Newsletter Subject

Michael Reagan: Press Get Zero for Their Cash to Candidates

From

reaganreports.com

Email Address

reaganreports@reply.reaganreports.com

Sent On

Fri, Oct 28, 2016 07:47 PM

Email Preheader Text

Hillary has a 27-to-1 advantage over Donald Trump, who got $14,000, which is probably less than the

[Michael Reagan] Press Get Zero for Their Cash to Candidates By Michael Reagan I think the old axiom goes: He who pays the piper calls the tune, but in this instance — as with so many other events in this bizarre election season — the idiom is an idiot. The Center for Public Integrity reports that members of the state media, whoops, sorry, I mean the unbiased media, have given Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign almost $400,000 during this election. Editor's Notes: Special: [6 Foods That Lower Blood Pressure Naturally] Hillary has a 27-to-1 advantage over Donald Trump, who got $14,000, which is probably less than the weekly pocket change collected from the sofas in all the Trump properties worldwide. The total count for media donors to Hillary was 430, while Trump donors were a mere 50. Aside from the disparity in amounts donated, what I find most alarming is we evidently now have a professional journalist class that believes there is nothing wrong with expressing financial support for the same politicians the journalist is supposed to cover for the public. This would be like the judge in your divorce case playing golf with your insufferable soon-to-be ex-spouse. Yet this priesthood of pontification sees no conflict of interest. Some of the journalists protest they don’t directly cover politics, so there is no inherent conflict, yet that is disingenuous and a slippery slope. What if their assignment changes in the future? Will the reporter ask for a refund? And what about political discussions in the office? Will the contributors hold their tongue, since they made a donation? Or will they defend their investment? Even more remarkable, the journalists’ love affair appears to be entirely unreciprocated. They give and Hillary gets and that’s it as far as she’s concerned. If someone gave me $400,000 (hint, hint) I would certainly be civil, but that’s not the case with Hillary. Hillary goes almost a year without holding a formal news conference. Her minions routinely berate journalists over the increasingly rare unfavorable story. And to top it off, she and her campaign routinely lie to members of a profession that are supposed to be guardians of the truth. It would have made more sense for reporters to donate on the installment plan. So much money for a news conference, so much for an exclusive interview and a sizable bonus if Hillary’s answers were actually true. Instead, no-strings-attached money gets a slap-in-the-face response. Maybe the truth is Hillary has found one area where she and Donald Trump have similar views: both hold most of the media in utter contempt. Michael Reagan is the son of former President Ronald Reagan and chairman of the League of American Voters. His blog appears on [reaganreports.com] More Links: ['Economic Crisis Ahead, Evidence Exposed] [Doctor: Even I Was Surprised by My Patients' Results] --------------------------------------------------------------- You received this Reagan Reports for America email because you subscribed to it or someone forwarded it to you. [Recommend Reagan Reports for America] to a friend or [unsubscribe] from our list. We respect your right to privacy. [View our policy]. This email was sent by: Reagan Reports for America 1501 Northpoint Parkway, Suite 104 West Palm Beach, FL 33407 USA[reaganreports.com]

Marketing emails from reaganreports.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

22/10/2024

Sent On

01/10/2024

Sent On

30/09/2024

Sent On

22/09/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.