Newsletter Subject

What Powell Left Unsaid

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Thu, May 2, 2024 10:06 PM

Email Preheader Text

What else to make of the Fed's message... High inflation is here to stay... The Bank of Japan interv

What else to make of the Fed's message... High(er) inflation is here to stay... The Bank of Japan intervenes again... Cannabis stocks get a bump... Weight-loss-drug company earnings... Mailbag: 'Everyone is not a winner'... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Digest] What else to make of the Fed's message... High(er) inflation is here to stay... The Bank of Japan intervenes again... Cannabis stocks get a bump... Weight-loss-drug company earnings... Mailbag: 'Everyone is not a winner'... --------------------------------------------------------------- If you're still left scratching your head after yesterday's Fed meeting... You're not alone. We shared our first impression on the fly as we went to press yesterday... and did our best to summarize what we heard. Still, it felt to me (Corey McLaughlin) like a difficult exercise given the mixed messages we heard... The Federal Reserve kept its suggested bank-lending-rate range right where it has been since last July... and its policy-setting committee acknowledged "lack of further progress" on the pace of inflation easing over the previous three months. Then, at a post-meeting press conference, Fed Chair Jerome Powell notably didn't acknowledge that he felt the central bank had reached "peak rates" as he has in previous months. This seemed to leave room open for a major "hawkish" policy shift from the Fed. But then, in response to financial reporters' (good) questions, Powell said that despite inflation numbers well above the central bank's supposed 2% annual goal, another rate hike was "unlikely." He even outlined hypothetical scenarios for rate cuts still happening. Reasonable people could have come to different conclusions about the message Powell was trying to send. Wall Street firms have, too. Here's CNBC.com today... Wall Street reacted Thursday to this week's Fed meeting, with forecasts scattered across a range of outcomes for where monetary policy heads next. Most economists for the biggest forecasting firms expect the central bank to lower benchmark interest rates sometime later this year. But the outlooks ranged from one cut to four, with most saying that only time will really tell how much the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee can take its foot off the brake. Appropriately, the major U.S. indexes took a full round trip late yesterday afternoon, from "mixed" to "everything up by at least 1%" to mixed again... They were up today, with the benchmark S&P 500 higher by nearly 1%. As [we wrote yesterday]( it seems the Fed wants to cut rates, but the central bank doesn't have an argument right now. The reality found in the Fed's beloved data remains the same... hot recent inflation numbers, a still-growing economy, and a sub-4% unemployment rate. Which brings up a good question: Why might the Fed want to cut rates?... Nobody at the Fed has really said anything about that in a while. It was long thought that cutting rates would just be necessary because the Fed always has after rate-hike cycles. Each time, the economy ultimately slowed down to a point where inflation eased... or a recession occurred. Not long ago, the Fed also publicly stated that it didn't want to damage the economy with any higher rates. But by its own definitions, growth has been going along just fine since the central bank made borrowing costs significant again. Even after a recent first-quarter GDP report that in fact showed slower growth than previous quarters and higher inflation, Powell yesterday disputed the idea of "stagflation" that represents this scenario. He joked... I don't see the stag or the 'flation. While funny, it was a revealing line, too. In short, Powell says the economy is fine, but bank-lending rates will likely go lower before they go higher. Something doesn't add up. Maybe there's a reason for this... Maybe the Fed feels like it has done all it can to "fight" inflation without causing more crises in the banking system or a deflationary recession, which would take care of inflation but cause other financial heartaches and job losses... Maybe that's a legitimate fear and a well-intentioned concern. Or maybe, as Powell and other Fed officials have alluded to in recent months, the fiscal side of the equation – government spending and all the pandemic stimulus – is and was too strong to think that the central bank is the be-all and end-all when it comes to prices. Perhaps once inflation took hold and the government started mailing checks to people and handing out loans like Halloween candy, it's hard to make things simply go back to the way they used to be. We read this message between the lines of Powell's remarks yesterday. He maintained that interest rates were "restrictive," and he specifically mentioned that while "interest rate sensitive" parts of the economy had been influenced by Fed policy, other factors were influencing prices as well. The big takeaway... If any of this is true, or even close, then it is reasonable to consider that the central bank doesn't care as much about decimal points in inflation data as it used to... including the long-held 2% goal. Often, what's most important can be what's left unsaid... And if that's the case, here's how we end the head-scratching... with what matters most when thinking about what any of this could mean for your investments. It's simple. Essentially, it's the same thing longtime readers know we've said since 2020, way back when we warned of higher inflation ahead... and in 2021, when we were doing the same despite the Fed claiming higher prices were "transitory"... and again earlier this year when we told you inflation was running "hot" well before the Fed acknowledged it. The Fed's claim of a 2% inflation rate rings hollow today. High(er) inflation will be sticky... and while the story isn't just beginning anymore, it's far from over. But we'll take a break from beating this horse... Switching gears to 'breaking the yen' watch... Lost in the bustle of yesterday's late-afternoon market frenzy around the Fed meeting was what looked like yet another intervention from the Bank of Japan to prop up the yen. Right after yesterday's close of U.S. trading, the yen fell sharply again versus the dollar – with each dollar worth five fewer yen than the day before. It follows a nearly identical