Newsletter Subject

The 'Fun-House Mirror' Is Still Misleading Today's Investors

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Wed, Aug 9, 2023 11:37 AM

Email Preheader Text

The mega-bubble of the past decade-plus is still misleading investors – in very dangerous ways.

The mega-bubble of the past decade-plus is still misleading investors – in very dangerous ways. That includes how older Americans look at risk... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [DailyWealth] The 'Fun-House Mirror' Is Still Misleading Today's Investors By Dan Ferris, editor, Extreme Value --------------------------------------------------------------- Quick, subtract your age from 100... Your answer is the percentage of your portfolio you should have in stocks. At least, that's according to the "traditional" rule of thumb. So since I am 61 years old, I should be 39% invested in stocks. If you're 35, then you should have 65% of your assets in stocks. If you're 70, you'd want 30% in stocks. And it's generally assumed that the rest of your assets would be in bonds. The basic idea behind this rule of thumb is simple... You save and invest for years so you have money when you get older and can't work (or just don't want to). When you're younger, you can afford to wait out all the crashes and bear markets. And you can even invest more during those turbulent times so your nest egg will grow even bigger. As you get older, though, your focus shifts from growing your wealth to preserving it. With less time to make up potential losses, you want to hang on to what you've built... So over time, you gradually allocate more of your money to bonds and cash. Now, I'm not saying you should or shouldn't follow this rule of thumb. But the basic idea of reducing your risk profile as you age isn't the worst idea I've ever heard. However, it seems like many older Americans are now doing the opposite. And it shows the mega-bubble of the past decade-plus is still misleading investors – in very dangerous ways... --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: [It's Not Flashy, It's Not Sexy, but It Just Flat-Out WORKS!]( Top value expert Dan Ferris is stepping forward to show you – for FREE – the secret behind his biggest winners. He's sharing the large gains his readers could've made, such as 406% on Prestige Brands... 201% on Alexander & {NAME}... and a massive 629% on Constellation Brands. This strategy is dead simple to use and only requires checking five boxes on any stock. Plus, get details on how it has led him to his latest shortlist of recommendations, which could double or triple from here if you act immediately. [Get the details here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [Stock Alert: The Great AI Bubble of 2023]( He called the Priceline collapse in 2012, the 2020 crash, and the 2022 bear market. Today, he's issuing a new warning for America's favorite AI stocks. If you're holding Nvidia or any FAANG stocks right now, it's time to prepare for a massive shift. [Click here for his new warning (includes the No. 1 AI stock recommendation)](. --------------------------------------------------------------- A Wall Street Journal article on this came out last month. It was titled "[America's Retirees Are Investing More Like 30-Year-Olds]( And as you might expect, it suggests that retirees have abandoned the rule of thumb to chase bigger returns... Nearly half of Vanguard 401(k) investors actively managing their money and over age 55 held more than 70% of their portfolios in stocks. In 2011, 38% did so. At Fidelity Investments, nearly four in 10 investors ages 65 to 69 hold about two-thirds or more of their portfolios in stocks. And it isn't just baby boomers. In taxable brokerage accounts at Vanguard, one-fifth of investors 85 or older have nearly all their money in stocks, up from 16% in 2012. The same is true of almost a quarter of those ages 75 to 84. Why take more risk at an age when capital preservation should be your priority? The Journal article cited several possible causes for the trend. For example, it mentioned the birth of 401(k) accounts in 1978 and the historical tendency over the past century for stocks to return more on average than bonds. But you and I both know that those aren't the real causes... The real cause is simply that savers haven't had a place to hide cash since 2008. That's when the Federal Reserve first took interest rates to zero. Since then, retirees have become increasingly comfortable with taking more risk to earn more return. In other words, they've learned to put more of their savings into riskier assets like stocks instead of safer assets like bonds and cash. And of course, it's not just older Americans. It's everybody, no matter how young or old. It's impossible to overstate how pervasively zero-percent rates have distorted the mindsets of nearly everybody who has even a passing interest in stocks and bonds... It would normally make sense to have this mentality after a down year like 2022. But with equity valuations still in mega-bubble territory, it's not a great idea today. And it shows us how difficult it has been to escape the