Newsletter Subject

Don't Get Lost in the AI Hype Cycle

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Fri, Jun 21, 2024 10:07 PM

Email Preheader Text

Hopes and dreams nearing all-time highs... The 'magic' of AI... Citi's losing 'AI Winners Basket'...

Hopes and dreams nearing all-time highs... The 'magic' of AI... Citi's losing 'AI Winners Basket'... 'Please, God, just one more bubble'... Everybody knows... There's always a reason to sell... I (Dan Ferris) bet you didn't know you can measure the market value of hopes and dreams... I didn't either. That is until I recently stumbled […] [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Digest] Hopes and dreams nearing all-time highs... The 'magic' of AI... Citi's losing 'AI Winners Basket'... 'Please, God, just one more bubble'... Everybody knows... There's always a reason to sell... --------------------------------------------------------------- I (Dan Ferris) bet you didn't know you can measure the market value of hopes and dreams... I didn't either. That is until I recently stumbled across a July 9, 2020 piece by Bloomberg macro strategist Cameron Crise, published on the Bloomberg terminal, titled "Why Worry About COVID When You Can Dream About 2030?" In the piece, Crise defines the "hopes and dreams" metric... [T]he "hopes and dreams" analysis disaggregates equity market valuation into book value, the net present value of expected earnings over the next three years, and everything else – the "hopes and dreams" of future earnings that are not yet forecast. Crise is describing a valuation tool that quantifies how much investors are looking past a business's fundamentals and instead betting on the over-optimistic nonsense people believe about the future. Crise adds immediately after his definition that, "the more hopes and dreams dominate equity valuation, the more speculative the market pricing is." So it's a great tool for measuring how hyped the market is at any given time. Hopes and dreams were 70% of the S&P 500's market valuation at the dot-com-era peak in March 2000. They're about 65% of it today, and a dot-com-bubble comparison suggests there's plenty of room for hopes to dwindle and dreams to fade... Today's measure is roughly in line with November 2000, after the S&P 500 had lost about 14% of its peak value. The S&P went on to lose another 35%, finally bottoming out in October 2002. Hopes and dreams took over the market, then the market fell apart. Hopes and dreams during the dot-com bubble were about the Internet... "Everybody" knew the Internet was the most amazing technological advancement since the printing press. Everybody knew it would make lots of folks rich. Everybody knew you couldn't go wrong buying Internet stocks... Today, "everybody" is focused on a single buzzword that has become nauseatingly ubiquitous: artificial intelligence, or more commonly, "AI." Everybody knows AI is the biggest thing since the Internet, that it'll make lots of folks rich, and that you can't go wrong buying AI stocks. Today, everybody, everywhere, is talking about AI... I can't get away from it, not even 8,000 feet up in the Rocky Mountains – a two-hour drive from any major city – at the annual VALUEx Vail conference run by my friend, investor and author Vitaliy Katsenelson. It's an invitation-only meeting of 40 investors who pitch their favorite stock ideas to each other. At breakfast each morning, Vitaliy presents the group with a discussion topic. You'd think a group of value investors would be able to talk about something besides AI, but sure enough, on the first morning, Vitaliy proposed the question, "How do you use AI?" The funny thing is, we talked about that same question at one of last year's breakfasts. (Don't tell Vitaliy, but when he stops talking about AI at VALUEx breakfasts, I'm going to start talking about it all the time.) AI has captured the world's imagination... Alphabet, Google's parent company, boasted on social media recently about "the magic of Google AI." The people who run Google are smarter than I'll ever be, so it feels odd for a group of geniuses to make a comment that seems to sum up what the average fool thinks of AI. It wouldn't surprise me if the technology became embedded into many tasks that are currently run by software. I assume most software might be improved by more intelligence. That might sound suspiciously or even worthlessly vague as AI assessments go, but anybody who talks about the future in less-than-vague terms should be a lot more suspicious to you. Any technology pundit touting AI miracles... any financial analyst looking for pure "AI stocks"... and certainly any government person saying anything at all about AI... is all highly suspicious to me and has a particular aroma any good analyst must learn to identify... I think 90% of what is touted about AI right now will be revealed in the next several years as pure bovine excrement. And the market is already starting to figure that out... A recent Financial Times article reported on the performance of Citigroup's "AI Winners Basket," a group of stocks said to benefit from AI... About 60 per cent of stocks in the S&P 500 have risen this year, but more than half the stocks included in Citi's "AI Winners Basket" – an index based on the names that were garnering the most excitement among the bank's clients last year – have declined. More than three-quarters of companies in the AI basket had climbed in 2023. Sounds like it's becoming an AI Losers Basket. Before it's all over, I bet that whole basket will decline. It's hilarious to me that so many people are talking about AI and putting good money into stocks because of it. It's hilarious because, if stock market manias weren't known to send valuations flying into the stratosphere, nobody would care about AI, since 99% of everybody talking about it doesn't even know what it is. They only believe that they can make money from it, because they've heard every talking head on their TVs and computers telling them so. They have no idea what they own. This is what I am warning you against getting caught up in... A recent CNN article pointed out that folks buying Nvidia (NVDA) don't really know what it does and suggested it'll one day be replaced by another company whose name they can't pronounce. Nvidia's $3 trillion-plus market cap is now larger than the entire market cap of each of the French, German, and U.K. stock markets. I suppose the company could be worth more than every public company in each of those countries... but would you bet on it? It would have been a better idea to buy Nvidia back in 2016. That's when my colleague and editor of Stansberry Venture Technology, Dave Lashmet, recommended shares in the chipmaker. The company was valued at around $24 billion at the time. The company's growth back then came from the video-gaming sector, but Dave saw potential ahead for more growth from AI and wrote, "nobody on Wall Street is betting on artificial brains as a business segment." That's far from the case today. Crise also noted that less than half the S&P 500 stocks and 43% of the Russell 3000 are trading above their 50-day moving averages and that the S&P rallied twice last week with less than 200 of its components rising on the day. Crise says this constellation of circumstances has aligned as often over the past month as it has only once in the past 30 years: March 22, 2000, two days before the S&P 500's dot-com-era peak. The desperation and speculative fervor around AI remind me of a bumper sticker allegedly seen in Silicon Valley after the dot-com bubble blew up, which read... 