market in which stock prices rise over the long run. Both things can be true. Stocks can go up, but maybe not by as much annually as they have in the previous 15 years or so. Dan referenced this whole topic on our Investor Hour podcast recently... He pointed out he recommends stocks in his Extreme Value and Ferris Report newsletters just like Brett and Matt do in theirs. They just come about it from different views, using different strategies... They talk about buying or selling different kinds of stocks, and for different reasons, so you will hear different things from them. It's the same reason why you'll hear different analyses and conclusions from Crypto Capital editor Eric Wade, who researches and writes about cryptocurrencies, than you will from our Mike DiBiase, who covers distressed corporate bonds in Stansberry's Credit Opportunities. They are far from the same thing. The more important thing... As Dan wrote on Friday... The market might go up, down, or sideways from here. I have no idea. Neither do you. And neither does your financial adviser. It's pointless to even try to predict what will happen. No one knows the future. So, let me turn to what is more important than being "right." The most important point of this discussion is to make sure how you are investing and what assets you are buying or selling align with what you want to accomplish, the risks you're willing to take, and your timeline for success. If you've got all that squared away in a plan that you feel comfortable with, great. You're way ahead of most people. But if you're not sure about anything I just referred to, as we shared in that 2021 essay, take some time to think about it... You can only answer these questions by first determining what your goals are for your investments. Most folks simply never do this, though... It means thinking about your time horizon, how much growth you hope to attain, and determining the right portfolio allocation – stocks, bonds, gold, or cryptocurrencies, for instance – that works for you. Here are just two examples of ideas to consider... Are you relatively young and looking to build wealth? Or are you near or in retirement and looking to preserve wealth? Depending on your viewpoint, you may want to own different assets... or have a different risk tolerance... or use a different exit strategy than your neighbor or some talking head on TV. To anyone who may have just found us... I'm confident we have newsletters and trading advisories for virtually every goal that an individual investor can imagine or want. Check out our lineup at [StansberryResearch.com](. That's why we're able to offer things like 100%-satisfaction guarantees like Brett and Matt did in their latest video presentation, in which they shared how to access their top stock picks today and their very best research. If for whatever reason, folks aren't satisfied with what they receive, they can call us within 30 days and receive 100% of the money spent back in the form of Stansberry credit. This credit is good for an entire year and can be applied to our other 20-plus research products. So to turn back to our original question from Diana S. about Dan versus Brett and Matt... In particular, as we mentioned in that 2021 essay, Dan takes a value-oriented approach, with the idea of buying shares of undervalued companies to build and protect wealth over the long term. So, in that vein, you may hear takes from Dan in his regular Friday Digests about distortions in the market or warnings about companies that are certainly not good values today... and what ills their mere presence in the market could mean... But even these bearish takes don't mean that Dan recommends against owning stocks... far from it. But you will probably read or hear something different [in Brett and Matt's work]( than Dan's in general. And that's just fine. Stansberry Research's role is to hire people who are worth listening to, not to tell them what they should say. All of our editors and analysts are trying to present the best possible information to their subscribers. They share our underlying Stansberry Research philosophy of providing you with the information they'd want to receive if they were in your shoes. And subscribers get to choose whose arguments sound most compelling... whether they're more interested in making the safest bets or the most potentially lucrative ones... or which assets interest them. I hope this helps clarify. Thanks for finding us, and do stick around. Bubba Horwitz on Oil, Inflation, Jobs, and More Financial pundit Todd "Bubba" Horwitz joins our editor-at-large Daniela Cambone to talk about the recent rise in oil prices, inflation, jobs, and more... They begin talking about the U.S. facing the biggest shortage in oil supply since 1985, then get off to the races... [Click here]( to watch this video right now. For more free video content, [subscribe to our Stansberry Research YouTube channel](... and don't forget to follow us on [Facebook]( [Instagram]( [LinkedIn]( and [X, the platform formerly known as Twitter](. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: [U.S. 'Shadow Banks' About to Blow Up Again?]( America's biggest economic calamities (1907, 1929, 2007, etc.) all start in the same spot – an unregulated sector one expert says is about to blow up again. Learn the four steps you can take today to protect yourself, your savings, and your investments. [Full details here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [His System Isolated Nvidia – Here's His NEXT Buy]( Marc Chaikin's stock-picking system isolated Nvidia before its massive bull run this year. Now, it just flashed "BUY" on a new AI company that no one is talking about yet. It's not a household name... but Marc predicts it could quickly double or triple from here. [Click here for the name and ticker](. --------------------------------------------------------------- New 52-week highs (as of 9/15/23): Cameco (CCJ), Denison Mines (DNN), Omega Healthcare Investors (OHI), Sprouts Farmers Market (SFM), Sprott Physical Uranium Trust (U-U.TO), Global X Uranium Fund (URA), Sprott Uranium Miners Fund (URNM), and Energy Fuels (UUUU). In today's mailbag, more discussion about labor unions... and another observation about [Dan Ferris' latest Friday essay]( and [Brett Eversole's Saturday Masters Series essay](... Do you have a comment or question? As always, e-mail us at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. "If [subscriber John M.] believes union wages will be the driving force behind some kind of inflation he doesn't have much real-world insight. Unions typically work through contracts that have been struck several years before new demands come out. Many times they work on expired contracts to the benefit of many employers. "Unions have many times taken cuts so companies can try to stay in business (see Yellow Trucking for recent information there) when a Union threatens to strike it really is the last thing they want to do. Unions get bad raps and sometimes it's warranted but labeling them all as greedy and only looking for money isn't the full story... "While I disagree with many things with unions and their politics, [if not for] what they do for real workers and the people they stand for, we would still be in a feudal system. Nobody hears anything about unions until they go on strike and then they are greedy." – Subscriber James S. "The Stansberry Digest offers readers different opinions from day to day. Often the topic covered offers solid fact-based opinions on where the author thinks we are and what direction they think that our economy is headed. "Reading Dan's letter on Friday 'Down to my last $268' comes off as very 'bearish'. The very next day Brett's '1932 Lesson that could send stocks soaring' was 'bullish.' I often wonder if we could put these two in a ring to watch them debate their opinions." – Subscriber Todd J. Corey McLaughlin comment: Not a bad idea, Todd. Brett (and Matt McCall) actually joined Dan for an interview on a recent episode of the Stansberry Investor Hour podcast. As you may imagine, their difference of opinion did come up early on in the going – and then they still kept talking. I can tell you they might have more in common than it may sound. [You can listen to the whole conversation right here, for free](. All the best, Corey McLaughlin Baltimore, Maryland September 18, 2023 --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Top 10 Open Recommendations Top 10 highest-returning open positions across all Stansberry Research portfolios Stock Buy Date Return Publication Analyst MSFT Microsoft 11/11/10 1,200.4% Retirement Millionaire Doc MSFT Microsoft 02/10/12 1,037.8% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter ADP Automatic Data Processing 10/09/08 881.3% Extreme Value Ferris wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 02/21/20 683.4% Stansberry Innovations Report Wade NVO Novo Nordisk 12/05/19 578.6% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Gula WRB W.R. Berkley 03/16/12 567.4% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter BRK.B Berkshire Hathaway 04/01/09 552.2% Retirement Millionaire Doc HSY Hershey 12/07/07 515.2% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter AFG American Financial 10/12/12 392.8% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter TTD The Trade Desk 10/17/19 339.1% Stansberry Innovations Report Engel Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 10 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the model portfolio of any Stansberry Research publication. The buy date reflects when the editor recommended the investment in the listed publication, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if a security is still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber to that publication and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 10 Totals 5 Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter/Gula 2 Retirement Millionaire Doc 2 Stansberry Innovations Report Engel/Wade 1 Extreme Value Ferris --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 5 Crypto Capital Open Recommendations Top 5 highest-returning open positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Stock Buy Date Return Publication Analyst wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 12/07/18 1,572.4% Crypto Capital Wade ONE-USD Harmony 12/16/19 1,045.5% Crypto Capital Wade POLY/USD Polymath 05/19/20 1,025.3% Crypto Capital Wade MATIC/USD Polygon 02/25/21 762.0% Crypto Capital Wade BTC/USD Bitcoin 11/27/18 608.2% Crypto Capital Wade Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 5 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the Crypto Capital model portfolio. The buy date reflects when the recommendation was made, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if it's still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Hall of Fame Top 10 all-time, highest-returning closed positions across all Stansberry portfolios Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Nvidia^* NVDA 5.96 years 1,466% Venture Tech. Lashmet Microsoft^ MSFT 12.74 years 1,185% Retirement Millionaire Doc Band Protocol crypto 0.32 years 1,169% Crypto Capital Wade Terra crypto 0.41 years 1,164% Crypto Capital Wade Inovio Pharma.^ INO 1.01 years 1,139% Venture Tech. Lashmet Seabridge Gold^ SA 4.20 years 995% Sjug Conf. Sjuggerud Frontier crypto 0.08 years 978% Crypto Capital Wade Binance Coin crypto 1.78 years 963% Crypto Capital Wade Nvidia^* NVDA 4.12 years 777% Venture Tech. Lashmet Intellia Therapeutics NTLA 1.95 years 775% Amer. Moonshots Root ^ These gains occurred with a partial position in the respective stocks. * The two partial positions in Nvidia were part of a single recommendation. Editor Dave Lashmet closed the first leg of the position in November 2016 for a gain of about 108%. Then, he closed the second leg in July 2020 for a 777% return. And finally, in May 2022, he booked a 1,466% return on the final leg. Subscribers who followed his advice on Nvidia could've recorded a total weighted average gain of more than 600%. You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized investment advice. © 2023 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

