Newsletter Subject

A Return to Stagflation

From

prosperitypub.com

Email Address

NathanTucci@e.prosperitypub.com

Sent On

Tue, May 7, 2024 08:30 PM

Email Preheader Text

Are We Entering a Return to Stagflation? 1970s America saw the stagflation era, a time of slow econo

[] 1970s America saw the stagflation era, a time of slow economic growth, high unemployment, and high inflation. [] [] [] Are We Entering a Return to Stagflation? 1970s America saw the stagflation era, a time of slow economic growth, high unemployment, and high inflation. It was a tough time for Americans. Back then if you wanted to purchase a house, you’d be charged an interest rate of 12.9%. The dilemma with stagflation is this: actions intended to help lower inflation often make unemployment worse and bring the entire system down further. It’s a tricky cycle to fall in. Now, in modern day America, we aren’t currently in a deep stagflation cycle. But the way things are trending is troublesome. Last month we saw a disappointing report highlighting much slower than expected economic growth, higher than expected inflation data, and a dip in the stock market. We also saw unemployment rise and wage growth slow far below the government's expectations. All a familiar combination to the conditions that garnered 1970’s stagflation. But today I want to discuss one area in particular that is especially troublesome and reminiscent of 1970’s stagflation: the US housing market. Homes Back in the 70’s inflation was running high. Which led the Federal Reserve to hike interest rates. This attempt to tame inflation increased costs for real estate developers and also drove mortgage rates higher, shrinking the 1970s home buyers purchasing power and ability. Because of this, the housing market grew stagnant. Homes were hard to afford at a 12.9% interest rate. And because of the increased borrowing costs for developers, fewer homes were being developed. There simply wasn’t enough supply, and the high interest rates made the existing supply unaffordable. Sounds a bit like today, doesn’t it? A lack of inventory was already a problem that existed prior to the COVID pandemic. We saw a decade of under-building after developers went belly up and got scared during the great recession (2007-2009) and we saw interest rates fall to record lows. Then suddenly COVID hit and buyers jumped into the housing market in swarms. There wasn’t enough supply for the level of demand which resulted in bidding wars, desperate deals being made, and buyers doing anything to make sellers happy to get the deal to close faster so that hopefully their offer would be the one to get picked. We saw buyers foregoing inspections, making ridiculous offers over asking price, a plethora of all cash deals over asking price, you name it, we saw it in 2020 and 2021. Home prices climbed to record highs in many markets and some homeowners decided to sell out and take advantage of the huge profit they were making on the sale of their home. But they too found themselves in the midst of an affordable housing crisis after selling their homes. Other homeowners battened down the hatches, stayed in their homes and refinanced while rates were low. Then builders found themselves in an opportunistic position. Existing home sales weren’t enough to keep up with demand. So, it was time to build new homes and buyers were willing to pay whatever price the builders demanded. Housing Today Now today we find ourselves in a tricky situation. In March, roughly ⅓ of the current housing inventory on the market was new construction. That’s leaps and bounds higher than the 12% average historically. In March, there were 970,000 existing single family homes for sale and approximately 477,000 brand new single family homes. But even with all that building we saw during and post COVID, inventory is incredibly tight. The US housing market is sitting in a deficit. Realtor.com found that the US is still short 6.5 million single family homes compared to the number of families currently starting new households. So even after all that, we still find ourselves in an affordable housing crisis. Housing accounts for a third of the overall inflation reading. And data from this March illustrates that across the US home prices have climbed another 5.7% since March of last year. Now that’s just ludicrous in an economy like this. And if we compare that to one year prior (March of 2023) we saw an increase of 8%. Which paints a scary picture for US homebuyers. We find ourselves in a time reminiscent of the 1970’s stagflation cycle. Although the conditions are not exactly the same and times have changed, we are in a rough period, economically, especially for home buyers. And even more so for first time home buyers. What am I doing about it? I am legging into a hedge against real estate (short XLRE). I only have a small position so far and I am still mostly bullish across my portfolio until the market shows otherwise. But as we get higher, I will likely keep legging into the Real Estate position as the most considerable hedge. From there, it’s just keeping an eye on the same signs we talked about in today’s letter. In my opinion, this is a “melt up” scenario where the higher we go, the quicker and larger the correction will be… Whether that is this year, or 2025 — or even later — remains to be seen. Remember, Michael Burry started shorting in 2005 based on the underlying data and had to wait 3 years for the position to work! [] To your trading success, Nate [] P.S. Since I first mentioned my SCCO recommendation, it is up 43% on the underlying stock! Not including the dividend yield I have received on top. Make sure you attend my [Ultimate Dividend Portfolio workshop here]( if you’ve not yet leveraged the power of dividends in your portfolio and as I share about 8 more tickers to consider during the presentation. [] Are We Entering a Return to Stagflation? 