Newsletter Subject

Robbers Cave experiment: Summer camp as psychology lab

From

qz.com

Email Address

hi@qz.com

Sent On

Wed, Jun 8, 2022 07:45 PM

Email Preheader Text

Breaking camp It’s the summer of 1954. Two school buses arrive at Robbers Cave State Park in Ok

Breaking camp It’s the summer of 1954. Two school buses arrive at Robbers Cave State Park in Oklahoma. Eleven and 12-year-old boys spill out of each. They are all white, middle-class, and emotionally stable. They believe they’re embarking on a camping adventure. Their parents think the Rockefeller-funded camp has something to do with developing leaders.​ But what neither the children nor their parents realize is that the three-week camp is actually an experiment in social psychology by one of the field’s giants, the Harvard-trained Muzafer Sherif. The Rockefeller money is grant money, and the camp counselors are actually graduate students in psychology. Sherif was obsessively focused on one topic: human tribalism. He wanted to find the source of prejudiced behavior and brutality between groups. In what became the famous Robbers Cave experiment, his researchers intentionally turned strangers into two tight-knit groups at war with each other. But the fake camp leaders also led the two factions back to peaceful co-existence by giving them a task to complete together. Sherif’s landmark study gave the world realistic group conflict theory, which holds that group conflicts arise when resources are scarce, demonstrating they are a product of circumstances, not warped personalities or innate human evilness. But the extent to which Sherif and his confederates pulled the strings at Robbers Cave would be uncovered years later in [The Lost Boys: Inside Muzafer Sherif’s Robbers Cave](, by Australian psychologist and writer Gina Perry. Using archived notes and audio tapes, Perry would also piece together what happened at Sherif’s first “failed” camp experiment one year earlier. In that case, the group dynamics played out very differently, pointing to some hidden lessons in Sherif’s work. So what does it all mean? Let’s link arms and follow this trail. 🐦 [Tweet this!]( 🌐 [View this email on the web]( Sponsored by [Quartz Weekly Obsession] Robbers Cave experiment June 08, 2022 Breaking camp --------------------------------------------------------------- It’s the summer of 1954. Two school buses arrive at Robbers Cave State Park in Oklahoma. Eleven and 12-year-old boys spill out of each. They are all white, middle-class, and emotionally stable. They believe they’re embarking on a camping adventure. Their parents think the Rockefeller-funded camp has something to do with developing leaders.​ But what neither the children nor their parents realize is that the three-week camp is actually an experiment in social psychology by one of the field’s giants, the Harvard-trained Muzafer Sherif. The Rockefeller money is grant money, and the camp counselors are actually graduate students in psychology. Sherif was obsessively focused on one topic: human tribalism. He wanted to find the source of prejudiced behavior and brutality between groups. In what became the famous Robbers Cave experiment, his researchers intentionally turned strangers into two tight-knit groups at war with each other. But the fake camp leaders also led the two factions back to peaceful co-existence by giving them a task to complete together. Sherif’s landmark study gave the world realistic group conflict theory, which holds that group conflicts arise when resources are scarce, demonstrating they are a product of circumstances, not warped personalities or innate human evilness. But the extent to which Sherif and his confederates pulled the strings at Robbers Cave would be uncovered years later in [The Lost Boys: Inside Muzafer Sherif’s Robbers Cave](, by Australian psychologist and writer Gina Perry. Using archived notes and audio tapes, Perry would also piece together what happened at Sherif’s first “failed” camp experiment one year earlier. In that case, the group dynamics played out very differently, pointing to some hidden lessons in Sherif’s work. So what does it all mean? Let’s link arms and follow this trail. 🐦 [Tweet this!]