Newsletter Subject

Good Luck With That, Chamath

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Fri, Sep 23, 2022 10:07 PM

Email Preheader Text

The 'SPAC King' gives up... This 'Bull Club' favorite isn't what it used to be... 'We ultimately wal

The 'SPAC King' gives up... This 'Bull Club' favorite isn't what it used to be... 'We ultimately walked away each time'... Expect many more SPAC liquidations... Good luck with that, Chamath... Blue chips can be risky for investors... In a mega-bubble, business quality doesn't matter... The 'top dogs' change all the time... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Digest] The 'SPAC King' gives up... This 'Bull Club' favorite isn't what it used to be... 'We ultimately walked away each time'... Expect many more SPAC liquidations... Good luck with that, Chamath... Blue chips can be risky for investors... In a mega-bubble, business quality doesn't matter... The 'top dogs' change all the time... --------------------------------------------------------------- Believe it or not, one 'Bull Club' member actually threw in the towel this week... [Three weeks ago]( I detailed the two major clubs that matter in a mega-bubble – the Bull Club and the Bear Club. I made those names up, but they're pretty self-explanatory. Today, I (Dan Ferris) want to focus on the Bull Club... This club is where all the wannabe cool kids go during the boom times. Its members include ARK Investment Management CEO [Cathie Wood]( WeWork founder turned real estate "guru" [Adam Neumann]( and Archegos Capital Management's [Bill Hwang](. Although I believe MicroStrategy (MSTR) co-founder Michael Saylor is the real deal, I explained in the September 2 Digest why he's in the Bull Club as well. His huge, leveraged bet on bitcoin devastated his company's stock after the crypto plunged from its record high. One key trait of Bull Club members is their conviction. And importantly, this conviction is a major driving force behind our current mega-bubble woes. As I said earlier this month... The [Bull Club] is made up of folks who get you into [a mega-bubble]... and try hard to keep you there. They'll do anything to convince you to stay. And they'll do it even after their favorite asset has generated massive losses and clearly hasn't lived up to its exaggerated promise. The members of this group are hailed as geniuses on the way up. And they're deemed hucksters (or worse) on the way down. With their steadfast conviction, the Bull Club's loyal members usually never give up. Well, maybe Bull Club member Chamath Palihapitiya doesn't want to be seen as a 'huckster' anymore... Palihapitiya is a venture capitalist and former Facebook executive. And in the Bull Club, his weapon of choice is the special purpose acquisition company ("SPAC"). Or... it was. As regular Digest readers know, SPACs surged in popularity in recent years... In short, they allow companies to go public without enduring the drawn-out, often mundane process of an initial public offering. And they're often called "blank check" companies... That's because a SPAC sponsor takes it public without having any business operations. The sponsor promises to use the money raised to acquire a real business within two years – or give the money back to investors. So until then, they're just publicly traded piles of cash. Palihapitiya got into the SPAC boom at the perfect time... In 2020, his first SPAC tripled four months after it merged with space-tourism hopeful Virgin Galactic (SPCE). And before long, he raised more than $4 billion to fund five other SPACs. Palihapitiya's success led to an all-too-familiar nickname in the investing world – "SPAC King." Overall, he has sponsored 10 SPACs. They're all tech- or biotech-focused. Of the 10 SPACs, six completed mergers... - Virgin Galactic - Online real estate brokerage Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) - Insurance tech provider Clover Health Investments (CLOV) - Online lender SoFi Technologies (SOFI) - Biotech Akili (AKLI) - Biotech ProKidney (PROK) However, like many Bull Club ideas during a mega-bubble, investors aren't too fond of SPACs these days... As the New York Times noted on Tuesday... Interest in SPACs has recently waned. SPACs raised more than $160 billion in public offerings last year, according to the database SPAC Research. So far this year, SPACs have raised about $13 billion. That's a big shift... SPAC funds are down more than 90%. And Palihapitiya, the man in charge of the SPAC Chapter of the Bull Club, finally appears to see the writing on the wall... He announced on Tuesday that his company, Social Capital, would close two SPACs it co-created and return their funds to investors. The two SPACs held about $1.6 billion overall. Basically, Palihapitiya's two-year deadline was fast-approaching – without any good options to spend $1.6 billion. (I wish I had that problem.) As he wrote on his blog... Over the past two years, we evaluated more than 100 targets and while we came close to doing a deal several times, we ultimately walked away each time. Palihapitiya isn't the only recent SPAC sponsor who failed to find a merger, either... Back in July 2020, hedge-fund manager Bill Ackman raised $4 billion in the biggest SPAC sponsorship in history. For me, it was a tell-tale sign of the developing bubble in the space. Sure enough, the bubble started bursting – taking down Ackman's record-setting SPAC in the process. Like Palihapitiya, he liquidated his SPAC and gave all the money back this past July. In my view, the SPAC bust is far from over... I believe many more SPAC liquidations are on the way. Earlier this month, the Financial Times reported that $75 billion worth of SPACs face expiration and will likely liquidate between now and the end of February. Then, another $36 billion is set to expire in March alone. You might recall that the SPAC boom peaked in March 2021. And since SPACs normally allow themselves two years to find a deal, it makes sense that a huge number of liquidations will happen between now and March – and that they'll top out that month. I'm confident most of these SPACs will liquidate because of what Chamath said about exploring more than 100 different companies and still not closing a deal. Given the powerful incentives to get a deal done... that tells me a huge bubble still exists in private companies. Perhaps that bubble will fully burst after more than $100 billion in SPACs liquidates by the end of March. The