Why the New York Times Bought Wordle

Game app Wordle took the nation by storm, prompting the New York Times to recently purchase it for over seven figures. Many analysts wonder if the brand name was worth it, but it's possible to pull back the curtain on its true performance... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [DailyWealth] Why the New York Times Bought Wordle By Joel Litman, editor, Altimetry's Hidden Alpha --------------------------------------------------------------- As Wordle took over, the New York Times (NYT) took notice... Wordle is the most recent gaming app to sweep the nation. Once a day, players get six chances to try and guess a five-letter word. Josh Wardle (yes – the name of the app is a pun) launched Wordle in October with humble beginnings. It started as a gift to his wife. The game had a mere 90 daily active users ("DAUs") in November... Now, it has roughly 300,000 DAUs. Wordle has taken off, with upward of 3 million total players around the world. It's easy to share your score and attempts with friends... It's competitive... And the limit of only playing once a day makes it addictive. In fact, its popularity drew the New York Times to purchase it a few weeks ago for more than seven figures. The New York Times has a repertoire of other word games, crossword puzzles, and paywalled articles as part of its subscription model. But considering the high cost paid for one simple game, many analysts wonder if the brand name was worth it. It's hard to tell if the New York Times' shift to a subscription model is working – unless you can pull back the curtain on its true performance... --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: [$3,000 GOLD Coming Soon?]( Gold just crossed $2,000 an ounce and could be on the verge of the biggest bull run in half a century. (It gained 1,700% during the high-inflation 1970s.) Now legendary analyst Dan Ferris believes you MUST own shares of one extraordinary gold stock. He says it's likely better than any miner, explorer, or exchange-traded fund on Earth. It's the crown jewel of his complete plan for this dangerous market, with 1,500%-plus potential. [Details here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [A Massive Wave of Bankruptcies Is Coming]( It's actually much bigger and more important than what happens to the Nasdaq or S&P 500 Index. Some of the world's best investors are practically drooling in anticipation because this crash will create a slew of 100%-plus opportunities... backed by legal protections that stocks can only dream of. A top analyst believes this could happen within months – and you must prepare now. [Get the full story here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- Company after company has switched from a one-time payments model to offering "sticky" subscription services. While pioneered by Adobe (ADBE) and Salesforce (CRM), other businesses are taking up this Software as a Service ("SaaS") model to bring in recurring sales and supercharge returns. The New York Times is doing the same. It has historically relied on advertising revenue, boosted by subscriptions as a smaller part of its business. But now, it's working to drive up its subscriber count by adding value – such as word games – to pursue more of that SaaS business model. The New York Times had a goal of 10 million subscribers by 2025. It shattered that goal in 2022... And it recently upped it, aiming for 15 million subscribers by the end of 2027. Considering that the New York Times has been actively pursuing this strategy, it should have already started to see impressive returns... Recently added segments like "Games" and "Cooking" each added about 1 million subscribers. So its purchase of Wordle shows promise. But if you only look at the as-reported metrics, you'd never know it... Returns appear to have been stagnant since 2016, sitting at just 5% return on assets ("ROA") for the past three years. Despite reaching millions more people, the New York Times' performance doesn't seem to be doing much. Take a look... This lack of growth has left analysts wondering why the New York Times would make such a huge purchase for a simple word game. Spending more than $1 million seems like a big gamble and a waste of money for a company that isn't doing anything extraordinary. However, Uniform Accounting tells us why the New York Times purchased the Internet's latest phenomenon so quickly – and with such a high price tag... Traditional accounting methods are rife with distortions. Our team at Altimetry uses Uniform Accounting to filter out those distortions and see what's really going on with a company's earnings. That way, we can see what the Wall Street analysts are missing. Uniform metrics show that the New York Times' returns have soared from 2% in 2017 – which was less than the cost of capital levels – to 16% in 2020. Take a look... Pursuing this subscription model for news and puzzle games has made the New York Times an above-average company. While analysts might be scratching their heads on why the New York Times would pay so much for Wordle, its subscription-based model of paying for games like this is turning the company around. Thanks to Uniform Accounting, we can see that clearly. Regards, Joel Litman Editor's note: Digital technology companies like Facebook, DocuSign, Twitter, Shopify, and many others have fallen 40% or more. But Joel says the big money is headed somewhere new... to a part of the markets very few people are paying attention to. And that means the "digital revolution" as we know it is about to get steamrolled – by something MUCH bigger. This opportunity is just now hitting an inflection point. All the details are in Joel's brand-new presentation... You can access it totally free of charge, [right here](. Further Reading Under conventional metrics, it's hard to explain how Amazon became a dominant player in e-commerce. But by stripping away the market distortions, Joel reveals why this giant continues to grow... Read more here: [Amazon's Profitability Is an 'Iceberg' Under the Surface](. New York Times isn't the only company making "hidden" profits. This software leader is growing its reach with a new business model. And it's a lot more lucrative than traditional accounting suggests... [Learn more here](. INSIDE TODAY'S DailyWealth Premium This gaming industry leader stays flush with cash... Addictive games like Wordle are a great way to retain customers. And one company has this business down to a science... [Click here to get immediate access](. Market Notes 'SELLING THE BASICS' GIVES THIS COMPANY A BOOST Today, we're looking at a "basics" company that's delivering steady gains... Regular readers know we love highlighting companies that sell everyday items, like [bread]( and [cleaning supplies](. These businesses sell the products that we use on a daily basis... which means customers will keep coming back to restock their cupboards. Take today's company, for example... [Hormel Foods (HRL)]( is a $30 billion food-processing company. It owns more than 50 brands worldwide, including well-known names such as Hormel Pepperoni, SKIPPY peanut butter, and SPAM. Its wide variety of foods makes it easy to buy for any occasion, whether you're looking for party appetizers or on-the-go snacks. And that leads to consistent, growing revenues... In the most recent quarter, Hormel Foods saw record sales of $3 billion, up 24% year over year. As you can see, HRL shares have climbed higher over the past five years. They're up almost 50% over that period and recently hit a new 52-week high. It's just more proof that selling the basics is a winning strategy... --------------------------------------------------------------- [Tell us what you think of this content]( [We value our subscribers’ feedback. To help us improve your experience, we’d like to ask you a couple brief questions.]( [Click here to rate this e-mail]( You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to DailyWealth. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from DailyWealth [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberrycustomerservice.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized investment advice. © 2022 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [www.stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.