Newsletter Subject

Will We Ever Go Back to a Gold Standard?

From

rogueeconomics.com

Email Address

feedback@exct.rogueeconomics.com

Sent On

Fri, Dec 16, 2022 05:32 PM

Email Preheader Text

Nomi just came forward with what could be the most urgent warning of her career? An event in Washi

[Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins]( Nomi just came forward with what could be the most urgent warning of her career… An event in Washington this month could trigger a major housing crisis, and a string of bankruptcies, similar to 2008. But if you’re armed with the right strategy, you can turn this crisis into an opportunity. That’s why, in a special strategy session, Nomi revealed a little-known technique she learned on Wall Street that could help you turn this crisis into big profits. She even gave away the name and ticker symbol of an opportunity she believes could be one of the top plays of 2023. [For a limited time, you can still watch the replay](. Will We Ever Go Back to a Gold Standard? By Nomi Prins, Editor, Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins Welcome to our Friday mailbag edition! Every week, we receive great questions from your fellow readers. And every Friday, I answer as many as I can. Now, before we dive into today’s questions, I want to thank everyone who joined me this week at my last strategy session of the year. Thousands of your fellow readers tuned in to learn how they can protect themselves – and even profit – from the housing crisis. If you missed it, my publisher is making a replay available. I can’t promise it’ll be online for long, [so be sure to watch it here](. Now, on to this week’s mailbag… Up first, reader Terry B. has a question about the gold standard from geopolitical strategist Peter Zeihan’s newest book, The End of the World Is Just the Beginning… I often hear people talk about a return to a gold standard. If I read it right, Peter Zeihan noted in his book that there is not enough gold to support a gold standard. Did I read that right? What’s your take on this? – Terry B. Hi Terry, thank you for writing in. You’re asking a very important question, and one that I believe is on the minds of many of our readers and subscribers. I can’t totally speak for Peter of course – though you may be happy to know that I’ll be doing another interview with him very soon… and I will make sure to ask him your question. [Featured: Former Goldman Sachs Exec: Everyone on Wall Street is investing, should you?]( (For those who missed it, I just published our second interview – and [shared a preview in these pages](. To get access to all four interviews I’m doing with Peter, [head here to learn more]( However, what I’ll say is this… There isn’t enough gold in the world to go back to a full gold standard. What do I mean by full? Let’s use the U.S. as an example. That would mean the fiat currency (U.S. dollar) is backed by full confidence in the U.S. government to make good on its debt obligations, and on the overall strength of the economy. There is simply too much fiat currency in the world to have a situation where it’s convertible to real gold. That said, there is room for a quasi-gold standard. What would that look like? Instead of every dollar (or any other major currency) being convertible to real gold… only a portion of the value of each dollar would have to be backed by a certain amount of gold. That’s the gold the Fed (or other central banks) would have to store in reserve. That would put a cap on the amount of fiat currency that the Fed (or other major central banks) could just create at whim. That’s because they would have to hold at least a portion of real gold to back some of the fiat currency they create. Under that scenario, people or governments would be able to convert a portion of dollars into gold, but not all of them. Recommended Link [Want to potentially make money before 2023?]( [image]( Ph.D. Economist and Investor Nomi Prins is releasing details on her next stunning prediction that is promising to trigger an energy revolution 117x bigger than all of the hottest tech trends combined. Get this cutting-edge financial research before 2023. [Click here.]( -- Up next, Distortion Report subscriber Mary A. has a question about different kinds of gold opportunities… I’m hoping you can expand on gold purchases. I understand stocks like Barrick Gold, buying gold coins/bars, and gold ETFs. But I think I am missing other possibilities and understanding having gold in my portfolio. – Mary A. Hi Mary, thank you for writing in. I can’t give personal advice. But you’ll be happy to know, as a subscriber of my flagship service, Distortion Report, you get access to specific recommendations. And[in our November issue]( I recommended a well-diversified gold mining company. In that issue, we took a global view of the steady demand central banks worldwide have for gold. And I showed what the [Three Stages of the Fed’s Pivot]( which I’ve written about in these pages, will mean for gold. As I put it [back in]( I believed the Fed would kick off Stage 1 as early as this month. Stage 1 means the Fed is still raising interest rates as part of its fight against inflation, but by smaller increments. And at its meeting this week, that’s what it did. It raised rates by 0.50%, compared to 0.75% at its last four meetings. Stage 1 should dampen the dollar, and thus the dollar-gold relationship, which will favor gold. So for anyone interested in building new gold investments, now is a good time. Recommended Link [Get 2023 off to a great start with early access now]( [image]( In this video, Market Wizard Larry Benedict reveals how to make all the money you need… In any market… Using a single stock. And he’s giving you early, year-end access to the top strategy that could put 2023 on the right track. [Click here to watch the video.]( -- Next, reader Jim L. has a question about commissions and fees on broker deals… and comments on the wide availability of financial research… I have a question regarding broker/dealer commissions. Aren’t most investment accounts now managed accounts that are not commissioned-based but fee-based? Aren’t there lots of low-cost investment accounts? Subscriptions to lots of good investment research and investor education are available and very reasonably priced. Aren’t Jim Cramer and Rick Santelli still on CNBC? – Jim L. Hi, Jim. Thanks for your questions. Yes, Jim Cramer and Rick Santelli are still on CNBC. And we also provide a variety of research here at Rogue Economics that you can use on your wealth-building journey. That means that, at the end of the day, as an investor, you make your own choices as to the style of funds you invest in and what information you choose to use. As for commissions vs. fees, the ratio of those different fund management options is changing constantly, though fee-based funds have seen more recent growth than commission-based ones. And yes, some investment accounts have lower costs than others, so it’s important to do your own homework there. Recommended Link Expert who called the bottom in March 2020 and June 2022 releases new forecast: [“The Pain Is Only Going to Continue”]( [image]( [Click here for the name and ticker of his #1 stock.]