How to Spot a 'Zombie' Company

Regional banks take another big hit... A different kind of run... The unintended consequences of short-term decisions... The next debt crisis is ahead... How to spot a 'zombie' company... One number everyone should know... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Digest] Regional banks take another big hit... A different kind of run... The unintended consequences of short-term decisions... The next debt crisis is ahead... How to spot a 'zombie' company... One number everyone should know... --------------------------------------------------------------- We'll get to the total 'zombies' in a moment... But first... We told you on Monday that JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon claimed "this part of the crisis is over," meaning the failure of regional banks... and that, to us, it didn't look like the trouble was finished. Regional-bank stocks were still selling off sharply, and there were signs the story could continue. Today, it did... Yesterday, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said in a press conference when asked about all this, "I guess our view is that the banking system is sound and it's resilient." "I guess?" Really? Now it looks like a few more U.S. regional banks are destined for the clearance rack or the garbage bin... The biggest losers in the small banks today were PacWest (PACW), a name we mentioned on Monday, and First Horizon (FHN). Their shares were down 51% and 33%, respectively, with speculation swirling that they could be the next to fail. PacWest, a small-business lender with about $44 billion in assets, is reportedly exploring a potential sale, and the company said it is evaluating "all options to maximize shareholder value." Uh-oh. And shares of First Horizon fell after Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) called off its $13 billion takeover plan for First Horizon, citing concerns about regulatory approval. This TD Bank deal was actually in the works before the banking crisis began back in March. A different kind of run... Back in March, Silicon Valley Bank kicked off the turmoil in the regional-banking sector with a run on deposits. In these latest crises of confidence, investors are fleeing from the stocks more than depositors closing out their accounts. In a public statement last night, PacWest said it had not experienced any unusual deposit outflows since the sale of First Republic Bank to JPMorgan Chase on Monday... Yet the stock has cratered, and short sellers betting against the company have racked up profits. As global news service Reuters reported yesterday – before many of these regional-banking stocks took another large tumble today... Short sellers have pocketed $1.2 billion in paper profits betting against U.S. regional lenders in the first two days of May, analytics firm Ortex said, as the third major regional bank failure in two months sparked a selloff in the sector. The SPDR S&P Regional Banking Fund (KRE) was down more than 5% today and is off 43% in the past three months. So while Jamie Dimon may be hoping to talk the end of this crisis into existence, it still doesn't look like it's over just yet. It might be close, though. Our Ten Stock Trader editor Greg Diamond's [technical analysis suggests it](. Mr. Market sure is a wild beast. Regardless, this is the sort of thing we had in mind over the past two-plus years when we said there would be consequences of the Federal Reserve's rate hikes... Of course, those rate hikes were a consequence of letting inflation run wild for about six to 12 months... which was a consequence of the economic stimulus in response to the pandemic... and so on. We're seeing the influence of everything in 2023... As we've also said, another likely outcome is the next 'debt crisis'... Among other things, this will be when the many "zombie" companies in America – which can barely pay the interest on their own debt – go out of business. Our Stansberry's Credit Opportunities editor Mike DiBiase recently joined Dan Ferris and me on [the Stansberry Investor Hour podcast]( to talk about this. As Mike says... A "zombie" is a company that can barely afford the interest on its debt. Zombies have no hope of paying off the principal of their debt when it comes due. These companies are completely reliant on creditors to refinance their debt as it matures. It's like borrowing on one credit card to pay off the balance on another. If or when the economy heads into a recession, the downturn will eat further into these struggling businesses' cash flows... And in a higher-rate environment where debt is twice as expensive as it was just a few years ago, many of these "zombies" will go bankrupt. And at that point, many investors will be panicking... Folks will rush to rescue some of their money before companies get completely wiped out. Counterintuitively, this will be exactly the time to put cash to work... In this crisis, stocks and corporate bonds will go "on sale" – even the ones of good businesses that have little chance of defaulting on your debt. (In Credit Opportunities, Mike and analyst Bill McGilton recommend this type of bond investing. It's an approach they call "safer than stocks" because bonds offer a fixed return and legal protections that stocks simply don't have. [You can learn more here]( But how do you spot these "zombies" to avoid? How do you know if you have one in your portfolio? This is key to avoiding potential major losses. After listening to our recent Investor Hour episode, subscriber Terry L. wrote in and said he enjoyed the interview with Mike but wanted to know more... Could you provide a short primer on how to evaluate potential zombie companies that are high risk in this worsening economic environment? This would be very helpful for me to make the right decisions in my portfolio going forward. We got in touch with Mike this week and, good news, he agreed to share a how-to with everyone on precisely what to do... To close things out today, he will go into detail on how to spot the "zombie" companies you should