Newsletter Subject

Bitcoin and Banks

From

rogueeconomics.com

Email Address

feedback@exct.rogueeconomics.com

Sent On

Wed, May 24, 2023 08:32 PM

Email Preheader Text

Welcome to Cycles Trading with me, Phil Anderson. My aim with this three-day-per-week e-letter is to

[Cycles Trading With Phil Anderson]( Welcome to Cycles Trading with me, Phil Anderson. My aim with this three-day-per-week e-letter is to introduce you to the most powerful knowledge for building wealth. And that’s the 18.6-year real estate cycle and its key relationship to stocks. Every 18.6 years, property, economy, and stock markets move through a repeating series of peaks and troughs – like clockwork. And the market has followed this cycle for over 200 years. Using this knowledge, I’ve been able to forecast every major market move over my 34-year career. If this is your first time tuning in, catch up on my[background]( how I [predict the markets]( and how I’ll help you avoid [false alarms]( from the mainstream media. Bitcoin and Banks By Phil Anderson, Editor, Cycles Trading with Phil Anderson On Monday, I talked about [bitcoin and the real estate cycle](. It’s the first part of a series, explaining how money is the accepted means of settling credit balances. Today, we’ll get to part two and talk about banks and how they fit into this sophisticated system. (Make sure to [check out part one]( if you haven’t yet.) Let’s get back to the example of writing an article and getting paid for it… It could be that my publisher, too, had a credit balance if, for example, it was yet to collect payment from its customers. In other words, it might not have the funds available to pay me yet. But it would still need to pay me soon, so it could secure an advance from its bank to achieve the same effect. It doesn’t matter that the publisher hasn’t settled its balance with customers. That will happen in time. Recommended Link [“Trade of a Lifetime”?]( [image]( He might just be the most accurate forecaster to have ever lived… On October 8, 1987 — 11 days before Black Monday — he recommended people short the stock market… A move that made Paul Tudor Jones $100 million. In 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1992, and 1993 he was named a “top 10 trader” by Timer Digest. And they put him on the cover in 1994. Then, he closed off his research to the regular public. But kept publishing his forecasts to the hedge funds and billionaires who paid him dearly for the privilege… In 2008, he called the bottom of the financial crisis — months in advance… In 2020, he called the top of the market before the Covid crash… Then, a month later, he told his clients to get back in — right at the bottom… $10,000 in the 13 stocks he recommended could have turned into $2.3 million. On January 3, 2022, he they called the top of the market. The very next day, stocks started their plunge… And, earlier this year, one forecast he made could have turned $100k into $6.3 million… In two days. That’s why his clients pay him between $5,000 and $10,000 (a month!) for his insights. But now he’s preparing for a major event which he’ll publicly reveal. And some are speculating he may be preparing for the “trade of a lifetime.” Is he? [The Prophecy An Exclusive Event with ‘Master Timer’ Mason Sexton]( -- Enter the Bank The bank advances the needed credit to the publisher, the publisher settles with me, and then once its customers have settled with the publisher, it will address the debt it owes to the bank. I hope that you’re starting to see that credit, money, and debt are connected. The role of a bank is to advance credit for this exchange… and for many, many others that take place every day. And it does so by creating – out of nothing – the means of settling those balances… Yes… that’s money creation. Don’t be fooled by erroneous thinking: banks don’t channel pre-existing money from savers to borrowers. They create money by advancing credit to whomever needs it to support the chain of exchanges which a productive economy depends on. For a time, some of those credits, after exchanges have been made and payments have been settled, appear to get “deposited” back into the bank awaiting use at some future date. First comes the credit, then comes the deposits (the term deposit is actually misleading, but we can leave that for another day). A bank’s job is to properly assess whether someone needing an advance can do what they say they will (produce a good) and that they’re trustworthy. Banks are at the center of the capitalist economy for this reason. If banks weren’t there, some other means of creating credit (money) and assessing creditworthiness would emerge. In the modern economy, banks fill this function. I hope you’re starting to see that much of the discourse around money is actually quite misleading. This includes the conversation about money in relation to bitcoin. The Decentralized Bank? The idea of decentralized finance rests upon this assumption: you can bypass the intermediary function provided by banks. But have you heard an advocate of decentralized finance articulate what money is or the role of a bank in this way? I haven’t. Creating money in this way is not inflationary if what the banks do is advance credit against increased future production. Credit is advanced, new goods are produced, they are sold, and that initial