Newsletter Subject

Boeing is almost cleared for takeoff

From

ragingbull.com

Email Address

support@ragingbull.com

Sent On

Fri, Dec 3, 2021 04:03 PM

Email Preheader Text

Daily Setup 12/03-header&utm_term=ss December 3, 2021 Boeing is almost cleared for takeoff Good morn

Daily Setup 12/03-header&utm_term=ss December 3, 2021 Boeing is almost cleared for takeoff Good morning traders, Welcome back to The Daily Setup. Markets were in the green yesterday. Here’s what’s on the docket today: - Kirklands misses earnings - Boeing gets ready for takeoff - Meta wants the FTC to drop its antitrust suit Have a good weekend and we’ll see ya on Monday. Jeff Kirklands, Boeing, and Snowflake BIGGEST MOVER Where is Spock When You Need Him? Shares of Kirkland’s Inc. (KIRK) *readers nodding now that they understand this article’s title* got smacked in the mouth during Thursday’s trading session. The stock, which released [disappointing Q3 earnings and forward guidance](, [fell nearly 25%](NASDAQ) on the day. Before we move on, let’s clear one thing up. Kirkland’s Inc is a U.S. home decor and furniture retail chain, while Kirkland Signature is Costco’s private label brand of which I’m a big fan of their ankle socks. The more you know, amirite? - Captain Kirkland’s earnings came in at $0.51/share on $143.6M in net sales vs. the expected $0.81/share on $146.1M in net sales. - Kirkland’s saw a Q3 net income of $7.2M vs. the $12.4M the company saw in Q3 2020, which is less than ideal. - The company also stated that Q4 earnings would be lower than the same period the previous year. You’re not going to believe this but [Chief Executive Steve Woodward said]( the disappointing earnings numbers were due to, “inconsistent traffic patterns and broader supply chain constraints.” Next you’re going to tell me there is a new and concerning virus variant...oh wait. Today’s announcement moved $KIRK down to levels not seen since December 2020. I’ll be watching to see if there is some consolidation at these levels over the next few weeks before considering a potential long position. Cleared for Takeoff (Almost) [Permission to buzz the tower?]( Boeing (BA) is a step closer to getting the 737 MAX [back into the skies]( at least the ones above China. The country’s aviation regulator laid out a series of steps that BA needs to take to get the MAX flying again. If you don’t recall, the aircraft was grounded worldwide back in 2019 after two crashes occurred over the course of five months, and has slowly been coming back into service in other regions. - The steps outlined include updating the flight manuals and control software, hopefully to include instructions about staying airborne until it’s time to land. - Like Lions coach Dan Campbell, Boeing is badly in need of a win after a series of faceplants, and BA shares were [up 7.5%]( on Thursday (if you were expecting a takeoff or liftoff pun, sorry to disappoint, but we strive for excellence here at TDS). - BA management expects to receive final clearance by the end of the year and expects deliveries to China to resume in Q1 2022. Besides Boeing (obviously), beneficiaries could be fuselage maker Spirit AeroSystems (SPR) and components manufacturer Hexcel (HXL). Note: Spirit AeroSystems should not be confused with Spirit Airlines, the flying insane asylum where passengers engage in cage fights at 30,000 feet for $20 seats. Special Snowflakes [Cold Weather Snow GIF by The Weather Channel - Find & Share on GIPHY] [SCHOOL’S CLOSED!](Grab your gloves and coat because the cloud-based data warehousing company Snowflake inc. (SNOW) had its best day since March. Shares were up 15.85% on Thursday thanks to its favorable Q3 earnings report, which revealed that SNOW’s revenue had [doubled since last year.]( - While the company did report a loss per share of $0.51, it did post $334M in revenue, higher than the $305M expected by analysts. - SNOW’s large growth in revenue is attributed to higher than anticipated consumption by its largest customers. This shift in information technology towards cloud-based models and data science creates the perfect conditions for companies like SNOW and its competitors. - $SNOW [raised its Q4 guidance]( to roughly $350M, higher than the expected $315.9M, and also raised its 2022 revenue to the range of $1.126B to $1.13B. The revised expectations would both represent YoY growth north of 90%. Snowflake doesn’t really show any signs of melting soon, and seems to be well positioned for its future and the development of the tech industry. That being said, it is likely important to consider the perspective of analysts like Kirk Materne at Evercore ISI: [“[Snowflake] is not going to be immune to market gyrations”]( and if the landscape stays volatile, change is always in the air. However, analysts like Materne and Oppenheimer’s Ittai Kidron are still encouraged by the company’s ability to weather such a storm. It Worked So Well With Mortgage Bonds Token Talk [Gordon would’ve been a big Bitcoin guy.](It was inevitable that Wall Street banks would eventually dabble in synthetic digital asset instruments, it’s in their DNA. You could put a group of beavers on the moon and they would start trying to build a dam because that’s what beavers do. Similarly, investment banks will take anything and securitize it. Goldman and friends are [looking at ways]( to use Bitcoin as collateral for loans to institutional clients. - Repo agreements where funds can be borrowed by selling securities only to repurchase them