Newsletter Subject

The AI Boom Is Far From Over

From

rogueeconomics.com

Email Address

feedback@exct.rogueeconomics.com

Sent On

Fri, Sep 8, 2023 04:35 PM

Email Preheader Text

The AI Boom Is Far From Over By Nomi Prins, Editor, Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins Welcome to ou

[Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins]( The AI Boom Is Far From Over By Nomi Prins, Editor, Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins Welcome to our Friday mailbag edition! Every week, we receive great questions from your fellow readers. And every Friday, I answer as many as I can. This week, we’ve got questions about the AI frenzy… and the Federal Reserve’s push for an all-digital dollar in the U.S.… Recommended Link [Final stage before digital money]( [image]( The end is near… Our financial system is now being transformed in a way that would’ve been unthinkable just a few years ago. And almost nobody is prepared for the chaos that follows. According to Bank of America, this overhaul is imminent – And Dr. Nomi Prins says the final stage started days ago with the rollout of the FedNow system. To show you everything you need to know about the FedNow system – and to help you prepare – Dr. Prins has recorded a free presentation with all the details. It’s controversial, but Nomi’s interview is a must-watch for anyone with more than $2,500 in an American bank or retirement fund. [Click here to find out what you need to do to prepare for this historic transformation.]( -- Why does everybody obsess over Nvidia? It cannot gain 1,000% going forward. It is not an end user of AI. We, the investors, need end-user companies: not all the big companies that are already gone. – John F. Hi, John, thank you for that timely question and observation. You’re right: AI stocks have exploded this year. Stocks like C3.ai, Super Micro Computer, and Nvidia are up 154%, 232%, and 221%, respectively. For some, it might be tempting to chase highflyers like these. But we’ve warned against that in these pages. We’ve suggested avoiding tech stocks whose share prices have surged on AI-driven hopes but have gone too far too fast. The names above are three examples. With that said, the AI boom is far from over. In fact, as I wrote about last week, we’re in the sweet spot for the biggest profit potential – what I call AI’s “take-off” moment. We weren’t there six months ago. And we may be past it in six months. Now is the time to act. The market for AI applications – apps that can’t function without AI – is on track to reach $192.6 billion by 2025, according to the International Data Corporation (IDC). That’s compound growth of 31.2%. And global executives see the writing on the wall, judging by a recent poll by Accenture. Accenture asked execs whether they believe AI will play an important role in their business in the next three to five years. Nearly all – 98% – said yes. In other words, corporate executives know they need to adopt AI systems in the coming years, or they could lose market share. As we’ve been showing at Inside Wall Street, large investors and corporations are investing massive sums to get a leg up on AI. According to Goldman Sachs, investment in AI is set to grow to more than $150 billion over the next two years. That’s growth of 25% per year. And usage is spiking. AI adoption is up 2.5x over the past five years alone, according to research firm McKinsey. That’s only going to accelerate. For instance, we can see this through user growth of ChatGPT, the popular AI-enabled chatbot. According to a study from UBS, it was the fastest-growing consumer application in history. It went from zero to 100 million users in only two months! To put that into perspective, it took TikTok about nine months to reach 100 million users and Instagram 2.5 years, according to data from Sensor Tower. Second, we follow what the smart money is doing. The insiders – venture capitalists, billionaires, major corporations – they’re all piling in now. Like Microsoft, which poured $10 billion into OpenAI, the parent company of the ChatGPT program. Or AI data architecture company Databricks, which raised $1.3 billion from major investors like BlackRock and Fidelity at a $38 billion valuation. And AI defense startup Anduril, which recently raised $1.48 billion from venture capital powerhouses including Andreessen Horowitz, Valor Equity Partners, and billionaire Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund. Even the U.S. government is betting on AI. In 2022 alone, the government spent $3 billion on AI research. But while that may sound like a lot, the U.S. is already at risk of falling behind. See, when it comes to defense, the U.S. missed the AI frenzy. And now, it’s scrambling to catch up… to the tune of a just-announced $826 billion spending spree. If you watched my urgent briefing last week, The AI Ultimatum, you’ll know there’s a tiny company positioned to benefit from this. It’s trading for only $0.26. And a major announcement could send this tiny AI company soaring at any point. [If you missed The AI Ultimatum, you can still click here to watch it and learn more](. Recommended Link [WARNING: 110 Banks Preparing for Digital Dollar]( [image]( If you have any money in the U.S. banking system, pay close attention because… Bank of America is warning its clients that ALL checking accounts are likely to be replaced with digital dollars soon. And it’s not just Bank of America. This former VP of a major U.S. investment bank just released [this list with more than 110 banks that are preparing to do the same.]( Is your bank on the list? [Click here to see the full list.]( -- If the Fed is still printing fiat currencies, why are there so many concerns about the digital dollar being ushered in? Can the Fed really afford to waste that much time and money, only to print more money? How can it contradict such a game of “ping pong,” without any winners? – Dennis M. Hi, Dennis, thanks so much for that terrific question. Here’s the thing. The Fed doesn’t consider printing money in different formats a contradiction. It’s merely an expansion of its powers if both avenues happen to overlap, like say in the transition from money as we know it to a fully digital currency-based financial and banking system. In the meantime, the Fed could easily print money as we know it and, at the same time, create more digital dollars once the mechanism for doing so is in place. That could be until the full conversion to digital from current dollars is made. By that point, the Fed would likely have a mechanism for converting the current dollars into digital dollars. Also, it takes no time at all for the Fed to electronically print money – say in the event of a banking emergency. We discussed earlier this year, when Silvergate and First Republic Bank went bust, how the Fed created more than $300 billion through its quantitative easing (QE) actions. (For more details on that, please check out some of our earlier explanations on how the Fed does QE [here]( and [here]( The Fed can do this at any time. In the end, the Fed wants to have as many forms of money creation at its disposal as it can. That way, if there’s any sort of financial emergency, the Fed has all the “tools,” as it calls them, to deal with it. So it’s not out of the question for the Fed to still be printing money as we know it today while printing digital