move [we saw earlier this week]( as the currency traded near 160 to the dollar. Analysts estimate this latest round of intervention amounted to as much as 3.5 trillion yen, or around $23 billion. The precise mechanism is unconfirmed, but it's thought that Japan's Ministry of Finance sold dollar deposits it holds in reserve on the foreign-exchange market and bought back its own currency with the proceeds – boosting demand, and thus prices, for the yen. The Bank of Japan's balance-sheet projections for next week show a 4.36 trillion yen net receipt of funds, compared with a 700 billion to 1.1 trillion estimate before this second suspected intervention. That follows the bank's similarly suspected and estimated purchase of 5.5 trillion yen on Monday. Speaking of stimulus... Cannabis stocks are back in the headlines... News this week that the U.S. government is getting closer to potentially reclassifying marijuana from a Schedule I drug (like heroin and LSD) to a Schedule III drug (such as Tylenol with codeine or steroids) sent cannabis stocks soaring... Today, DailyWealth Trader editor Chris Igou [updated his subscribers on the story](... and a cannabis trade in his portfolio... and noted that the cannabis sector is likely to remain in the news through November's election, much like in the 2016 and 2020 election years. An update on the weight-loss-drug winners... They just keep winning. Novo Nordisk (NVO) and Eli Lilly (LLY), the two major makers of the popular weight-loss drugs (and diabetes treatments), have reported terrific quarterly earnings this week. Novo reported today that its net quarterly profit rose 28% year over year (to $3.6 billion), sales of its popular weight-loss drug Wegovy more than doubled, and overall sales in North America rose 35%. On Tuesday, Eli Lilly said its first-quarter revenue rose 26% (to almost $9 billion) from the same period a year ago, a result primarily driven by its own weight-loss drugs, Mounjaro and Zepbound. It also raised its full-year revenue projections by $2 billion. Stansberry Venture Technology editor Dave Lashmet – who gave away both of these tickers in a free presentation earlier this year and here in the Digest in years past – shared his take with me today... Looking at Lilly and Novo for weight-loss drugs, the first thing to know is their Type 2 diabetes drugs and their weight-loss drugs are the same chemicals, branded separately. So, Lilly's Mounjaro and Zepbound both have a drug called tirzepatide inside Lilly's self-injector. And Novo Nordisk's Ozempic and Wegovy both have a drug called semaglutide inside Novo's self-injector. Secondly, no matter which drug you are on, you scale into it, from lower doses to higher doses, if necessary. For savvy investors, then, splitting revenue streams within companies is not the full story. Instead, what matters is profound revenue growth for these two drugs – plus their added production capacity. For Lilly, it's added $1.8 billion in quarterly revenue growth (year over year) for its tirzepatide product line. It's also spending $10 billion building new factories to make this drug. So this is a gangbusters business... For Novo Nordisk, it's added $1.7 billion in quarterly revenue growth (year over year) for semaglutide. It's also gaining 27,000 new prescriptions for Wegovy per week – which means 1.4 million new scripts per year. Given that there's at least 250 million medically obese people in the U.S., Canada, Europe, Australia, and Japan, it would take more than 100 years to reach market saturation. Clearly, Novo Nordisk is trying to beat that. Dave added that Novo just spent $11 billion buying an existing protein-manufacturing site (a concept he wrote about [in the March 15 Digest]( and Novo is also building $6 billion worth of new factories, all for these weight-loss and Type 2 diabetes drugs. Dave says this will continue to be a high-growth market as more supply comes online for these two companies. Both are growing at around 25% per year overall, and "we see this trend continuing," he says. What to watch tomorrow... On the economic-data front, investors' eyes will be on tomorrow morning's "nonfarm payrolls" report from Uncle Sam. This will include an updated unemployment rate... Any notable weakness in the labor market tomorrow or anytime in the near future could cause enough investors to lean toward the "Fed cut" idea rather than whatever they might be thinking now. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: [Until Midnight Tonight: 'Prepare Now: A New, Rare Crisis Looms']( The last time this rare type of crisis hit America was more than a decade ago. During that period, Porter Stansberry and his team of analysts used an obscure investment vehicle to deliver 40 winning recommendations. Porter now says in the aftermath of this new crisis, a rare window of opportunity will once again open for the first time in a decade. To get the names of the investments Porter is buying to capitalize on this imminent financial event, [click here before midnight tonight](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [Obama's 2024 Surprise: His Secret Plan to Finish What He Started]( The ONLY way Democrats can keep the White House is to bring back Barack Obama. And there's a sneaky (yet 100% legal) way to achieve this. In fact, this scenario is already underway. See what they're up to and how you can get ready today. [Here's the full video exposé](. --------------------------------------------------------------- New 52-week highs (as of 5/1/24): Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box Fund (BOXX), Commvault Systems (CVLT), Procter & Gamble (PG), and RadNet (RDNT). In today's mailbag, feedback on what the Fed said yesterday... and a take on higher interest rates being a good thing for savers... Do you have a comment or question? As always, e-mail us at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. "Corey, the Fed Said, 'Who the Flick Knows, NO CHANGE FOR THE FORSEEABLE FUTURE'. "Of course, Powell also admitted that the future is no longer than the next meeting AND it would take a massive change in employment to scare them into not going higher for longer than the wider market really expects. "Net bottom line? The fear of a potential Volker2 scenario due to Fiscal Sloppiness is not off the table. Me? I love it. These are the times that fortunes are made (or lost)!" – Stansberry Alliance member Bill B. "You cannot turn in to any broadcast, podcast, or financial blurb without the topic of Fed rate cuts coming up. It's been that way for