back later might be the preferred vehicle for big banks. - Goldman also sees the development of [liquid options markets]( for digital assets as the next big step in broader adoption. Perhaps there is no greater indicator that the digital market has achieved legitimacy than Wall Street banks trying to figure out ways to leverage it for their gain. Be wary of suits pushing Dogecoin backed mezz loans though. Meta's Only Holiday Wish Rumor has it Meta, the artist formerly known as Facebook, asked a U.S. court (nicely I hope) to [dismiss and not allow the refiling]( of an antitrust lawsuit brought against the company by the FTC. [The U.S. Federal Trade Commission first sued]( Zuck and Co. during the Trump administration and once again in August, asking a judge to force Meta to sell Instagram and WhatsApp. They claim Meta used their monopolistic power to squash or buy their rivals. The real concern is not about monopolies, but how this will affect influencers (i.e., the people we really care about). *said no one ever* Zuckerberg’s band of ghouls (lawyers) responded by saying... - The FTC had “no plausible factual support” to claim that Meta has the power to force up prices in the social network market. - The FTC also had failed to “plausibly establish” that Meta had acted illegally to protect a monopoly. - Additionally, Meta pushed for FTC chair Lina Khan to be recused and not allowed to vote on the matter as she had criticized the company before joining the FTC. Does anyone really believe Big Tech when they say they don’t act in a monopolistic manner? Then again, does anyone believe that a governmental agency can actually do their job correctly and get done what they initially set out to accomplish? Maybe I’m just jaded, but you don’t get to have a market cap close to $1T by following all the rules. Pay attention to any news coming out regarding the court’s decision on the matter as a ruling in the FTC’s favor could spell big trouble for Big Tech. In the meantime, it’s business as usual, so trade what’s in front of you with solid risk management in place. Link Roundup Other News Other News Link Roundup - [OPEC+ has morals – will stay the course on its supply hike in January]( - [Shocker – Cathie Wood is big on the metaverse]( - [I paid my monthly rent, and Mark Cuban bought a city]( - [Wait, are They Agreeing on Something? – Congress Reaching a Deal to Prevent Government Shutdown]( - [The Dragon is Cranky – Beijing could be pressuring US-listed Chinese stocks]( - [P Diddy is trying to buy his own company out of bankruptcy. No, really…]( [Image] RagingBull, LLC [Sender_Address], [Sender_City], [Sender_State] [Sender_Zip] [$emailSettings$] Questions or concerns about our products? Call or text us on your mobile: 1.800.123.4567 © Copyright 2020, [RagingBull]( - [Refund Policy]( - [Privacy Policy]( - [Terms & Conditions]( DISCLAIMER: To more fully understand any Ragingbull.com, LLC ("RagingBull") subscription, website, application or other service ("Services"), please review our full disclaimer located at . FOR EDUCATIONAL AND INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY; NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE. Any RagingBull Service offered is for educational and informational purposes only and should NOT be construed as a securities-related offer or solicitation, or be relied upon as personalized investment advice. RagingBull strongly recommends you consult a licensed or registered professional before making any investment decision. RESULTS PRESENTED NOT TYPICAL OR VERIFIED. RagingBull Services may contain information regarding the historical trading performance of RagingBull owners or employees, and/or testimonials of non-employees depicting profitability that are believed to be true based on the representations of the persons voluntarily providing the testimonial. However, subscribers' trading results have NOT been tracked or verified and past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results, and the results presented in this communication are NOT TYPICAL. Actual results will vary widely given a variety of factors such as experience, skill, risk mitigation practices, market dynamics and the amount of capital deployed. Investing in securities is speculative and carries a high degree of risk; you may lose some, all, or possibly more than your original investment. RAGINGBULL IS NOT AN INVESTMENT ADVISOR OR REGISTERED BROKER. Neither RagingBull nor any of its owners or employees is registered as a securities broker-dealer, broker, investment advisor (IA), or IA representative with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, any state securities regulatory authority, or any self-regulatory organization. Employees, owners, and other service providers of [RagingBull.com](), LLC are paid in whole or in part by commission based on their sales of Services to subscribers. WE MAY HOLD SECURITIES DISCUSSED. RagingBull has not been paid directly or indirectly by the issuer of any security mentioned in the Services. However, Ragingbull.com, LLC, its owners, and its employees may purchase, sell, or hold long or short positions in securities of the companies mentioned in this communication. [Unsubscribe]( RagingBull.com, LLC 62 Calef Hwy #233 Lee, New Hampshire 03861 United States (410) 775-6138

Marketing emails from ragingbull.com

View More
Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

29/11/2024

Sent On

27/11/2024

Sent On

26/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.