Newsletter Subject

Air travel and 5G, briefly explained

From

recode.net

Email Address

dailynews@recode.net

Sent On

Wed, Jan 12, 2022 02:30 PM

Email Preheader Text

The FAA is upset about planes and cellphones again. Why 5G is threatening to cause flight delays You

The FAA is upset about planes and cellphones again. Why 5G is threatening to cause flight delays Your 5G phone could soon start working like the amazingly fast 5G phone you heard about in TV commercials. On January 19, Verizon and AT&T [plan to switch on]( new cellular frequencies that will boost connections for tens of millions of phones throughout the US. Once these airwaves are activated, you should be able to [download a song to your phone in just a few seconds](. This is thanks to the addition of C-band frequency, which could not only improve speeds but expand 5G coverage. This is welcome news for anyone who owns or plans to buy one of these devices, which will be [more than 10 times faster]( than their 4G predecessors once 5G networks become fully operational. But this update hinges on a familiar yet unexpected critic of cellular technology: the Federal Aviation Administration. What’s 5G got to do with airplanes? Not much, argue the wireless carriers hoping to deploy the technology. But the FAA says it’s worried that C-band could interfere with [some radio altimeters](, aircraft safety tools that rely on nearby airwaves. The agency is so concerned that it’s been fighting to [delay 5G deployment]( and has prepared guidance that could cause [flight cancellations]( from airports operating near certain 5G antennas, meaning that anyone who flies or has one of these devices could be affected. It’s unclear whether 5G is an issue for these altimeters. After all, 5G itself isn’t exactly new. 5G smartphones have been on the [market since 2019](, and last year, [nearly 90 million of these devices]( were shipped in the United States alone. Wireless carriers have promised that 5G technology won’t just have [higher speeds but also lower latency]([,]( which will make activities like [streaming media and video calls]( achievable without any lag. But to make 5G a reality, wireless companies [spent over $81 billion]( to buy the rights to use certain parts of the radio spectrum — specifically, the C-band frequencies between [3.7 and 3.98 GHz](. Wireless providers use a range of frequencies to send data between cellphones and transmission stations, like phone towers, that connect those devices to the internet. Each band of frequencies comes with its own advantages and disadvantages. C-band is considered a [sweet spot]( on the spectrum and is a critical part of wireless companies’ 5G ambitions. 5G phones can already connect to what’s called millimeter wave spectrum, which operates at a very high frequency. The [millimeter wave frequency band]( supports very high speeds and can carry a lot of data, but doesn’t stretch very far. 5G phones can also connect to low-band spectrum, which operates at a much lower frequency. Low-band frequencies can cover large areas, but can only support a small amount of data, which makes it slower. C-band is essentially a middle ground between low-band and millimeter wave, so it covers a good amount of area with pretty high speeds. Once they're turned on, these frequencies should be enough to finally [see a real difference]( between 5G and 4G in [your day-to-day life](. Flight regulators are very nervous about this C-band update because of how it might affect [certain aircraft’s radio altimeters](. This device [transmits radio waves]( from an airplane toward the ground in order to help measure a plane’s altitude. Altimeters are especially useful on a [cloudy]( day or in [a mountainous area](, when pilots can’t see where they’re landing. The problem is, altimeters rely on parts of the spectrum that neighbor the airwaves used by the C-band. In a nightmare scenario, the FAA thinks that signals sent over C-band could interfere with these altimeters — [specifically older altimeters]( — creating a potential safety issue. Meanwhile, the Federal Communications Commission already determined that 5G would not pose [a problem for modern altimeters](, and similar 5G technology has already been deployed in Europe with no issue. To give the airlines more time to address this concern, Verizon and AT&T [have delayed]( their C-band rollout twice. The update was originally scheduled for December 5, but the carriers agreed to push that deadline back by a month, and then again by two weeks, to January 19, after Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg [stepped in](. But the FAA also [announced]( in December that flights that might rely on a radio altimeter could need to be rescheduled if there was a risk of 5G interference. That warning, in effect, pitted Verizon and AT&T against the entire airline industry. With flight cancellations at stake, airlines, as well as the [pilots']( and [flight attendants](’ unions, have rallied against 5G, arguing that their industry can’t handle any more disruption right now. “Aviation operations are already stretched to a breaking point by the ongoing pandemic,” Sara Nelson, the president of the flight attendants’ union, said in [a recent statement](. “Adding strain and creating potentially dangerous conditions will only make a bad situation worse.” There is a peace plan, though it’s precarious. Wireless carriers and airlines agreed at the end of last year to test how well some radio altimeters perform in [real-world conditions,]( and the FAA is hoping to lift [restrictions on aircraft](, one by one, as airlines prove their altimeters can work when C-band is turned on. Wireless providers have also promised not to transmit C-band at [50 airports]( selected by the FAA for at least six months, so you can’t blame 5G for any delays or cancellations at any of those airports yet. If you have a 5G phone and live within a mile of [one of these airports](, though, you might be a bit more frustrated. But the standoff raises questions about why US regulators weren’t better prepared for this moment. After all, 5G is not the first new generation of wireless technology [the FAA has encountered](. It’s also possible that history is repeating itself, and the FAA is letting wireless carriers and airlines do the work of proving to the agency that C-band is safe, instead of taking a proactive stance on its own. The FAA only rescinded its unilateral ban on using phones and laptops on planes in 2013, a move that came after a yearslong campaign from [the consumer technology industry and frustrated passengers]( who argued these devices were unlikely to cause interference problems. Wireless carriers certainly hope they’ve done enough explaining and can finally start the process of turning on C-band, which should bring better 5G coverage to their customers. But we shouldn’t hold our breath. History shows that the FAA is no fan of cellphone technology, and there’s no reason to think the agency won’t stall and disrupt things again. —Rebecca Heilweil, reporter [FTC Chair Lina Khan speaking into a microphone.]( Saul Loeb/Getty Images [The FTC’s antitrust case against Facebook is going forward after all]( [Despite an initial setback, the regulatory agency is proceeding with its lawsuit to limit Facebook’s market power.]( [Aaron Salvador swabs his nose with a Covid-19 rapid antigen test kit outside the Watha T. Daniel-Shaw Neighborhood Library in Washington, DC, where tests were distributed to residents, on December 29.]( Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images [Rapid tests, omicron, and you]( [At-home tests work with omicron, but there are caveats.]( [A tractor plowing a dirt field.]( John Deere [We’re one step closer to self-farming farms]( [John Deere will start selling autonomous tractors later this year.](  [Learn more about RevenueStripe...]( [A white Tesla vehicle charges at a supercharger in an otherwise empty parking lot.]( Andia/Universal Images Group via Getty Images [Electric cars aren’t just vehicles. They’re big batteries.]( [To get more Americans in electric vehicles, we all need to realize they can do much more than just get us around.]( [The New York Times skyscraper in New York, as seen from street level looking up to its top against the blue sly.]( Daniel Slim/AFP via Getty Images [Why the New York Times is buying the Athletic]( [A big bet with real risk and reward.]( [This is cool] [Listen to the Recode Daily podcast.]( [Rapid tests, omicron, and you]( Rapid tests work with omicron, but there are caveats. [Listen on Apple Podcasts.]( [This is cool] [Starlink's self-heating internet satellite dishes are attracting cats](  [Learn more about RevenueStripe...]( [Vox Logo]( [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [YouTube]( This email was sent to {EMAIL}. Manage your [email preferences]( or [unsubscribe](param=recode). View our [Privacy Notice]( and our [Terms of Service](. Vox Media, 1201 Connecticut Ave. NW, Floor 11, Washington, DC 20036. Copyright © 2022. All rights reserved.

Marketing emails from recode.net

View More
Sent On

08/03/2023

Sent On

01/03/2023

Sent On

22/02/2023

Sent On

15/02/2023

Sent On

08/02/2023

Sent On

02/02/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.