EDM Keywords (269)

yet years year wrote writing writes writers works work willing whole weekend watch washington warranted warnings want views viewpoint vein use us unions understand two tv turn trying try true triple trends track topic today times timeline time though think things thing thanks tell talking talk take sure suggestions success subscription subscribers subscriber strike stocks still stay start stansberry stand spot speak sometimes sideways shoes shared share sent seen seeks security say savings satisfied role risks ring right returns retirement responsibility researches referred refer redistribution recorded reconcile recommendations recommendation recommend receiving received receive reason really reading read questions question published publication providing protect prevents present predict position popular politics pointless pointed plan perhaps people particular part organization opposite opinion onset one often nvidia newsletters neither neighbor near name must money might message mentioned mean maybe may matters matt market making makes make mailbag made lot looking listen lineup letter let learned learn large labeling know kind investor investments investment investing interview interested instance information inflation important imagine ills ideas idea hope hold happen greedy great got good going goals go gives get generate general gain future friday free form forget followed find finally feedback far facing express expect example even engage endorse employees email education editors editor economy early distortions discussion disagreements disagree direction difference diana determining deserves deserve decades debate day date dan cryptocurrencies credit covered cover contracts consider confident conclusions companies common comment come combination closed click certainly case came buying bullish build bring brett booked blow benefit bearish based attain assets applied anything anyone answer analysts america advice address actually acting account accomplish access able 600 108

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

26/05/2024

Sent On

26/05/2024

Sent On

25/05/2024

Sent On

25/05/2024

Sent On

25/05/2024

Sent On

24/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.