two years. Why don't the commentators raise the obvious corollary – maybe rates are about where they belong in the long term; at rates that force lenders to allocate capital to viable projects; rates where savers can actually be compensated for saving without having to become stock market investors. "For 15 years, the Fed has robbed seniors of the chance to earn a real rate of return on savings without incurring a degree of risk that a great many are simply unprepared to accept. I know many low-income seniors who have kept their savings invested in CDs at 1% or thereabouts for more than 10 years. In the meantime, massive misallocation of trillions of dollars of capital has occurred due to the ridiculous maintenance of sub-real market borrowing rates. Ridiculously low mortgage interest rates have contributed to real estate prices ballooning to the point that today's young adults, for the most part, have no dream, much less the reasonable expectation of becoming homeowners short of using an inheritance or major parental gift, or perhaps finding a bag of money in the road that dropped off the Brinks truck. "Now, for the first time since the Great Recession, ordinary conservative savers can collect 5% on their money risk-free... Lenders actually underwrite commercial loans now, so that borrowers must be reasonably able to repay their debt – or not get the loan... Yes, the rate increases generate a lot of fallout among weaker businesses that cannot survive refinancing low-interest debt for market-rate debt. To that I say no one promised them interest rates would be 1% forever... "Free market capitalism requires that there be losers. Everyone is not a winner. Businesses that borrow money that they cannot expect to repay when the bill becomes due are those losers. There may be a couple more years of 'hell to pay' as the lending 'crisis' plays out. There are a lot more losers set to close up shop in the next year or two. And gee, maybe, just maybe, as market forces drive T-bill rates up and up, the Fed will resist the pressure to ease the rates back down to zero so Congress can continue to spend like, well Congress, without making real spending cuts. But I doubt it." – Subscriber Kelly F. All the best, Corey McLaughlin Baltimore, Maryland May 2, 2024 --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Top 10 Open Recommendations Top 10 highest-returning open stock positions across all Stansberry Research portfolios Investment Buy Date Return Publication Analyst MSFT Microsoft 11/11/10 1,324.5% Retirement Millionaire Doc MSFT Microsoft 02/10/12 1,253.0% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter ADP Automatic Data Processing 10/09/08 897.1% Extreme Value Ferris WRB W.R. Berkley 03/16/12 708.6% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter BRK.B Berkshire Hathaway 04/01/09 606.7% Retirement Millionaire Doc HSY Hershey 12/07/07 475.5% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter AFG American Financial 10/12/12 449.2% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter TT Trane Technologies 04/12/18 404.0% Retirement Millionaire Doc NVO Novo Nordisk 12/05/19 367.3% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Gula TTD The Trade Desk 10/17/19 344.1% Stansberry Innovations Report Engel Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 10 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the model portfolio of any Stansberry Research publication. The buy date reflects when the editor recommended the investment in the listed publication, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if a security is still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber to that publication and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 10 Totals 5 Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter/Gula 3 Retirement Millionaire Doc 1 Extreme Value Ferris 1 Stansberry Innovations Report Engel --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 5 Crypto Capital Open Recommendations Top 5 highest-returning open positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Investment Buy Date Return Publication Analyst wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 12/07/18 2,291.8% Crypto Capital Wade BTC/USD Bitcoin 11/27/18 1,451.1% Crypto Capital Wade ONE/USD Harmony 12/16/19 1,206.7% Crypto Capital Wade MATIC/USD Polygon 02/25/21 806.1% Crypto Capital Wade AGI/USD Delysium AI * 01/16/24 383.1% Crypto Capital Wade Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 5 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the Crypto Capital model portfolio. The buy date reflects when the recommendation was made, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if it's still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Hall of Fame Top 10 all-time, highest-returning closed positions across all Stansberry portfolios Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Nvidia^* NVDA 5.96 years 1,466% Venture Tech. Lashmet Microsoft^ MSFT 12.74 years 1,185% Retirement Millionaire Doc Inovio Pharma.^ INO 1.01 years 1,139% Venture Tech. Lashmet Seabridge Gold^ SA 4.20 years 995% Sjug Conf. Sjuggerud Nvidia^* NVDA 4.12 years 777% Venture Tech. Lashmet Intellia Therapeutics NTLA 1.95 years 775% Amer. Moonshots Root Rite Aid 8.5% bond 4.97 years 773% True Income Williams PNC Warrants PNC-WS 6.16 years 706% True Wealth Systems Sjuggerud Maxar Technologies^ MAXR 1.90 years 691% Venture Tech. Lashmet Silvergate Capital SI 1.95 years 681% Amer. Moonshots Root ^ These gains occurred with a partial position in the respective stocks. * The two partial positions in Nvidia were part of a single recommendation. Editor Dave Lashmet closed the first leg of the position in November 2016 for a gain of about 108%. Then, he closed the second leg in July 2020 for a 777% return. And finally, in May 2022, he booked a 1,466% return on the final leg. Subscribers who followed his advice on Nvidia could've recorded a total weighted average gain of more than 600%. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Crypto Hall of Fame Top 5 highest-returning closed positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Band Protocol BAND/USD 0.31 years 1,169% Crypto Capital Wade Terra LUNA/USD 0.41 years 1,166% Crypto Capital Wade Polymesh POLYX/USD 3.84 years 1,157% Crypto Capital Wade Frontier FRONT/USD 0.09 years 979% Crypto Capital Wade Binance Coin BNB/USD 1.78 years 963% Crypto Capital Wade You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice. © 2024 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

