What the Skeptics Get Wrong About Unemployment

Unemployment is likely to be an issue – eventually – but not for the reason some people think... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [DailyWealth] Editor's note: If you're expecting a recession, the hot jobs market might have you stumped right now. So today, Joel Litman – chief investment strategist at our corporate affiliate Altimetry – is clearing the air. In this piece, he debunks a common misunderstanding about the labor force. And he reveals what investors should pay attention to instead... --------------------------------------------------------------- What the Skeptics Get Wrong About Unemployment By Joel Litman, chief investment strategist, Altimetry --------------------------------------------------------------- Jobs data is still defying the odds... The January unemployment rate came in at 3.4%, its lowest level since May 1969. The U.S. added another 517,000 jobs to the economy. Economists only expected an additional 187,000 jobs. The labor market beat expectations by a landslide. And these numbers are even better than the strong data we've seen in recent months. The U.S. added 223,000 jobs in December and 256,000 in November. There's a bit of a mismatch, though... January's data suggests that the job market is still white hot. And yet, other market-outlook indicators – like the [inverted yield curve]( – suggest that we're on the verge of a recession. Some people reconcile the raging job market and the economy's tenuous footing by saying that jobs data is misleading. They claim unemployment rates are only low because no one wants to go to work... And they back up this idea using an entirely different metric. The problem is that when it comes to this alternative measure, most folks are missing a crucial detail. Today, we'll take a closer look at two ways of determining the health of the job market. And I'll explain why unemployment is going to be an issue eventually – just not for the reason some people think. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: [A New Financial Crisis Just Arrived]( This week, while most investors panicked over the Federal Reserve's latest rate hike – and the big swing that followed – a new financial crisis has quietly taken hold of the U.S. stock market. And if you're following the usual crisis playbook... staying on the sidelines... or hoarding cash... your money is more at risk than at any other time in recent history. But there's a dead-simple way to take advantage of what's coming, instead of being blindsided. [Click here for the major story (including two stocks to SELL immediately)](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [The ONLY Stock You Need for 2023]( Greg Diamond is giving away the name of his No. 1 stock for 2023. You could have already doubled your money five different times with this stock using his strategy, which dates back to 1876. It's how Greg managed up to $900 million a day on Wall Street, where he booked an average profit of $155,000 per day. [Click here to learn the ticker](. --------------------------------------------------------------- Some skeptics are sounding the alarm on labor-force participation... The labor participation rate measures what percentage of working-age Americans are employed or looking for work. This is separate from the unemployment rate, which is simply the number of unemployed Americans divided by the labor force. On its surface, the labor participation rate looks like it's plummeting. It was 62% in December... inching toward its lowest level since the mid-1970s (not counting a brief dip at the onset of the pandemic). And it has been trending lower since 2007. Take a look... If participation is tanking, folks claim the unemployment rate may not be as useful as it once was. They say unemployment looks low because people aren't looking for work, not because everyone has jobs. In fact, some argue it means the unemployment rate is artificially low. It's true that weak labor-force participation could be cause for concern. If fewer people are looking for work, it might suggest a shortage of workers in the economy. That could slow economic growth. Here's the issue... Most people don't really understand the labor-force participation rate. Anyone who's over the age of 16 and able to work is counted in the labor force. You never leave the labor force by that definition. Since 2007, a large percentage of Baby Boomers – folks born from roughly the mid-1940s to the mid-1960s – have reached retirement age. That's a big chunk of the American workforce that's no longer working. So it's no surprise that labor-force participation is declining. While people are aging out of the labor force, they're still being counted as potential workers. This is a massive flaw in how the rate is calculated. It's why we don't expect levels to recover anytime soon. And it means labor participation shouldn't change how we view unemployment. That doesn't mean the unemployment rate will stay historically low forever... The Federal Reserve is actively trying to raise unemployment. So we expect that number to rise in the coming months. The tech industry has already started the year by cutting tens of thousands of jobs... And another round is likely on the way. However, that's also a sign that higher interest rates are starting to do their job in slowing the economy. For now, don't listen to the people claiming unemployment data is unreliable... Most of them don't understand what they're looking at. Regards, Joel Litman --------------------------------------------------------------- Editor's note: Two legendary investors who called the 2020 crash are stepping forward with an urgent stock prediction. It involves the pullback in stocks we saw this week... a market shift that no one sees coming... and a rare group of investments that is known to soar at moments just like this one, even if we see more volatility from here. [You can learn the details here](. Further Reading "If you ask CEOs what they see in their own businesses, the fundamentals look fine," Brett Eversole writes. "But if you ask them about the overall picture, they expect everything to deteriorate quickly." This recent paradox in sentiment is important to understand... Find out what it means for investors [right here](. Everyone is trying to get ahead of the Federal Reserve's next move. Are more rate hikes coming? Or will the Fed change its aggressive stance? When you look closely at the economy, the answer is more complicated than it seems... [Read more here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [Tell us what you think of this content]( [We value our subscribers' feedback. To help us improve your experience, we'd like to ask you a couple brief questions.]( [Click here to rate this e-mail]( You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to DailyWealth. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from DailyWealth [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You're receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized investment advice. © 2023 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [www.stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.