Dear {NAME}, Today the attendees of the World Health Assembly (WHA) discussed the fate of the pandemic treaty and the proposed changes to the International Health Regulations (IHR). No decisions yet, but there was near-unanimous consensus to keep on trucking. The question right now is how fast. Some urged quick agreements to show the world that the World Health Organization (WHO) can work together successfully, while others called for more time on both documents. Notably, smaller or poorer countries want more time. Without expansive resources like large, wealthy countries have, they cannot participate fully in all discussions, therefore losing their voice. The U.S., specifically, has its sights on the IHR. Our delegates urged rapid adoption of IHR amendments this week, despite the document not being finished, and called for up to two years more of negotiation on the treaty. This is in line with what the U.S. global health strategy has been all along. Remember, it was the U.S. that proposed the IHR amendments at the same time the treaty negotiations started. Why would they do that? The IHR doesnât require advice and consent of the Senate to go into force, but the treaty clearly would. One of our tasks moving forward is to make sure our Congress has its eye on the IHR the same way the White House does. We also call on our lawmakers to reclaim their constitutional right and duty to approve significant international agreements, whether globalists call them a treaty or not. In short, everyone was in general agreement that the treaty needs more time, whether that means the rest of this year, another year, or two more years. Opinion was split on whether the IHR amendments should be finalized this week or given more time. The outcome of todayâs session was to create a new drafting group to âconsiderâ the treaty and the IHR, âincluding further work,â the details of which we will learn tomorrow. What we do know for sure is that this is not over by a long shot. Globalists in the U.S. are playing a long game, where the treaty is just one part of the global health architecture being built. When it was clear last week that there would be no treaty document ready for the WHA, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus declared that the WHO will âtry everythingâ to make the treaty happen. Source: Remarks by U.S. Delegate Pamela Hamamoto at Committee A of the World Health Assembly, May 28, 2024. We turned this email update into a quick blog post for ease of sharing. [Click here]( or on the button below to share. [READ ARTICLE]( [But U.S. states are fighting back](. At the same time the WHA was planning the global health architecture, Louisianaâs governor, Jeff Landry, was signing a law prohibiting WHO and other international agency jurisdiction in the state! SHFâs own Jill Hines was on site for the special occasion. Louisiana has been on the front lines of statesâ rights in the face of a global health power grab since the word COVID became common vocabulary. Thank you to everyone who is fighting there to keep our liberties and protect our Constitution. For our sovereignty, Stand for Health Freedom [standforhealthfreedom.com](âââââââ) is a nonprofit dedicated to protecting basic human rights. We exist to educate people and for people to have the tools to educate their lawmakers. Please support our work by making a [donation today](. We rely on the generosity of concerned individuals like you so that together - through education and action - we can see a cultural shift for health freedom.âââââââ Please add advocates@standforhealthfreedom.com to your contact list to make sure you get our mailings. You are receiving this email because you signed up for alerts from Stand for Health Freedom.
Click [here]( to unsubscribe from this mailing list.