Newsletter Subject

All Things Being Equal

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Tue, Jul 11, 2023 10:26 PM

Email Preheader Text

Your feedback on bullishness... More about life beyond the 'Magnificent Seven'... All things being e

Your feedback on bullishness... More about life beyond the 'Magnificent Seven'... All things being equal... What the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index is doing... An encouraging picture... A surprising bit of history... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Digest] Your feedback on bullishness... More about life beyond the 'Magnificent Seven'... All things being equal... What the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index is doing... An encouraging picture... A surprising bit of history... --------------------------------------------------------------- Our unpopular bullish picture yesterday stirred some feedback... I (Corey McLaughlin) love our readers and this gig. After publishing a take like we did yesterday – on what I felt was [an unpopular bullish picture]( – we hear the good and bad and in between, and we get to take note of what you want to hear more about almost instantly. For starters, several of you came to the defense of Dan and me after reading the criticism from a YouTube commenter who compared us to "Jim Kramer and AOC" because we happened to share a few bullish ideas on a recent podcast episode. And yet others wrote in over the past 24 hours with some important questions related to yesterday's Digest, which I want to address today... As always, keep the conversation going by sending your e-mails to feedback@stansberryresearch.com. Your top concern... Stansberry Alliance member Bill B. said that while he gets our point about a bullish outlook, he's still concerned about the idea of what he called "4 of 5 stocks holding up 95% of the market." And a few others said something similar. Alliance member Jeffrey G. wrote in... The chart in [yesterday's] Digest to me says a lot. Many individual decisions are made on those numbers [50-day moving average and 200-day moving average] on markets and individual companies. Can you show what it would look like without FANG or Magnificent 7, which I understand are overrepresented by value. Or use the weighted average S&P? Just my thoughts and curiosity. I so appreciate what you publish. Yes, Jeffrey, we sure can. This is a worthwhile discussion, one that we've [mentioned]( in the past few weeks (and which is the subject of [our latest Portfolio Solutions issues](. Let's now explore it in more depth. First off, this allows us to mention an essential point for anyone in the markets... Always know what's in your index... We wrote yesterday about the S&P 500 Index, the one you hear about on the nightly news and that's plastered on mainstream financial websites. As we noted, it has been trading above its simple technical long-term (200-day) and short-term (50-day) moving averages for several months. The S&P 500 is weighted by market cap, meaning its largest companies represent a greater share of the overall index than the still-large but comparatively smaller S&P 500 businesses. For example, Nvidia (NVDA) is a $1 trillion chip company and everyone's favorite artificial-intelligence play, and it represents around 2.8% of the entire index. Meanwhile, retailer Advance Auto Parts (AAP) has a $4 billion market cap – respectable by most standards – but still makes up just a hundredth of a percent of the S&P 500. The result is when the "mega caps" do well, the headline index that a lot of people follow as the gauge of the entire "market" tends to do the same, and vice versa. This isn't necessarily a bad thing. When the largest companies in America are doing well, that's notable. But you have likely heard that the S&P 500's behavior lately has been significantly influenced lately by the so-called Magnificent Seven: Apple (AAPL), Meta Platforms (META), Nvidia, Alphabet (GOOGL), Amazon (AMZN), Microsoft (MSFT), and Tesla (TSLA). Today, the share prices of these companies account for nearly 30% of the performance of the U.S. benchmark index, and these seven stocks are up an average of 85% for the year. They've kept the S&P 500 moving higher even as the rest of the market hasn't been as strong. But, as we'll show today, the rest of the market might not be as weak as some may make it sound, either... And what we've seen lately with the biggest of mega-caps leading the way is perhaps, counterintuitively, a sign of possible new highs ahead... In other words, just following the S&P 500 Index can obscure other stories and trends beneath the surface – for worse or better. Here's the real story today beyond the 'FANGs'... For a look at the broader market performance, look today at the recent performance of the lesser-followed equally weighted S&P 500 Index, as Jeffrey suggested. In this index, each of the S&P 500 companies gets an equal share (0.2%) of the index pie. In other words, Nvidia or another Magnificent Seven company is valued the same as Advance Auto Parts or any other S&P 500 member. This index takes out the market-cap bias, which is what we want to do. At the same time, it has its own bias... Since a handful of stocks or a sector can move the index significantly, it can be more volatile than the standard S&P 500. But it's useful to use in a full market analysis. Here's a one-year chart of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, with lines for simple technical long-term and short-term moving averages overlaid, like we did for the S&P 500 Index yesterday... At a glance, this may look like an inconclusive mess. The Equal Weight Index has traded more sideways than the market-cap-weighted version. It's below its high from earlier this year. And it's up "only" 11% over the past year versus the S&P 500 Index's 15%. Just a few days ago, the regular S&P 500 was beating the Equal Weight Index by 10 percentage points. But in general, I see the same unpopular bullish picture playing out for both indexes... First off, look back at