Newsletter Subject

This billionaire is now using one of our top strategies

From

riskhedge.com

Email Address

subscribers@riskhedge.com

Sent On

Tue, Aug 31, 2021 08:19 PM

Email Preheader Text

By Justin Spittler - RiskHedge Has billionaire Dan Loeb been reading the RiskHedge Report? Loe

[RiskHedge Report] This billionaire is now using one of our top strategies [Justin Spittler] By Justin Spittler - RiskHedge   Has billionaire Dan Loeb been reading the RiskHedge Report? Loeb climbed to the top of Wall Street by achieving remarkable success as an “activist investor.” In a nutshell, Loeb would buy large stakes in struggling companies… replace management… and make other adjustments (like cutting a dividend) to turn around the company. That’s how Loeb amassed a $4 billion fortune. Most people with that much success wouldn’t change their approach. If it isn’t broke, why fix it, right? But Loeb recently made a huge change in how he invests… - He started investing more money in “hypergrowth companies”… Hypergrowth companies are exactly what they sound like. They’re companies that grow at an explosive rate. As longtime readers know, not only do these companies turn entire industries on their heads… In some cases, they create brand-new industries from scratch. According to CNBC, Loeb wrote in his recent investor letter: “[We have] moved decisively into building our capability to invest in ‘hyper-growth’ companies, focusing on early-stage ventures.” Loeb largely avoided hypergrowth stocks for most of his career. Instead, he focused on “dirt cheap” value stocks with the potential to rebound. So, why the change? Well, it’s quite simple. - Investing in hypergrowth companies can deliver massive returns… For example, Loeb’s hedge fund Third Point invested in cybersecurity disruptor SentinelOne (S) in 2015. At the time, SentinelOne was a private company valued at just $98 million. Today, SentinelOne is a publicly traded company worth $15.6 billion. In other words, SentinelOne’s market value has increased more than 150X since Loeb first invested in it! Third Point also invested in artificial intelligence lending company Upstart Holdings (UPST) in 2015. Back then, Upstart was a private company valued at just $145 million. But, like SentinelOne, Upstart went public earlier this year. It’s now worth $16.7 billion… or 112X more than the company was worth when Loeb originally invested in it! More recently, Third Point invested in FTX. FTX is one of the world’s biggest cryptocurrency exchanges, and one of the fastest-growing businesses on the planet. The company was founded just three years ago. And it’s already worth $18 billion. - This is a huge departure from how Loeb used to invest… Loeb said so himself in his recent letter to Third Point investors. Per CNBC: While valuation always matters, our analysis is more focused today on business quality, differentiation, innovation, disruption and market structure… This contrasts with our previous focus as an event-driven fund on using “events” (spinoffs, recaps, mergers, etc.) as opportunities to find “cheap” stocks. In other words, Loeb is investing more heavily into innovative companies… even though it’s not cheap to invest in them. In fact, investors will often pay steep premiums to own hypergrowth stocks. And that keeps many old-school investors from touching them. They can’t justify buying a stock that trades at 20… 30… or even 40 times sales. But that hesitation often leads to missing out on multi-bagger investments. Of course, you don’t need to be a private investor or billionaire like Loeb to make a fortune off hypergrowth stocks. - RiskHedge readers have also been reaping big returns on hypergrowth stocks… In fact, I’m constantly recommending “expensive” hypergrowth stocks in my advisories, IPO Insider and Disruption Trader. Most folks do the opposite. They buy whatever’s cheap. By “cheap,” I mean stocks that have a low stock price in relation to their sales or earnings. If a stock trades for $20/share and earns $4/share, it’s cheap. If it trades for $200/share and earns $4/share, it’s not cheap. People are drawn to “cheap” stocks for the same reason they flock to the Macy’s clearance rack. It feels good to get a deal. Americans love nothing more than getting lots of “bang for their buck.” But when it comes to investing, this is usually the wrong approach. - Expensive hypergrowth stocks are often the elite performers… Edge computing pioneer Cloudflare (NET) is a perfect example. When I recommended Cloudflare to IPO Insiders in November 2019, it was flying under the radar. Most people hadn’t heard of edge computing yet. According to traditional valuation metrics, Cloudflare was expensive. But that didn’t stop it from becoming a monster stock. As you can see below, NET has rallied 558% since I recommended it less than two years ago. - Cloudflare is still an expensive stock today… According to analyst Jamin Ball, Cloudflare is the fourth most expensive software stock—behind SentinelOne, Bill.com, and Snowflake. Yet I have no intention of selling it anytime soon—it still has plenty of room to grow. Bill.com (BILL) is another hypergrowth stock that I recently recommended. As you can see, it’s even more expensive than Cloudflare. Bill.com is a software as a service (SaaS) company. In short, the company sells cloud-based software that helps simplify, digitize, and automate back-office financial processes. Last Friday, BILL surged 30% after reporting that its sales surged 86% last quarter. It’s now rallied 82% since we bought the stock less than two months ago. And those are just two examples. Other expensive software stocks include Zscaler (ZS), Asana (ASAN), and Atlassian (TEAM). If you had avoided these stocks due to their lofty valuations, you would have missed out on big gains. Zscaler has soared more than 700% since it went public in 2018. Asana has climbed 188% since it went public last September, and Atlassian has surged more than 1,200% since it IPO’d in 2016. That’s nearly 10X the S&P 500’s return over the same period. - Clearly, avoiding hypergrowth stocks because they’re “expensive” is the WRONG move. Investing in these types of opportunities can lead to explosive profits… in some cases, triple-digit gains in a matter of months. My colleague Stephen McBride and I recently compiled our top 5 hypergrowth stocks to buy today. This special report includes a “rare earth” metals play… a small lithium play… a leading cybersecurity stock… and two “proteomics” stocks. (If you’ve been following along, you know the proteomics industry is a true game-changer—what I call “Genomics 2.0.”) You can learn how to access this report by [going here](. [In this presentation, you’ll also get the name of one of our two proteomics plays—name and ticker for free](, just for reading. Justin Spittler Chief Trader, RiskHedge This email was sent to {EMAIL} as part of your subscription to RiskHedge Report. To opt-out, please visit the [unsubscribe page](. [READ IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES HERE.]( YOUR USE OF THESE MATERIALS IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF THESE DISCLOSURES. Copyright © 2021 RiskHedge. All Rights Reserved RiskHedge | PO Box 1423 | Stowe, VT 05672

Marketing emails from riskhedge.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/11/2024

Sent On

30/10/2024

Sent On

17/10/2024

Sent On

15/10/2024

Sent On

14/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.