Newsletter Subject

The Diversification Disillusion

From

prosperitypub.com

Email Address

NathanTucci@e.prosperitypub.com

Sent On

Mon, Jul 8, 2024 09:26 PM

Email Preheader Text

The Diversification Disillusion If you have been listening to me for any length of time, you?ve pr

[] Earlier this year, my younger brother was sitting on $50k in cash, unsure of how to invest it. [] [] [] The Diversification Disillusion If you have been listening to me for any length of time, you’ve probably heard me bash traditional “diversification”... I don’t lament how poorly mainstream finance has treated average people just for the sake of it; I really believe there are better options (no pun intended) out there and I hate how many people are years — or even decades — behind by doing “the right thing.” Today, I wanted to give you a practical, real-world example of why I often challenge the traditional investment strategy of diversification. Earlier this year, my younger brother, Daniel, was sitting on $48k in cash, unsure of how to invest it and asked me what he should do if he wants to invest it for the long term. In fact, he had been sitting on the money for about a year. After a little brotherly shaming for sitting on cash while inflation erodes his dollars, I laid out two options for him… One was the conventional 60/40 mix of mutual funds and bonds, which typically yields a 6-8% return but isn’t immune to bear markets… The other was a more aggressive strategy focusing on 15 to 20 of the top-performing stocks, betting on their continued market outperformance. Now, obviously, my strong bias that the first option is a bad one came through as I laid out the options and I probably applied some pressure to go with what I strongly believe is a better route for buy and hold investors: Buy and hold strength. He decided to do just that and I gave him 19 stocks I had vetted as strong performers. He spread out the $48k just about evenly across those 19 stocks and decided he would forego traditional “diversification” and bet that the top stocks would continue to be the stop stocks for the medium and long term (remember, just because those are the 19 I gave him now, doesn’t mean they can’t change a year or 5 years from now). I hadn’t even realized it had been 6 months until he texted me this pic: [] In just six months, he’s up a remarkable 29%, turning what was idle cash into an additional $14,000. I was honestly shocked when I realized how much it had produced in that period of time, because even though I expect strong stocks to do exactly this, it’s still wild when you take a minute and see it happen in the real world. He included a joking “you’re a wizard” text too 😂 [] But the reality is, I am definitely not a wizard haha I picked a set of pretty basic, momentum stocks and I let the market go to work. And he’s benefited from a pretty monster bull run, of course, too. The key is that the entire investment is in high-potential areas rather than spreading thinly across a "diversified" portfolio. There’s not a group of “low risk” instruments or “hedges” pulling down the performance of the entire portfolio. The Truth About Diversification This leads us to a critical point about diversification. Traditional diversification spreads risk but also dilutes the potential for high returns. And in my experience, the payoff you get from that diversification in soft markets isn’t much. Anyone remember how those lovely bonds performed in 2022? That’s why I don’t think simply diversifying your assets wider and wider until you are inevitably in weaker assets makes a ton of sense. And, instead, I recommend diversifying your strategies along with your assets. For example, imagine you own 20 stocks, and even if 10 fail, the remaining 10 could yield returns that not only cover these losses but significantly propel your portfolio forward. Many of the top juggernaut stocks have returned 1,000% or greater over a decade… The math is simple yet powerful: a few high performers can outweigh several underperformers. Let’s say we invest $50,000 equally into 20 of the biggest fast-moving names right now, Amazon, Tesla, Meta, Google, Netflix, etc. Now imagine 10 of those top 20 names fail. Literally assume half of the top companies go to zero which I think we all agree is wildly unlikely… Go ahead and take off $25,000… But let’s say the remaining 10 perform exceptionally: [] The average return of these sample names is a 933% gain over the last decade. So let’s say the other half of our money was invested in 10 winners like this, at the end of the decade, the $25,000 we put into these stocks would now be worth $233,275. In other words, you’d be further ahead with HALF of the top stocks going to zero if the other half performed exceptionally than you would with a traditional “diversified” approach. And that’s precisely why I think this mainstream model has failed so many people. This approach is about making calculated investments, not bets. It's about understanding which companies, like Amazon, have the resilience and market position to not just survive but to thrive. So, when you hear traditional advice about diversification, remember