( 🌐 [View this email on the web]( Person of interest Who was Muzafer Sherif? --------------------------------------------------------------- Muzafer Sherif was born into a wealthy Muslim family in Izmir Province, Turkey, in 1906. A gifted student, he eventually attended Harvard and Columbia universities, finishing his PhD in psychology at the latter. He married Carolyn Wood, a respected psychologist who co-authored [his book about Robbers Cave](. In The Lost Boys, Perry presents Sherif as a brilliant scholar, volatile drinker, and, ironically, autocratic leader whose early experiences drove his interests. As political winds changed in the Turkey of his childhood, Sherif would have watched Greek and Armenian neighbors be demonized and deported. He witnessed the murder of Turks, almost for sport, when Smyrna (now Izmir), where he went to boarding school, was occupied by Greece. Decades later, he would find other psychologists equally eager to investigate intergroup dynamics following the horrors of World War II. Fun fact! The titular caves in Robbers Cave State Park, Oklahoma were favored by American outlaws following the Civil War. The area’s most famous fugitive in residence was the legendary bandit Jesse James. Sponsored by EY Reframe your future with EY --------------------------------------------------------------- EY can help you realize your ambitions by offering a radically different approach to connecting strategy, transactions, transformation and technology, where design and delivery inform each other at every step.[Advertisement][Discover more]( Giphy Explain it like I’m 5! The experiments --------------------------------------------------------------- Robbers Cave: The experiment was structured so that the boys would first bond with each other in separate clubs, adopting names and inventing their own subculture. Sherif purposely recruited boys who were similar to each other so that when the conflicts began, it would be clear that the boys were fighting as two randomly created groups, and not because of racial, religious, or other differences. Next the counselors introduced the Rattlers to the Eagles, eventually pitting them against each other in a multi-day, multi-event competition for a set of bowie knives. The boys squared off in tug of war, baseball, and other games, even competing to have the tidiest living quarters. When necessary, the counselors introduced “frustration exercises.” For example, suggesting to the Eagles that they ​​dump​ buckets of​ mud inside the ​Rattlers’ cabin. Eventually the kids grew hateful, violent, and verbally abusive with each other. In the experiment’s final stage, the boys were united through a series of projects. In one, the researchers blocked the valve to the camp’s water tank. Everyone would have to work together to move piles of heavy rocks to re-establish access to the water supply. Reluctantly, they did, and soon all the boys were mixing and cooperating. There were no Rattlers or Eagles fighting over the prized knives, only a bunch of happy campers. Middle Grove: For his 1953 “failed” camp study in upstate New York, Sherif had selected a similar cohort of boys, but he allowed them to get to know each other in the first week of camp. Then the counselors divided the boys into two teams, separating any pairs that had bonded in that first week, often despite tearful protests. The tournament and frustration exercises began, but the plan backfired. The group—the Pythons and the Panthers, in this case—could see that the adults were trying to drive the boys to fight. Soon, they trusted each other instead of the counselors and decided that the camp leaders had ransacked one team’s tents and lied about it. “Maybe you just wanted to see what our reactions would be,” one camper said. Eventually, the boys confronted the adults, and the experiment ended. Like many early social psychology studies, the experiments would likely be considered unethical today. Eric Helgas, styling by Alex Citrin-Safadi Listen up! What's the future of podcasts? --------------------------------------------------------------- Has your greatest experiment to date been recording a new podcast? In some ways, making a new one can be as simple as buying the right equipment and finding a quiet space. But in a world with more than 800,000 active podcasts, that’s where the simplicity ends. As podcasting becomes a big business, the industry now has decisions to make—about how much data it collects from listeners, how important hosts are to the experience, and who will have the resources to survive. For the [latest episode of the Quartz Obsession podcast](, we got meta and talked about… podcasts. 🎧 Listen on: [Apple Podcasts]( | [Spotify]( | [Google]( | [Stitcher]( Sponsored by EY Giphy Pop quiz! What did researchers *not* do during the ​​experiments?​ Invite only one band of boys to eat birthday cake.Break one boy’s treasured ukulele and imply that the rival team did it.Replace one team’s soap bars with dead toads.Hide one group’s clothing in the other’s cabin, as if the clothes had been stolen. Correct. Thankfully, they were spared the dead toads. Incorrect. That really happened! If your inbox doesn’t support this quiz, find the solution at bottom of email. Sponsored by EY Reframe your future with EY --------------------------------------------------------------- EY can help you realize your ambitions by offering a radically different approach to connecting strategy, transactions, transformation and technology, where design and delivery inform each other at every step.