Newsletter Subject

Fads, 'FOMO,' and Financial Ruin

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Sun, Jul 28, 2024 12:36 PM

Email Preheader Text

In today's Masters Series, adapted from the January 19 issue of The Big Secret on Wall Street at Por

In today's Masters Series, adapted from the January 19 issue of The Big Secret on Wall Street at Porter & Co., Porter reveals the red flags that can help you avoid putting your money into fad investments... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Master Series] Editor's note: [Don't let the "fear of missing out" influence your decisions](... As our founder Porter Stansberry warns, it could be your downfall as an investor... no matter how intelligent you are. In today's Masters Series, adapted from the January 19 issue of The Big Secret on Wall Street at Porter's company, Porter & Co., Porter reveals the red flags that can help you avoid putting your money into fad investments... --------------------------------------------------------------- Fads, 'FOMO,' and Financial Ruin By Porter Stansberry, founder, Stansberry Research No one wanted to be caught hanging out at Jonathan's Coffee House. The unassuming shop – a hole in the wall in London's seedy Exchange Alley – was frequented by pickpockets and ladies of "easy virtue." Even worse... it was also a den of stock traders. In Exchange Alley, you minded your own business. So no one asked too many questions about the mysterious "Mr. Newton" who showed up one day... or suggested that maybe he shouldn't invest his entire fortune in shares of the South Sea Company. So, despite his education and superhuman understanding of risk and numbers, Sir Isaac Newton fell for a classic economic bubble – just like countless other speculators over the centuries. And we'll keep making those errors today... unless we understand how fads work and how to avoid them. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Link: ['Anyone Who Subscribes to Financial Research Needs to Hear THIS']( Porter Stansberry is the CEO of the largest independent financial research firm in the world. More than 5 million people have seen his work. On July 30, he's stepping forward with an important message about this year's manic market... and sharing step-by-step instructions on what he's doing with his own money to prepare. It costs you nothing to attend. [Click here for details](. --------------------------------------------------------------- In 1719, the brilliant physicist, mathematician, and economist was pushing 80. He was also rich... and bored with his cushy government position as "Master of the Mint." The South Sea Company – whose shares Newton bought – was a British joint-stock company founded in 1711. It mainly facilitated the slave trade between Africa and Spain's western colonies. But soon, it would branch out into other schemes. When King George took over as the company's governor, shares soared. And by late 1719, Sir Isaac Newton had succumbed to the mania. He built up a position worth £13,000, equivalent to $2.5 million in today's money. After buying in under £200 per share, he began selling the stock at £400 per share. He should have quit while he was ahead. But instead, he got caught up in phase two of the South Sea bubble... the Ponzi scheme. In 1720, the South Sea Company pitched a program to convert British debt into South Sea shares. It proposed using the sale of new shares to pay down the £32 million in British government debt. Bribes flowed into Parliament to ensure the plan's acceptance... And company owners encouraged others to fuel the speculative bubble. Newton got greedy. The Master of the Mint bought back in... at almost double the price he'd received as a seller months before. Weeks after his new purchase, the stock price collapsed from more than £950 to less than £200. By December 1720, Newton lost today's equivalent of millions. He'd discovered gravity decades earlier when an apple fell in his garden... But now, he'd learned painfully that the same principles held true in the stock market. Today, you don't need a deep understanding of finance – or physics, or astronomy – to spot investment fads. (As Newton regretfully acknowledged after the South Sea disaster: "I can calculate the motion of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people.") You simply need a strong mix of skepticism, market awareness... and knowledge of a few bright-red flags: - Red Flag No. 1: Popular media outlets push the new trend. Media-sponsored events and "investment conferences" typically encourage investors to invest large sums immediately, pushing a combination of "FOMO" (fear of missing out) and promises of high, fast returns. - Red Flag No. 2: The returns don't align with historically average market returns. Fads typically lack fundamentals, strong business models, revenue streams, and developed markets. Instead, they rely more on hype than substance. - Red Flag No. 3: The "peanut gallery" is buzzing. Watch to see if people with a shallow knowledge of investing get excited about an opportunity. If your cousin – who can't balance a checkbook – starts trading Dogecoin on his cellphone, that's a bad sign. - Red Flag No. 4: The business operators make bad decisions. In addition to the investment, you must look at the people who are operating the companies... and see if they have a weak track record or a history of failed ventures in various businesses. A person who was working in cannabis in 2019, angel investing in 2020, jumped to blockchain in 2021, and then ran a non-fungible-token company in 2022 probably isn't your ideal CEO. - Red Flag No. 5: The regulators are cautious. If you can't spot fads independently, regulatory agencies like the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or Commodity Futures Trading Commission occasionally issue alerts about potential investment scams or fads. As a master class in fads, consider one-time wunderkind investment manager Cathie Wood... Wood has notoriously invested in unprofitable companies with terrible fundamentals. They usually do great... for a while... until they collapse. Wood's ARK Innovation Fund (ARKK) portfolio consists of tech wunderkinds like Coinbase (COIN), Roku (ROKU), and Zoom Video Communications (ZM). Wood has argued that investors need to "wait five years" for ARK's investment to pay off. Yet it continues to burn through money in overhyped industries that still lack developed markets. Another example of a recent fad is the wave of special purpose acquisition companies ("SPACs"). This fad has fueled dramatic losses, bankruptcies, and busts... In 2020, the SPAC craze started with private companies merging with shell companies. The private companies could then go public without the hassle of an initial public offering. This included names like sports-gambling business DraftKings (DKNG) and electric-vehicle maker Lucid (LCID). These companies were largely venture-capital-level investments with sky-high valuations in developing industries. Speculators went crazy for them. DraftKings surged more than 600%... before crashing back to Earth a year later. In 2023 alone, 21 SPACs went bankrupt, according to Bloomberg. All told, those bankruptcies wiped out $46 billion in shareholder equity from their peak market capitalizations. These aren't the only fads or bubbles of our lifetime, or the last... So remember: If it looks too good to be true, it likely is. While the hype surrounding these "disruptive" sectors and speculative investments creates profits for some early investors, the downside risk is much larger than the short-term possibilities. Focus on great companies with low debt, tangible assets, and strong capital efficiency – ones that return the maximum amount of cash possible to shareholders over a long period of years. Regards, Porter Stansberry --------------------------------------------------------------- Editor's note: Porter accurately predicted the world's largest mortgage brokers – Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – were headed toward bankruptcy. He did the same with General Motors in January 2007. Now, he's sharing an urgent warning about the most dangerous investment in America right now and the one strategy you must implement immediately to protect your wealth. [Learn more here](... --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Link: [Our No. 1 Stock for the Rare 'Millionaire Window' Opening NOW]( According to Wall Street legend Whitney Tilson, an extremely rare window in the markets is about to open. It's an often-misunderstood market setup we've only seen 13 times since 1920. The last time this happened, it minted 1 million brand-new millionaires – in a single year. But Tilson says this unique window in the markets could close much sooner than anyone realizes, leaving most investors in the dust, while making a select few incredibly rich. [Get our No. 1 stock (with 500%-plus upside potential) for this rare market event now](. --------------------------------------------------------------- You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You're receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice. © 2024 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.