Newsletter Subject

Decoding conservative legislative priorities

From

redistrictingaction.org

Email Address

allontheline@redistrictingaction.org

Sent On

Sat, Feb 6, 2021 03:08 AM

Email Preheader Text

This is what they mean by "election integrity" laws. And here's how ending the filibuster can make a

This is what they mean by "election integrity" laws. And here's how ending the filibuster can make a difference. [All On The Line] [End the filibuster »](3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA) We've seen conservative lawmakers in the majority in two of our target states in the south -- Georgia and Texas -- roll out "election integrity" as a big theme for their legislative sessions. Let's decode these legislative priorities: "Election integrity" to address "widespread voter fraud" is just code for more voter suppression to address record voter turn-out. There is a clear path to ending this thinly veiled attempt to suppress voting in communities of color. The John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act would restore the essential voting protections gutted by the Supreme Court in 2013. If Mitch McConnell and his caucus continue to obstruct a fairly won majority -- Democrats can and should pass this bill by eliminating the filibuster. [Help us stop blatant voter suppression. Sign our petition asking Congress to end the filibuster if they need to do so to pass democracy reforms now.](3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA) To be clear -- this burgeoning narrative of a need for "election integrity" is just a new coat of paint on a decades-long effort to restrict voting in communities of color. It's no surprise we're seeing these bills in states like Georgia where Black voters recently turned out in record numbers. [We are calling on the Senate to not let the filibuster -- a tool of the minority party to obstruct progress -- stop them from passing the John Lewis VRAA and restoring essential voting rights protections. Add your name.](3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA) -- The AOTL Team All On The Line is the grassroots advocacy campaign supported by the National Redistricting Action Fund. Support our work to end gerrymandering. [DONATE](3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA) Paid for by The National Redistricting Action Fund. Contributions or gifts to The National Redistricting Action Fund are not tax deductible. This email was sent to: {EMAIL}. If that is not your preferred email address, you can update your information [here](3D%3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA). We believe that emails are a vital way to stay in direct contact with supporters. Click [here]( if you'd like to receive fewer emails from All On The Line. Click [here]( if you'd like to unsubscribe from these messages. Paid for by The National Redistricting Action Fund, 700 13th Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, D.C. 20005

Marketing emails from redistrictingaction.org

View More
Sent On

03/11/2024

Sent On

30/10/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Sent On

26/10/2024

Sent On

17/10/2024

Sent On

06/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.