[Advertisement][Discover more]( Brief history [1953:]( Muzafer Sherif stages a camp study in upstate New York. He roams the grounds as the camp caretaker, and secret puppet master, but cuts the experiment short when the boys refuse to turn on each other. [1954:]( The Robbers Cave experiment proves Sherif’s theories. [Lord of the Flies](, the highly influential novel by William Golding, is published in the US the same year. [The book and the experiment]( offer radically different theses about human nature. [1965:]( In a real-life Lord of the Flies situation, six teenage boys from Tonga are shipwrecked on an abandoned island. They band together to survive for 15 months, until they’re rescued by a passing Australian boat. [1988:]( Sherif dies of a heart attack in Fairbanks, Alaska, where he lived. His obituary notes that the Robbers Cave experiment influenced psychologists’ understanding of conflict during the civil rights movement in the US. [2018:]( The Lost Boys is published. It features interviews with surviving campers who learned for the first time that they were part of a study. [2020:]( A Pew Research survey finds that the challenges of the covid-19 pandemic led the residents of most wealthy nations (except the US) to feel more united. Youtube Watch this! [This short film]( about the Robbers Cave experiment features real audio and images from the study. Giphy Million-dollar question Are humans naturally inclined to hate or cooperate? --------------------------------------------------------------- Standard accounts of the Robbers Cave experiment tend not to reveal how much the boys were prodded into developing vitriol for their rivals. That doesn’t mean, obviously, that tribalism doesn’t exist. Several theories about the [sources of inter-group conflicts](, including Sherif’s, are now supported by years of research that replicate the human tendency to favor people who belong to our in-groups. And, importantly, as Sherif had proposed, a group’s relevance [changes according to context](. [Research shows]( that we pick and choose which group matters most based on the situation. But historian Rutger Bregman, who recently published [Humankind: A Hopeful History](, points out that the boys’ lack of fighting at Sherif’s Middle Grove camp [supports increasingly popular theories]( by social psychologists, anthropologists, evolutionary scientists, and others that say humans are defined by our inclination to be friendly and helpful. Perhaps it’s our ability to cooperate—and not the urge to dominate or kill—that has allowed us to create marvels of technology and medicine. Quotable “The very dark truth that makers of reality TV found out in the beginning was that when you put people on a deserted island and you let them do whatever they want, nothing happens. They drink tea together and play games. It’s horrible for ratings.” — [Rutger Bregman](, historian and author Giphy Poll Which cave experiment should we explore next? [Click here to vote]( The Deep Time isolation experiment in FranceThe Cask of AmontilladoThe man cave In last week’s poll about [green screens](, 47% of you said that it’s become tougher to spot a green screen, but 28% of you said you still can. 🤔 [What did you think of today’s email?](mailto:obsession%2Bfeedback@qz.com?cc=&subject=Thoughts%20about%20the%20Robbers%20Cave%20Experiment%20&body=) 💡 [What should we obsess over next?](mailto:obsession%2Bideas@qz.com?cc=&subject=Obsess%20over%20this%20next.&body=) 🎲 [Show me a random Obsession]( Today’s email was written by[Lila MacLellan]( (survived one year as a Girl Guides Brownie), edited by [Morgan Haefner]( (never remembered camp songs), and produced by [Jordan Wienstock]( (read A Paradise Built in Hell by Rebecca Solnit). [facebook]([twitter]([external-link]( The correct answer to the quiz is Replace one team’s soap bars with dead toads.. Enjoying the Quartz Weekly Obsession? [Send this link]( to a friend! Want to advertise in the Quartz Weekly Obsession? Send us an email at ads@qz.com. Not enjoying it? No worries. [Click here]( to unsubscribe. Quartz | 1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10104

Marketing emails from qz.com

View More
Sent On

28/11/2023

Sent On

27/11/2023

Sent On

25/11/2023

Sent On

24/11/2023

Sent On

23/11/2023

Sent On

22/11/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.