1970s America saw the stagflation era, a time of slow economic growth, high unemployment, and high inflation. It was a tough time for Americans. Back then if you wanted to purchase a house, you’d be charged an interest rate of 12.9%. The dilemma with stagflation is this: actions intended to help lower inflation often make unemployment worse and bring the entire system down further. It’s a tricky cycle to fall in. Now, in modern day America, we aren’t currently in a deep stagflation cycle. But the way things are trending is troublesome. Last month we saw a disappointing report highlighting much slower than expected economic growth, higher than expected inflation data, and a dip in the stock market. We also saw unemployment rise and wage growth slow far below the government's expectations. All a familiar combination to the conditions that garnered 1970’s stagflation. But today I want to discuss one area in particular that is especially troublesome and reminiscent of 1970’s stagflation: the US housing market. Homes Back in the 70’s inflation was running high. Which led the Federal Reserve to hike interest rates. This attempt to tame inflation increased costs for real estate developers and also drove mortgage rates higher, shrinking the 1970s home buyers purchasing power and ability. Because of this, the housing market grew stagnant. Homes were hard to afford at a 12.9% interest rate. And because of the increased borrowing costs for developers, fewer homes were being developed. There simply wasn’t enough supply, and the high interest rates made the existing supply unaffordable. Sounds a bit like today, doesn’t it? A lack of inventory was already a problem that existed prior to the COVID pandemic. We saw a decade of under-building after developers went belly up and got scared during the great recession (2007-2009) and we saw interest rates fall to record lows. Then suddenly COVID hit and buyers jumped into the housing market in swarms. There wasn’t enough supply for the level of demand which resulted in bidding wars, desperate deals being made, and buyers doing anything to make sellers happy to get the deal to close faster so that hopefully their offer would be the one to get picked. We saw buyers foregoing inspections, making ridiculous offers over asking price, a plethora of all cash deals over asking price, you name it, we saw it in 2020 and 2021. Home prices climbed to record highs in many markets and some homeowners decided to sell out and take advantage of the huge profit they were making on the sale of their home. But they too found themselves in the midst of an affordable housing crisis after selling their homes. Other homeowners battened down the hatches, stayed in their homes and refinanced while rates were low. Then builders found themselves in an opportunistic position. Existing home sales weren’t enough to keep up with demand. So, it was time to build new homes and buyers were willing to pay whatever price the builders demanded. Housing Today Now today we find ourselves in a tricky situation. In March, roughly ⅓ of the current housing inventory on the market was new construction. That’s leaps and bounds higher than the 12% average historically. In March, there were 970,000 existing single family homes for sale and approximately 477,000 brand new single family homes. But even with all that building we saw during and post COVID, inventory is incredibly tight. The US housing market is sitting in a deficit. Realtor.com found that the US is still short 6.5 million single family homes compared to the number of families currently starting new households. So even after all that, we still find ourselves in an affordable housing crisis. Housing accounts for a third of the overall inflation reading. And data from this March illustrates that across the US home prices have climbed another 5.7% since March of last year. Now that’s just ludicrous in an economy like this. And if we compare that to one year prior (March of 2023) we saw an increase of 8%. Which paints a scary picture for US homebuyers. We find ourselves in a time reminiscent of the 1970’s stagflation cycle. Although the conditions are not exactly the same and times have changed, we are in a rough period, economically, especially for home buyers. And even more so for first time home buyers. What am I doing about it? I am legging into a hedge against real estate (short XLRE). I only have a small position so far and I am still mostly bullish across my portfolio until the market shows otherwise. But as we get higher, I will likely keep legging into the Real Estate position as the most considerable hedge. From