financial markets could start getting really, really ugly between now and April or May – sometime after all these SPACs liquidate. Palihapitiya apparently knows he'll be kicked out of the SPAC Chapter of the Bull Club at that point. But he's still not completely giving up his full club membership. As he concluded in his blog post... Our view on SPACs remains consistent since our first deal – SPACs are just one of many tools in our toolkit to support companies as they enter subsequent stages of growth. Good luck with that in the middle of a raging mega-bubble, Chamath. On that note, before you start your weekend, we need to cover another recent news story... As my colleague Corey McLaughlin [shared on Tuesday]( FedEx (FDX) caught many folks off guard last week... In short, the delivery giant "pre-announced" a terrible earnings report last Thursday. FedEx also withdrew its full-year guidance. And importantly, management said that it "expects business conditions to further weaken in the [fiscal] second quarter." The company is now making changes to cut costs. As Barron's reported last Friday... Sales were close, but management said revenue was impacted by "global volume softness." The economy is slowing. Costs are also a problem. The company is going to close more than 90 FedEx office locations, slow hiring, and consolidate some package sorting operations, among other actions, to save some money. FedEx's stock fell more than 21% on Friday. Nearly $12 billion in market cap evaporated. According to Barron's, data going back to 1978 showed it was the stock's worst day ever. Pay attention... FedEx is telling you something I've warned folks about before... In the fall of 2017, as I do every year, I presented at our annual Stansberry Conference. One point I made was that many folks falsely think mega-cap "blue chip" stocks are safe... It's true that these stocks tend to carry less risk than many of their small-cap counterparts. But that doesn't mean you can just rest easy... Blue chips can be risky for investors, too. You see, most people understand that small-cap stocks are risky. So they act accordingly. It's much worse to believe a stock is safer than it really is. In 2017, with the stock market raging, I told the crowd something unbelievable... I said that beloved stocks like the company formerly known as Facebook, Amazon (AMZN), and Alphabet (GOOGL) could easily plunge 20% in a single day. I explained that these stocks were all riskier than most folks would ever think. It didn't take long for the market to prove me right... On July 26, 2018, Facebook fell 19% in a single day. It lost $119 billion in market cap. Then, it happened again on February 3, 2022... The social-media giant now known as Meta Platforms (META) fell 26% in a single day. The drop set the record for a one-day market cap loss at $232 billion. Keep in mind... I'm not saying blue chips are riskier than other stocks. I'm saying they're riskier than most folks believe. And I'm saying a 20% or more loss in a day is likelier than they believe, too. It's a matter of expectations versus reality... When you act in a way that underestimates risk – even when buying blue-chip stocks – you're more vulnerable to a big, sudden loss than you realize. That's why I always urge folks to prepare for a wide range of outcomes. I bet more so-called blue chips will suffer massive single-day drops over the next few years... Specifically, I'm wondering when it might happen to Apple (AAPL) and Tesla (TSLA). Why those two mega-cap stocks? Two reasons... First, Apple and Tesla are among the five largest stocks by market cap in the S&P 500 Index, the Nasdaq Composite Index, the Russell 3000 Index, and probably dozens of other stock indexes. In other words, they're two of the market's most important assets. Second, they haven't performed as poorly as Microsoft (MSFT), Alphabet, and Amazon so far this year. Those three other mega-cap dominators are all down roughly 30% in 2022. Meanwhile, Apple is down around 15% and Tesla is down about 23%. But mark my words... before the bear market ends, Apple and Tesla will crack like the rest. The progression of stocks peaking then performing poorly is clear... It started with the worst garbage in the market peaking in February and March 2021. Since then, bubbles in unprofitable tech companies (like the ones in Wood's flagship ARK Innovation Fund), cannabis, clean energy... and yes, SPACs... have all burst. Then, in November 2021, the Nasdaq and the small-cap-focused Russell 2000 Index peaked. Both indexes are down more than 30% since then. This past January, the higher-quality S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average peaked. They've both dropped roughly 20% this year. And they're on the downswing yet again. If you want to figure out what inning of the bear market we're in, just keep your eye on Apple and Tesla... Since Tesla isn't a great business and is already underperforming Apple, I suspect it will crack first. By the end of this year, I believe Tesla could lose 20% or more in a single day. Then, Apple will crack. That will be the beginning of the end... Now, don't get me wrong – Apple is a phenomenal business... Everybody loves Apple. Everybody loves iPhones. You either own one or want one. (I can already hear the keyboard cowboys typing their hatred for Apple and iPhones. Don't bother. Nobody will believe you. You're probably even writing the e-mail on your iPhone.) The most important thing is... everybody knows Apple is one of the greatest businesses in the history of human commerce. Everybody. That's the point... In a mega-bubble bear market like the one we're living through right now, business quality doesn't matter even a little bit. No company can escape the carnage when a mega-bubble goes bust – not even Apple. And Apple plunging 20% or more in a single day would go a long way toward convincing everyone that this bear market is real and brutal. With that in mind, one of the best things you can do as an investor is be proactive... You should always look for ways the landscape has changed since the last big storm. Aside from the COVID-19 pandemic, the last big storm in the markets happened during the 2008 financial crisis. And the landscape looks a lot different today than it did back then... For example, the biggest market-cap companies in the world's stock indexes have completely changed over that span. And in general, they don't stay the same for long. Market-research firm Research Affiliates refers to these stocks as the market's "top dogs." And as you can see, most of these top dogs change every decade – or faster... (If you're curious, Tesla is currently No. 6 on the list of top dogs globally.) Whether you realize it or not, the changing of the guard is likely underway again... I don't know what the top five will be in another 10 years. But the odds are against Apple or any of today's other four top dogs staying there – and almost certainly not all five of them. Keep that in mind as you navigate the bear market and try to figure out how to position your wealth for the next few years. And remember, blue chips are riskier than you think. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: # [RECAP: Here's What You Missed Last Night...]( Marc Chaikin helped build Wall Street. Joel Litman spent his career denouncing it. But they both agree about the ONE financial crisis that threatens your wealth more than anything else today... plus the EXACT step to take with your money to protect yourself and see five times potential gains. Don't get blindsided – see what's coming and how you need to prepare immediately, [right here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- # [Huge Recession Loophole (See These Charts)]( Amid today's market turmoil, THIS is one of the biggest and most bullish opportunities today: a red-hot sector with almost unlimited pricing power and a history of outperforming in recessions. It's also the sector where Dr. David Eifrig spent half his professional life, meaning he's extremely qualified to spot world-class opportunities today. [Take a look at the evidence here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- New 52-week highs (as of 9/22/22): SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill Fund (BIL), General Mills (GIS), iShares U.S. Real Estate Fund (IYR), Northrop Grumman (NOC), and the short position in Capital One Financial (COF). Our inbox is overflowing with "yes" answers to [our suggestion of creating a "bottom is (probably) in" checklist]( based on indicators we've shared over the past few months. Given the interest, we'll plan on putting that checklist together soon. And as always, we'll keep you posted on all the developments in the markets. Other than that, stay tuned this weekend for a pair of Masters Series essays from our friends at Chaikin Analytics. And if you have any comments, questions, concerns, or other suggestions, you can e-mail us at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. Good investing, Dan Ferris Eagle Point, Oregon September 23, 2022 --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Top 10 Open Recommendations Top 10 highest-returning open positions across all Stansberry Research portfolios Stock Buy Date Return Publication Analyst MSFT Microsoft 11/11/10 861.3% Retirement Millionaire Doc ADP Automatic Data 10/09/08 816.3% Extreme Value Ferris MSFT Microsoft 02/10/12 738.9% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter HSY Hershey 12/07/07 537.0% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter ETH/USD Ethereum 02/21/20 484.6% Stansberry Innovations Report Wade AFG American Financial 10/12/12 400.6% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter BRK.B Berkshire Hathaway 04/01/09 376.1% Retirement Millionaire Doc WRB W.R. Berkley 03/16/12 357.7% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter NTLA Intellia Therapeutics 12/19/19 286.6% Stansberry Innovations Report Engel FSMEX Fidelity Sel Med 09/03/08 284.5% Retirement Millionaire Doc Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 10 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the model portfolio of any Stansberry Research publication. The buy date reflects when the editor recommended the investment in the listed publication, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if a security is still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber to that publication and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 10 Totals 3 Retirement Millionaire Doc 1 Extreme Value Ferris 4 Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter 2 Stansberry Innovations Report Engel/Wade --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 5 Crypto Capital Open Recommendations Top 5 highest-returning open positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Stock Buy Date Return Publication Analyst ONE-USD Harmony 12/16/19 1,160.6% Crypto Capital Wade ETH/USD Ethereum 12/07/18 1,154.5% Crypto Capital Wade POLY/USD Polymath 05/19/20 1,063.0% Crypto Capital Wade MATIC/USD Polygon 02/25/21 823.5% Crypto Capital Wade BTC/USD Bitcoin 11/27/18 416.6% Crypto Capital Wade Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 5 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the Crypto Capital model portfolio. The buy date reflects when the recommendation was made, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if it's still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Hall of Fame Top 10 all-time, highest-returning closed positions across all Stansberry portfolios Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Nvidia^* NVDA 5.96 years 1,466% Venture Tech. Lashmet Band Protocol crypto 0.32 years 1,169% Crypto Capital Wade Terra crypto 0.41 years 1,164% Crypto Capital Wade Inovio Pharma.^ INO 1.01 years 1,139% Venture Tech. Lashmet Seabridge Gold^ SA 4.20 years 995% Sjug Conf. Sjuggerud Frontier crypto 0.08 years 978% Crypto Capital Wade Binance Coin crypto 1.78 years 963% Crypto Capital Wade Nvidia^* NVDA 4.12 years 777% Venture Tech. Lashmet Intellia Therapeutics NTLA 1.95 years 775% Amer. Moonshots Root Rite Aid 8.5% bond 4.97 years 773% True Income Williams ^ These gains occurred with a partial position in the respective stocks. * The two partial positions in Nvidia were part of a single recommendation. Editor Dave Lashmet closed the first leg of the position in November 2016 for a gain of about 108%. Then, he closed the second leg in July 2020 for a 777% return. And finally, in May 2022, he booked a 1,466% return on the final leg. Subscribers who followed his advice on Nvidia could've recorded a total weighted average gain of more than 600%. You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberrycustomerservice.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized investment advice. © 2022 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [www.stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

