The 'Fun-House Mirror' Is Still Misleading Today's Investors

In today's Masters Series, originally from the August 9 issue of our free DailyWealth e-letter, Dan details how the mega-bubble of the past decade-plus is still fooling investors... explains why older Americans especially are being misled... and talks about how to navigate this ongoing market chaos... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Master Series] Editor's note: Don't fall for the market's "fun-house mirror"... Many investors have rushed back into the market this year after keeping their money on the sidelines throughout 2022 in hopes of uncovering high-upside opportunities. But according to Extreme Value editor Dan Ferris, we're still in the thick of the largest financial mega-bubble of all time. That's why Dan stresses it's critical for investors to understand the current state of the markets in order to avoid catastrophic losses once this bubble ends. In today's Masters Series, originally from the August 9 issue of our free DailyWealth e-letter, Dan details how the mega-bubble of the past decade-plus is still fooling investors... explains why older Americans especially are being misled... and talks about how to navigate this ongoing market chaos... --------------------------------------------------------------- The 'Fun-House Mirror' Is Still Misleading Today's Investors By Dan Ferris, editor, Extreme Value Quick, subtract your age from 100... Your answer is the percentage of your portfolio you should have in stocks. At least, that's according to the "traditional" rule of thumb. So since I am 61 years old, I should be 39% invested in stocks. If you're 35, then you should have 65% of your assets in stocks. If you're 70, you'd want 30% in stocks. And it's generally assumed that the rest of your assets would be in bonds. The basic idea behind this rule of thumb is simple... You save and invest for years so you have money when you get older and can't work (or just don't want to). When you're younger, you can afford to wait out all the crashes and bear markets. And you can even invest more during those turbulent times so your nest egg will grow even bigger. As you get older, though, your focus shifts from growing your wealth to preserving it. With less time to make up potential losses, you want to hang on to what you've built... So over time, you gradually allocate more of your money to bonds and cash. Now, I'm not saying you should or shouldn't follow this rule of thumb. But the basic idea of reducing your risk profile as you age isn't the worst idea I've ever heard. However, it seems like many older Americans are now doing the opposite. And it shows the mega-bubble of the past decade-plus is still misleading investors – in very dangerous ways... --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Link: # [Back by Demand: Can Kevin Kisner Collect $4,000 in 60 Seconds?]( This morning, we're airing a Real Money Demo. A professional athlete will attempt to collect $4,000 in 60 seconds by selling put options. Will he succeed? Or will he lose money? Watch his transaction on Costco Wholesale (COST) and find out – including how to [begin using this strategy yourself](. --------------------------------------------------------------- A Wall Street Journal article on this came out last month. It was titled "America's Retirees Are Investing More Like 30-Year-Olds." And as you might expect, it suggests that retirees have abandoned the rule of thumb to chase bigger returns... Nearly half of Vanguard 401(k) investors actively managing their money and over age 55 held more than 70% of their portfolios in stocks. In 2011, 38% did so. At Fidelity Investments, nearly four in 10 investors ages 65 to 69 hold about two-thirds or more of their portfolios in stocks. And it isn't just baby boomers. In taxable brokerage accounts at Vanguard, one-fifth of investors 85 or older have nearly all their money in stocks, up from 16% in 2012. The same is true of almost a quarter of those ages 75 to 84. Why take more risk at an age when capital preservation should be your priority? The Journal article cited several possible causes for the trend. For example, it mentioned the birth of 401(k) accounts in 1978 and the historical tendency over the past century for stocks to return more on average than bonds. But you and I both know that those aren't the real causes... The real cause is simply that savers haven't had a place to hide cash since 2008. That's when the Federal Reserve first took interest rates to zero. Since then, retirees have become increasingly comfortable with taking more risk to earn more return. In other words, they've learned to put more of their savings into riskier assets like stocks instead of safer assets like bonds and cash. And of course, it's not just older Americans. It's everybody, no matter how young or old. It's impossible to overstate how pervasively zero-percent rates have distorted the mindsets of nearly everybody who has even a passing interest in stocks and bonds... It would normally make sense to have this mentality after a down year like 2022. But with equity valuations still in mega-bubble territory, it's not a great idea today. And it shows us how difficult it has been to escape the biggest financial mega-bubble in all recorded history. Taking on more risk in search of more return is the definitive mentality of investors in a bubble. The line between investing and speculation becomes blurrier and blurrier... And then, one day, it fades completely out of existence. As I said in our January 20 issue of the Stansberry Digest... Investing in a mega-bubble is tough... It's like trying to paint an accurate full-length portrait of a human by looking only at their image in a fun-house mirror. You can try to adjust for the distortions all you want. But the image you create won't look right in the end. You'll be misrepresenting reality, not accurately reflecting it. You just can't know how tall, short, fat, or thin your subject really is until you see them in person – or at least in a picture that's not distorted. In the end, it's essentially impossible to paint using a fun-house mirror. And in the market's fun-house mirror, garbage assets look like good bets and safe assets look stupid... After all, why would you ever put your money in a savings account yielding 0.05% when you can buy stocks that go up and could double, triple, or quadruple your money in a matter of months? It would be reasonable to assume that folks would've stopped reaching for returns and piling on risk after the drubbing investors took in 2022. But it's still happening today... That means the danger isn't over yet. Ultimately, I expect all kinds of financial and economic distortions that we can't see today will come to light over the next decade. That's the hallmark of a massive mega-bubble. Good investing, Dan Ferris --------------------------------------------------------------- Editor's note: You don't have to navigate this mega-bubble without a guiding light. Dan has been using the same simple strategy for over 20 years to earn gains of more than 600%. Now, he's stepping forward to share the secret behind this method amid today's chaotic market... Dan recently hosted an online presentation to reveal a low-risk strategy that could help you potentially double your money in the next few months – no matter what happens in the markets. [Check out the full presentation right here](... --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Link: # [The No. 1 AI Stock of 2023 (Not Nvidia)]( It's not Nvidia, Meta Platforms, Alphabet, or Amazon. But thanks to a recent major deal, an under-the-radar stock could become the No. 1 winner of the 2023 AI boom. "This company just teamed up with one of the biggest power players in the AI industry... yet you can still buy it for just one-twelfth the price of Nvidia. The time to buy is NOW," says Marc Chaikin. [Click here for the name and ticker](. --------------------------------------------------------------- You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized investment advice. © 2023 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [www.stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.