'Please, God, just one more bubble'... THAT is what the hopes-and-dreams metric measures: investors' belief that, even though they failed to get rich from the past three epic bubbles, the presence of yet another awesome new technology means they'll be able to get rich fast in this one, and with a lot less effort than it takes to generate real wealth in a universe in which there is no free lunch. It's the same reason people bought meme stocks and NFTs (non-fungible tokens) over the past few years... and every other pathetic gamble investors have bought in the financial markets over the past few centuries. A few smart folks get an idea and make some money from it. When it seems to every fool with a few extra bucks in his pocket like the market has validated a few early birds' theses, a greed-addled throng of followers pours into those markets, trying to ride others' coattails to an easy fortune. But life – and investing – doesn't work that way. The coattail riders always get wiped out. More than one successful investor has pointed out that the wise do in the beginning what the fool does in the end. And it's looking a lot more like the foolish end of the inflated expectations portion of the AI hype cycle than its wise beginning. Consultants at Gartner have made a technology hype cycle graphic you should see... The language on the graph is reminiscent of [my Digest last Friday](. I evoked the phrase "One Ring to rule them all," from Lord of the Rings, which refers to the "One Ring" of power at the center of J.R.R. Tolkien's epic of hobbits, elves, wizards, and other creatures in the mythical land of Middle-Earth. Looking at Gartner's hype cycle chart, you can almost hear Gandalf, the wizard from Lord of the Rings, warning, "Should you survive that hopeless dark chasm, the Trough of Disillusionment, you will have to call upon all your remaining strength to climb the steep Slope of Enlightenment and finally stand atop the glorious Plateau of Productivity..." Right now, my vain efforts to stop hearing and talking about AI have left me thinking we're somewhere around the Peak of Inflated Expectations. Next stop: the Trough of Disillusionment. Make sure you're not on board the hype train when it leaves for that station. As for me, I'm not betting on AI at all because I think it's a bunch of hype and nonsense at this point. I'd like to think I'll become interested as an investor when somebody can convince me we're on the Slope of Enlightenment, but only time will tell. For now, here's an idea so 'terrible,' it's good... When buying hopes and dreams is widely seen as a good idea, shorting the market is widely seen as a terrible one... JPMorgan Chase recently published data showing that "short interest tied to SPY and QQQ is hovering at the lowest levels since at least 2018," as Wall Street Journal reporter Gunjan Banerji put it in a recent post on social platform X. In other words, everybody knows AI will send the market soaring to a permanently high plateau and that it's just dumb to be short the market. But as regular Digest readers all know, whatever everybody knows is wrong, whether it's the unassailability of the Nifty Fifty "blue chip" stocks before they were decimated in the 1973 to 1974 bear market... The no-brainer bets on gold that folks took on in 1979 and 1980, before the yellow metal descended into an epic 19-year, 70% decline... The dot-com miracle before it was obliterated in the 2000 to 2002 bear... Or the belief "U.S. home prices never fall" before the housing bubble nearly caused the global financial system to collapse in 2008. Each time, what everybody knew was dead wrong. Big losses followed. I have no reason to believe this time is different... All the ingredients are in place for an epic meltdown. And though it might not be imminent, the risk of a meltdown is certainly higher than any time since the dot-com peak, by the measures we cited today. I have to conclude that putting on some short exposure beyond November 2024 is not a terrible idea right now, especially considering the current low short interest in SPY (the SPDR S&P 500 Fund) and QQQ (the Invesco Nasdaq-100 Fund). Maybe short exposure seems like a mistake to you. After all, markets hate uncertainty... For instance, when the next U.S. president is elected, that'll remove a great source of uncertainty, which could unleash a new bull market rally. That sounds suspiciously like something everybody knows. What they don't know, or at least don't care about, is that stocks are egregiously overvalued and starting to behave the way they did around the dot-com peak. You could argue that whatever optimism anybody might have about who the next president will be is already firmly priced into the current valuations – along with "everything else," as Crise described investors' hopes and dreams. Uncertainty in the stock market has apparently gone out of style. But, please, don't misunderstand me... I can't overemphasize that I'm not telling you to sell everything, but only to prepare for what may lie ahead... Matt Franz and Dan Shuart from asset-management firm Eagle Point Capital are here in Vail this week. I've found their writing very thoughtful and occasionally brilliant. In [a piece they published last March]( they point out that there's always a reason to sell stocks and run for the hills... and how that has consistently been a mistake for the past several decades. Buying great businesses for the long haul and riding out the rough times is still the best thing most folks can do with their capital, with the notable exception of starting a highly successful business. There are dozens of great businesses in the stock market. Many aren't valued as richly on "hopes and dreams" as Nvidia or other popular AI stocks today. Learning something about as many of them as possible and buying shares when they're priced right has been an excellent way to build long-term wealth throughout my six-plus decades of life. I suspect this time is no different. I doubt that'll change much over the next several years, even if I'm right about a huge bear market followed by a decade-plus sideways market, and even if I'm right about today's AI hype having the hallmarks of previous bubbles. As it has in the past, investing in great companies throughout such periods would lay the groundwork for decades of excellent compounding at very high rates. So I'm not trying to scare you away from stocks. I'm just trying to help you avoid the big, catastrophic mistakes equity investors tend to make. Getting caught up in AI hype right now definitely qualifies. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: [Urgent Warning About the Magnificent Seven]( Wall Street veteran Marc Chaikin predicted this bull market... last year's bank collapses... even the rise of Nvidia, as early as 2014. Now, he's sounding the alarm on what's coming next for the stock market and warns: "Folks getting distracted by the Magnificent Seven right now, especially Nvidia, risk getting sideswiped by [what's coming next]( --------------------------------------------------------------- [Urgent Alert: 'This Could Be Worth 20 Times More Than Nvidia']( Whitney Tilson has nailed many of the most famous stocks of the past 25 years – including Netflix, Amazon, and Apple. Now he's pounding the table on a new technology rolling out across America, which early estimates say could create more wealth than AI, the personal computer, and the smartphone combined. [Click here to see how it could become the No. 1 investment of the next decade](. --------------------------------------------------------------- New 52-week highs (as of 6/20/24): Brown & Brown (BRO), Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield Fund (EYLD), KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index Fund (KEMX), Motorola Solutions (MSI), Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities (VTIP), and the short position in Teladoc Health (TDOC). A quiet mailbag today. What's on your mind? Let us know with an e-mail to feedback@stansberryresearch.com. Good investing, Dan Ferris Vail, Colorado June 21, 2024 --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Top 10 Open Recommendations Top 10 highest-returning open stock positions across all Stansberry Research portfolios Investment Buy Date Return Publication Analyst MSFT Microsoft 11/11/10 1,421.1% Retirement Millionaire Doc MSFT Microsoft 02/10/12 1,420.4% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter ADP Automatic Data Processing 10/09/08 897.5% Extreme Value Ferris WRB W.R. Berkley 03/16/12 739.2% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter BRK.B Berkshire Hathaway 04/01/09 625.4% Retirement Millionaire Doc HSY Hershey 12/07/07 450.0% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter AFG American Financial 10/12/12 446.2% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter TT Trane Technologies 04/12/18 437.3% Retirement Millionaire Doc NVO Novo Nordisk 12/05/19 408.6% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Gula TTD The Trade Desk 10/17/19 373.6% Stansberry Innovations Report Engel Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 10 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the model portfolio of any Stansberry Research publication. The buy date reflects when the editor recommended the investment in the listed publication, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if a security is still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber to that publication and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 10 Totals 5 Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter/Gula 3 Retirement Millionaire Doc 1 Extreme Value Ferris 1 Stansberry Innovations Report Engel --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 5 Crypto Capital Open Recommendations Top 5 highest-returning open positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Investment Buy Date Return Publication Analyst wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 12/07/18 2,291.8% Crypto Capital Wade BTC/USD Bitcoin 11/27/18 1,625.3% Crypto Capital Wade ONE/USD Harmony 12/16/19 1,168.0% Crypto Capital Wade MATIC/USD Polygon 02/25/21 773.8% Crypto Capital Wade AGI/USD Delysium AI 01/16/24 345.4% Crypto Capital Wade Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 5 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the Crypto Capital model portfolio. The buy date reflects when the recommendation was made, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if it's still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Hall of Fame Top 10 all-time, highest-returning closed positions across all Stansberry portfolios Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Nvidia^* NVDA 5.96 years 1,466% Venture Tech. Lashmet Microsoft^ MSFT 12.74 years 1,185% Retirement Millionaire Doc Inovio Pharma.^ INO 1.01 years 1,139% Venture Tech. Lashmet Seabridge Gold^ SA 4.20 years 995% Sjug Conf. Sjuggerud Nvidia^* NVDA 4.12 years 777% Venture Tech. Lashmet Intellia Therapeutics NTLA 1.95 years 775% Amer. Moonshots Root Rite Aid 8.5% bond 4.97 years 773% True Income Williams PNC Warrants PNC-WS 6.16 years 706% True Wealth Systems Sjuggerud Maxar Technologies^ MAXR 1.90 years 691% Venture Tech. Lashmet Silvergate Capital SI 1.95 years 681% Amer. Moonshots Root ^ These gains occurred with a partial position in the respective stocks. * The two partial positions in Nvidia were part of a single recommendation. Editor Dave Lashmet closed the first leg of the position in November 2016 for a gain of about 108%. Then, he closed the second leg in July 2020 for a 777% return. And finally, in May 2022, he booked a 1,466% return on the final leg. Subscribers who followed his advice on Nvidia could've recorded a total weighted average gain of more than 600%. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Crypto Hall of Fame Top 5 highest-returning closed positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Band Protocol BAND/USD 0.31 years 1,169% Crypto Capital Wade Terra LUNA/USD 0.41 years 1,166% Crypto Capital Wade Polymesh POLYX/USD 3.84 years 1,157% Crypto Capital Wade Frontier FRONT/USD 0.09 years 979% Crypto Capital Wade Binance Coin BNB/USD 1.78 years 963% Crypto Capital Wade You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice. © 2024 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