currency as well. The first way wouldn’t be a waste of time if it achieves an immediate goal. Plus, it’s a big logistical undertaking to transform all existing currency into digital currency. One part of that process has to do with FedNow, a digital payments system that the Fed launched in July. FedNow isn’t a digital dollar, but it is a system that enables the immediate transfer of payments between its bank and corporate users. The next logical step in developing that platform would be to introduce a digital dollar that could be used for those payment processes. And it would simply be impossible to do all of that testing and adapting overnight, as we’ve discussed here before. FedNow took years from inception to its current state as a rapid payment system for the banks and companies that have signed on to it. In the meantime, what you should know is that the Fed has the power to print money. And it can and will be able to print dollars and digital dollars at the same time. So what I’d tell all my readers is to be prepared for that situation. How? By ensuring your portfolio has a mix of cash outside of the banking system (in your safe, for instance), and hard assets that can be used as currency, such as gold and Bitcoin. Recommended Link [This Stock Could Go Up 66% or More.]( [image]( Marc Chaikin built the system that isolated NVDA before it became the best-performing stock of 2023. [Click here to get his latest buy.]( -- Regarding Nomi Prins’ Inside Wall Street article on July 28: I am remembering how the president of India announced, without warning, that the two largest bills of rupees were going to be worthless in a very short time. Our government saw what chaos that caused, and I hope will not just cancel U.S. fiat all at once. The resulting social upheaval would make India’s experience look like a picnic in the park. But what if the U.S. government just dropped the $100 bill first, then maybe a year later dropped the $50 bill? In other words, since the government’s goal is to totally eliminate cash, in your opinion would it be better to cancel all fiat currency at the same time, or would it be better to phase in the cash grab? – Carl N. Hi, Carl, thank you for bringing up India’s experience with taking certain notes out of circulation. That was a scary event. For readers that aren’t as familiar, it serves as a good barometer to watch out for. (And for readers who missed that July 28 article, [catch up here](. There, I wrote about the Federal Reserve’s plans to eventually implement a central bank digital currency, or CBDC, in the U.S.) Let me give a bit of context on what India did… On May 19, 2023, India’s central bank said it would start withdrawing its 2,000-rupee ($24.50) notes from circulation. As things stand, people can still use those notes – for now. But they are being asked to deposit them in their bank accounts in order to exchange them for smaller denomination notes by September 30. But the story goes back further. That 2,000-rupee note was introduced in 2016 after the Narendra Modi-led government took the smaller 500- and 1,000-rupee notes out of circulation. That move created an acute shortage of cash. That’s because it removed 86% of the total value of India’s currency in circulation overnight. That plan was referred to as “demonetization” by the media. This was the first time anything as quick or dramatic had ever been tried before – anywhere in the world. The Indian government claimed its plan had to be executed so quickly to surprise those involved in corruption or counterfeiting – and also to kickstart India’s transition into a digital, cashless world. But things got chaotic. People rushed to banks and ATMs to exchange their old notes and withdraw the new currency. There were major lines at banks. Matters were worse for the poor who couldn’t access, or didn’t have, bank accounts through which to exchange their money. The residue of these problems still lingers. Now, hopefully, the Federal Reserve saw what happened and realized that removing certain bills so quickly in America would create similar chaos. But that doesn’t mean there won’t be a slower withdrawal of printed bills. In fact, there already has been. According to the Fed, the print order of bills in circulation for 2023 ranged from 4.5 billion to 8.6 billion notes. Now, that’s a smaller range than the prior two years, when more money was circulated to soften the pandemic’s blow. The lower range of the print order for 2023 dropped by 2.4 billion notes, or 34.8%, relative to 2022’s order. And the upper range of the 2023 print order fell by 1.1 billion notes, or 11.3%, versus the upper range of the 2022 print order. You can see from this Fed chart that the $100, $50, and especially $20 bills have seen the largest comparative drops this year. [Chart] To me, that means we could see a gradual, continued decline in bill printing. The effects might not be as dramatic as what happened in India. But the result of fewer larger printed notes in circulation could be similar: confusion and panic. So it’s still important to prepare. I can’t give personalized advice, but what I’d say to all of my readers once again is this: Ensure you keep a certain amount of lower denomination bills out of banks. And invest in hard currency assets – such as gold and Bitcoin – to diversify your currency holdings. And that’s all for this week’s mailbag! Thanks to everyone who wrote in. If I didn’t get to your question this week, look out for my response in a future Friday mailbag edition. I do my best to respond to as many of your questions and comments as I can. Just remember, I can’t give personal investment advice. And if there are any other topics you’d like me to write about, I’d love to hear from you. Write me at feedback@rogueeconomics.com. Happy investing… and have a fantastic weekend! Regards, [signature] Nomi Prins Editor, Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins --------------------------------------------------------------- Like what you’re reading? Send your thoughts to [feedback@rogueeconomics.com](mailto:feedback@rogueeconomics.com?subject=RE: Inside Wall Street Feedback). IN CASE YOU MISSED IT… [What does Trump’s arrest mean for the market?]( The answer is – it doesn’t matter. Why? Because Larry Benedict, a genuine Market Wizard, successfully trades in all markets. Bullish, bearish, he has it covered. He crushed it in 2022… And delivered a perfect track record to his One Ticker Trader readers, going 11-for-11. Previously, he went 20 straight years on Wall Street without a single losing year. And when the market plummeted 37% in 2008, he delivered 23% returns… Now he’s sharing an over-the-shoulder “demo” of his winning strategy in action. He calls it the One Ticker Retirement Plan… And it takes less than 10 seconds to demonstrate. [Watch it here.]( [image]( [Rogue Economincs]( Rogue Economics 55 NE 5th Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33483 [www.rogueeconomics.com]( [Tweet]( [TWITTER]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. Rogue Economics welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-800-681-1765, Mon–Fri, 9am–7pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:memberservices@rogueeconomics.com). © 2023 Rogue Economics. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Rogue Economics. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use](