October 2022 in the chart above. In what makes it increasingly look like a bottom, the Equal Weight Index hit lows and hasn't returned to that level since. In fact, it's up roughly 20% since October. If anything, it was the Equal Weight Index that got a bit overextended earlier in the year... It hit highs above the market-cap-weighted S&P 500, then appropriately pulled back to lower lows in March amid the banking panic before starting a push higher to current levels. About a month ago, the Equal Weight Index's 50-day moving average once again crossed higher than its 200-day moving average. You could say this is a weaker picture than the market-cap-weighted S&P 500, which has been trading above those averages consistently since March. But the picture is still encouraging... Maybe most important, the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index's long-term trend has stopped falling. When you zoom out a bit to a five-year time frame, you may get a better sense of why this action could be important. It has tended to happen near the beginning of longer moves higher for the broader market rather than at the end... This doesn't mean the trends can't break down ahead... or that I can tell you what's going to happen in the future... or that a recession isn't coming eventually. I would want to see the Equal Weight Index get above its highs from earlier in the year (and last summer's "bear market rally") before declaring that a new full-fledged bull market is here to stay. But the action since March (and last October) is encouraging. The Equal Weight Index is up 10% since its March lows and is nearly 4% higher in the past month. This may also be an opportunity... If you're still convinced that a handful of stocks is the only thing powering the entire market higher, or if you now think the market is relatively stronger than before you started reading this Digest, there may be an opportunity for you... As Stansberry Research senior analyst Brett Eversole recently shared in [our free DailyWealth newsletter]( when the S&P 500 Index significantly outperforms the Equal Weight S&P 500 Index, as it was doing until just a few days ago, this is actually a bullish sign. As he said... Many believe that this setup will doom the current stock market boom. But history shows us otherwise. In fact, this misunderstood situation could lead to massive gains in a specific stock index. He was talking about a dynamic that has been playing out with the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index... Specifically, the difference between the trailing two-month returns of these indexes hit 6.2 percentage points earlier this year. This shows just how strong the outperformance is. Similar setups have only happened five other times since 1990. This might sound like a bad omen for stocks. Most folks would expect tough times ahead when the market-weighted index crushes the Equal Weight Index. But the exact opposite happens. It's not the big stocks that slow down... It's the smaller stocks that catch up. Take a look... As you can see, the S&P 500 beat its typical return in the months after these setups. The market-weighted index jumped 6.6% in six months and 12.6% in a year. But the truly massive gains happened in the Equal Weight Index... The Equal Weight Index has averaged a roughly 27% gain over the following year each time we've seen behavior like we have recently. That's three times higher than usual. If anything, when it seems like the biggest companies are carrying the market significantly, "the rest of the market catches up to big players" afterward, Brett said. And the market-cap-weighted S&P 500 Index outperforms, too, rather than crashing. As Brett mentioned, as this story plays out, it's worth considering exposure to the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. You can do it through a vehicle like the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Fund (RSP) or a similar exchange-traded fund that tracks the equally weighted S&P 500. These funds will rise by more than the regular S&P 500 Index if smaller companies surge to keep up with the Magnificent Seven. Searching for the Next 100-Bagger Investor Chris Mayer, co-founder of Woodlock House Family Capital, joins Matt McCall to talk about stocks that have returned 100-to-1 over history... and how to go about spotting the next 100-bagger opportunities... [Click here]( to watch or listen to this episode right now. And to catch all of Matt's shows and more videos and podcasts from the Stansberry Research team, be sure to [visit our Stansberry Investor platform]( anytime. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: [Until MIDNIGHT Tonight: The Signs Are Clear... This Type of Crash Has Begun]( Top experts are calling it: A major crisis is now underway. It's something far bigger and more important than what happens to the Nasdaq or S&P 500. The world's best investors are ready to pounce. And so are a tiny handful of readers who know the secret to cashing in. This crash will create a slew of 100%-plus opportunities... backed by legal protections that stocks can only dream of. It's finally happening. So it's critical that you [get the full story here by midnight tonight](. --------------------------------------------------------------- ['Federal Bitcoin' Is Coming to a Bank Near You, Starting THIS MONTH]( Beginning this month, the U.S. government will take the first step toward creating its own cryptocurrency... a "Federal bitcoin." The U.S. Treasury and 120 banks have already signed up for it. If you get positioned before the rollout this month, you could make 3,050%. [Click here to learn more](. --------------------------------------------------------------- New 52-week highs (as of 7/10/23): Adobe (ADBE), Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH), Covenant Logistics (CVLG), Commvault Systems (CVLT), Dice Therapeutics (DICE), DraftKings (DKNG), Floor & Decor (FND), Global X MSCI Greece Fund (GREK), W.W. Grainger (GWW), Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), Ingersoll Rand (IR), Iron Mountain (IRM), New York Community Bancorp (NYCB), Parker-Hannifin (PH), Pure Storage (PSTG), TE Connectivity (TEL), and VMware (VMW). In today's mailbag, more feedback on the unpopular bullish picture [we wrote about yesterday](... and a thought about a note in yesterday's mail... Do you have a comment, question, praise, or rage? As always, e-mail us at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. "If the panic over interest rates has subsided, perhaps it is just a matter of mathematics. The jump from 1% to 2% is double. After that, .25% on top of 5% seems inconsequential." – Subscriber Rudy F. "I totally agree with Jon J. The action on the market today is living proof that investors are stuck between a rock and a hard place. Investors have only two choices, either invest in great companies or put your money in banks (ugly history) or keep it in cash and money market instruments which the people at the Fed and central government can manipulate at will with crazy and irrational interest rate policy. And if you look at the past, that hasn't worked out well... "Over the years we have been through several presidents and Fed-manipulated economic hiccups (high inflation and interest rates in the 80s), the financial ass whipping in 2008, and several other issues, and where is the market today? And look at the health of the world markets. Europe, China, and most every other country are in a slide backward. The only silver lining is the U.S. stock market. Money goes where it's treated best. Like it or not, that's the U.S. stock market. Foreign investors are going to flock here because the alternatives are not so great. IMO." – Subscriber John M. "I've never seen nor read any research delivered like The Stansberry Report/s. I'm not officially a paid client, yet. But that will change." – Subscriber Curtis W. Corey McLaughlin comment: We'll be delighted to have you. To anyone who has recently found us, you can [find some more information on our 30-plus research services here](. And stay tuned to the Digest as we share the latest information and opportunities from our editors and analysts. All the best, Corey McLaughlin Baltimore, Maryland July 11, 2023 --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Top 10 Open Recommendations Top 10 highest-returning open positions across all Stansberry Research portfolios Stock Buy Date Return Publication Analyst MSFT Microsoft 11/11/10 1,206.1% Retirement Millionaire Doc MSFT Microsoft 02/10/12 1,040.8% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter ADP Automatic Data 10/09/08 808.3% Extreme Value Ferris wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 02/21/20 634.1% Stansberry Innovations Report Wade HSY Hershey 12/07/07 585.1% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter WRB W.R. Berkley 03/16/12 523.8% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter BRK.B Berkshire Hathaway 04/01/09 504.8% Retirement Millionaire Doc AFG American Financial 10/12/12 402.5% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter TTD The Trade Desk 10/17/19 320.5% Stansberry Innovations Report Engel FSMEX Fidelity Sel Med 09/03/08 312.7% Retirement Millionaire Doc Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 10 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the model portfolio of any Stansberry Research publication. The buy date reflects when the editor recommended the investment in the listed publication, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if a security is still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber to that publication and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 10 Totals 4 Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter 3 Retirement Millionaire Doc 2 Stansberry Innovations Report Engel/Wade 1 Extreme Value Ferris --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 5 Crypto Capital Open Recommendations Top 5 highest-returning open positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Stock Buy Date Return Publication Analyst wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 12/07/18 1,500.1% Crypto Capital Wade ONE-USD Harmony 12/16/19 1,070.9% Crypto Capital Wade POLY/USD Polymath 05/19/20 1,026.5% Crypto Capital Wade MATIC/USD Polygon 02/25/21 818.9% Crypto Capital Wade BTC/USD Bitcoin 11/27/18 709.8% Crypto Capital Wade Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 5 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the Crypto Capital model portfolio. The buy date reflects when the recommendation was made, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if it's still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Hall of Fame Top 10 all-time, highest-returning closed positions across all Stansberry portfolios Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Nvidia^* NVDA 5.96 years 1,466% Venture Tech. Lashmet Band Protocol crypto 0.32 years 1,169% Crypto Capital Wade Terra crypto 0.41 years 1,164% Crypto Capital Wade Inovio Pharma.^ INO 1.01 years 1,139% Venture Tech. Lashmet Seabridge Gold^ SA 4.20 years 995% Sjug Conf. Sjuggerud Frontier crypto 0.08 years 978% Crypto Capital Wade Binance Coin crypto 1.78 years 963% Crypto Capital Wade Nvidia^* NVDA 4.12 years 777% Venture Tech. Lashmet Intellia Therapeutics NTLA 1.95 years 775% Amer. Moonshots Root Rite Aid 8.5% bond 4.97 years 773% True Income Williams ^ These gains occurred with a partial position in the respective stocks. * The two partial positions in Nvidia were part of a single recommendation. Editor Dave Lashmet closed the first leg of the position in November 2016 for a gain of about 108%. Then, he closed the second leg in July 2020 for a 777% return. And finally, in May 2022, he booked a 1,466% return on the final leg. Subscribers who followed his advice on Nvidia could've recorded a total weighted average gain of more than 600%. You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized investment advice. © 2023 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [www.stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