EDM Keywords (312)

years year writing writers would worth worry world work wizard wise whole week wealth way warning valued validated vail universe uncertainty unassailability tvs trying trough trading touted today time thoughtful though thinking think terrible telling tell talks talking talked talk takes table suspicious suspect survive surprise suppose sum suggestions suggested subscription subscribers subscriber style stocks still station starting spy speculative speak spdr sounding somebody software smarter slope short sent send sell seems see security scare run rule roughly room risk risen rise rings right riding richly revealed responsibility replaced remove reminiscent refers refer redistribution recorded recommendation recommend receiving received reason read questions question quantifies qqq putting published publication president presence prepare power pounding possible position pointed point plenty please place pitch piece performance people peak past part overemphasize one often obliterated nvidia nonsense names must money misunderstand mistake might meltdown meeting measuring measures measure market many make magic made lot lost lord looking line like life less left leaves least learned learn larger language known know invitation investor investment investing internet intelligence instance ingredients information improved imminent identify idea hyped hype hovering hopes hills hilarious help hallmarks half growth group groundwork graph good gold going geniuses gartner garnering gain future fundamentals found fool followed folks focused finally figure feedback far failed evoked every ever even epic enlightenment endorse end employees elected either editor early dwindle dumb dreams dream dozens doubt disillusionment different desperation describing definition declined decline decimated decades date creatures covid countries could convince constellation consistently conclude company companies comment colleague collapse closed climbed climb citigroup citi circumstances chipmaker certainly centuries center care captured capital came business bunch bubble breakfasts breakfast bought booked board betting bet benefit believe behave beginning becoming based bank away avoid assume around apple anybody always aligned alarm ai advice address acting account able 70 65 43 2030 2016 2014 2008 2000 200 1980 1979 1973 14 108

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.