EDM Keywords (275)

zero zepbound yesterday yen years year wrote writers work winner whole whatever went well wegovy week way warned want versus using used update unlikely unconfirmed tylenol two trying true trillions transitory trading topic told today times time tickers thought thinking think thereabouts team take table summarize suggestions subscription subscribers subscriber strong story still sticky stay started stagflation stag speak shop shared sent semaglutide seems seemed see security schedule scenario scare scale says saying say savers road risk return restrictive responsibility response resist reserve represents repay remain refer redistribution recorded recommendation recommend receiving received reasonable reason read rates range questions question published publication prop progress pressure powell position portfolio point period people pay part pace ozempic outcomes opportunity open nvidia novo november noted news necessary names must much mounjaro money mixed ministry might message maybe may matters matter make maintained made lsd love lot losers longer lines lilly likely learned learn know kept keep joked japan investments investment inheritance information influenced inflation including include important idea holds hell heard head hard handing growing government get gain future funny four fortunes foot follows followed fly flation finish fine finally felt feedback fed fear far factors fact everything even endorse end employment employees else economy economists ease earn earlier drug dropped doubt doubled done dollars dollar digest despite degree decade debt day date damage currency crises couple contributed continue consider congress concept compensated comment comes come codeine closed close claim change chance cds cause case care capitalize capital buying bustle brings breaking break booked best benchmark belong beating beat based bank bag back anytime alone alluded aftermath advice address add actually acting acknowledge achieve account accept 2021 2016 108

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

13/05/2024

Sent On

12/05/2024

Sent On

12/05/2024

Sent On

11/05/2024

Sent On

11/05/2024

Sent On

11/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.