that it’s not just about spreading your money across different assets but choosing where to place it for maximum impact. — Nate Tucci P.S. If you’re wondering if this means I put everything I own into short term option trading, the answer is a resounding no. A big chunk of my capital is in dividend stocks — so I am certainly not advocating against using buy and hold investing strategies! But if you check out my dividend portfolio, you will see much like the set of stocks I gave my brother, it’s diversified into top performers — not blanket hedges. [You can see my entire dividend strategy here](. [] The Diversification Disillusion If you have been listening to me for any length of time, you’ve probably heard me bash traditional “diversification”... I don’t lament how poorly mainstream finance has treated average people just for the sake of it; I really believe there are better options (no pun intended) out there and I hate how many people are years — or even decades — behind by doing “the right thing.” Today, I wanted to give you a practical, real-world example of why I often challenge the traditional investment strategy of diversification. Earlier this year, my younger brother, Daniel, was sitting on $48k in cash, unsure of how to invest it and asked me what he should do if he wants to invest it for the long term. In fact, he had been sitting on the money for about a year. After a little brotherly shaming for sitting on cash while inflation erodes his dollars, I laid out two options for him… One was the conventional 60/40 mix of mutual funds and bonds, which typically yields a 6-8% return but isn’t immune to bear markets… The other was a more aggressive strategy focusing on 15 to 20 of the top-performing stocks, betting on their continued market outperformance. Now, obviously, my strong bias that the first option is a bad one came through as I laid out the options and I probably applied some pressure to go with what I strongly believe is a better route for buy and hold investors: Buy and hold strength. He decided to do just that and I gave him 19 stocks I had vetted as strong performers. He spread out the $48k just about evenly across those 19 stocks and decided he would forego traditional “diversification” and bet that the top stocks would continue to be the stop stocks for the medium and long term (remember, just because those are the 19 I gave him now, doesn’t mean they can’t change a year or 5 years from now). I hadn’t even realized it had been 6 months until he texted me this pic: [] In just six months, he’s up a remarkable 29%, turning what was idle cash into an additional $14,000. I was honestly shocked when I realized how much it had produced in that period of time, because even though I expect strong stocks to do exactly this, it’s still wild when you take a minute and see it happen in the real world. He included a joking “you’re a wizard” text too 😂 [] But the reality is, I am definitely not a wizard haha I picked a set of pretty basic, momentum stocks and I let the market go to work. And he’s benefited from a pretty monster bull run, of course, too. The key is that the entire investment is in high-potential areas rather than spreading thinly across a "diversified" portfolio. There’s not a group of “low risk” instruments or “hedges” pulling down the performance of the entire portfolio. The Truth About Diversification This leads us to a critical point about diversification. Traditional diversification spreads risk but also dilutes the potential for high returns. And in my experience, the payoff you get from that diversification in soft markets isn’t much. Anyone remember how those lovely bonds performed in 2022? That’s why I don’t think simply diversifying your assets wider and wider until you are inevitably in weaker assets makes a ton of sense. And, instead, I recommend diversifying your strategies along with your assets. For example, imagine you own 20 stocks, and even if 10 fail, the remaining 10 could yield returns that not only cover these losses but significantly propel your portfolio forward. Many of the top juggernaut stocks have returned 1,000% or greater over a decade… The math is simple yet powerful: a few high performers can outweigh several underperformers. Let’s say we invest $50,000 equally into 20 of the biggest fast-moving names right now, Amazon, Tesla, Meta, Google, Netflix, etc. Now imagine 10 of those top 20 names fail. Literally assume half of the top companies go to zero which I think we all agree is wildly unlikely… Go ahead and take off $25,000… But let’s say the remaining 10 perform exceptionally: [] The average return of these sample names is a 933% gain over the last decade. So let’s say the other half of our money was invested in 10 winners like this, at the end of the decade, the $25,000 we put into these stocks would now be worth $233,275. In other words, you’d be further ahead with HALF of the top stocks going to zero if the other half performed exceptionally than you would with a traditional “diversified” approach. And that’s precisely why I think this mainstream model has failed so many people. This approach is about making calculated