Newsletter Subject

Lessons From the Dot-Com Bubble

From

rogueeconomics.com

Email Address

feedback@exct.rogueeconomics.com

Sent On

Mon, Aug 14, 2023 04:58 PM

Email Preheader Text

Lessons From the Dot-Com Bubble By Nomi Prins, Editor, Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins Are we in

[Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins]( Lessons From the Dot-Com Bubble By Nomi Prins, Editor, Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins Are we in a tech bubble? This question is on many investors’ minds today. Now, it’s hard to say for sure – and some individual tech stocks may continue to perform well in the future. But the tech rally might have veered into the territory of irrational exuberance. Look no further than Nvidia. The chip technology company recently became a trillion-dollar enterprise and the world's newest tech giant. Right now, Nvidia is trading at a mind-boggling 24 times its next 12 month's revenue. That’s not even earnings, just revenue. And it’s not just Nvidia. The AI narrative is driving tech returns across the board. The S&P 500 Information Tech sector has already climbed 41% this year. Compare that to the broad S&P 500's 17% gain. But here’s the thing about narratives... They can be very risky in investing. They may lead you to follow the crowd's sentiments instead of taking a hard look at the fundamentals. And that's what I believe might be happening with tech stocks right now. Recommended Link [“Amazon Loophole” could hand you $28,544 in “royalty” payouts]( [image]( Thanks to a little-known IRS loophole… Regular Americans can collect up to $28,544 (or more) in payouts from what Brad Thomas calls the “Amazon secret royalty program…” And the best part is, there are: - NO age or income requirements… (It’s available to anyone 18+ or older) - NO employment requirements… (You can be working part-time, full-time, or even be retired) - And you NEVER have to shop or sell a single product on Amazon… (It only takes 5 minutes to set up!) See how to collect the next payout before the strict cutoff deadline. [Watch short video now.]( -- We’ve Been Here Before The situation with tech stocks and AI right now reminds me of the dot-com bubble of the early 2000s. I was working on Wall Street at the time. When the dot-com bubble burst, it was a watershed moment for hundreds of tech companies. And those that survived were nearly wiped out. Case in point: Amazon. On December 16, 1998, an analyst named Henry Blodget from Oppenheimer made a move that caught people’s attention. He raised the price target for Amazon (AMZN) stock to $400. At the time, Amazon traded for about $243 a share. But Blodget believed Amazon was in the early phases of becoming a significant global e-commerce player. It had the potential to reach $10 billion in revenue, he thought, and earnings of $10 per share within five years. On that same December day, Amazon's stock surged 19%. It hit $289 in what became the pinnacle of dot-com fever. Amazon snagged the second spot among the top risers in the market that day. Other online retail stocks also got a boost. Books-A-Million, another online bookstore, spiked 80% in just one day. eBay jumped 11%, and Barnes & Noble went up by 7%. Even back then, these valuations appeared too good to be true. And yet, people couldn't resist diving headfirst into the hype and excitement of the bubble. Recommended Link [“One-Stock Millionaire” IGNORES 99.9% of the Market]( [image]( During the 2008 financial crisis, millionaire trader Jeff Clark stunned the world when he managed to double his readers’ money 26 TIMES… CNBC caught wind of this and asked Jeff to come on live TV to explain his secret. Jeff politely said no. And now, years later, Jeff is back to finally bring this secret into the light. …Revealing how anyone can collect returns of huge gains in just 8 days… in bullish AND bearish markets! And why you need to IGNORE 99.9% of the market, instead focusing on only ONE stock. [(ticker revealed here)]( Jeff says: “I am tired of watching as investors lose their shirts buying risky assets… even my OWN SON lost -60% in crypto & tech stocks… now I’m going to give him a [“Financial Intervention”]( to help him win his account back in 2023!” [Click Here to Watch Jeff Demonstrate This ONE Stock Secret.]( -- This was happening even as Amazon continued to report losses every quarter. Several analysts said Blodget’s valuation was based on hype. But he argued that, as with most internet stocks, valuing Amazon was more of an art than a science. Three weeks later, it seemed that Blodget was proven right. On January 6, 1999, the stock hit $400, like Blodget had predicted. After that, it didn't take long for it to go to $600. Blodget's analyst reputation soared to legendary status. He joined Merrill Lynch, reportedly with a substantial salary increase. And he became a prominent advocate for dot-com stocks on CNBC. But a year later, in 2000, the dot-com bubble burst. And Amazon? See for yourself. Here’s a chart of Amazon’s share price (adjusted for the numerous share splits it has undergone since then)… [Chart] The stock declined 94% between 1999 and 2001. It’s safe to say many Amazon shareholders who followed the hype in ’99 got wiped out. After a 94% plunge, you’d need roughly a 1,567% gain just to get back to breakeven. For Amazon investors who were able to hold on for the long run, it might have worked out when Amazon became a success story. But the majority of tech plays from the dot-com bubble era failed to come anywhere near replicating Amazon’s long-term success. Recommended Link [WARNING: These 110 Banks Could Replace the U.S. Dollar in Weeks]( [image]( Please, pay close attention because if your bank is on [this “blacklist” with 110 banks]( your entire life savings could be at risk. According to this famous banker, you must move your cash THIS month. Or risk losing everything. [Click here for the three critical steps to take]( to prepare for what The Wall Street Journal called a “game-changing development.” [PREPARE NOW.]( -- What This Means for Your Money Today Here’s the bottom line… These investors overestimated hyped-up companies burdened with inflated valuations. And they got the timing wrong. But they weren’t wrong about the future during the dot-com bubble. Plenty of successful tech businesses founded during that time still dominate today. Including Amazon. Take a look at this next chart… [Chart] The dot-com crash is almost unnoticeable on the company’s long-term price chart. The same is true for many other companies that survived the dot-com crash – like Microsoft, Apple, Adobe, Intuit, and Nvidia. They not only survived but went on to become industry dominators. In other words, when the dot-com bubble burst, it did not wipe out the potential of tech or the internet. But it did teach us that nailing a call on the future doesn't guarantee you won't burn cash with bad timing. So, here’s the lesson for today. Even though AI is revolutionary, not every AI-related company will be a good investment. Don’t rush into the hype with blinders on. And be cautious about companies with art-based valuations. If Amazon’s story has taught us anything, it’s that in distorted times, patience pays off. Regards, [signature] Nomi Prins Editor, Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins --------------------------------------------------------------- Like what you’re reading? Send your thoughts to [feedback@rogueeconomics.com](mailto:feedback@rogueeconomics.com?subject=RE: Inside Wall Street Feedback). MAILBAG Do you think AI has put us in a new tech bubble? And is it bound to burst like the dot-com bubble in the early 2000s? Write us at [feedback@rogueeconomics.com](mailto:feedback@rogueeconomics.com?subject=RE: Inside Wall Street Feedback). IN CASE YOU MISSED IT… [Market Wizard who made $95 million for his clients in 2008 – and predicted the 2022 collapse – reveals his strategy:]( The One-Ticker Retirement Plan How to make all the money you need – in any market – using a single stock. [Click here for the name of the ticker…]( [image]( [Rogue Economincs]( Rogue Economics 55 NE 5th Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33483 [www.rogueeconomics.com]( [Tweet]( [TWITTER]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. Rogue Economics welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-800-681-1765, Mon–Fri, 9am–7pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:memberservices@rogueeconomics.com). © 2023 Rogue Economics. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Rogue Economics. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use](

Marketing emails from rogueeconomics.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

02/11/2024

Sent On

01/11/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.