Newsletter Subject

Be Wary of a Promised 'Royal Flush'

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Sat, May 11, 2024 11:33 AM

Email Preheader Text

If you want to avoid corporate money pits, you need to know how to stay a step ahead of management's

If you want to avoid corporate money pits, you need to know how to stay a step ahead of management's games... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [DailyWealth] Editor's note: Some management teams play elaborate games to try to win the public's approval. But according to Joel Litman – founder of our corporate affiliate Altimetry – all the good press can sometimes distract you from what's really going on beneath the surface. In today's Weekend Edition, we're taking a break from our usual fare to share one of Joel's essays, updated from a May 2023 issue of the free Altimetry Daily Authority e-letter. In it, Joel explains how to look past the false signals – and expose potential red flags... --------------------------------------------------------------- Be Wary of a Promised 'Royal Flush' By Joel Litman, chief investment strategist, Altimetry --------------------------------------------------------------- Only a madman could end the Vietnam War... By 1969, the U.S. had been involved in Vietnam for nearly a decade and a half. The war was costly, bloody, and vastly unpopular. And when former President Richard Nixon took office that year, he desperately wanted an off-ramp. Nixon knew he couldn't pull troops out while the war was still raging. There didn't seem to be any end in sight. So he chose the opposite path... and dramatically escalated the fighting. Under Operation Giant Lance, which launched that October, the U.S. deployed 18 B-52 bomber jets to patrol the polar ice caps. Each jet was armed with nuclear weapons. The general public didn't know about the launch. But the Soviets – a key ally for Vietnam – could easily see what was going on. Or so they thought. What the Soviets didn't realize was that they were focusing on the wrong actions. They were playing directly into the U.S.'s hands. As I'll explain today, this lesson also applies to investing... because in order to avoid corporate money pits, you have to know exactly how to stay a step ahead of management. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Link: [These Regular Stocks Could DOUBLE Your Money by June 28]( No options trading. No cryptos. If you have a brokerage account and a calendar, you have the chance to double your money on regular stocks by June 28 – simply by buying and holding. The Wall Street accountant who has identified 29 100%-plus winning stocks explains exactly what to buy, [right here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- With huge nuclear-armed bombers flying around, the Soviets shifted their approach... and the U.S. was watching. Nixon and his national security advisor, Henry Kissinger, were utilizing what they called the "madman theory." They made a series of what seemed like irrational, volatile moves. They let the Soviet Union and Vietnam discover their actions on purpose. Their goal was to convince the enemy that Nixon would stop at nothing to end the war, even nuclear annihilation. They hoped the threat of an unpredictable madman would be enough to bring all sides to the negotiating table. Moscow and Hanoi already thought Nixon was irrational. So it wasn't hard to convince them that he might push things further than any reasonable leader. And it was made even easier because the two sides were playing entirely different games. Throughout both the Vietnam War and the Cold War, the Soviets were considered experts at "chess." They read the table and moved their pieces around to gain strategic position. They wanted to win the game in front of them. U.S. leaders, on the other hand, were playing "poker." They were reading the players across the table rather than playing the cards they were dealt. The U.S. bluffed to create unforced errors from the Soviets. And it played a risk-averse game when the enemy was more volatile. By playing poker when our opponents were playing chess, we were able to stay one step ahead of the Soviet Union and Vietnam. This strategy doesn't only apply to war, though... It's also critical to investing. Some of the most influential investors, like hedge-fund managers Steve Cohen and David Einhorn, are also great poker players. These folks know better than to take data or management's claims at face value. They also look at the company's actions to gauge whether it's trustworthy. And we aim to follow in their footsteps... Every quarter, subscribers to our Microcap Confidential advisory receive our "[Do Not Buy List]( It features the worst of the worst microcaps we can find... companies that have failed multiple tests on our rigorous fundamental forensics checklist. One warning sign we look for is an overabundance of press releases – with little to show for it. That's something we noticed with Blink Charging (BLNK), an electric-vehicle charging-station company that we first added to the list in January 2021. In each update, we take it upon ourselves to count the number of press releases Blink posts. It's at 17 so far in 2024... and we're not even halfway through the year. Most of them describe new charging stations and new partnerships. Blink spends far less time acknowledging that it has been hemorrhaging money for years. It lost $3.21 per share in 2023. And the stock is down 95% since we first said to stay away. All those press releases were a red flag that told us to take another look. Corporate executives love to make lofty promises. And Blink isn't alone... Plenty of other companies use a barrage of announcements to distract from "weak cards." That's why the savviest investors know how to read between the lines and call management's bluffs. When a company announces lots of big – or small – newsworthy events that suggest great prospects, don't buy into it blindly. Take a closer look behind the scenes first. Remember, management teams carefully curate what they say to swing opinions and drive interest. As investors, we're playing poker... not chess. Spend most of your time looking across the table at the key players. It's the only way to know whether or not they can be trusted. Regards, Joel Litman --------------------------------------------------------------- Editor's note: Some of the biggest hedge funds on Wall Street are preparing for a $10 trillion reckoning. More than 3,000 stocks stand to be impacted. This event is just weeks away... And the last time it happened, dozens of stocks saw massive losses – some even falling as much as 90%. But you can set yourself up to profit from this volatility, too... [Click here to learn the details](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [Tell us what you think of this content]( [We value our subscribers' feedback. To help us improve your experience, we'd like to ask you a couple brief questions.]( [Click here to rate this e-mail]( You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to DailyWealth. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from DailyWealth [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You're receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice. © 2024 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

26/05/2024

Sent On

26/05/2024

Sent On

25/05/2024

Sent On

25/05/2024

Sent On

25/05/2024

Sent On

24/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.