Newsletter Subject

CDC’s ACIP recap: Things they didn’t say

From

standforhealthfreedom.com

Email Address

advocates@standforhealthfreedom.com

Sent On

Thu, Mar 7, 2024 04:17 PM

Email Preheader Text

Last week the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices gathered for their regularly s

Last week the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) gathered for their regularly scheduled February meeting. No images? [Click here]( Dear {NAME}, Last week the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) gathered for their regularly scheduled February meeting. Four votes were taken; each passed easily. The ACIP spent a hefty chunk of time debating the subtleties of persuasive language to ensure as many people were getting shots as possible. Could they have spent their time discussing other things? [Click here or the button below]( for a recap of the votes and questions about what was left unsaid. [READ MORE]( Here are some comments made by people who keep voting YES to more shots and denying safety signals from VAERS: “I totally acknowledge that lots of people don’t want it…anything we can do to lower the barrier of getting a vaccine in someone’s arm is just wonderful." “We know efficacy wanes.” “98% of people have natural or vaccine immunity.” [There are] “lots of questions, probably unanswerable.” Check out the article, share with friends, and keep the conversation going to shine a light on how much we know and still don’t know about vaccines. Please also consider making a gift to support our work to follow and report on these consequential meetings. We’re honored to serve as your eyes and ears, so that you are always informed and empowered to stand for health freedom. [Click here to make a donation for our ADVOCACY work through our 501(c)(4), Stand for Health Freedom.]( [Click here to make a donation for our EDUCATION work through our 501(c)(3), Health Freedom Institute.]( For accountability, Stand for Health Freedom [standforhealthfreedom.com]( is a nonprofit dedicated to protecting basic human rights. We exist to educate people and for people to have the tools to educate their lawmakers. Add advocates@standforhealthfreedom.com to your contacts to make sure you get our mailings. You are receiving this email because you are opted in to our Stand for Health Freedom mailing list. [Preferences]( | [Unsubscribe](

Marketing emails from standforhealthfreedom.com

View More
Sent On

06/06/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

24/05/2024

Sent On

16/05/2024

Sent On

13/05/2024

Sent On

10/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.