EDM Keywords (284)

zoom yesterday years year wrote writers worse world worked work words whole well weighted weeks weak way watch want volatile visit videos valued value usual useful use underway understand type trends treasury trading traded tracks top today time thoughts thought think things tended tell talking talk take surface sure suggestions subscription subscribers subscriber subject stuck strong stories stocks still stay starting standards standard spotting speak slow slew signs sign sideways shows show share several setups setup sent sending see security sector secret says rollout rock rise returned result rest responsibility regular refer redistribution recorded recommendation recommend recession recently receiving received ready reading readers read rather rage questions put publishing published publication pounce position point podcasts playing plastered picture performance percent people past part panic overrepresented outperformance opportunity opportunities one officially obscure nvidia noted note notable necessarily nasdaq must move months month money mentioned mention mean may matter matt mathematics markets market manipulate makes make mailbag mail made lot look listen lines learned learn know kept keep jump issues investors investment invesco information index important idea hundredth history highs high hear health happens happened happen handful government got good going go glance gig gets get general gauge gain future funds following followed flock find finally felt feedback fed fangs fact explore everyone every equal endorse end encouraging employees editors earlier dynamic dream double doom digest difference delighted defense declaring date dan curiosity cryptocurrency criticism critical create crazy crashing crash country coming closed clear chart catch cashing cash carrying came calling bullishness break bottom booked bit biggest better beginning beating based bad averaged average appreciate aoc anything anyone analysts america alternatives ahead advice address actually action acting account 95 85 80s 600 25 2008 15 11 108

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.