Newsletter Subject

We’ve Already Had Our “1987 Crash”

From

rogueeconomics.com

Email Address

feedback@exct.rogueeconomics.com

Sent On

Wed, Oct 11, 2023 08:31 PM

Email Preheader Text

Welcome to Cycles Trading with me, Phil Anderson. My aim with this three-day-per-week e-letter is to

[Cycles Trading With Phil Anderson]( Welcome to Cycles Trading with me, Phil Anderson. My aim with this three-day-per-week e-letter is to introduce you to the most powerful knowledge for building wealth. And that’s the 18.6-year real estate cycle and its key relationship to stocks. Every 18.6 years, property, economy, and stock markets move through a repeating series of peaks and troughs – like clockwork. And the market has followed this cycle for over 200 years. Using this knowledge, I’ve been able to forecast every major market move over my 34-year career. If this is your first time tuning in, catch up on my[background]( how I [predict the markets]( and how I’ll help you avoid [false alarms]( from the mainstream media. We’ve Already Had Our “1987 Crash” By Phil Anderson, Editor, Cycles Trading with Phil Anderson Some people get daily reminders to drink water. I get daily reminders of how much of their own Kool-Aid financial commentators drink. Even those who you’d think would be “in the know” are ignorant of the true drivers of the economy. And I’m not talking about just anyone… Société Générale strategist Albert Edwards, famed for his constant pessimism, warned that today’s resilience in the stock market reminded him of how things felt before the 1987 market crash against the backdrop of surging bond yields. “The equity market’s current resilience in the face of rising bond yields reminds me very much of events in 1987, when equity investors’ bullishness was eventually squashed,” Mr. Edwards wrote in a note. “[M]y own view is that a recession still lurks, but like many I have held that view for a while now and have been proved wrong – so far. But there is still plenty of evidence to suggest a recession is imminent.” See what I mean? Société Générale, one of Europe’s leading financial services groups, would be regarded by the mass media and the public at large as a leading economic commentator and, dare I say, trusted to know what they are talking about. But alas… Recommended Link [Teeka: “This Patent-Pending AI is a Game-Changer for Cryptocurrencies”]( [image]( Teeka Tiwari has picked 27 coins that jumped at least 1,000%. But those gains took years in most cases. Could you accelerate your wealth journey and make those kinds of gains in 60 days or less? It’s possible, but only with C.O.N.A.N., Teeka’s first-ever artificial intelligence (AI)-powered crypto trading system. AIRING TONIGHT AT 8 PM ET [CLICK HERE TO INSTANTLY RSVP.]( -- Only the History of the Real Estate Cycle Can Set You Free I do urge you to take a minute now to review some of my previous notes to you about the strength of the U.S. economy. If you do, you’ll know I believe the chances of a recession this year are basically zero. And it comes down, as it always does, to your knowledge of the history of the 18.6-year real estate cycle. So to assume that today is simply another 1987-type event shows that this market commentator isn’t looking at the real estate cycle. He wants history to repeat because that’s the pattern he knows. And history does repeat, but not in the way he thinks. Looking at our current cycle timeline, the U.S. economy has already experienced its own 1987-type market fall. [Chart]( That was in 2020,amid the pandemic lockdowns. It was the mid-cycle slowdown. But here’s the key to this. In 1987, the U.S. did not experience a land price-led depression or recession. In other words, with land prices supported and still growing, the “recession” was mostly in equity markets. Once the market bottoms were in, the economy then raced to its land market peaks in 1989. Today, U.S. land prices are strong and growing. [image] Source: Yahoo Finance And so, the only parallel between 1987 and today is this: with U.S. land prices continuing to rise, the U.S. economy should be strong, with record levels of investment, jobs, infrastructure spending, and credit creation. We are, therefore, a few years away from a land market peak and then a bust. That was where the U.S. economy was in 1987, and that’s where it is today. Most important of all, even revered market commentators from Société Générale cannot possibly time the economy correctly without knowledge of the land market. Can you see now why this knowledge is the market edge you must develop? Isn’t it valuable to know what the real historical parallels are, what happened next, and what you should do right now? It’s up to you… You can either chase the opinions of the Kool-Aid crowd or join me. While everyone thought the markets would crash in March and April… my readers were positioning themselves in the right stocks at the right time. They even scored a 52% gain on a homebuilder stock in just over three months. We’re nearing another buy point in the markets… and you can join us [right here](. Regards, [signature] Phil Anderson Editor, Cycles Trading with Phil Anderson --------------------------------------------------------------- Like what you’re reading? Send your thoughts to [feedback@rogueeconomics.com](mailto:feedback@rogueeconomics.com?subject=RE: Cycles Trading Feedback). IN CASE YOU MISSED IT… [Viral Silicon Valley video reveals new AI cash cow]( Did you see this new viral AI video? On camera, one of America’s top tech analysts, Colin Tedards, reveals the next AI cash cow… A groundbreaking technology The Wall Street Journal calls, “the lifeblood of AI.” It has nothing to do with Nvidia or any popular tech company. But firms like Tesla, Microsoft, and OpenAI – the company behind ChatGPT – are buzzing about this groundbreaking technology right now. For early investors, this tiny new device could unlock $200 trillion in AI profits. [Click here to see this viral video before it gets taken down.]( [image]( [Rogue Economincs]( Rogue Economics 55 NE 5th Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33483 [www.rogueeconomics.com]( [Tweet]( [TWITTER]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. Rogue Economics welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-800-681-1765, Mon–Fri, 9am–7pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:memberservices@rogueeconomics.com). © 2023 Rogue Economics. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Rogue Economics. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use](

Marketing emails from rogueeconomics.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

02/11/2024

Sent On

01/11/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.