EDM Keywords (280)

zero year wrote writing write would worthless worse world withdraw whole went well week way watched watch waste warning warned ushered used use usage unthinkable ubs tune trump tried transition transformed transform trading track topics tools today time thoughts thing testing tempting tell takes take system surprise surged subscribed study still sort soften situation silvergate signed showing show sharing set service serves sent seen see scrambling say said safe rupees rollout risk result response respond residue replaced remembering remember released referred redistribution recorded realized readers quickly quick questions question qe put push process print president preparing prepared prepare powers power portfolio poor point play plans plan place piling picnic phase perspective payments past part park panic pandemic pages overhaul order openai observation nvidia notes nomi need near names much money moment mix missed might merely media mechanism meantime means mean maybe may matter market many made love lot list likely like let leg learn know keep involved invest introduced introduce interview instance india inception impossible imminent hopefully hope history help hear happened growth grow government gone gold going goal give get game follow find fidelity fiat feedback fednow fed fast far familiar fact exploded experience expansion executed exchange everything everyone ever event ensuring ensure end enables dropped dramatic diversify disposal discussed digital developing details deposit demonetization delivered defense deal data currency crushed covered counterfeiting could corruption corporations converting controversial contradiction contradict context content companies comments comes clients circulation circulated chatgpt chaos cbdc caused catch cash case cancel calls business bringing blow bitcoin bit bills betting better best benefit became banks bank atms asked anywhere anyone answer america also already ai action act achieves according access accelerate able 66 2022 2016 2008

Marketing emails from rogueeconomics.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

02/11/2024

Sent On

01/11/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.