investments, not bets. It's about understanding which companies, like Amazon, have the resilience and market position to not just survive but to thrive. So, when you hear traditional advice about diversification, remember that it’s not just about spreading your money across different assets but choosing where to place it for maximum impact. — Nate Tucci P.S. If you’re wondering if this means I put everything I own into short term option trading, the answer is a resounding no. A big chunk of my capital is in dividend stocks — so I am certainly not advocating against using buy and hold investing strategies! But if you check out my dividend portfolio, you will see much like the set of stocks I gave my brother, it’s diversified into top performers — not blanket hedges. [You can see my entire dividend strategy here](. [] ABOUT US: We believe that the opportunity for financial literacy and freedom belongs to all people, not just those who already have years of investing experience. Jeffry Turnmire Trading provides an array of educational services and products that will help you navigate the markets and become a better investor. Trading is made simple through our online forum full of trading techniques to give you the best tools to kick-start your investing journey. We offer collaborative webinars and training; we love to teach. No matter the opportunity, we bring together a strong community of like-minded traders to focus on analyzing market news as it’s presented each day. DISCLAIMER: FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. The materials presented from Jeffry Turnmire Trading are for your informational purposes only. Neither Jeffry Turnmire Trading nor its employees offer investment, legal or tax advice of any kind, and the analysis displayed with various tools does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice and should not be interpreted as such. Using the data and analysis contained in the materials for reasons other than the informational purposes intended is at the user’s own risk. DISCLAIMER: TRADE AT YOUR OWN RISK; TRADING INVOLVES RISK OF LOSS; SEEK PROFESSIONAL ADVICE. Jeffry Turnmire Trading is not responsible for any losses that may occur from transactions effected based upon information or analysis contained in the presented. To the extent that you make use of the concepts with the presentation material, you are solely responsible for the applicable trading or investment decision. Trading activity, including options transactions, can involve the risk of loss, so use caution when entering any option transaction. You trade at your own risk, and it is recommended you consult with a financial advisor for investment, legal or tax advice relating to options transactions. Please visit [( for our full Terms and Conditions. [Unsubscribe]( This email was sent to {EMAIL} by Prosperity Pub 101 Marketside Ave, Suite 404 PMB 318, Ponte Vedra, Florida 32081, United States [Prosperity Pub]( [] ABOUT US: We believe that the opportunity for financial literacy and freedom belongs to all people, not just those who already have years of investing experience. Jeffry Turnmire Trading provides an array of educational services and products that will help you navigate the markets and become a better investor. Trading is made simple through our online forum full of trading techniques to give you the best tools to kick-start your investing journey. We offer collaborative webinars and training; we love to teach. No matter the opportunity, we bring together a strong community of like-minded traders to focus on analyzing market news as it’s presented each day. DISCLAIMER: FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. The materials presented from Jeffry Turnmire Trading are for your informational purposes only. Neither Jeffry Turnmire Trading nor its employees offer investment, legal or tax advice of any kind, and the analysis displayed with various tools does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice and should not be interpreted as such. Using the data and analysis contained in the materials for reasons other than the informational purposes intended is at the user’s own risk. DISCLAIMER: TRADE AT YOUR OWN RISK; TRADING INVOLVES RISK OF LOSS; SEEK PROFESSIONAL ADVICE. Jeffry Turnmire Trading is not responsible for any losses that may occur from transactions effected based upon information or analysis contained in the presented. To the extent that you make use of the concepts with the presentation material, you are solely responsible for the applicable trading or investment decision. Trading activity, including options transactions, can involve the risk of loss, so use caution when entering any option transaction. You trade at your own risk, and it is recommended you consult with a financial advisor for investment, legal or tax advice relating to options transactions. Please visit [( for our full Terms and Conditions. [Unsubscribe]( This email was sent to {EMAIL} by Prosperity Pub 101 Marketside Ave, Suite 404 PMB 318, Ponte Vedra, Florida 32081, United States [Prosperity Pub](

Marketing emails from prosperitypub.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.