Another Round of Panic Hits the U.S. Banking Industry... And More Contagion Could Be on the Way

[Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins]( Welcome to Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins! It’s the only daily newsletter featuring the insights of renowned author and former Wall Street insider, Nomi Prins. Every day, Nomi shines a light on a massive wealth transfer she calls The Great Distortion. That’s the true cause of the permanent disconnect she sees between the markets and the real economy. And she shares ways you can come out ahead, if you know where the money is flowing. You’ll find all Nomi’s Inside Wall Street issues [here](. If you have questions or comments, send Nomi a note anytime [here]( or at feedback@rogueeconomics.com. Another Round of Panic Hits the U.S. Banking Industry… And More Contagion Could Be on the Way By Nomi Prins, Editor, Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins A 50% drop. That’s how much San Francisco-based First Republic Bank’s shares fell earlier this week. The decline looks even more impressive on a chart. Take a look below… [Chart] In fact, First Republic’s stock has lost nearly 90% of its value since early March. So in its current state, First Republic looks all but worthless. As you well know, last month, Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and Signature Bank [collapsed]( in just a matter of days. Global banking giant Credit Suisse in Europe followed shortly afterward. Bank analysts and the financial media’s talking heads thought the events wouldn’t cause a banking meltdown. But I argued otherwise. As the banking crisis unfolded, I predicted [more contagion]( across the sector. Here’s what I said in my earlier essay on the bank woes: My gut tells me there’s probably another ticking-time bomb waiting to go off in the banking sector. In fact, as I mentioned above, trouble is already spreading to Europe. That means we can expect many investors to get burnt. First Republic Bank is a case in point. As I write this, First Republic’s failure is sending shockwaves through the market. So, today, I want to look beyond the headlines. And I’ll show you what this latest banking crisis story means for you and the safety of your money. Recommended Link [99% of Stocks Are B.S. – Only Trade ONE (Revealed)]( [image]( Jeff Clark predicted the crashes of 2008, 2020, & 2022 – helping his readers dodge huge losses. He then helped double his readers’ money 13 TIMES in the last year alone… But after watching his OWN 23-year-old soon lose -60% in risky crypto & tech stocks… Jeff is finally coming forward with his biggest WARNING yet. Jeff says: “Sell Your Stocks BEFORE The Stock Shock!” [Click Here to See Jeff’s New Warning.]( P.S. – Jeff refuses to watch his own son lose any more money in risky investments. So, he is rolling the camera to help him win back all his losses – and then some – [with just ONE ticker.]( -- There’s an Erosion of Trust in the Banking Sector As I’ve said previously, what happened at SVB and Signature Bank could repeat if depositors get really worried about the safety of their money. And that’s exactly what we saw with First Republic. On Tuesday of this week, the bank revealed that depositors withdrew more than 40% of their deposits last month. Shortly after this report came out, the bank’s shares went into a free fall. You see, no bank has deposit outflows in billions of dollars on an average day... So what happened with First Republic was actually a bank run. In fact, management said they could only stop the bleeding after a group of large banks stepped in to save the day. That was in the form of a $30 billion lifeline in combined deposits from U.S. banking giants including Bank of America, Citigroup, and JPMorgan. Yet, First Republic’s deposits fell from $176.6 billion in the fourth quarter of 2022 to $104 billion in the first quarter of 2023. You read that right… If you exclude the $30 billion the big banks injected into First Republic’s accounts, the bank faced a drop of almost $102 billion. And this decrease in deposits happened in the month of March alone. [Forget tech, crypto, bonds, and treasuries – buy these instead]( Right now, it’s very unlikely that the U.S. government won’t get involved in the First Republic debacle. During the SVB crisis, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) implemented a systemic-risk exception to insure uninsured depositors. This cost an estimated $22.5 billion. So the government has already set a precedent to bail out the banks. And with as much as 68% of First Republic’s deposits uninsured – a higher rate than most of its competitors – it’s hard to see the government not stepping in again. If the FDIC doesn’t make First Republic’s depositors whole, it could rekindle doubts about the general state of our banking system. This could prompt customers to pull their deposits from other banks and trigger a bigger domino effect across the sector. What’s more, the big banks would have to pay up if the FDIC didn’t guarantee uninsured depositors. And of course, the government can’t have the likes of Bank of America and Citibank taking a cut. Finally, it’s important to consider the bigger picture… Recommended Link [What does Trump’s arrest mean for the market?]( [image]( The answer is – it doesn’t matter. Why? Because Larry Benedict, a genuine Market Wizard, successfully trades in all markets. Bullish, bearish, he has it covered. He crushed it in 2022… And delivered a perfect track record to his One Ticker Trader readers, going 11-for-11. Previously, he went 20 straight years on Wall Street without a single losing year. And when the market plummeted 37% in 2008, he delivered 23% returns… Now he’s sharing an over-the-shoulder “demo” of his winning strategy in action. He calls it the One Ticker Retirement Plan… And it takes less than 10 seconds to demonstrate. [Watch it here.]