there, it’s just keeping an eye on the same signs we talked about in today’s letter. In my opinion, this is a “melt up” scenario where the higher we go, the quicker and larger the correction will be… Whether that is this year, or 2025 — or even later — remains to be seen. Remember, Michael Burry started shorting in 2005 based on the underlying data and had to wait 3 years for the position to work! [] To your trading success, Nate [] P.S. Since I first mentioned my SCCO recommendation, it is up 43% on the underlying stock! Not including the dividend yield I have received on top. Make sure you attend my [Ultimate Dividend Portfolio workshop here]( if you’ve not yet leveraged the power of dividends in your portfolio and as I share about 8 more tickers to consider during the presentation. [] ABOUT US: We believe that the opportunity for financial literacy and freedom belongs to all people, not just those who already have years of investing experience. Jeffry Turnmire Trading provides an array of educational services and products that will help you navigate the markets and become a better investor. Trading is made simple through our online forum full of trading techniques to give you the best tools to kick-start your investing journey. We offer collaborative webinars and training; we love to teach. No matter the opportunity, we bring together a strong community of like-minded traders to focus on analyzing market news as it’s presented each day. DISCLAIMER: FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. The materials presented from Jeffry Turnmire Trading are for your informational purposes only. Neither Jeffry Turnmire Trading nor its employees offer investment, legal or tax advice of any kind, and the analysis displayed with various tools does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice and should not be interpreted as such. Using the data and analysis contained in the materials for reasons other than the informational purposes intended is at the user’s own risk. DISCLAIMER: TRADE AT YOUR OWN RISK; TRADING INVOLVES RISK OF LOSS; SEEK PROFESSIONAL ADVICE. Jeffry Turnmire Trading is not responsible for any losses that may occur from transactions effected based upon information or analysis contained in the presented. To the extent that you make use of the concepts with the presentation material, you are solely responsible for the applicable trading or investment decision. Trading activity, including options transactions, can involve the risk of loss, so use caution when entering any option transaction. You trade at your own risk, and it is recommended you consult with a financial advisor for investment, legal or tax advice relating to options transactions. Please visit [( for our full Terms and Conditions. [Unsubscribe]( This email was sent to {EMAIL} by Prosperity Pub 101 Marketside Ave, Suite 404 PMB 318, Ponte Vedra, Florida 32081, United States [Prosperity Pub]( [] ABOUT US: We believe that the opportunity for financial literacy and freedom belongs to all people, not just those who already have years of investing experience. Jeffry Turnmire Trading provides an array of educational services and products that will help you navigate the markets and become a better investor. Trading is made simple through our online forum full of trading techniques to give you the best tools to kick-start your investing journey. We offer collaborative webinars and training; we love to teach. No matter the opportunity, we bring together a strong community of like-minded traders to focus on analyzing market news as it’s presented each day. DISCLAIMER: FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. The materials presented from Jeffry Turnmire Trading are for your informational purposes only. Neither Jeffry Turnmire Trading nor its employees offer investment, legal or tax advice of any kind, and the analysis displayed with various tools does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice and should not be interpreted as such. Using the data and analysis contained in the materials for reasons other than the informational purposes intended is at the user’s own risk. DISCLAIMER: TRADE AT YOUR OWN RISK; TRADING INVOLVES RISK OF LOSS; SEEK PROFESSIONAL ADVICE. Jeffry Turnmire Trading is not responsible for any losses that may occur from transactions effected based upon information or analysis contained in the presented. To the extent that you make use of the concepts with the presentation material, you are solely responsible for the applicable trading or investment decision. Trading activity, including options transactions, can involve the risk of loss, so use caution when entering any option transaction. You trade at your own risk, and it is recommended you consult with a financial advisor for investment, legal or tax advice relating to options transactions. Please visit [( for our full Terms and Conditions. [Unsubscribe]( This email was sent to {EMAIL} by Prosperity Pub 101 Marketside Ave, Suite 404 PMB 318, Ponte Vedra, Florida 32081, United States [Prosperity Pub](

Marketing emails from prosperitypub.com

View More
Sent On

26/05/2024

Sent On

26/05/2024

Sent On

26/05/2024

Sent On

26/05/2024

Sent On

26/05/2024

Sent On

26/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.