The race to stop weaponized robots

There's more to consumer robots than viral, dancing videos.   Got 10 minutes? Take Vox's audience survey. [Survey](   Off-the-shelf robots might seem cute. They can also be dangerous. A Twitter post featuring a video of a robot dog firing a gun that’s racked up [nearly 120,000 likes]( since July. Videos of Ukrainian soldiers apparently [modifying]( off-the-shelf drones to airdrop weapons. An art project featuring Spot, the Boston Dynamics robot most known for viral dancing videos, [outfitted]( with a paintball gun. These kinds of videos are all over the [internet](. They demonstrate the kind of scary scenarios that six top robot manufacturers, including Boston Dynamics, probably had in mind when they published [a letter]( last week promising not to weaponize their products. While robots are becoming increasingly accessible to consumers, these companies warned, people might try to turn them into weapons meant to harm people. To prevent this from happening, the companies promised to review what customers want to do with their commercial robots before selling them (“when possible”) and to look into developing technologies that might reduce the risk of this happening in the first place. “[W]e do not support the weaponization of our advanced-mobility general-purpose robots,” the companies wrote. “[W]e now feel renewed urgency in light of the increasing public concern in recent months caused by a small number of people who have visibly publicized their makeshift efforts to weaponize commercially available robots.” The robots available to the general public are still somewhat expensive, and they’re not as common as the other kinds of commercial technologies that people can buy (namely, drones). Still, this letter serves as a reminder that the risk of weaponization isn’t exactly zero, and that it’s an issue that robot makers are already worried about. At the same time, though, these companies left plenty of caveats in their declaration, and they’ve kept the door open to continue selling robots to law enforcement and the military. They’re also far from the [only manufacturers]( making these kinds of technologies, which are slowly entering the mainstream. “You don't necessarily want to be seen by the public as producing a good and then intentionally having it be used for military purposes,” explains [Erik Lin-Greenberg,]( a professor who studies how emerging military technologies impact conflict at MIT. “Whether or not that kind of statement is actually going to have any impact on how these systems are being used, I think is another question. These are essentially just off-the-shelf technologies.” An international campaign called [Stop Killer Robots]( has urged people to push back against the development of autonomous weapons, and has highlighted how racism, sexism, and dehumanization can be built into these technologies. One former New York City councilmember, Ben Kallos, [proposed]( a law banning police from acquiring any kind of armed robot last year after the New York Police Department started trialing a Boston Dynamics robot. (That pilot was called off after backlash.) The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital rights organization, has [called]( for banning law enforcement from using autonomous or remote-controlled robots. Even some unconventional efforts have caught the attention of robot manufacturers. Back in 2021, an art collective called MSCHF purchased a Spot, Boston Dynamics’s nearly-$75,000 robot dog, for a demonstration the group called “Spot’s Rampage.” The project involved attaching a paint gun to the robot, and then inviting people from around the world to remotely operate the “weapon.” Though the paintball gun-armed robot eventually [broke down](, Boston Dynamics –– which has offered the same robot model to [police departments]( and [militaries]( in the past –– [was not happy](, and said the project misrepresented how its robot “is being used to benefit our daily lives.” Though off-the-shelf robots are still somewhat rare, drones have become more commonplace, and demonstrate how consumer technologies can be weaponized. Amid the war in Ukraine, some soldiers have turned to off-the-shelf drones and used them to drop ammunition, including grenades and weapons [meant to target tanks](. Cartels in Mexico have similarly used drones to carry and detonate explosives. Terrorist groups and other non-state actors can also retrofit these [relatively simple technologies to their advantage](, explains Kerry Chávez, an instructor at Texas Tech University and a project administrator at the university’s peace, war, and social conflicts laboratory. “A lot of them are just the hobbyist and commercial models, even some homemade ones,” Chávez told Recode. “Even if you cut off a supply chain from one vector, they can just activate another one.” The US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives did not respond to a request for comment as to how common it knows weaponizing drones to be in the US, but we do know that it’s happened. In 2015, an 18-year-old in Connecticut [stirred]( global outrage, and an investigation, after he fired a handgun attached to a homemade drone. In 2020, a Pennsylvania man was sentenced to prison after, among other crimes, using a drone to drop explosives to “[terrorize](” a woman that he used to date. The Federal Aviation Administration has pursued legal action in at least one case concerning a weaponized drone. Operating a drone with a dangerous weapon attached is illegal and comes with an up to $25,000 fine, according to agency spokesperson Rick Breitenfeldt. What we’ve already seen with drones might make companies getting ahead of the weaponization of more advanced, consumer robots seem like a good idea. But there are critical caveats. For one thing, the companies seem to acknowledge that they, alone, won’t be able to stop the misuse of their tech, and they’re already asking the government for help. At the same time, these technologies can still be used for other types of harm, like surveilling people or funneling weapons across borders. Earlier this year, Canadian police [caught]( a drone carrying almost a dozen handguns from the US after it crashed into a tree in the southern part of Ontario. And there’s the biggest caveat of all: These companies limited their pledge to “general-purpose” robots, but noted that “we are not taking issue with existing technologies that nations and their government agencies use to defend themselves and uphold their laws.” While there’s certainly room for interpretation there, these companies seem to be against the weaponization of robots for the general public, but may continue selling robots to some of their biggest customers: militaries and [police departments]( that are already weaponized. Help Vox help you Tell us about your needs so that we focus on what's most useful for you. Will you take our audience survey today? [Yes]( [Illustration of an office worker wearing a collared shirt and tie while sitting at a desk.]( CSA Images/Getty Images [You’re going back to the office. Your boss isn’t.]( [Bosses are ordering people back to the office from the comfort of their own homes.](   [Meta’s new Quest Pro headset device is its first mixed reality headset.]( Courtesy of Meta [The $1,500 ticket to Mark Zuckerberg’s metaverse]( [Mark Zuckerberg wants you to work in the metaverse. It will cost you.](   [An avatar image of Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg presenting at the company’s Connect conference in October 2022.]( Meta [Legs are finally coming to Mark Zuckerberg’s metaverse]( [The tech CEO said getting it right will be “hard.”](   [Learn more about RevenueStripe...](   [An illustration of a credit card with a tap-to-pay symbol, surrounded by coins.]( Getty Images/Vox [Everyone wants a tip now. Do you have to give them one?]( [Thanks to touchscreens and the pandemic, tipflation is everywhere — and it’s hard to say no.](   [Elon Musk at Tesla’s Gigafactory in Gruenheide, Germany, in March.]( Patrick Pleul/AFP via Getty Images [A Twitter trial would expose Elon Musk to scrutiny. Buying Twitter might help him avoid it.]( [The billionaire might buy Twitter after all — and for once not get his way.](   [This is cool] [Listen to Pivot]( [Elon Musk is buying Twitter. Really. (Really?)]( He’s back! Elon Musk, who agreed to buy Twitter for $44 billion last spring and then tried to back out of the deal, says he wants to buy Twitter for $44 billion, after all. That doesn’t mean it will actually happen — because, Elon Musk — but maybe it’s real this time. Maybe. [Listen on Apple Podcasts.](   [This is cool] [Donating your body to science]( [Learn more about RevenueStripe...](   [Vox Logo]( [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [YouTube]( This email was sent to {EMAIL}. Manage your [email preferences]( or [unsubscribe](param=recode). View our [Privacy Notice]( and our [Terms of Service](. Vox Media, 1201 Connecticut Ave. NW, Floor 12, Washington, DC 20036. Copyright © 2022. All rights reserved.