EDM Keywords (285)

years year wrote writing writers worse world work words wood wondering wish whole well weekend weapon wealth weaken ways way want wall vulnerable view used use two tuesday try true towel top toolkit told today three threatens tesla tells telling tech take suspect suggestions suggestion subscription subscribers subscriber stocks stock still stay started start speak span spacs spac something short shared set sent seen see security sector saying save said safer safe risky riskier right return rest responsibility refer redistribution recorded record recommendation recommend recessions receiving received really realize real read raised questions putting published publication prove protect progression problem probably proactive presented prepare posted position popularity poorly point plan performed past part palihapitiya pair overflowing outperforming outcomes ones one odds nvidia note next need navigate nasdaq names must month money mind middle merged members mean matter markets market mark march many man make made loss look long living lived list liquidations liquidated liquidate likelier learned learn landscape known know kicked keep iphones iphone investors investor investment interest inning information indicators indexes inbox importantly impacted history hatred happened happen hailed guard group going give get geniuses general gave gain funds friends fond followed folks focus five find finally figure feedback february faster far fall failed eye exploring explained expire example evidence even evaluated escape endorse end employees either economy drawn developments detailed deal days day date currently creating crack convince conviction consolidate confident concluded company coming club closing closed close clearly clear choice charge changing chamath carnage burst bubbles bubble brutal bottom booked blog biggest bet believe beginning based barron back april apple anything announced among amazon always also agree advice address actions acting act acquire ackman account 90 600 23 21 2020 2017 20 108

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.