Newsletter Subject

Big bets

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Tue, Jun 11, 2019 03:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

I like to make big bets. If you follow my work, you know that I also refer to them as "fat pitches."

I like to make big bets. If you follow my work, you know that I also refer to them as "fat pitches." The idea is that I don't have to be in the game if I don't want to. You can unsubscribe [here]( but you will no longer receive DailyWealth. [Daily Wealth] Dear Reader, I like to make big bets. If you follow my work, you know that I also refer to them as "fat pitches." The idea is that I don't have to be in the game if I don't want to. If I'm patient I can wait on the sidelines waiting for the right "pitch" to come my way. But when it does, I swing for the fences. In other words, when I have my highest conviction ideas, I like to bet BIG. One of the ways I've done that over the years is using leveraged Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs). They are designed to multiply the gains you can get on an idea. So, if the fund is a 2x levered fund, it should go up 2% for every 1% rise in the ordinary fund. That was the case when I saw an opportunity in the semiconductor market toward the end of 2017. It was November when I recommended the ProShares Ultra Semiconductors Fund (USD). You see, I was so bullish on semiconductors, I used an "ultra" fund that delivered double the return on semiconductors. But here's why I bring this up... My friend and colleague, Dr. David Eifrig, saw my semiconductor recommendation at the time and agreed that there was an opportunity to make some money. But instead of using a leveraged fund, he recommended a similar bullish bet using a unique strategy he developed. Now here's where it gets even more interesting... As it turns out, I got my timing wrong. I ultimately closed the position six months later for a 1.28% loss. But that's not what happened with Doc's trade... Believe it or not, Doc's trade was a big winner... over a similar period of time... AND he achieved that WITHOUT using a leveraged fund. In fact, he closed his recommendation for a 90% gain in only four months. Now how is that possible? How did he recommend a bullish bet on the same sector, over a similar period of time and make higher gains WITHOUT using a leveraged fund? Well, that's exactly what Doc is going to reveal during his [first-ever Trading Master Class]( on June 19 at 8 p.m. Eastern. It is a trading strategy he learned during his time at Goldman Sachs that can turn losing recommendations into big winners. And it can even help you [multiply small winners by up to 10x or more](. He's invited several folks to Baltimore, where he'll teach his newest strategy... and he's broadcasting the entire event to show readers like you how you could make up to 10x higher gains from your highest conviction investment ideas. The event is free, but you must reserve your seat to attend. To claim your spot today, [simply click here](. Good Investing, Steve Sjuggerud Editor, DailyWealth --------------------------------------------------------------- All contents of this e-mail are copyright 2019 by Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Reproducing any part of this document is prohibited without the express written consent of Porter Stansberry. Protected by U.S. Copyright Law {Title 17 U.S.C. Section 101 et seq., Title 18 U.S.C. Section 2319}: Infringements can be punishable by up to five years in prison and $250,000 in fines. DISCLAIMER: The work included in this publication is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, and corporate press releases. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of Stansberry Research. You're receiving this email at {EMAIL}. If you have any questions about your subscription, or would like to change your email settings, please contact Stansberry Research at (888) 261-2693 Monday-Friday between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time. Or if calling internationally, please call 443-839-0986. Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles Street Baltimore, MD 21201. If you wish to contact us by email, please do not reply to this message but instead go to info@stansberrycustomerservice.com. To unsubscribe from this mailing, click here: [Unsubscribe](

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.