Newsletter Subject

New Year’s edition—Good riddance 2016, finding aliens, idiot savant economists

From

qz.com

Email Address

hi@qz.com

Sent On

Sat, Dec 31, 2016 12:30 PM

Email Preheader Text

in history. Yes, it’s in our nature to give at China’s efforts to lure overseas companies,

[Quartz - qz.com] Good morning, Quartz readers! 2016? As[the sign guy said], “Geez.” Yes, there have been[far worse years] in history. Yes, it’s in our (and the media’s) nature to give[too much weight] to bad, short-term news. Sure, you can take solace in the[vast longer-term strides] humanity has made, or in devil-may-care[existential nihilism], or in hopeful bromides—the arc of the moral universe,[yadda yadda]. Choose your flavor of forced optimism, and indulge in it all you want. By any objective measure, this has still been an awful year. It’s not just because of Aleppo, Nice, Brussels, Orlando, and other milestones in carnage. Nor because of the rise of Trump, Farage, Le Pen, Fillon, Duterte, and other merchants of hatred. Nor because free trade and movement[are on the retreat]. Nor even because a newly[isolationist US],[resurgent Russia], and[aggressive China] are about to take the world’s geopolitical balance and shake it like a snow-globe. No: It’s also because this has been the[year of post-truth], when the combined effects of polarizing social media, weakening traditional media, shameless politicians, and economic and political tribalism reached their logical destination. In countries whose systems of governance were premised on at least a veneer of reasoned debate about mutually agreed-on facts, the scope for such debate is shrinking fast. This is fundamental. Don’t like the way the world is going? Want to change it? How do you convince people if they won’t even hear you? So yes; things are bad, and it’s foolish to pretend otherwise. But it’s equally foolish to wallow in despair. Whether history records 2016 as the start of a new age of darkness, or just the darkness before a new dawn, is still up to us—each one of us. Don’t like the way the world is going? Want to change it? There’s[no shortage of ideas].—Gideon Lichfield Some things on Quartz we especially liked We’re closer to finding alien life than ever before. Akshat Rathi explains why 2016 saw so many reputable scientists suddenly—and seriously—ascribe [new phenomena] to aliens. Adobe Flash is worth saving. Its video, interactivity, and animation capabilities enabled “the web’s adolescence—its weird, rioting teenage years,” writes Keith Collins, who analyzes the rise and fall of Flash, and why it [should be preserved]. Nestlé wants to change your diet—for the better. Outgoing chairman Peter Brabeck-Letmathe talks to Chase Purdy about why he’s [steered] the world’s largest food company into the realm of healthy nutrition. South Africans love reading about their own dysfunction. How Long Will South Africa Survive? and We Have Now Begun Our Descent are just some of the [apocalyptic titles flying] off the shelves of Africa’s biggest economy, writes Lynsey Chutel. This was the year solar panels became cheaper than fossils fuels. Michael J. Coren recounts the [incredible gains]made in renewable energy—and the many obstacles that still remain. Has bitcoin’s time finally come? Joon Ian Wong on why the cryptocurrency is reaching a new all-time high, and why it [might be for real this time]. Donald Trump doesn’t need to build a Muslim registry. There already is one, explains Michael Coren: [It’s called Facebook]. Farewell, trading floors. As New York shutters its last commodity trading pits, Leslie Josephs and Siyi Chen take a [nostalgic look back], with a video guide to the lost language of trading gestures. Quartz announcement Sign up for our pop-up newsletter, the [Davos Daily Brief]. Each day from January 16 to 20, we’ll deliver the most interesting news from the World Economic Forum conference directly to your inbox. Our team of veteran journalists in Davos will tell you what to watch for each day, report back on the news and discussions that matter, and identify the most intense debates and any surprises on the ground. Five things elsewhere that made us smarter Meet the reporter Trump calls a “nasty guy.” In a year that saw journalists do their best to expose Trump’s many flaws, Washington Post reporter David Fahrenthold took the prize for most hard-hitting stories. In [a personal essay], he reveals how he broke those stories through the use of both digital tools and simple shoe-leather reporting. The 2016 movies that resonated with behavioral economists. The Becons, or “Behavioral Economics Oscars,” go to movies and movie-makers who embody concepts explored in that field of study. With nods to everything from cognitive operation to norm theory, Bloomberg’s Cass R. Sunstein [doles out] awards for best director, best documentary, best actor, best actress, and best picture. America can learn something from Singapore. The city-state is often portrayed as a democratic success story, but Singapore suffers from an authoritarian streak that will sound familiar to Americans fearful of a United States under president Trump. “Authoritarianism isn’t just about show trials or disappearing dissidents,” Kirsten Han [writes in The Establishment]. “It’s about the gradual consolidation of power through the erosion of democratic institutions and processes.” Economists don’t understand the world. The great economists of yore were polymaths. Mill was also a philosopher; Hayek, a political scientist. These days, economists treat the world as a set of abstract equations, argues Robert Skidelsky, economic historian, in a Project Syndicate column. The result is that the profession [can only tell us what is true in its models], not the real world. “The economists,” writes Skidelsky, “are the idiots savants of our time.” The key to Apple’s China operation is perks—lots of them. The world’s biggest iPhone factory—capable of producing 500,000 phones a day—is a Foxconn outfit in Zhengzhou, China, dubbed “iPhone City” by locals. In a [detailed glimpse] (paywall) at China’s efforts to lure overseas companies, New York Times reporter David Barboza documents the string of incentives that make iPhone City possible—everything from construction subsidies to recruiting help to bonuses for high production. Our best wishes for a relaxing but thought-filled weekend and New Year’s Eve. Please send any news, comments, alien phenomena, and Becon nominations to hi@qz.com. You can follow us [on Twitter here] for updates throughout the day. Want to receive the Daily Brief at a different time? [Click here] to change your edition. To unsubscribe entirely, [click here]. Like us on [Facebook] and follow us on [Twitter]. Quartz | 675 Avenue of the Americas, 4th Fl | New York, NY 10011 | United States

Marketing emails from qz.com

View More
Sent On

28/11/2023

Sent On

27/11/2023

Sent On

25/11/2023

Sent On

24/11/2023

Sent On

23/11/2023

Sent On

22/11/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.