( -- And finally, reader Tom M. questions why I called Goldman Sachs a strong player in my recent essay, “[Has FTX’s Fall From Glory Doomed Crypto?]( How can you call Goldman a strong player that came back in 2008, when it sought commercial bank status, to gain access to the discount window to shore up its finances? And didn’t it get a loan of $5 billion from Warren Buffett? Then it shed the commercial bank status as soon as the situation cleared. Sorry, I’m not buying that Goldman was a strong player seeing the assistance it received. – Tom M. Hi Tom, thank you for writing in and for your comments. You are absolutely right! Goldman not only sought but achieved commercial bank status. Or more specifically, it achieved bank holding company status in order to gain access to the Fed’s help. It was on the verge of collapse in the fall of 2008. Due to the size of its assets, Goldman became the fourth-largest bank holding company in the U.S. instantaneously as a result. (Even though the distinction was supposed to be reserved for banks that held regular customer deposits.) Morgan Stanley did the same thing at the time. And yes, Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway did indeed invest $5 billion in Goldman Sachs at the time – a clear indication of having rich friends helping you out when the going gets rough – on a Wall Street level. You are right, I probably mischaracterized by using the term “strong” instead of “powerful.” And I completely agree with you. Frankly, if Goldman hadn’t converted to a bank holding company as per the Fed’s agreement… And if it hadn’t received the Fed’s assistance, and Buffett’s, and a chunk of bailout money from the TARP act (or us taxpayers)... It could very well have gone the route of Lehman. [Featured: One Stock Doubles Your Money, During Crisis?]( I write about that possibility in my book, All the Presidents’ Bankers. That might be an interesting excerpt to share with you in a future essay, so keep an eye out for that. And that’s all for this week’s mailbag. Thanks to everyone who wrote in! If I didn’t get to your question this week, look out for my response in a future Friday mailbag edition. I do my best to respond to as many of your questions and comments as I can. Just remember, I can’t give personal investment advice. And if there are any other topics you’d like me to write about, I’d love to hear from you. You can write me at [feedback@rogueeconomics.com](mailto:feedback@rogueeconomics.com?subject=RE: Will We Ever Go Back to a Gold Standard?). Happy investing… and have a fantastic weekend! Regards, [signature] Nomi Prins Editor, Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins --------------------------------------------------------------- Like what you’re reading? Send your thoughts to [feedback@rogueeconomics.com](mailto:feedback@rogueeconomics.com?subject=RE: Inside Wall Street Feedback). --------------------------------------------------------------- IN CASE YOU MISSED IT… [“It’s like pulling cash out of thin air!” – Jeff Clark, Millionaire Trader]( Would you like to know how to generate instant cash from a wide range of stocks… [But without investing a single dime upfront?]( This has nothing to do with dividends... taking out a loan… or anything like that. Best of all, anybody can learn how to do it. It doesn’t matter if you’re retired… or planning to retire. It doesn’t matter if you don’t have millions to invest… What you need is about 3 seconds to execute this simple financial maneuver… And you could be generating $230… $329… even $1,420 or more… In the next hour. [Click here to learn how.]( [image]( Get Instant Access Click to read these free reports and automatically sign up for daily research. [The Ultimate Guide to Taking Back Your Privacy]( [The 101 Guide to Pre-IPO Investing]( [An Insider’s Guide to Making a Fortune from Small Tech Stocks]( [Rogue Economincs]( Rogue Economics 55 NE 5th Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33483 [www.rogueeconomics.com]( [Tweet]( [TWITTER]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. Rogue Economics welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-800-681-1765, Mon–Fri, 9am–7pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:memberservices@rogueeconomics.com). © 2022 Rogue Economics. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Rogue Economics. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use](

EDM Keywords (225)

yes wrote written writing write would world whole whim well week watch washington want verge variety value using use understanding turn trigger topics took today time ticker thus thoughts think thing take sure supposed support subscribers subscriber subscribed style string store stocks still specifically sought soon size situation simply showed shore shed shared share service sent seen say said route room right return retired retire response respond reserved reserve research replay remember redistribution recommended received readers read ratio questions question put publisher published protect promising promise privacy preview powerful possibility possibilities portion planning pivot peter per part pain pages others order opportunity online one nothing need name money missing missed minds millions might meeting means mean may matter many making make mailbag love lots long loan like least learned learn know keep joined issue investor investing invest instantaneously insider information inflation important image however hoping homework hold help hear happy guide government gone goldman gold going giving get funds ftx frankly fortune finances fight fees feedback fed fall eye expand execute example everyone event ensure end economy economist early dollars dollar dive distinction day dampen crisis create could convertible converted convert content commissions comments collapse cnbc chunk choose choices case career cap called buying buffett bottom book best believed believe beginning banks backed back available assistance asking ask armed anybody answer amount agreement able 2023 2008

Marketing emails from rogueeconomics.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

02/11/2024

Sent On

01/11/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.