ICYMI: Justice Kagan on election results

"There are no results to 'flip' until all valid votes are counted." [All On The Line] IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: In the 11th hour, the conservative majority on the Supreme Court undermined Tuesday's consequential election by not allowing all ballots cast by Election Day to be counted in Wisconsin -- in an attempt, according to Justice Kavanaugh, to avoid the "suspicions of impropriety" if absentee ballots "flip the results" of the election. But as Justice Kagan pointed out in her dissent: "There are no results to 'flip' until all valid votes are counted." [If you agree, add your name to support counting all valid votes.](3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA) Elections should be decided by voters. No candidate should be claiming victory before every valid ballot is counted -- and the Supreme Court should not prevent votes from being counted in order to expedite election results. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: SCOTUS Alert Date: Oct 27, 2020 Subject: Kagan dissent calls out Kavanaugh [Tell the Supreme Court to protect voting rights, not suppress voter turnout »](3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA) In her dissenting opinion of the SCOTUS decision rejecting requests to reinstate an extension of Wisconsin's deadline for receiving absentee ballots, Justice Elena Kagan called out Justice Kavanaugh for his absurd refusal to count ballots received after Election Day. "There are no results to 'flip' until all valid votes are counted. And nothing could be more 'suspicio[us]' or 'improp[er]' than refusing to tally votes once the clock strikes 12 on election night." -- Justice Kagan Conservatives on the Supreme Court are hellbent on silencing voters. Deciding to throw away absentee ballots that arrive after Election Day -- during a pandemic when Senate Republicans have refused to properly fund the USPS and Trump installed a Postmaster General intent on dismantling the Postal Service -- is nothing short of court-sanctioned voter suppression. [Add your name to call for a stop to court-sanctioned voter suppression »](3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA) If this case sounds familiar, it's because the Court's conservative majority made a similar eleventh-hour decision to upend changes to Wisconsin's vote-by-mail system during the state's primary. While ballots still needed to be postmarked by the primary election date, there was a six-day window for ballots to be received and counted. Now, just six months later and days before Election Day, an almost-identical extension is apparently a bridge too far to help voters. We need the highest court to protect voters, yet the conservative majority on the Supreme Court has proven they will enable voter suppression tactics instead. Add your name to call for an end to such court-sanctioned voter suppression. [ADD YOUR NAME](3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA) All On The Line is the grassroots advocacy campaign supported by the National Redistricting Action Fund. Support our work to end gerrymandering. [DONATE](3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA) Paid for by The National Redistricting Action Fund. Contributions or gifts to The National Redistricting Action Fund are not tax deductible. This email was sent to: {EMAIL}. If that is not your preferred email address, you can update your information [here](3D%3D/?g=c_HRLc4YDKRc5lMu5pqE6VA). We believe that emails are a vital way to stay in direct contact with supporters. Click [here]( if you'd like to receive fewer emails from All On The Line. Click [here]( if you'd like to unsubscribe from these messages. Paid for by The National Redistricting Action Fund, 700 13th Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, D.C. 20005