debt is repaid. More money is available to facilitate the increased number of exchanges taking place as the economy grows. In fact, the origin of all money begins this way – with someone using a token created out of nothing or which had some unrelated use to settle a balance. The tokens may or may not be inherently valuable… whether they are is irrelevant to their function as money. Their utility derives from the trust that people have that they can be used in exchange for settling their own credit balances. This is why the tokens issued by a central authority typically work best as money because it can be mandated that all credit balances are settled in this way. And besides, we all need to pay our taxes – and so it makes sense to use tokens stamped in the same way. How Money Creation Leads to the Real Estate Cycle Some of you may find that a controversial statement, but the worst thing to have is money that you can’t use in exchange. Exchanges have to be settled by something that everyone accepts. So wherein lies the problem with money in the economy? Earlier, I said that money creation led to increased production. That’s the ideal, but in reality, our system has become distorted. Most of the money created by the banking system is for the acquisition of land rather than advancing credit for businesses. This is inherently inflationary because the money so created does not directly lead to increased production (it may do in part, but it may not). Worse, it drives economies through cycles of booms and busts, and at the end of it, banks collapse, and their money-creating function for genuinely productive businesses is significantly impaired. Hence we get the dark moments at the end of every real estate cycle, where the economy, starved of credit, sinks into an economic depression. A Built-In Flaw in the Banking System Frantic governments then attempt to bail out the system…. but what they’re really trying to do is preserve the credit creation process and fill the gap in the money supply that is lost as banks stop lending. Incidentally, the size of each bailout is always directly linked to the fall in land values – and as land values get higher with each passing cycle, the size of the bailout gets bigger. So to recap… Money is created out of nothing. It is given its value by the fact that it is a generally accepted means of payment. How do we agree on what is to be accepted and trusted? Well, that’s the issue. This depends on the context. Nowadays, it is a government decree. In medieval times it was often a precious metal, generally imposed on people by violence (see David Graeber’s research on this in Debt: The First Five Thousand Years). At other times, people have used rocks, such as some indigenous peoples who had highly evolved systems of credit. Or it can be cigarettes, as in some prisons. Or paper. Or even a digital token. The key requirement is that when you are in possession of it, you can settle a balance. Once bitcoin can play this role, it can be money. At the moment, its most important feature is the fact that it is limited in supply, which makes it a highly speculative asset. This excess demand against limited supply makes it a little like a piece of land (albeit that land, unlike bitcoin, has some inherent value because you can grow something on it). Bitcoin’s link to speculation brings me to its next link to the cycle: economic rent. I’ll discuss economic rent and put the whole picture together in our next issue. For now, if you have read this series carefully, you’re ahead of the vast majority of investors in terms of understanding money, both fiat and digital. Regards, [signature] Phil Anderson Editor, Cycles Trading with Phil Anderson IN CASE YOU MISSED IT… [The “Amazon Secret Royalty Program” Can Help Anyone Retire Like Royalty]( A unique type of investment could help you make more money than you will need for the rest of your life. It’s what we call the “Amazon secret royalty program.” It’s an income stream that allows you to collect $1,000s… $10,000s… or more every year! In fact, Business Insider says this type of investment could provide “enough money to live off of each year, without having any other retirement plan...” “Royalties” are the most exciting investments in history. Put simply, they’re periodic payouts… That could deliver all the money you need for your retirement… While these “royalties” are different from traditional royalties, just one could hand you enough income to live life on your own terms. And it only takes a few minutes to set up. [Learn how to collect your first payout before June 13th.]( [image]( [Rogue Economincs]( Rogue Economics 55 NE 5th Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33483 [www.rogueeconomics.com]( [Tweet]( [TWITTER]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. Rogue Economics welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-800-681-1765, Mon–Fri, 9am–7pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:memberservices@rogueeconomics.com). © 2023 Rogue Economics. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Rogue Economics. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use](

EDM Keywords (211)

Marketing emails from rogueeconomics.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

02/11/2024

Sent On

01/11/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.