( -- “Systemic Risk” Is Rearing Its Ugly Head Again Right now, the financial media talking heads are scrambling to explain away First Republic’s fall as another exception in the banking world. For one, experts say, the bank catered to wealthy clients by offering interest-only loans. And these loans required no principal payments for a decade. First Republic couldn’t collect the principal payments on a large portion of its mortgages, and this compounded its woes… That much is true. But the actual problem is much more systemic in nature. As you well know, the Fed’s been hiking interest rates aggressively since March 2022. This has wreaked all sorts of havoc on banks… For one, with rates going up quickly, banks had to compete with government-issued Treasuries. They were late to hiking rates, meaning they failed to raise interest rates on their deposits fast enough. So when people chose to put their money in Treasuries instead of bank deposits, the banking sector was in trouble. It lost over a trillion dollars in the first three quarters of 2022 alone. Second, when rates went from zero at the start of 2022 to over 4% by the end of that year, bond prices fell fast on the open market. As I explained in a [recent essay]( this meant that any bank that bought these bonds before the rates went up saw a big paper loss. [Market Wizard Who Accurately Predicted 2022 Market Collapse Has Shocking New Forecast]( Now, normally, a bank holding these bonds shouldn’t face any problems… As long as it keeps the bonds for the duration of their maturity. But what if you’re facing a bank run and you need to process withdrawals quickly? Well, that means you have to sell some of those underwater assets right away. Your “paper” losses turn into actual ones. And pretty soon, you’re tittering on the brink of the precipice just like First Republic. The problem isn’t only with one bank, though. U.S. banks as a group are currently sitting on $620 billion in unrealized paper losses on government securities. This year, the banks also expect to earn significantly less from their loan businesses. In other words, the banks are getting squeezed on all sides. To say that this is a problem for a system that’s built on confidence would be putting it mildly. And remember, all of this is happening under the watchful eyes of the Fed and its thousands of bank regulators. That’s ironic, since the Fed’s one real job is to regulate the banks. Instead, the Fed’s inability to ensure stability across the banking system makes the issue more widespread. (For more details on how the Fed has contradicted its own monetary policy, prioritized bailing out the big banks, and created distortions in the economy… read up [here]( It’s also why I continue to expect more contagion across the sector. Recommended Link [The #1 stock for 2023]( [image]( Investment expert Brad Thomas knows how to pick stocks. He bought Starbucks back in 2006… He bought Nike in 2003… And he and his team delivered a near-perfect track record from March 2020 to September 2022. Now, for a limited time, he’s revealing his #1 stock for 2023… [Get its name here.]( -- What This Means for Your Money With all this happening, you, too, might be wondering: Is your money safe in banks? It depends. But if your bank is FDIC-insured and you have less than $250,000 in there, you have nothing to worry about. The important thing is to make sure that your deposits are FDIC-insured. Not all banks are. You can find out which ones are by going [here](. What if you have more than $250,000 at one bank? In some cases, you can divide it into different account categories to meet FDIC limits. For more on that, check out the FDIC’s [deposit insurance FAQ page](. If anything else happens in the banking sector, I’ll be in touch again. Regards, [signature] Nomi Prins Editor, Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins --------------------------------------------------------------- Like what you’re reading? Send your thoughts to [feedback@rogueeconomics.com](mailto:feedback@rogueeconomics.com?subject=RE: Inside Wall Street Feedback). MAILBAG On Tuesday, we asked you if you hold any exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in your portfolio. Richard wrote in to tell us about his investments, and why he thinks ETFs are valuable… Yes, I have ETFs. I believe they are particularly valuable for investing in sectors such as energy, biotech, or precious metals and mining. In those sectors, picking individual stocks is very risky. – Richard S. Now, after reading today’s piece, do you also expect more contagion across the banking sector? Why or why not? Write us at [feedback@rogueeconomics.com](mailto:feedback@rogueeconomics.com?subject=RE: Inside Wall Street Feedback). IN CASE YOU MISSED IT… [“Shadow CIA” Insider Releases Tell-All Book on the End of the World]( This is how the world will end. According to best-selling author, Peter Zeihan, massive changes are brewing which could turn the world as we know it – and the financial markets – upside down. His latest prediction is so important… We’ve reached out to him and secured a copy of his latest book for you, at a huge discount. For details on what he’s predicting now – and how to claim your discounted hardback copy… [Click here.]( [image]( [Rogue Economincs]( Rogue Economics 55 NE 5th Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33483 [www.rogueeconomics.com]( [Tweet]( [TWITTER]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. Rogue Economics welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-800-681-1765, Mon–Fri, 9am–7pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:memberservices@rogueeconomics.com). © 2023 Rogue Economics. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Rogue Economics. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use](