Newsletter Subject

The white supremacist history of voter suppression

From

redistrictingaction.org

Email Address

allontheline@redistrictingaction.org

Sent On

Wed, Jan 27, 2021 01:20 PM

Email Preheader Text

Voter suppression is rooted in racism. Just look at Georgia. will provide context to how institution

Voter suppression is rooted in racism. Just look at Georgia. [All On The Line] Voter suppression is rooted in racism. Just look at Georgia. All On The Line condemns the insurrection against our democracy. Our team hopes [this series]( will provide context to how institutional racism allows such hatred and violence to thrive -- and what we as individuals can do to help collectively build a more just political system. If you would like to take a break from receiving our emails, [please let us know here](. If you're interested in supporting our efforts to increase accountability through our electoral system -- and you're in a position to comfortably do so -- [you can make a contribution here](3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA). Thank you for your support. --------------------------------------------------------------- Time and time again, systems of white supremacy are created or reinforced as a reaction to progress on the road to racial equity -- from the Jim Crow voting laws instituted after ratification of the 15th Amendment, to the coordinated effort to gerrymander maps immediately following the election of our first Black president. [Voter suppression is rooted in racism. Just look at Georgia.](3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA) The current runoff system in Georgia was first implemented in 1963 after the Supreme Court ruled that the state's previous electoral system unfairly diluted the power of Black voters in cities like Atlanta in violation of the 14th Amendment. But the new system didn't fix the problem of inequity; it continued it. Not only is the runoff system a relic of the Jim Crow era, the segregationist state legislator who proposed adopting the runoff system later admitted he was "racially prejudiced" and some of his political activity was "racially motivated". Immediately following the 2008 election, conservatives invested heavily in winning state legislative races in order to control redistricting. Their efforts were successful -- for the first time ever, Republicans controlled the Georgia redistricting process. [The resulting gerrymandered map was described by John Lewis as "an affront to the spirit and the letter of the Voting Rights Act."](3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA) In 2013, the Supreme Court gutted key protections in the Voting Rights Act that helped prevent voter suppression. Since then, hundreds of polling locations have closed in Georgia, we've seen unprecedented efforts to purge voters off registration rolls, and voters have experienced hours-long lines in areas with more voters of color. Despite all these obstacles, Georgians set voter turnout records in November 2020 and again in January's runoff election -- thanks to the tireless efforts of Black grassroots organizers who worked to engage, register, and turn out their communities in record numbers. [But as President Obama has warned, one good election will not eliminate threats to our democracy.](3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA) Conservative state legislators in Georgia have already committed to restricting absentee voting and eliminating ballot drop boxes -- key provisions that make voting more accessible. It is not a coincidence that after 15 years of no-excuse absentee voting in Georgia, conservatives are calling to end the practice after an election cycle when high Black turnout was the deciding factor of their party's losses. We need to restore accountability in our government. Right now. [Ending gerrymandering in states like Georgia is essential to breaking the cycle of voter suppression and restoring accountability in our democracy. Help All On The Line train and empower grassroots volunteers to peacefully and effectively hold politicians accountable.](3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA) If you've saved your payment information with ActBlue Express, your donation will go through immediately. [DONATE: $15](3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA) [DONATE: $35](3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA) [DONATE: $50](3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA) [DONATE: $100]( [DONATE: $250]( [DONATE OTHER AMOUNT](3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA) --------------------------------------------------------------- Our mission at All On The Line is to end gerrymandering and help restore accountability in our democracy. Here are a few ways you can take action. [Demand accountability:]( Add your name to demand the resignation of the 147 representatives and senators who attempted to overturn election results -- after the violent insurrection that disrupted the peaceful transition of power. [Submit a letter to the editor:]( Help educate your community about democracy reform. We've drafted a template LTE about how the For the People Act can help restore our democracy. Our tool will let you customize the letter and submit it to your local newspaper. [Contact Congress:]( The U.S. House of Representatives reintroduced the For the People Act (H.R. 1) which would provide much-needed democracy reforms on redistricting, voting rights, ethics, election laws, and election security. Our tool will connect you with your members of Congress and provide suggested language on how to advocate for this bill. [Make a donation:](3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA) All On The Line is committed to training and empowering grassroots activists to peacefully and effectively hold politicians accountable. We appreciate the generosity of grassroots donors who help make our work possible. Forward this email to a friend: This grassroots movement is strengthened every time someone joins our collective call for accountability and an end to gerrymandering. Forward this email to a friend who you think might be interested in learning more about democracy reform. All On The Line is the grassroots advocacy campaign supported by the National Redistricting Action Fund. Support our work to end gerrymandering. [DONATE](3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA) Paid for by The National Redistricting Action Fund. Contributions or gifts to The National Redistricting Action Fund are not tax deductible. This email was sent to: {EMAIL}. If that is not your preferred email address, you can update your information [here](3D%3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA). We believe that emails are a vital way to stay in direct contact with supporters. Click [here]( if you'd like to receive fewer emails from All On The Line. Click [here]( if you'd like to unsubscribe from these messages. Paid for by The National Redistricting Action Fund, 700 13th Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, D.C. 20005

Marketing emails from redistrictingaction.org

View More
Sent On

03/11/2024

Sent On

30/10/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Sent On

26/10/2024

Sent On

17/10/2024

Sent On

06/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.