Newsletter Subject

This “No Brainer” Trade Threatened to Bankrupt Me. Here’s What It Taught Me...

From

rogueeconomics.com

Email Address

feedback@exct.rogueeconomics.com

Sent On

Tue, Apr 2, 2024 04:31 PM

Email Preheader Text

This “No Brainer” Trade Threatened to Bankrupt Me. Here’s What It Taught Me… By

[Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins]( This “No Brainer” Trade Threatened to Bankrupt Me. Here’s What It Taught Me… By Jeff Clark, Editor, Jeff Clark’s Market Minute In February 2000, I spotted an irresistible trade. It was a no-brainer – almost as if the guys on the trading floors were holding up signs announcing, “FREE MONEY.” So, I backed up my wheelbarrow and loaded up. It was the most profitable trade of my career. But also, the most aggressive. To the best of my memory, here’s what happened… PALM, the maker of smartphones and other handheld technology products, was scheduled to go public on March 2, 2000. The company was a wholly-owned subsidiary of 3Com – which was issuing about 20% of the company to the public. The IPO price was set at $38. Of course, we all knew the stock would open for trading way above that level because of the ongoing dot-com mania. In January 2000, shares of 3Com were trading at about $50. By the last week of February, they crossed more than $90. The market was already pricing in the increased valuation of 3Com shares as a result of the PALM IPO. Among traders, expectations had reached purely foolish levels. I knew the hype would disappear as soon as the stock went public. So, I did the only thing I could do… I bet against the stock. I placed a trade to take advantage of the stock’s inevitable move down. In fact, since the profit potential was so high, I took a position about three times my normal size. The Hype Continued The next day, just three trading days before the PALM IPO, shares of 3Com rallied to $95, and I was down $400 on every single trade I’d placed. So, I increased my position. Not only that, I started telling my clients about this trade and encouraging them to take positions. I even put my own brokerage firm’s money into the trade. I was THAT certain it would be a winner. 3Com went higher the next day, too. It was now at $96 per share, and – in a further display of the power of hype – optimistic traders continued aggressively betting on the stock’s rise. So, I increased my position even more. Sure, the stock was going up – the exact opposite of what I’d predicted – but the probability of the stock rallying above $120 (let alone $130, $140, or $150) was so remote that I rationalized it was OK to keep the exposure. Then came the morning of the PALM IPO. I hadn’t slept at all the night before. I was sitting at my desk and staring through an assortment of half-empty Pepto-Bismol bottles at the television screen on the other side of my office. Maria Bartiromo and Bob Pisani were on CNBC. They were talking about the tremendous interest investors had in the PALM IPO. Early indications were that PALM – which was priced at $38 for the IPO – would open for trading somewhere north of $150 per share. My stomach sank, and I slammed my forehead onto the top of my desk. If PALM was worth $150 per share, then a quick “back of the napkin” calculation told me 3Com was worth more than $300 per share. But my exposure betting against the stock was so large that anything above $180 would bankrupt me. It would wipe out my account, put my firm under the minimum net capital requirements, and create huge losses for my clients. I started to panic. I started typing an order to cover the position and take the loss while there was still time. It would be a tough loss to swallow, but I’d remain solvent, and I’d be around to trade the next day. Just as I finished typing the order and was about to hit the “send” key, I stopped. A voice in the back of my head said, “It’s all hype. You’ve seen this before and you know how it’s going to end. You used logic and common sense when you got into the position. Now you’re about to panic to get out.” Logic Over FOMO I erased my order entry screen. I stood up from my desk and unplugged the television. I then left my office for two hours. PALM started trading about one hour later. It opened at $140 per share, the high of the day, and then began drifting lower. 3Com never traded above $110. And as soon as PALM went public, 3Com started to sell off. It was a typical, and predictable, “sell on the news” situation. When I returned to the office, 3Com was trading at $85. And, the trade I’d made betting against the stock now allowed me to essentially turn every $6 into a minimum of $600. The trade that had threatened to bankrupt me just a few hours earlier had now made a fortune. My clients were rich. My firm was rich. And my own net worth nearly doubled as a result. I shut my office door, turned off the lights, sat down at my desk, and closed my eyes. And I swore I would never, ever do that again. There’s no need to. The market provides any number of ways to take advantage of mispriced, overhyped situations without exposing yourself to tremendous risks. And once you identify that fact, you’ll be able to make more money trading in one week than some people make in an entire year. Best regards and good trading, [signature] Jeff Clark Editor, Market Minute --------------------------------------------------------------- Like what you’re reading? Send your thoughts to [feedback@rogueeconomics.com](mailto:feedback@rogueeconomics.com?subject=RE: Inside Wall Street Feedback). MAILBAG Have you ever bet on something that everyone seemed against, and what was the outcome? What other ways does the market provide profit in unexpected places? Write us at [feedback@rogueeconomics.com](mailto:feedback@rogueeconomics.com?subject=RE: Inside Wall Street Feedback). [Rogue Economincs]( Rogue Economics 55 NE 5th Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33483 [www.rogueeconomics.com]( [Tweet]( [TWITTER]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. Rogue Economics welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-800-681-1765, Mon–Fri, 9am–7pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:memberservices@rogueeconomics.com). © 2024 Rogue Economics. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Rogue Economics. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use](

Marketing emails from rogueeconomics.com

View More
Sent On

26/05/2024

Sent On

25/05/2024

Sent On

25/05/2024

Sent On

24/05/2024

Sent On

24/05/2024

Sent On

24/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.