avoid owning. Here is Mike's advice for spotting a 'zombie'... First things first, you have to know your way around a set of financial statements. I (Mike DiBiase) prefer to compare a company's "cash profits" with its interest expense on its annual 10-K forms and its quarterly 10-Qs. If that cash profit is less than its interest payouts, the company is a zombie. Ideally, you want to see a company's cash profits measure at least twice that of its interest expense. That gives you a cushion if its earnings happen to fall. In general, you'll want to look at more than one year or quarter. Note the trend. Is the company's interest coverage improving or getting worse over time? You'll find "cash profits" in a company's statement of cash flows. It won't be called "cash profits," though, but "net cash provided by (used in) operating activities." Companies already deduct interest costs to arrive at this number, so you'll need to add them back (you'll find the "interest expenses" line elsewhere in the financial report) and then compare the two figures. (The "official" definition of a zombie uses a different stat called earnings before interest and taxes, or "EBIT." However, some companies have a lot of noise in their income statements like large noncash expenses, which is why I prefer the other metric I mentioned.) Here's my simplest advice... When credit is getting tight, like today, stay away from unprofitable companies. Companies that failed to make a profit while debt was cheap will often struggle further when debt is expensive. The market is no longer pumping up high-growth tech companies with vague aspirations of future profitability... and for good reason. Also, avoid highly leveraged companies. If a company's long-term debt totals more than 60% of its assets, stay away. Unfortunately, there isn't a place where you can find a list of all zombies today. But one place you can do a kind of "zombie" stock checkup is on our website. When you look up a company by name or ticker, you can look at [our Stansberry Score]( (available to subscribers who are signed in). The Stansberry Score includes a "financial" score, which reflects the financial health of a company and predicts whether a company will default on its debt within the next year. A higher "financial" score means a more financially sound company, with a score above 80 being ideal and a score of 50 being considered neutral. I haven't conducted in-depth research on every company that our automated system reports on... But I'd suggest avoiding any stock with a Stansberry Research financial-health score of less than 30. The Real Risk of Deflation Forget inflation... In this episode of Making Money With Matt McCall, Mike McGlone, a senior macro strategist at Bloomberg Intelligence, joins Matt to talk about the opposite problem... [Click here]( to watch this video right now. For more free video content, [subscribe to our Stansberry Research YouTube channel](... and don't forget to follow us on [Facebook]( [Instagram]( [LinkedIn]( and [Twitter](. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: # [NEW: Huge May 10 Stock Warning]( An event 20 times BIGGER than the bank collapse of 2023 is coming... because over HALF of the U.S. stock market ($10 trillion) is set to move in less than 60 days. This critical moment will send some stocks soaring... while slashing others up to 90%. It's time to protect your money now. [Click here while there's still time](. --------------------------------------------------------------- # [Sell This Popular Stock NOW]( More than 1 million people around the world follow Marc Chaikin, a Wall Street veteran with 50 years of experience, for his surprisingly accurate stock predictions. And he just gave them an urgent SELL ALERT for one of the most popular stocks in U.S. history. He says, "After years of breathtaking gains, this company's day in the sun is coming to an end. You must sell this stock – NOW!" [Get the ticker symbol here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- New 52-week highs (as of 5/3/23): Alamos Gold (AGI), Eli Lilly (LLY), MYR Group (MYRG), Novartis (NVS), and Torex Gold Resources (TORXF). In today's mailbag, giddyap... your suggestions for the name of a Fed-owned racehorse... As always, send your comments, questions, horse names, and other feedback to feedback@stansberryresearch.com. "How about Running Deficit? Running on Empty would be nice but they'd probably get sued by Jackson Browne." – Paid-up subscriber George R. "DEADBEAT!" – Paid-up subscriber Richard D. "Runaway (as in budget deficit)" – Paid-up subscriber B.F. "What immediately came to mind, especially after the comments about the relentless spending and the debt limit: "Gotta Spend; Damn the Debt; Ain't no Limit; Drunken Sailor. "Down the stretch they come!" – Paid-up subscriber Steve R. "If the Fed owned a racehorse, it would be named Hardly Able." – Paid-up subscriber Patty G. "We'll Print More." – Paid-up subscriber Todd L. "Out of the Money, because this horse never needs to finish in the top three positions to earn its keep. Politicians will just keep feeding it my money." – Paid-up subscriber Roy B. "If the Fed or any of those other clowns in office owned a racehorse, its name would be Forever in Debt." – Stansberry Alliance member S.G. "Off the top of my head I can think of a few good names for the Fed's race horse. Let's start with Rate Hike or Bankrupt... and lastly Forever Printing." – Flex Alliance Member Kenneth S. "KickTheCan, of course." – Paid-up subscriber Daniel B. "If the Fed owned a racehorse... "First of all, it would pay for the horse with 30-year bonds, paying more in interest over 30 years than the horse was worth and finally paying the principal note after the poor thing was dead. "Then they would hire a jockey whose father knew someone who owed someone a favor, a jockey who went to Harvard or Yale, was 6'4", good-looking, and had always been chauffeured around in a Bentley. "But it wouldn't matter if the horse (or the jockey or the taxpayers) won or lost. "The horse's name would be Long Run. 