Newsletter Subject

DAY 3 - Abdominal & Trauma Imaging!

From

radiopaedia.org

Email Address

conference@radiopaedia.org

Sent On

Tue, Jul 23, 2024 11:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

We're not even half way. Watch live or on-demand. Day 3 is here! It's Day 3 of and we're not even ha

We're not even half way. Watch live or on-demand. Day 3 is here! It's Day 3 of [Radiopaedia 2024]( and we're not even halfway through yet! Our favourite part so far is seeing thousands of international delegates chatting up a storm during live sessions! Please don't stress if the week is slipping away and you haven't made it to as many live sessions as you'd hoped! All of the Day 1 and 2 sessions are now available on-demand (with subtitles), so you can catch up whenever you have the chance. On-demand access is available for 30 days post-conference for delegates, and for 90 days for All-Access Pass holders! STILL NEED TO REGISTER? Don't forget that registrations close this Friday [ACCESS CONFERENCE NOW]( Check out today's lectures ... Abdominal Imaging - Rectal cancer: MRI assessment Vikas Shah - Cystic liver lesions Joseph Mullineux - Diseases of the appendix Carla Goncalves - Hepatobiliary showdown: FNH vs Adenoma Matt A Morgan - Hepatobiliary showdown: HCC vs ICCA Matt A Morgan - Abdominal infections: imaging review of global diseases Michael Hartung - On-call abdominal case reporting set Vikas Shah - Abdominal anatomy review George Harisis & Michael Nel - Post oesophagectomy imaging Carla Goncalves Gynaecologic Imaging - Update on polycystic ovarian syndrome Emmeline Lee - Imaging in endometrial cancer Nishat Bharwani - On-call gynaecology case reporting set Alexandra Stanislavsky - Pelvic anatomy review Craig Hacking & Michael Nel - Top five adnexal masses on MRI Alexandra Stanislavsky Use the [Live Schedule]( to see today's session times in your local timezone. [LIVE SCHEDULE]( Bet you weren't expecting a faceoff at [Radiopaedia 2024]( In these innovative presentations during today's 4th session, Matt Morgan pits HPB pathologies against each other, comparing their similarities and differences, so that we confidently tell them apart. First into the ring are FHN and adenoma (fierce competitors), followed by HCC and ICCA in round 2. They're going to be epic showdowns, so come and place your bets - may the best pathology win! For more info on Matt's radiology super-skills, check out his [Speaker Card](. [EXPLORE RADIOPAEDIA 2024]( [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Link]( [Website]( Copyright © 2024 Radiopaedia Australia Pty Ltd, All rights reserved. You have previously opted to receive Radiopaedia emails Our mailing address is: Radiopaedia Australia Pty Ltd PO BOX 274Kew, Vic 3101 Australia [Add us to your address book]( Want to change how you receive these emails? You can [update your preferences]( or [unsubscribe from this list](.

Marketing emails from radiopaedia.org

View More
Sent On

22/10/2024

Sent On

08/10/2024

Sent On

03/10/2024

Sent On

26/09/2024

Sent On

11/09/2024

Sent On

03/09/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.