Newsletter Subject

This Is What a 37-Year-Old Face Without Filters or Makeup Actually Looks Like

From

self.com

Email Address

self@newsletter.self.com

Sent On

Thu, Feb 22, 2024 04:05 PM

Email Preheader Text

Find out more. If you are unable to see the message below, . “What am I *supposed* to look like

Find out more. If you are unable to see the message below, [click here to view](. [Update your preferences]( [SELF]( [Headshots of people in their thirties]( [This Is What a 37-Year-Old Face Without Filters or Makeup Actually Looks Like]( “What am I *supposed* to look like at my age?” Over the past year, we’ve seen this question pop up repeatedly online and in our own group chats—and we certainly hear it in our heads as we look in the mirror. Thanks to the enormous power of the beauty industry, the increased accessibility of “tweakments,” the ubiquity of social media, and the experience of staring at your face all day on Zoom and wondering if those smile lines have always been there or you’re just paying more attention lately...yeah, it’s natural to ask what you’re “supposed” to look like as you get older. This question led us to create [Group Shot](, which we’re excited to launch today. In this series, you’ll find makeup- and filter-free portraits of people along with relevant details (like whether they smoke or wear SPF regularly, what they do for work, and how much money they spend every year on their skin care routine—a number that ranges from $50 to $15,000). We shot each individual in the same lighting, and the photos are not retouched at all. We didn’t choose our subjects because they look “good” or “bad” for their age, or because they do or do not have work done, but because they simply…are. It’s just a bunch of people showing their faces; that’s the whole thing. We decided to start with 37 because that’s when, according to one dermatologist we spoke with, people start to “freak out” about aging. We plan to do more installments this year, with different age groups each time. We hope each one helps normalize the existence of undereye circles and nasolabial folds; lays bare the ways that money and effort can (but don’t always!) influence appearance; and encourages everyone to stress less about aging. [SEE ALL THE PHOTOS]( Get your wallets ready. SELF Recommends A weekly email of the absolute best products and editor-approved sales. [SIGN UP NOW]( [Instagram]( [Pinterest]( [Twitter]( [Facebook]( [TikTok]( [Unsubscribe]( | [Privacy Policy]( Sent from Condé Nast, 1 World Trade Center, New York, NY 10001 Copyright © 2024 Condé Nast.

Marketing emails from self.com

View More
Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

28/05/2024

Sent On

27/05/2024

Sent On

26/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.