Newsletter Subject

Are AI stocks the next bubble?

From

riskhedge.com

Email Address

subscribers@riskhedge.com

Sent On

Wed, Feb 22, 2023 09:06 PM

Email Preheader Text

These are my favorite ways to play the AI boom... Are AI stocks the next bubble? By Stephen McBride

These are my favorite ways to play the AI boom... [RiskHedge Report] [Stephen McBride] Are AI stocks the next bubble? By Stephen McBride - RiskHedge What frustrates me the most about this AI boom… FOMO is back… Beware of AI ETFs... My top two strategies to play the AI boom… - Are you sick of hearing about AI yet? It’s the hottest craze on Wall Street. AI-related stocks are ripping, as I’ll show you... And it’s thanks, in large part, to the AI-powered chatbot ChatGPT. If you haven’t tried ChatGPT yet, you should. It can answer pretty much any question in a conversational way, as if you’re talking to a human. I first wrote about this breakthrough technology (before it was called ChatGPT) in the November 2021 issue of Disruption Investor. ChatGPT is now the fastest-growing product in history! In only two months after its release, over 100 million users have signed up. For comparison, it took the second fastest–growing app, TikTok, nine months to reach 100 million users. Google needed a year, and Instagram needed two years. - But here’s what’s frustrating me about AI… I’m excited about all the possibilities AI will bring… AI can help discover new cures for diseases. It promises to ease up traffic in cities and eliminate tedious tasks from your schedule. But here’s the problem… When a breakthrough technology like AI bursts onto the scene, it’s always difficult to invest in it. There are hundreds of AI projects with tremendous potential in development. But most of them are off-limits to ordinary investors. They’re either owned by a private company or a tech giant like Google (GOOGL) or Amazon (AMZN). ChatGPT, for example, is owned by private company OpenAI. OpenAI doesn’t trade on the stock market. And it likely won’t anytime soon. When new technologies emerge, you’re usually left with only a handful of “pure-play” stocks to choose from. And these quickly become overcrowded trades... - AI stocks are surging this year… C3.ai (AI) jumped 95%… SoundHound AI (SOUN) soared 192%... And BigBear.ai (BBAI) is up 377%... This looks like bubble behavior to me. Think back to the 2000 dot-com bubble. A company could boost its stock price 100% just by adding “.com” to its name. Folks piled into dot-com stocks. They did it for fear of missing out (FOMO) on the internet’s success. In the end, they inflated one of the largest bubbles in human history. FOMO is why the three AI stocks—AI, SOUN, and BBAI—are surging. They’re the only pure-play AI stocks on the market most investors know about. Last month, BigBear.ai surged 353% in a single day when news broke it had landed a $900 million contract with the US Air Force. It sounds great on the surface… until you dig deeper and realize this isn’t a fixed contract. BigBear.ai must compete with 92 other companies for orders from the $900 million fund. It could end up receiving nothing. - Stay away from AI and “machine learning” ETFs, too… For now, AI ETFs are marketing ploys, plain and simple. AI ETFs are filled with lots of “kind of, but not really AI” stocks. For example, GameStop Corp. (GME) is listed as a Top 10 holding in the popular AI-Powered Equity (AIEQ) ETF. But how much revenue does GameStop generate from AI? Virtually none. - Here are my two favorite ways to play the AI boom… The first way involves investing in the top AI “picks and shovels” stocks. Ask yourself: Who sells the basics? That’s the first question I answer when evaluating an investment trend. For instance, computer chips will continue to be a critical part of the AI boom. So buying the right chip stocks like Nvidia (NVDA) is a smart idea. You also want to look at the sectors in which AI will make the biggest, most imminent advancements. And the one sector my colleague Chris Wood and I have our eyes on is healthcare.... specifically drug development. We’re researching one particular company using AI to make the drug development process better, faster, and cheaper. We’ll share all the details in the upcoming issue of our Disruption Investor advisory. Paid-up subscribers should stay tuned. If you’re not a subscriber, [go here]( to discover more about a risk-free trial, as well as the full story on the “Chip Wars”—another huge investing opportunity in 2023. Stephen McBride Chief Analyst, RiskHedge In the mailbag... Here’s what a fellow reader had to say about [the current state of Apple](: I do agree with your concerns on Apple overall—they haven’t had a market-disrupting innovation since Steve passed. The last one was the Apple Watch, and even that had his fingerprints on it. Tim is a great operator, able to generate lots of profits. But the clock is ticking, and they won’t be able to sustain the semi-lofty P/E much longer. —John Another reader weighed in on Apple’s [highly anticipated AR glasses](: People are so dependent upon their iPhones. I can’t see them being replaced by VR/AR headsets. The headsets will quickly find a role in gaming and in certain industrial applications, particularly in controlling remote machinery. After a few years of development, surgeons will be able to use them for remotely controlled surgery and for other medical applications. The military will also find plenty of uses. However, I suspect the convenience of iPhones will dominate for everyday use until a device can tap directly into brain waves to control all the apps currently running on iPhones. —David Finally, Richard wrote in about Stephen’s recent [magazine cover indicator](: I remember two things [The Economist] mentioned, one of which was major. They ran a leader about the subprime risk in 2006, and I’ll never forget what they pointed out. The Chinese stock market (in 2015?) was getting too hot—a short at this point would have been excellent. It dropped like a stone in the following months. I’ve been reading their headlines about crypto, and I’ve stayed in. —Richard We appreciate all your feedback. If there are any other topics you’d like Stephen to cover, write in at stephen@riskhedge.com. Suggested Reading... [Exclusive 1-on-1: "This is your Warren Buffett moment"](  [Stream for free: A Conversation with Keith Fitz-Gerald]( If someone forwarded you this email and you would like to be added to our email list to receive the RiskHedge Report every week, [simply sign up here.]( This email was sent to {EMAIL} as part of your subscription to RiskHedge Report. To opt-out, please visit the [unsubscribe page](. [READ IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES HERE.]( YOUR USE OF THESE MATERIALS IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF THESE DISCLOSURES. Copyright © 2023 RiskHedge. All Rights Reserved RiskHedge | 1417 Sadler Road, PMB 415 | Fernandina Beach, FL 32034

Marketing emails from riskhedge.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/11/2024

Sent On

30/10/2024

Sent On

17/10/2024

Sent On

15/10/2024

Sent On

14/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.