Newsletter Subject

Market Milestones: ETF War

From

reallifetrading.com

Email Address

support@reallifetrading.com

Sent On

Fri, Jan 12, 2024 12:34 PM

Email Preheader Text

AAPL Bitcoin went public on Thursday, January 11th, 2024, as 11 spot bitcoin ETFs began trading. Thi

[Image] Happy Friday , This week, the SPY continued its grind higher, reaching ever closer to its all-time highs. The dip was short-lived, only lasting one week and filling only the most aggressive of limit buys. A slightly hot CPI tried to derail the bull train but only managed to cause a half-day of selling before the bulls were back on track. There are strong, high-volume, bearish hammers on all of the market indices. The hammer candle is one of the most famous candlesticks around, but its placement on the chart is key. If you see a hammer after a retest at the low, it’s bull time. However, if you see a hammer at a new high and then its low gets swiftly taken out, welcome to bear o’clock. Sure, there is the chance of a larger retest present, but the markets are in a clear bullish trend, and big tech has taken the lead once again as small caps chop lower. NVDA, MSFT, and META all seem to be on a mission to the moon. One chart that does look a little concerning is AAPL. AAPL, at the time of this writing, is the biggest company in the world, the biggest component of the QQQ, and the second-biggest component of the SPY. The market is rewarding A.I. companies right now, and let’s face it, AAPL is just not cutting it in that department. I mean, have you talked to Siri lately? That girl may be artificial but is anything but intelligent. Sure, they make 100 billion dollars a year, but with iPhone sales sliding and Siri answering every question with a bad article from the internet, the market may be tired of this big dumb cash cow. AAPL has a strong weekly gap down that could be the start of a bigger downtrend if the 200DSMA does not hold. SPY [Image]( AAPL [Image]( [Image] Bitcoin went public on Thursday, January 11th, 2024, as 11 spot bitcoin ETFs began trading. This momentous occasion happened 15 years after bitcoin’s genesis block was mined on January 3rd, 2009. We cannot dive too deep down the rabbit hole in this email, so let’s just cover the basics. An ETF or Exchange Traded Fund is a public investment fund traded on the stock exchange that tracks the performance of a specific index or asset class. A spot ETF, unlike a futures ETF like BITO, tracks the current or “spot” price of the underlying asset it represents and has to acquire and hold that asset. This means that when you buy a bitcoin ETF, you are not purchasing bitcoin, but instead purchasing shares of a fund who will purchase and hold bitcoin. The funds price fluctuations should match those of Bitcoin, giving the ETF holders exposure to Bitcoin with the click of a button in their traditional trading account. The approval of these bitcoin ETFs has given everyone with a brokerage account an easy way to allocate a portion of their portfolio to bitcoin. This intersection between traditional finance and decentralized finance allows for mainstream adoption and an easy on ramp for institutional investors who want some of that sweet, sweet bitcoin alpha. It also gives bitcoin, and to a lesser extent the entire digital asset space, a stamp of legitimacy and approval. This is driving the anti-bitcoin crowd like Elizabeth Warren, Jamie Dimon and Gary Gensler absolutely bananas, which is just icing on the cake. The fee wars have been heating up between all 11 of these ETFs. The ETF with the highest fees and also the most AUM is Grayscale (GBTC) at 1.5%. GBTC was converted to a spot ETF from a Bitcoin Trust and has actually lowered its fee from 2.0%. They seem to be banking on the fact that most holders will stick with them for tax reasons and for the trusted name and liquidity. There are several of the ETFs that are coming out the gate with a 0.0% introductory fee for the first several months and most of the bunch are sitting in the 0.2% to 0.4% range. There will likely be one or two winners in this ETF battle and that winner will hold the majority of the AUM and have the most liquidity. Top contenders are Grayscales GBTC because of their head start and BlackRock’s IBIT because of their name and size. With any ETF, there is counterparty risk, so the more trusted and know the issuer, the better position they will be in. I am personally rooting for VanEck in this ETF battle. My reasoning is very simple. First, they are a crypto friendly company and second their ticker is HODL. I also think that these ETFs will be a wonderful way to trade bitcoin going forward. Crypto exchange fees are often exorbitantly high and even if they come down as a result of these ETFs, they will likely still be higher than a traditional broker when trading. Trading in a traditional broker is also going to make tax accounting so much easier and possibly one day provide the option for options. If you increase the demand of a product by making it easier to buy and hold and then you decrease the incoming supply (the halving), one could say you have created the perfect storm for bitcoin to continue trending higher over time. What do you think about the bitcoin ETFs and which, if any, do you plan on trading and owning? [Send us an email and let us know.](mailto:support@thetradersplan.com) mailto:support@thetradersplan.com Strive On, Yates Craig, RLTN Market Analyst Disclaimer: Trading involves inherent liabilities and risks. By accessing this newsletter, you acknowledge and understand the associated risks with trading and investing. This newsletter or email does not serve as a solicitation to buy or sell any security, and its content should not be construed as financial advice. The trades, analyses, and results presented are for entertainment and educational purposes only. These materials do not substitute professional advice from a qualified individual, firm, or corporation. Past performance does not guarantee future results, and simulated performance results have inherent limitations. Readers are strongly urged to consult a qualified financial advisor or professional before making any trading or investment decisions. Each individual's financial situation is unique, requiring personalized advice. No strategy or trading approach ensures profits, and market conditions can change rapidly. Participants should trade with capital they can afford to lose. This newsletter does not aim to create an advisor-client relationship, and receipt does not constitute such a relationship. Readers are responsible for compliance with applicable local laws and regulations related to trading and investing. Unable to view? Read it [online]( If you no longer wish to receive mail from us, you can [unsubscribe]( Sent from: Real Life Trading in Nashville TN 37221

Marketing emails from reallifetrading.com

View More
Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

03/05/2024

Sent On

03/05/2024

Sent On

26/04/2024

Sent On

19/04/2024

Sent On

12/04/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.