biggest financial mega-bubble in all recorded history. Taking on more risk in search of more return is the definitive mentality of investors in a bubble. The line between investing and speculation becomes blurrier and blurrier... And then, one day, it fades completely out of existence. As I said in our January 20 issue of the Stansberry Digest... Investing in a mega-bubble is tough... It's like trying to paint an accurate full-length portrait of a human by looking only at their image in a fun-house mirror. You can try to adjust for the distortions all you want. But the image you create won't look right in the end. You'll be misrepresenting reality, not accurately reflecting it. You just can't know how tall, short, fat, or thin your subject really is until you see them in person – or at least in a picture that's not distorted. In the end, it's essentially impossible to paint using a fun-house mirror. And in the market's fun-house mirror, garbage assets look like good bets and safe assets look stupid... After all, why would you ever put your money in a savings account yielding 0.05% when you can buy stocks that go up and could double, triple, or quadruple your money in a matter of months? It would be reasonable to assume that folks would've stopped reaching for returns and piling on risk after the drubbing investors took in 2022. But it's still happening today. That means the danger isn't over yet. Ultimately, I expect all kinds of financial and economic distortions that we can't see today will come to light over the next decade. That's the hallmark of a massive mega-bubble. Good investing, Dan Ferris --------------------------------------------------------------- Editor's note: You don't need to take on extra risk to double your money or better in this market. Dan is responsible for THREE of our firm's biggest closed winners... And he's currently sitting on triple-digit open gains as high as 880%. Now, he's pulling back the curtain to reveal the strategy he has used hundreds of times – in bull markets, bear markets, and even "dead zone" markets – to stay in wealth-building mode... without jeopardizing your entire portfolio. [Get the details here](. Further Reading "Too many investors nowadays still don't understand that they were faking it in the bull market," Dan says. When times are good and prices are rising, it's tempting to think investing is easy. You need to avoid that mindset – or you'll get burned... [Read more here](. "Investors are now rethinking the conventional '60/40' investment portfolio," Mike Barrett writes. It's true that putting more money in stocks can boost your returns – but you must do so carefully. Here's how to weigh the balance between risk and reward... [Learn more here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [Tell us what you think of this content]( [We value our subscribers' feedback. To help us improve your experience, we'd like to ask you a couple brief questions.]( [Click here to rate this e-mail]( You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to DailyWealth. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from DailyWealth [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You're receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized investment advice. © 2023 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [www.stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

EDM Keywords (211)

younger young years writers would work words whole weigh wealth want wait value use understand try true triple trend tough times time thumb three think thin tempting taking take suggests suggestions subscription subscribers strategy stocks stay speak since simply simple shows show sharing sexy sent see security search saying savings savers save said rule risk rising reveal returns return retirees rethinking rest responsible responsibility reducing redistribution recommendations recommendation recommend receiving received reasonable reading read rate questions quarter quadruple putting put published priority prices preserving prepare portfolios portfolio place piling picture person percentage part paint overstate opposite older old note need nearly must months money mindsets mindset mentioned mentality means matter market make made looking line like light led least learned know kinds issuing investors investing invest information includes impossible image human high hang hallmark growing good go free follow flat flashy firm financial feedback faking experience expect existence example everybody even escape endorse end employees easy earn double distortions distorted difficult details danger dailywealth curtain create crashes course content come cash carefully came called built bubble boost bonds blurrier birth better based balance avoid average assume assets ask answer america almost alexander age afford adjust address acting account according abandoned 880 84 70 65 406 35 2023 2022 2012 1978 16 100

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

08/06/2024

Sent On

08/06/2024

Sent On

08/06/2024

Sent On

07/06/2024

Sent On

07/06/2024

Sent On

07/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.