Newsletter Subject

What Kamala Said On Eve Of 9/11 Was Disgraceful

From

redrightpatriot.com

Email Address

mail@redrightpatriot.com

Sent On

Thu, Sep 12, 2024 10:50 PM

Email Preheader Text

Yup, she actually said this. Oh, here we go again. It seems every time Donald Trump steps on a debat

[Logo]( [What Kamala Said On Eve Of 9/11 Was Disgraceful] [What Kamala Said On Eve Of 9/11 Was Disgraceful]( Yup, she actually said this. Oh, here we go again. It seems every time Donald Trump steps on a debate stage, there's a [double standard]( bigger than Texas. This time, it was Trump vs. Kamala Harris, and surprise, surprise - the moderators decided to play referee for Harris while letting her throw some serious punches without even a slap on the wrist. Harris, always ready with her well-rehearsed quips and jabs, didn't hold back. From calling Trump a "disgrace" to claiming world leaders are "laughing at him," she made it clear that her strategy was to go for the jugular. She even had the audacity to say that people leave Trump's rallies "out of exhaustion and boredom." Talk about rewriting history. If anyone's rallies are suffering from attendance issues, it's the Democrats. But let's talk about the moderators. Instead of sitting back and letting the candidates go at it, they seemed all too eager to fact-check Trump on everything, yet somehow turned a blind eye when Harris spouted off her own questionable claims. Remember when Trump brought up crime rates? Harris should've been sweating when he pointed out how cities like L.A., New York, and Chicago - Democrat strongholds - were missing from the FBI's data. Instead, David Muir conveniently stepped in to cut Trump off and defend Harris because, you know, fairness and all that. And the so-called fact-checking didn't stop there. Trump rightly called out Harris for her disastrous foreign policy track record, specifically her botched attempt at diplomacy with Ukraine and Russia. But again, Muir jumped in to shield her. Then there's Harris' wild claims about Trump and abortion, which she somehow twisted into an unrecognizable mess of misinformation. Yet, instead of holding her accountable, the moderators just smiled and nodded. JUST IN: Donald Trump calls for ABC News to get their license taken away after their abysmal debate moderation last night. Moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis are under fire for their continuous fact-checks of Trump without any for Harris. The moderators not only... [pic.twitter.com/1TDX9TPxub]( - Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) [September 11, 2024]( Let's not forget about the tired, overused Charlottesville reference that Harris lobbed in Trump's direction. Trump's explanation of the "very fine people" comment has been public knowledge for years, and even the left-leaning Snopes debunked Harris' version of events. But did the moderators mention that? Of course not. She also trotted out the overused argument about the January 6th incident, calling it the worst attack on the U.S. since the Civil War. Seems she conveniently forgot about 9/11 and the countless lives lost that day. To make matters worse, she made this claim on the eve of 9/11, adding an even deeper layer of irony to her statement. One day before the anniversary of 9/11, Kamala Harris says January 6th was the greatest attack on our country since the Civil War [pic.twitter.com/qQDjgGFwMV]( - ALX ???? (@alx) [September 11, 2024]( Meanwhile, as Trump was getting grilled from all sides, Harris was laughing her way through it. Literally. Her dismissive chuckle every time Trump tried to make a point was like nails on a chalkboard. For someone who is supposed to be serious about becoming the next president, she sure doesn't seem to take much seriously - except for the moderators who were there to make sure her gaffes were smoothed over. Behavior Analysis Experts EXPOSE Moderator Bias Against Trump in Tonight's Debate[@DrPhil]('s guests bring the receipts. 1. "There was clearly a bias against Trump in their faces." 2. Scott Rouse observed that Trump's microphone was louder, making him appear aggressive. 3.... [pic.twitter.com/hTowufXV6E]( - The Vigilant Fox ?? (@VigilantFox) [September 11, 2024]( But here's the thing: the American people aren't blind to this game. The media's blatant bias and Harris' non-stop jabs aren't fooling anyone. [Glenn Beck Rips Fox News As Source Of Evil] [Glenn Beck Rips Fox News As Source Of Evil]( Goes into detail what happened. [The Question Kamala Refused To Answer Was Telling] [The Question Kamala Refused To Answer Was Telling]( Even the moderators couldn't bail her out. [Wacko Taylor Swift Fans Rage After Pop Hugged Trump Supporter] [Wacko Taylor Swift Fans Rage After Pop Hugged Trump Supporter]( For crying out loud. [John Kirby's Reaches New Heights Of Gaslighting Over Afghanistan] [John Kirby's Reaches New Heights Of Gaslighting Over Afghanistan]( WATCH - He actually said this. [Even CNN Is Shocked Over Kamala Answers To Questionnaire] [Even CNN Is Shocked Over Kamala Answers To Questionnaire]( They couldn't believe it! You are receiving this email because you opted in to Red Right Patriot daily newsletter. Copyright 2024. Red Right Patriot. All rights reserved. 30 N. Gould St, Suite 6911, Sheridan, WY 82801 [UNSUBSCRIBE]( | [VIEW IN BROWSER]( | [PRIVACY POLICY](

Marketing emails from redrightpatriot.com

View More
Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.