Newsletter Subject

Court-sanctioned voter suppression

From

redistrictingaction.org

Email Address

allontheline@redistrictingaction.org

Sent On

Wed, Apr 8, 2020 11:15 PM

Email Preheader Text

Two things happened Monday night that reversed one governor's attempt at a safe and fair election. W

Two things happened Monday night that reversed one governor's attempt at a safe and fair election. [All On The Line] Two things happened Monday night that reversed Wisconsin Governor Evers' attempt at a safe and fair election. The Wisconsin Supreme Court overruled the Governor's decision to delay the election until June. And the Supreme Court of the United States overruled the extended deadline for absentee ballots in a decision that Justice Ginsburg said in her dissent will result, she fears, in "massive disenfranchisement." We know gerrymandered state legislatures will do anything to maintain their power -- and now we know the Roberts-Kavanaugh-Gorsuch-Thomas-Alito Supreme Court of the United States will work to protect conservative power as well. The Supreme Court's decision last summer that federal courts don't have the authority to rein in partisan gerrymandering was disappointing. This week's decision is just more evidence that the conservatives on the court will continue to sanction voter suppression tactics. [Add your name if you believe the Supreme Court should be protecting voting rights, not enabling voter suppression.](3D/?g=mAh1VMyULAlc5lNRS2N0TzA) We're seeing the consequences of these SCOTUS decisions play out in Wisconsin right now. The judge who wins this week's election for the Wisconsin Supreme Court will very likely rule on redistricting cases in the coming years. That's why conservatives in the state legislature, the Wisconsin Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court of the United States all played a role in allowing voter suppression tactics to prevail -- wagering the health and safety of Wisconsinites for another decade of gerrymandered power. [Sign this petition to tell the Supreme Court they should be protecting voting rights, not enabling voter suppression amidst a public health crisis.](3D/?g=mAh1VMyULAlc5lNRS2N0TzA) We'll keep you updated as this situation unfolds, -- The AOTL Team All On The Line is the grassroots advocacy campaign supported by the National Redistricting Action Fund. Support our work to end gerrymandering. [DONATE](3D/?g=mAh1VMyULAlc5lNRS2N0TzA) Paid for by The National Redistricting Action Fund. Contributions or gifts to The National Redistricting Action Fund are not tax deductible. This email was sent to: {EMAIL}. If that is not your preferred email address, you can update your information [here](3D%3D/?g=mAh1VMyULAlc5lNRS2N0TzA). We believe that emails are a vital way to stay in direct contact with supporters. Click [here]( if you'd like to receive fewer emails from All On The Line. Click [here]( if you'd like to unsubscribe from these messages. Paid for by The National Redistricting Action Fund, 700 13th Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, D.C. 20005

Marketing emails from redistrictingaction.org

View More
Sent On

03/11/2024

Sent On

30/10/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Sent On

26/10/2024

Sent On

17/10/2024

Sent On

06/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.