'In the long run, we are all dead.' – Keynes." – Paid-up subscriber Jacqueline G. "Easy Money" – Paid-up subscriber Michael B. "Couldn't settle on just one. Here's a possible field: "Dust in My Wind Bubble Trouble Pumper's Delight Yellen in the Dark Guttenberg Express Jamie's Diamond Too Drunk to Fail Barnum and Bail Out Print n' Sprint Cart Before the Horse Greenscam Here's Your Mandate Transitory Story." – Paid-up subscriber Gary S. "I don't know about race horses, but if the Fed ran NASCAR it would go like this: "Interviewer: 'You've raised the limit on horsepower 10 times in a row resulting in extremely hazardous conditions for everyone not just on but near the track. Are you oblivious to the consequences of your actions?' "Fed: 'We are well aware that 4 of the most prominent cars drove into the wall this past month resulting in their complete destruction, so that's why we are only raising the horsepower limit by 25 this time.'" – Paid-up subscriber D.M. Hi Corey, The horse's name should be In God we Trust because if the great masses lose faith in the dollar then it will be hell on Earth. But maybe Just Another Comma might be more descriptive." – Paid-up subscriber Jim H. "If the Fed owned a race horse, it should be named Inflation. Then at the track they could cheer him on by saying 'Run away, Inflation!!'" – Paid-up subscriber Larry N. Corey McLaughlin comment: Wow, how about these names? See what teamwork can do? Thank for sending in all the fun suggestions, though it might be more fun if every single one of them weren't so appropriately accurate. It's hard to pick a winner, but in the spirit of betting and this weekend's Kentucky Derby – which subscriber Craig R. mentioned [in yesterday's mail]( to spur this whole conversation – here's my trifecta from all of your great nominations... Down the stretch they come... Forever Printing, Yellen in the Dark, and Running on Empty (even though Jackson Browne may sue). I can imagine a track announcer yelling: "... and it's Forever Printing by a nose!" Jamie's Diamond also made me laugh out loud, but we'll save that for a horse owned by JPMorgan Chase, which there also has to be – at the very least indirectly – somewhere in the world. All the best, Corey McLaughlin and Mike DiBiase Baltimore, Maryland May 4, 2023 --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Top 10 Open Recommendations Top 10 highest-returning open positions across all Stansberry Research portfolios Stock Buy Date Return Publication Analyst MSFT Microsoft 11/11/10 1,101.8% Retirement Millionaire Doc MSFT Microsoft 02/10/12 949.5% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter ADP Automatic Data 10/09/08 777.1% Extreme Value Ferris HSY Hershey 12/07/07 662.2% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 02/21/20 639.5% Stansberry Innovations Report Wade WRB W.R. Berkley 03/16/12 509.7% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter BRK.B Berkshire Hathaway 04/01/09 473.1% Retirement Millionaire Doc AFG American Financial 10/12/12 397.9% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter FSMEX Fidelity Sel Med 09/03/08 319.8% Retirement Millionaire Doc ALS-T Altius Minerals 02/16/09 307.7% Extreme Value Ferris Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 10 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the model portfolio of any Stansberry Research publication. The buy date reflects when the editor recommended the investment in the listed publication, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if a security is still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber to that publication and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 10 Totals 4 Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter 3 Retirement Millionaire Doc 2 Extreme Value Ferris 1 Stansberry Innovations Report Wade --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 5 Crypto Capital Open Recommendations Top 5 highest-returning open positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Stock Buy Date Return Publication Analyst wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 12/07/18 1,508.0% Crypto Capital Wade ONE-USD Harmony 12/16/19 1,160.0% Crypto Capital Wade POLY/USD Polymath 05/19/20 1,063.6% Crypto Capital Wade MATIC/USD Polygon 02/25/21 893.1% Crypto Capital Wade BTC/USD Bitcoin 11/27/18 672.4% Crypto Capital Wade Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 5 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the Crypto Capital model portfolio. The buy date reflects when the recommendation was made, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if it's still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Hall of Fame Top 10 all-time, highest-returning closed positions across all Stansberry portfolios Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Nvidia^* NVDA 5.96 years 1,466% Venture Tech. Lashmet Band Protocol crypto 0.32 years 1,169% Crypto Capital Wade Terra crypto 0.41 years 1,164% Crypto Capital Wade Inovio Pharma.^ INO 1.01 years 1,139% Venture Tech. Lashmet Seabridge Gold^ SA 4.20 years 995% Sjug Conf. Sjuggerud Frontier crypto 0.08 years 978% Crypto Capital Wade Binance Coin crypto 1.78 years 963% Crypto Capital Wade Nvidia^* NVDA 4.12 years 777% Venture Tech. Lashmet Intellia Therapeutics NTLA 1.95 years 775% Amer. Moonshots Root Rite Aid 8.5% bond 4.97 years 773% True Income Williams ^ These gains occurred with a partial position in the respective stocks. * The two partial positions in Nvidia were part of a single recommendation. Editor Dave Lashmet closed the first leg of the position in November 2016 for a gain of about 108%. Then, he closed the second leg in July 2020 for a 777% return. And finally, in May 2022, he booked a 1,466% return on the final leg. Subscribers who followed his advice on Nvidia could've recorded a total weighted average gain of more than 600%. You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized investment advice. © 2023 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [www.stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.