Newsletter Subject

Chris Wood: Get ready for a big "second half" in biotech...

From

riskhedge.com

Email Address

subscribers@riskhedge.com

Sent On

Mon, Apr 25, 2022 08:35 PM

Email Preheader Text

Is now the time to invest in biotech stocks? Chris Wood has the answer… By Chris Reilly - RiskH

Is now the time to invest in biotech stocks? Chris Wood has the answer… [RiskHedge Report] Chris Wood: Get ready for a big "second half" in biotech... [Chris Reilly] By Chris Reilly - RiskHedge Biotech stocks are on sale. The SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI), one of the most popular biotech funds, has fallen more than 50% since February of last year: According to our expert Chris Wood, this is presenting a fantastic buying opportunity. I called Chris for the full story… *** Chris Reilly: Chris, our readers know you as the microcap guy. Specifically, you focus on tiny, early-stage disruptors taking on massive markets. And while your research covers a wide range of tech trends, folks may not know you’re a seasoned vet in biotech stocks… SIC 2022: The Countdown Begins... We’re officially one week out from the start of SIC 2022. Six action-packed conference days where over 50 top money managers, economists, and geopolitical experts provide their timely analysis and insights into current events and markets. Watch Dr. Henry Kissinger, Ron and Michael Baron, Tom Hoenig, Joe Lonsdale, Cathie Wood, Danielle DiMartino Booth, Charles and Louis Gave, David Rosenberg, George Friedman, Stephen McBride, Felix Zulauf, former NATO Deputy Commander Richard Shirreff, and many more in over 40 live presentations, panel discussions, and fireside chats. The conference kicks off on Monday, May 2. There’s still time to secure your Virtual Pass. [Click here to see attendance details.]( Chris Wood: Yes, biotechs were the first stocks I focused on when I started investing professionally 15 years ago. As you know, in addition to my role at RiskHedge, I co-edit an investment service at Mauldin Economics called Biotech Millionaire, which exclusively covers small biotech stocks. I also recommend a couple biotech stocks in the Project 5X portfolio, my microcap advisory here at RiskHedge. In fact, I’m recommending a new, tiny biotech stock this week, [so Project 5X members]( should stay tuned. Reilly: What got you interested in biotech stocks? Wood: The excitement. Biotech combines cutting-edge science and technology with the world of finance to create the medicines of tomorrow. It feels good to invest in companies trying to save lives. And these stocks can provide mammoth returns in short order. So, they’re a great opportunity for investors with the right risk tolerance. Reilly: You’re saying biotechs are risky. Wood: Yes. Their stock prices move around 5 to 10 times more than a “normal” stock. Take Greenwich LifeSciences… It jumped from $5.20 on December 8, 2020, to a high of $158.07 the next day. This was after it reported zero recurring cases of breast cancer five years after treatment with its drug in clinical trials. That’s a jump of over 2,900% in one day. The stock closed that day significantly lower, at $57.10. But the closing price on December 9 was still 1,000% above the previous day’s close. Now, a 1,000% gain in a day is rare—but a 50% gain or even a 100%+ gain is not. You see it all the time when a biotech announces great clinical trial results. But the big moves go both ways. I’ve seen plenty of biotechs fall 80%+ in a day on bad clinical trial results. So you have to know what you’re doing to put the odds of success in your favor. If you do, biotech stocks can be a great opportunity. And right now is the best time I’ve seen in years to buy a lot of these small biotechs. Reilly: Why’s that? Wood: They’re dirt cheap. Biotechs have sold off for more than a year now. Look at the SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI). It’s down 30% this year alone. The S&P 500 is down 9% over the same time frame. Record numbers of biotechs are trading at or below cash. That means the companies are worth less than the cash they have in the bank. Investors are assuming the companies’ drugs in development are worthless. This happens sometimes with small biotechs that are burning through cash too quickly. But that’s not what’s going on here. The whole space is oversold and cheap, and I believe we’re close to the bottom. It’s presenting an opportunity for investors who get in now. Reilly: I understand these stocks have been beaten down to a pulp… and we may not see these attractive entry prices again for some time… But what else do you like about biotech stocks today besides the fact they’re dirt cheap? Wood: Historically, when biotech stocks have a prolonged pullback like this, big biopharma companies tend to step in and start buying them up. The big companies usually buy the smaller companies for a big premium over their current stock price—which can lift the tide in the whole space. According to analysis from SVP Leerink, big biopharma has more than $1.7 trillion in cash for acquisitions over the next couple years. And it’s spread pretty evenly across all the big names. Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, AbbVie, Glaxo, Novartis, Merck, are flush with cash. And many of these companies have openly stated they’re on the hunt for acquisitions. Once a few of these big names start announcing acquisitions, it’ll have a snowball effect… and more and more deals will get done. In short: I think we’ll see a lot of acquisitions in the second half of this year. Reilly: How can readers take advantage of this opportunity in biotech stocks? Wood: The easiest way is to buy XBI. This ETF will benefit from a rebound in biotech in the back half of the year and beyond. I’ll also be highlighting a few exciting individual biotech stocks at the upcoming Strategic Investment Conference. It’s virtual this year—so you can sign up to watch from home if you’re interested. [Editor’s note: [The Strategic Investment Conference]( is a closed-door gathering of many of the world’s greatest investors. This year, there will be 52 expert speakers, 40 live presentations and fireside chats, and six days full of timely insights and analysis, which you can watch from the comfort of your own home with a Virtual Pass. Check out the full lineup of speakers—and claim your Virtual Pass for 44% off if you’re interested—[right here](.] Monday Mailbag Readers loved Stephen’s recent essay: [Put down the phone](! Here’s what some are saying: Smartphones are ruining society as we know it—now, something will come in its place: but it will be light years away from the youth we had/kids are having. In light of the Meta world—who knows if this is what humans want/need/deserve—but make no mistake, smartphones are destroying the society that I grew up in. As you said, the ubiquity of information is the issue, the endless distraction with something “new.” ‘Go throw a ball with your dog’ is getting lost along the way… and what a shame that is. Good piece. —Chris I have a simple solution for the phone problem. If I go into a meeting I instruct everyone to turn off their phones, not just silent mode, OFF. If they don’t, I leave. People think I’m nuts, out of tune with the current times, etc., but I don’t care. Amazing how effective that can be in conducting a constructive meeting, and usually in less time than had been allotted. Same thing when going out to dinner. —Dennis It might be possible to run governmental campaigns to the like of anti-smoking campaigns, which actually has seemed to work quite well, at least in Norway, but it might be that the era where people listen to their government has come to an end, so today maybe the influence of role models are the way to go. A third option could be regulation of the addictiveness of information technology. Unlike manufacturing of drugs and alcohol, information technology requires lots of skilled professionals that will likely want to adhere to regulation to maintain their reputation. One thing that is for sure is that the people/societies who figure out how to control this addiction will be great beneficiaries in an economic sense and in quality of life, like you pointed out yourself. —Kjetil I plead guilty. We all fall into the traps you mentioned. I’m going to experiment this evening as we’re joining 2 other couples for dinner tonight. I’m going to propose no cell phones at the table. We’ll see what happens?! —Frank Would you like to see more essays like this one from time to time—or should we stick to strictly investing ideas? Let me know at chrisreilly@riskhedge.com. Chris Reilly Executive Editor, RiskHedge Suggested Reading... [Billionaire Peter Thiel calls this the biggest secret in venture capital](  [Put down the phone!]( This email was sent to {EMAIL} as part of your subscription to RiskHedge Report. To opt-out, please visit the [unsubscribe page](. [READ IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES HERE.]( YOUR USE OF THESE MATERIALS IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF THESE DISCLOSURES. Copyright © 2022 RiskHedge. All Rights Reserved RiskHedge | PO Box 1423 | Stowe, VT 05672

Marketing emails from riskhedge.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/11/2024

Sent On

30/10/2024

Sent On

17/10/2024

Sent On

15/10/2024

Sent On

14/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.