Hereâs why I believe Google has lost its edge... [RiskHedge Report] [Stephen McBride]
RiskHedge subscriber challenges me: Am I wrong about Google? By Stephen McBride - RiskHedge âStephen, Iâm afraid you sound like your âfavoriteâ magazineâThe Economistâon this one...â A RiskHedge reader wrote me after I laid out why [Google is about to be disrupted in a major way](. Iâll quickly recap my argument⦠Google is the most-visited website in the world. It processes 8.5 billion searches per day. Eyeballs = money in the marketing world. This is why Google rakes in the most ad dollars of any business on Earth. But now, ChatGPTâwhich gained 100 million users in just two monthsâis coming for Googleâs crown. RiskHedge reader Guerton disagreedâ¦Â âIt is Googleâone of the most innovative companies on the planetâwe are talking about here. Sure, itâs received a wake-up call... a shot to its bow. But it will respond. Google is the reigning king of AI⦠It will remain in my portfolio for the foreseeable future.â Thank you, Guerton. Now, let me respond... - Did the perfect stock market indicator strike again? Earlier this year, I wrote about how it [usually pays to do the exact opposite of what The Economistâs cover stories suggest](. When The Economist writes a glowing story about a certain asset or country, itâs usually time to sell, and vice versa. In February, a robotic hand pulverizing Googleâs logo appeared on the cover: Googleâs stock looks like it bottomed less than two weeks later: Having the same view as an Economist cover story makes me nervous. Iâm breaking my own rules! But Iâm confident Googleâs heyday is behind us. - Is Google really one of the most innovative companies on the planet? Google gives off vibes itâs a cutting-edge innovation hub. It has cool offices with rock climbing walls and beanbags. It allows employees to spend 20% of their time working on personal projects. And its âmoonshotâ division is plowing billions of dollars into self-driving cars and delivery drones. But cut through all the noise, and youâll see Google is basically a giant ad network. Roughly 80% of Googleâs sales come from selling digital ads. Google built or acquired many great products we use every day: Google Search⦠Gmail⦠the Chrome browser⦠Maps⦠Nest⦠Android, which powers most non-iPhone smartphones⦠and YouTube. But when was the last time it introduced a new service that really moved the needle for its business? Google pioneered the idea of cloud computing⦠yet today, itâs a distant third behind Microsoft (MSFT) and Amazon (AMZN). Sales of its Pixel smartphones never really took off, either. A portfolio manager once told me: âGoogle is the biggest underachiever Iâve ever seen relative to its competitive advantages.â - Ever heard of the âresource curse?â Countries blessed with vast oil or mineral reserves tend to be places you wouldnât bring your family on vacation. In places like Venezuela, two roughnecks can drill a hole in the ground and produce enough âwealthâ to feed the whole country. This is usually a poisoned chalice. The modern-day version of this is two nerds grinding away in their parentâs garage who can write a couple lines of code, which then creates a trillion-dollar company. I call it the âtech resource curse.â And Google is its most high-profile victim. Google Search is likely the most successful product in history. Last year alone, it raked in $220 billion selling ads on the âinternetâs homepage.â But this success made Google fat and lazy. Instead of building great new products, it spent its time building rock climbing walls and chill-out pods for its employees. In fact, a recent memo from ex-Google employee Praveen Seshadri shows us just how bloated the tech giant has become. In the note, Seshadri quipped: âGoogle has 175,000+ capable and well-compensated employees who get very little done quarter over quarter, year over year. Google has four core cultural problems. They are all the natural consequences of having a money-printing machine called âAdsâ that has kept growing relentlessly every year, hiding all other sins. (1) no mission, (2) no urgency, (3) delusions of exceptionalism, (4) mismanagement.â - BREAKING NEWS: Google, reigning king of AI, has been overthrown. For years, folks talked about how Google was the leader in artificial intelligence (AI). It employed three-quarters of the top AI talent. It owns self-driving car leader Waymo. It literally wrote the paper that sparked the âgenerativeâ AI boom. It even had an AI chatbot ready to go before ChatGPT. More than two years ago, Google launched a ChatGPT-like system internally. Employees used it to debate philosophy and write screenplays in the style of Seinfeld. Google developers pushed senior executives to release it, but they were scared. Why? The chatbot didnât adhere to its AI safety standards. Executives were afraid the AI would say something wrong or âpolitically incorrect.â Microsoftâs hiccup a couple years earlier put the fear of God into Google. [As I mentioned last month](, Microsoft released an AI chatbot named âTayâ on Twitter, which was supposed to tweet like a teenage girl. It pulled the plug on Tay just 16 hours after its release due to âsexistâ tweets. Google cared more about cozying up to the politically correct mob than innovating. And because Search was generating so much cash, Google didnât need to do anything. âWeâre Google; weâre invincible.â This is the tech resource curse in action. Google threw away its AI lead and now must worry about far more than sending a few mean tweets. - ChatGPT is coming for Googleâs âhomepage of the internetâ crown. Data from investment bank Barclays shows ChatGPT is stealing market share from Google âat an accelerating rate.â Microsoft Bing, which runs on OpenAIâs tech, also gained market share. And get this⦠The New York Times recently reported the worldâs largest smartphone maker, Samsung, is considering switching from Google to Bing. Upon learning the Samsung news, Google employees âreacted with emojis and surprise.â The tech resource curse runs deep. What about Googleâs ChatGPT competitor, Bard? If you want reassurance Google blew its AI lead, give Bard a try. Having spent several hours playing around with both GPT and Bard, Iâm more confident than ever âpeak Googleâ is in the rear-view mirror. Stephen McBride
Chief Analyst, RiskHedge Think Iâm still wrong about Google? Am I missing something? If so, write me at stephen@riskhedge.com. I love hearing from RiskHedge readers. If someone forwarded you this email and you would like to be added to our email list to receive the RiskHedge Report every week, [simply sign up here.](
This email was sent to {EMAIL} as part of your subscription to RiskHedge Report.
To opt-out, please visit the [unsubscribe page](. [READ IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES HERE.]( YOUR USE OF THESE MATERIALS IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF THESE DISCLOSURES. Copyright © 2023 RiskHedge. All Rights Reserved
RiskHedge | 1417 Sadler Road, PMB 415 | Fernandina Beach, FL 32034